Page 31 of 33
1 29 30 31 32 33

Nueva Zelanda: New online education tool launched

Oveanía/Nueva Zelanda/19 de Agosto de 2016/Fuente: Indian News Link

RESUMEN: Educación de Nueva Zelanda (ENZ) ha lanzado hoy una nueva herramienta en línea para ayudar a los proveedores internacionales de educación reclutar y apoyar a los estudiantes internacionales. «El Laboratorio de Habilidades es un gran nuevo recurso para las instituciones más pequeñas que no tienen mucha experiencia en este sector complejo y será particularmente útil para los recién llegados a la industria», dice Grant McPherson, presidente ejecutivo de ENZ. «En el corazón del Laboratorio de Habilidades son proyectos prácticos que caminan a través de los proveedores de pasos que deben tomar para lograr un crecimiento sostenible. «Este enfoque basado en proyectos significa que los proveedores pueden elegir las áreas en las que más necesitan apoyo y se aplican las nuevas habilidades y procesos de inmediato a sus operaciones del día a día a medida que trabajan a través de un proyecto». Actualmente hay 55 proyectos en el Laboratorio de Habilidades, con más previstos para el desarrollo en el futuro. Los proyectos incluyen una amplia gama de temas tales como la investigación de mercado, la realización de análisis de la competencia, el manejo de quejas en las redes sociales y el uso de intérpretes.«Educación Nueva Zelanda se compromete a aumentar la capacidad de los proveedores internacionales de educación en este país, y para apoyar el crecimiento continuado en la industria.»El Laboratorio de Habilidades se puso en marcha en la Conferencia Internacional de Educación de Nueva Zelanda 2016, que se celebra hoy y mañana (18 – 19 Agosto) en Auckland.

Education New Zealand (ENZ) has today launched a new online tool to help international education providers recruit and support international students.

“The Skills Lab is a great new resource for smaller institutions who don’t have a lot of experience in this complex sector and will be particularly useful to newcomers to the industry,” says Grant McPherson, ENZ Chief Executive.

“At the heart of the Skills Lab are practical projects which walk providers through the steps they need to take to achieve sustainable growth.

“This project-based approach means that providers can choose the areas where they most need support and apply the new skills and processes immediately to their day-to-day operations as they work through a project.”

Currently there are 55 projects on the Skills Lab, with more planned for development in the future. Projects include a wide range of topics such as researching a market, undertaking competitor analysis, handling complaints on social media and using interpreters.

Strategic partnership

The Skills Lab has been designed in partnership with experienced international education providers. It responds to a need for comprehensive online support services to industry available anytime, anywhere in the world.

The Skills Lab sits alongside Education New Zealand’s Brand Lab, which provides institutions with downloadable branding and marketing collateral and resources to support their international marketing efforts.

“Initial feedback on the Skills Lab has been extremely positive, with providers indicating that it will be a valuable resource for training and upskilling the industry,” says Mr McPherson.

“Today’s launch is a starting point and we expect to add more specialised content to the project list, in partnership with industry.

“Education New Zealand is committed to increasing the capability of international education providers in this country, and to supporting continued growth in the industry.”

The Skills Lab was launched at the New Zealand International Education Conference 2016, being held today and tomorrow (18 – 19 August) in Auckland.

Fuente: http://www.indiannewslink.co.nz/new-online-education-tool-launched/

Fuente de la imagen: https://actualidad.rt.com/actualidad/view/122054-nueva-zelanda-cambiar-bandera

Comparte este contenido:

Francia Universités : la France 6e au classement de Shanghaï

Europa/Francia/19 de Agosto de 2016/Autor: Denis Peiron/Fuente: La Croix

RESUMEN: La clasificación de Shanghai, a lo largo de los años, se ha consolidado como la referencia, el ministerio también invita a tomar en cuenta otras clasificaciones internacionales para evaluar el rendimiento del sistema francés. Él cita el ranking de Reuters sobre las instituciones mundiales de investigación más innovadoras. Por lo tanto, de acuerdo con la última edición de una clasificación por el Times Higher Education, que incluye especialmente la enseñanza y las condiciones de investigación, Francia, hasta 15 de sus escuelas y universidades es considerada entre las 200 mejores en Europa. En 2013, Europa ha tratado de desarrollar una herramienta de evaluación comparativa totalmente independiente y que incluye más criterios, incluyendo la calidad de la enseñanza y el aprendizaje llamado U-Multirank, que sin embargo hasta ahora había tenido problemas para conseguir un lugar en el paisaje.

Dans l’ordre, sur le podium : Pierre-et-Marie-Curie (39e), Paris-Sud (46e) et l’École normale supérieure (87e). Même s’ils perdent respectivement 3, 5 et 15 places par rapport à l’édition précédente, ces trois établissements restent les seuls représentants tricolores dans le « top 100 » du classement de Shanghaï, version 2016, dominé une nouvelle fois par le duo américain Harvard et Stanford.

Comme l’an dernier, la France place 22 de ses universités et écoles parmi les 500 « meilleures » au monde, si l’on en croit l’étude annuelle réalisée par le cabinet Shanghaï Ranking Consultancy, qui prend en compte six critères, notamment le nombre de prix Nobel parmi les anciens étudiants, le nombre de chercheurs les plus cités dans leurs disciplines ou le nombre de publications dans les revues de langue anglaise Science et Nature.

Deux établissements font leur entrée dans ce club : Paris Sorbonne Université et Versailles-Saint-Quentin. Avec ce décompte, la France se classe 6e, derrière les États-Unis, la Chine, l’Allemagne, le Royaume-Uni et l’Australie.

Des critères défavorables à la France

« Le maintien de 22 établissements français dans le classement de Shanghaï témoigne de l’excellence de notre enseignement supérieur et de notre recherche, dans un classement qui, faisant peu de place aux sciences humaines et sociales et pénalisant les unités mixtes de recherche, n’est pas favorable à la France », salue le secrétariat d’État à l’enseignement supérieur et à la recherche, Thierry Mandon.

Si le classement de Shanghaï, au fil des ans, s’est imposé comme la référence, le ministère invite aussi à prendre en compte d’autres classements internationaux pour apprécier les performances du système français. Il cite notamment le classement Reuters sur les institutions de recherche mondiales les plus innovantes. Le Centre d’études atomiques (CEA) y occupe, rappelle-t-il, la 1re place, le CNRS la 5e, l’Inserm la 10e et l’Institut Pasteur la 17e.

D’autres outils de comparaisons

D’autres études apparaissent moins flatteuses. Ainsi, selon la dernière livraison d’un classement réalisé par le Times Higher Education, qui inclut notamment les conditions d’enseignement et de recherche, la France place 15 de ses universités et écoles parmi les 200 meilleures en Europe. À l’échelle du continent, notre pays apparaît en 4e position.

À noter que les établissements distingués par le mensuel anglais en 2016 ne sont pas forcément les mêmes que ceux mis à l’honneur par le classement de Shanghaï. À titre d’exemple, l’École polytechnique figure ici, côté français, en seconde position, derrière l’École normale supérieure, alors que selon l’étude menée par les Chinois, elle fait partie d’un peloton compris entre les 14e et 18e places.

Mieux intégrer les classements dans la stratégie

En 2013, l’Europe a cherché à se doter d’un outil de comparaison pleinement indépendant et incluant davantage de critères, notamment celui de la qualité de l’enseignement et de l’apprentissage. Nommé U-multirank, celui-ci a cependant eu jusqu’ici du mal à se faire une place dans le paysage.

Dans un domaine universitaire de plus en plus mondialisé, l’influence des classements s’avère parfois décisive, y compris dans les choix que font les étudiants. Aussi le secrétariat d’État confiera-t-il prochainement à l’Inspection générale de l’administration de l’éducation nationale une mission consistant à aider les établissements et les sites à mieux intégrer dans leur réflexion stratégique la manière dont ces études internationales valorisent – ou ignorent – les multiples aspects de l’excellence.

Fuente: http://www.la-croix.com/Famille/Education/Universites-la-France-6e-au-classement-de-Shanghai-2016-08-15-1200782328

Comparte este contenido:

Sudáfrica: 0% university fee increase for 2017 will be unsustainable

África/Sudáfrica/14 de Agosto de 2016/Autor: Dineo Bendile/Fuente: EWN

RESUMEN: El Consejo de Educación Superior ha recomendado un aumento en todos los ámbitos relacionadossegún la inflación para las universidades de Sudáfrica en 2017. A principios de este año, el ministro de Educación Superior Blade Nzimande pidió al consejo para que le asesore sobre un marco regulador para la gestión de los aumentos de tasas tras numerosas protestas de los estudiantes. Ahora el cuerpo ha presentado un informe al Nzimande, donde se dice que un aumento de tasas cero por ciento el próximo año será insostenible. El Consejo de Educación Superior ha aconsejado a las universidades para acordar un aumento de tasa uniforme que será implementado en el año 2017. Se cree que un aumento de la manta en el nivel del índice de precios al consumidor es el método más favorable para su uso. Según el informe, este método equilibra los intereses de los estudiantes con la sostenibilidad del sector de la educación superior. Sin embargo, muchas asociaciones de estudiantes que han hecho presentaciones ante la comisión de investigación sobre la educación superior gratuita esta semana todavía mantienen el rechazo hacia el aumento de tasas el próximo año.

The Council on Higher Education has recommended an across the board inflation-related increase for South Africa’s universities in 2017.

Earlier this year, Higher Education Minister Blade Nzimande asked the council to advise him on a regulatory framework for managing fee increases following numerous student protests.

Now the body has submitted a report to Nzimande, where it says a zero percent fee increase next year will be unsustainable.

The Council on Higher Education has advised universities to agree on a uniform fee increase which will be implemented in 2017.

It believes a blanket increase at the level of the consumer price index is the most favourable method to use.

According to the report, this method balances the interests of students with the sustainability of the higher education sector.

The council says universities are better off negotiating as one unit than having individual exchanges with students over increases.

However, many student bodies that have made presentations to the commission of inquiry into free higher education this week still maintain they want no fee increase next year.

‘THERE’S NO MONEY’

Yesterday, National Treasury said it hadn’t budgeted for another zero percent fee increase in the higher education sector next year.

Treasury said it hadn’t made any plans for the decision to be rolled over to 2017 but it had planned for fee increases to resume next year and will now continue with involvement in fee discussions.

Treasury Deputy Director General Michael Sachs said, “We’ve budgeted on the basis that we will return to the situation of normal fee increases.

“But of course we’re prepared to respond to changes if they’re there.”

Sachs said continuing with no fee increases will mean sourcing money from other aspects of the Budget.

With Treasury saying it’s not willing to take out loans to spend more on higher education, it said the only other alternative is to increase taxes.

Lobby group Students for Law and Social Justice (SLSJ) said it believed students should only pay university fees based on what they can afford.

The group made its presentation to the commission of inquiry into free higher education yesterday afternoon.

Like other student groups, it was also calling fees to remain flat despite National Treasury saying it hadn’t budgeted for this next year.

Representatives from SLSJ said they didn’t agree with calls for higher education to be free for everyone.

Nikhiel Deeplal said the rich, who can afford to pay, must do so to ease the burden of government having to subsidies universities.

“The rich must be able to subsidise the poor, therefore remove the billions that are being pumped into State institutions and we give it to individual students.”

The group believed its proposed method will work better than the current system which sees National Student Financial Aid Scheme funding given to poor students, while those who don’t qualify are disadvantaged.

Fuente: http://ewn.co.za/2016/08/13/Council-on-Higher-Education-recommends-inflation-related-increase-for-universities

 

Comparte este contenido:

Nueva Zelanda: ACG opens pathway with Victoria University

Oceanía/Nueva Zelanda/07 de Agosto de 2016/Autora: Natalie Marsh/Fuente: The PIE News

RESUMEN: La Universidad Victoria de Wellington ha establecido un acuerdo con  Academic Colleges Group, un proveedor de educación con sede en Nueva Zelanda, para ofrecer programas de pre-grado para los estudiantes internacionales. Esta asociación universitaria será la tercera de ACG, que también ofrece programas de fundaciones similares en la Universidad de Auckland y la Universidad Tecnológica de Auckland. El  rector de la Universidad de Victoria, dijo que la universidad espera ampliar su alcance internacional a través de la asociación con la Concesión de Guilford. El programa puede tomar seis, ocho o 12 meses en completarse, dependiendo de la formación o nivel de Inglés académico del estudiante. Además de los programas de vía, ACG opera 15 escuelas y colegios terciarios en Nueva Zelanda, Vietnam e Indonesia, que alojan a más de 2.500 estudiantes internacionales procedentes de 100 países diferentes cada año.

Victoria University of Wellington has established a pathway agreement with Academic Colleges Group, a New Zealand-headquartered education provider, to deliver pre-degree programmes for international students.

This university partnership will be the third for ACG, which also offers similar foundation programmes at the University of Auckland and Auckland University of Technology.

John Williamson, chief executive of ACG Group, said offering this pathway with Victoria University is part of the diversification of the group’s portfolio.

“For 17 years, we have been preparing young international students for their undergraduate degree entry into the University of Auckland and, since 2004, to AUT University,” he said.

“We are pleased to now be offering those same trusted services to international students intending to study at Victoria University of Wellington.”

Grant Guilford, vice-chancellor of Victoria University, said the university expects to expand its international reach through this partnership.

“Approximately 30% of international students stay in New Zealand at the end of their studies, contributing significantly to the pool of talented ‘knowledge workers’ living here,” he said.

“Those students who return home usually maintain their links to New Zealand, acting as influential cultural, business and political ambassadors for our country.”

The first programme will be delivered to students in January next year, close to the Pipitea campus.

The programme can take six, eight or 12 months to complete, depending on the student’s academic background or level of English.

In addition to pathway programmes, ACG operates 15 schools and tertiary colleges in New Zealand, Vietnam and Indonesia, which host over 2,500 international students from 100 different countries each year.

Fuente: https://thepienews.com/news/nz-acg-establishes-pathway-with-victoria-university/

Comparte este contenido:

México: Intereses de la OCDE y Banco Mundial en reforma educativa

América del Norte/México/05 de Agosto de 2016/Fuente: E-Consulta.com

Tanto la inoperante y abrogada reforma educativa, como la reforma recién anunciada por el gobierno federal, no son más que híbridos atentatorios contra la dignidad de los mexicanos, cuyos principales fines auspiciados por organismos internacionales como la OCDE y el Banco Mundial (BM), tienen un doble y perverso objetivo: hacer negocios público-privados con la infraestructura educativa, y “producir” niños y jóvenes tecnócratas deshumanizados, que como meras máquinas “humanas” sirvan y produzcan para los grandes capitales transnacionales.

Así lo consideró el Foro académico sobre la reforma educativa, que analistas del Movimiento Opción Ciudadana (OP)presidieron en el auditorio de la Escuela Normal Superior federalizada del estado de Puebla, con profesores del interior del país, del estado y de la capital poblana.

Al respecto el experto internacional en educación, Luis G. Benavides ilizaliturri, indicó que sobre-concentrada en el aspecto material de las escuelas, en la función del profesorado y no en la educación armónica de niños y jóvenes, la Organización para la cooperación y el desarrollo económico (OCDE) es uno de los organismos internacionales que pugnan por la formación de tecnócratas para un mundo que sirva a los capitales internacionales, y no para formar personas movidas no sólo por el conocimiento, sino por un humanismo personal y social regido por los valores inscritos en nuestra carta magna.

Aseveró además que esta seudo reforma educativa ya está muerta, y las discusiones sobre modelos y evaluación son distractores de lo realmente fundamental que, como cizaña se sembró en los añadidos a los artículos 3º y 73 que deben abrogarse.

En su intervención, el analista Germán Benítez M., destacó que desde el punto de vista psicológico y de un desarrollo humano integral, el sistema educativo ha incumplido con la esencia del Tercero Constitucional, específicamente en lo tocante al ordenamiento siguiente: “La educación que imparta el Estado tenderá a desarrollar armónicamente, todas las facultades del ser humano y fomentara en él, a la vez, el amor a la patria, el respeto a los derechos humanos…”

Precisó que desde el punto de vista psicológico, “…el desarrollo de todas las facultades del ser humano que ordena la Constitución, aplica fundamentalmente en el desarrollo de la inteligencia de los educandos”.

Y añadió que en los elevados índices de reprobación, deserción escolar, “ninis”, desempleo, delincuencia y otros fenómenos sociales, se confirma que el sistema educativo no propicia la ejercitación de las operaciones de la inteligencia, y justo por ello, niños y jóvenes pasan por las aulas y hasta llegan a la universidad, sin conocer y razonar lo elemental. Debido a ello, los educandos no pueden aplicar el conocimiento supuestamente adquirido en las aulas.

Fuente: http://www.e-consulta.com/nota/2016-08-04/educacion/intereses-de-la-ocde-y-banco-mundial-en-reforma-educativa-op

Comparte este contenido:

Higher Education in Africa: Who is Going to Pay?

Africa/31 de Julio de 2016/Autor: /Fuente: All Africa

RESUMEN: Los últimos 18 meses han sido turbulentos para muchas universidades de todo el continente africano. De Ciudad del Cabo a Ibadan a Nairobi, los campus se han convertido en sitios de protesta y debate acerca de las tarifas, la igualdad de acceso a la educación, el carácter colonial de los planes de estudios, la desigualdad social, y muchos otros temas. El centro de atención ha sido la cuestión de cómo hacer la educación accesible a millones de jóvenes estudiantes, en un continente con el más rápido crecimiento de la población juvenil en el mundo. Al mismo tiempo, las universidades e institutos de investigación de África tienen el mandato de producir una investigación independiente, socialmente relevante dentro de un sector de la educación superior en forma global cada vez más por la privatización, la competencia, la comercialización de la investigación académica y la inseguridad laboral. La cuestión de cómo garantizar el acceso de estudiantes a la educación e invertir en investigación, en un contexto de estancamiento económico, el aumento de los costos de vida, y la amenaza de recesión mundial, es una controvertida.

The past 18 months have been turbulent for many universities across the African continent. From Cape Town to Ibadan to Nairobi, campuses have become sites of protest and debate about fees, equal access to education, the colonial character of curriculums, social inequality, and many other issues.

Under the spotlight has been the question of how to make education accessible to millions of young students, in a continent with the fastest growing youth population in the world. At the same time, Africa’s universities and research institutes are mandated to produce independent, socially relevant research within a global higher education sector increasingly shaped by privatisation, competition, the commercialisation of research and academic job insecurity. The question of how to ensure student access to education and invest in research, against a backdrop of economic stagnation, rising living costs, and the threat of global recession, is a vexed one.

Today, SciDev.Net is holding an online debate to discuss these issues with academics, students and education specialists from across Africa and its diaspora. In this feature, we set out some of the main issues and what to do about them.

What are the challenges?

Universities face myriad funding problems. In a continent of 54 countries, with different economic policies, political structures and histories, it’s obviously problematic to generalise. But there are some features more widely found.

Often, the histories of universities have loosely mirrored those of the state: the university as site of anticolonial struggle; the idealism and intellectual exuberance of the post-independence years; the growing poverty and damage of 1970s and 1980s structural adjustment policies; and the lingering effect of underinvestment and neglect.

Many universities are still reeling from the effects of the policies imposed by the World Bank and International Monetary Fund from the 1970s in return for loans. These institutions framed Africa’s universities not as the backbone of development, but as a misuse of resources. [1] Money for education was channelled away from universities and into primary and secondary schools. «To this day, many countries have not been able to recover from that onslaught on African higher education,» wrote Ann Therese Ndong-Jatta in 2002, when she was Gambia’s education minister. [1]

Underinvestment in infrastructure, staff salaries that have failed to keep pace with inflation and living costs, and inadequate research funding have poleaxed many universities. Universities that were once beacons of intellectual vigour and research excellence are struggling. Faced with economic stagnation and poor tax revenues, many governments claim their tax base is too small to prop up a free higher education system, while their critics argue that corruption and bulging public sector salaries must be rapidly reined in and the money raised directed towards education.

All this means that in many places, the dream of free higher education is fading fast. Rather than improving accessibility, education is instead growing increasingly elitist.

Students in the firing line

For students, the situation can be dire. In South Africa, the average annual cost of fees and board exceeds the average household income. While the poorest students are supposed to get government assistance, «there are a group of people caught in between» who neither qualify for assistance nor can afford to pay fees, explains Lesley Le Grange, higher education professor at Stellenbosch University. This means universities not only perpetuate, but also actively widen South Africa’s social inequalities, say both Le Grange and Kealeboga Mase Ramaru of campaigning organisation Equal Education.

For those students who do get in, university can involve a struggle to balance studying with paying the bills. Underinvestment in labs, teaching and basic infrastructure also undermines learning. Poor salaries among staff mean strikes are frequent in many African countries, which can extend the time it takes to complete a degree by years. And then many graduates who can afford to leave do so, worsening Africa’s infamous ‘brain drain’ problem.

Things can be particularly acute for female students. In many countries, female students find it harder than men to gain access to university, or can encounter serious issues once there, from teaching methods that favour men, to sexism, discrimination and rape.

Staff struggles

For staff, academic careers are increasingly becoming the preserve of those who can afford them. Salaries can fail to match rising living costs. Many in the state tertiary sector now top up low salaries with consultancy fees or jobs at the many private colleges proliferating in countries such as Uganda.

Academics often find themselves struggling to meet the demands of unreasonable teaching loads, including vast undergraduate classes, unwieldy responsibilities for PhD supervision and enormous amounts of administration. This can harm research, says Goolam Mohamedbhai, former secretary-general of the Association of African Universities.

Impact on research

Heavy work burdens and underinvestment in research also starves many African countries of the knowledge they need to meet certain twenty-first century challenges.

On paper, the continent’s 54 countries have noble research goals. Spurred on by the African Union, many governments have said they intend to spend one per cent of GDP (gross domestic product) on research, as laid out in the Lagos Plan of 1980 and reaffirmed in the Science, technology and innovation strategy for Africa. This ambitious strategy aims to put science «at the epicentre of Africa’s socio-economic development».

But few countries look close to meeting this target, and the strategy has been criticised for failing to match rhetoric with action or to commit governments to spending targets. Furthermore, funding and research policy experts decry the lack of efficiency in grant management systems – one they say hampers science across the continent.

Clearly something has to change if African countries are to fund the kind of research they need. The Ebola crisis in West Africa is just one example of a poor research landscape preventing local researchers from taking the lead on vaccine research or the public health response.

Education is also considered a buffer against extremism – both because it can bring jobs and because it opens students to the value of cultural diversity and bridges divides in an increasingly fractured world, and a continent plagued by militant groups from Boko Haram in Nigeria and Chad to Al-Shabaab in Kenya and Somalia.

Other challenges include the growing pressure neoliberalism places on universities. Universities are increasingly expected to compete with each other for students, monetise research and audit research outputs, within a highly competitive, global higher education sector. The growing power of league tables to compare and rate universities, not just on research but also on other assessments such as ‘student experience’, adds to the pressure.

What are the solutions?

Many of those in government and university management claim that introducing fees is now the best way to fund universities. But others argue that fees will always be inadequate and that a diversified funding structure is required.

Beyond fees, there are many examples of universities cutting costs while ensuring quality research. Collaboration is one option. In Ghana, the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology has opened a US$6.5 million ‘superlab’ that is available for use by students across West Africa. The idea is to reduce costs by sharing equipment.

Cross-disciplinarity is another route. This aims to bring together different disciplines and sectors to tackle the complex, intertwined challenges of modern life. But it can have economic benefits too. Rather than duplicating research in different labs and departments, academics can pool resources and streamline research.

Another route includes South-South partnerships, or North-South partnerships. The latter have underpinned scientific research in Africa for decades. But here again the charge of postcolonial legacies and unequal power balances are hard to shake off. African researchers complain of being treated as secondary partners, the poor cousins to the wealthy research institutes of the North. Others complain Africa is seen as a ‘petri dish’ where Northern scientists test out new ideas.

These criticisms also extend to the many aid programmes focused on higher education partnerships. Many are of value, from the British Council’s long history of investing in education, to the new SPHEIR programme launched by the UK Department for International Development and partners. But these also need interrogation. What model of higher education are rich nations exporting? Where does power reside and who designs courses and management structures? How are privatised models for education reshaping universities across the world?

Centres of excellence

Academics across Africa and its diaspora often advocate turning certain institutions into centres of excellence for particular science and innovation subjects, rather than spreading resources thinly across many universities. For example, Calestous Juma debates the merits of innovation universities, a new kind of institute that combines research, teaching, community service and commercialisation.

Digital futures

Digital technology also offers rich opportunities for delivering better education at a fraction of the cost of conventional teaching. The internet and mobile tech can link academics, students and staff as never before, building pan-African networks, while also bringing education to those in volatile or war-torn regions. One example is online training programmes for Somali medics. Digital tech enables MOOCs (massive open online courses), distance learning and blended courses that combine classroom and online learning. Tunisian digital education expert Houda Bouslama describes this as a powerful force for change in Tunisia: through information and communications technologies, universities can support far more students, far more cheaply.

Growing university-industry links

The call for closer links between industry and universities is getting louder. Higher education specialist Beatrice Muganda argues that universities need to position themselves far more clearly as part and parcel of the societies they supposedly serve, and to nurture research landscapes where innovations can thrive and reap dividends for universities. Ghanaian-British politician Paul Boateng says that intellectual property systems must drastically improve if African countries are ever to become knowledge economies – a view echoed by Nigerian intellectual property specialist Umar Bindir among others.

There is also a growing call for universities to team up with local innovation sectors, such as the tech hubs flourishing in towns and cities across the continent. Technology businesswoman Mariéme Jamme has long campaigned for better regulatory frameworks and government investment to help pioneering African technologists and coders turn creative projects into viable, sustainable businesses.

Many also call for closer links between African universities and big business. Mauritian President Ameenah Gurib-Fakim argues that African universities must work more closely with industry – whether local businesses or multinationals – and that this should include industry directly funding courses.

This obviously poses a risk. Industry-sponsored PhDs for specific research outcomes are one thing, but what happens when industry funds an institute: what might the compromises be then? UCT engineering student, activist and writer Brian Kamanzi says «one of the hugest battles that we have is to protect our public institutions from interference» from industry, particularly when so many businesses in South Africa, as in other African countries, are foreign owned or controlled.

Meanwhile many other avenues for funding higher education in Africa are opening up – not least the growth of Chinese investment in the continent’s universities.

Taxing the wealthy

The small tax base of many African countries is often held up as a reason why governments can’t invest enough in education and in other services. «Someone has to pay,» says Le Grange. «But we have a responsibility to students who are unable to afford higher education, but have the ability to study and perform.» One route to bridging the impasse is a wealth tax, he says. «I think a lot of people would agree to that as long as that money is ring-fenced and channelled to higher education, because people are concerned about corruption within the government.»

Others suggest a graduate tax could be the best way forward, while still others say the tax base is already overburdened, and that the focus instead should be on higher corporation tax, reining in corruption and reducing the salaries of senior ministers.

The future

Worldwide, the higher education sector is undergoing radical change. Globalisation and privatisation are reshaping universities, while mechanisation and the internet are altering industry and employment in ways that we are only just beginning to grasp. While access to university in Africa and across the world remains beset by challenges, having a degree no longer guarantees work.

In a continent where over 200 million people are under 24 years old, wider changes are needed to provide jobs. Shaking up how universities are funded, and laying the foundations for a more robust public and higher education funding landscape, are good steps to making universities accessible and sustainable. But there are enormous challenges ahead.

These need scrutiny and debate – something we hope today’s online discussion, from 1-3pm BST (GMT+1) will provide. Do join us.

References

[1] Joel Samoff and Bidemi Carrol Conditions, coalitions, and influence: the World Bank and higher education in Africa (Annual Conference of the Comparative and International Education Society Salt Lake City, 7 February 2004)

Fuente: http://allafrica.com/stories/201607300146.html

Fuente de la imagen: http://blogs.elpais.com/africa-no-es-un-pais/2013/08/volver.html

Comparte este contenido:

EE.UU: Student Debt Helps, Not Harms, the U.S. Economy, White House Says

EE.UU/22 de julio de 2016/blogs.wsj.com/By Josh Mitchell

Resumen:

La Casa Blanca acaba de lanzar un gran informe sobre la deuda que adquieren los estudiantes de universidades, las cuales contienen todos los horrores familiares sobre las escuelas con fines de lucro, abandonos endeudados y estudiantes morosos en sus préstamos. Pero tiene una conclusión interesante: Esa pila creciente de US $ 1,3 billones en deuda del estudiante está ayudando a no lastimar, la economía de Estados Unidos.

Esta conclusión deviene de muchos defensores de los estudiantes y grupos de intereses especiales, de los agentes de bienes raíces y los empleadores que buscan nuevos recortes de impuestos para sus trabajadores jóvenes-que sostienen que la deuda del estudiante es un gran «arrastre» en la economía. ( Hillary Clinton y Donald Trump han criticado cada uno el aumento de la deuda del estudiante.) Sin embargo, el informe de 77 páginas de los Asesores Económicos del Consejo de la Casa Blanca demuestra con numerosos gráficos y estudios de economistas y académicos, que la deuda de los estudiantes representa un problema para las familias.

El aumento de la deuda de los estudiantes se produjo en gran medida con el presidente Barack Obama, a pesar de que comenzó varios años antes. Desde principios de 2009, cuando el Sr. Obama asumió el cargo, la deuda del estudiante casi se ha duplicado, cerca de $ 1.3 billones en la actualidad, de acuerdo con la Reserva Federal de Nueva York. El repunte es debido en gran medida al lamentable estado de la economía: Durante el alto desempleo, la inscripción en la universidad y la escuela de posgrado suele aumentar. Esto se debe a los trabajadores, el llamado coste de oportunidad de ir a la escuela a los salarios que perder que no se trabaje, es menor.

Su conclusión: «El principal impacto macroeconómico de los préstamos estudiantiles, sobre todo en el largo plazo, es a través del impulso a la producción y la productividad para formar una fuerza de trabajo más educada».

Noticia original:

The debt surge has hurt many, but adds to overall economic output and productivity, report says
A new report from the White House suggests education, not student debt, drives the differences in homeownership among borrowers. Here, graduates of Rutgers University at their commencement ceremony in May. ENLARGE
A new report from the White House suggests education, not student debt, drives the differences in homeownership among borrowers. Here, graduates of Rutgers University at their commencement ceremony in May.

The White House just released a big report on student debt that contains all the familiar horrors about for-profit schools, indebted dropouts and students defaulting on their loans. But it has an interesting conclusion: That growing stack of $1.3 trillion in student debt is helping, not hurting, the U.S. economy.

That conclusion is sure to rankle the many student advocates and special-interest groups—from real-estate agents to employers seeking new tax breaks for their young workers—that argue student debt is a big “drag” on the economy. (Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump have each decried the rise in student debt.) But the 77-page report from the White House Council of Economic Advisers backs up its claim with numerous charts and studies from economists and academics.

The surge in student debt occurred largely on President Barack Obama’s watch, though it began several years earlier. Since early 2009, when Mr. Obama took office, student debt has nearly doubled, to about $1.3 trillion today, according to the New York Federal Reserve. The uptick owed much to the sorry state of the economy: During high unemployment, enrollment in college and graduate school typically rises, the White House notes. That’s because for workers, the so-called opportunity cost of going to school–the wages they lose from not working—is lower.

MORE IN STUDENT DEBT

Government on Track to Forgive Up to $131,000 Each in Student Debt for Thousands of Doctors
The Average Student at a For-Profit College Was Worse Off After Attending
How Much are Young Americans Paying a Month on Student Debt? Less than You Think
Student Debt Is About to Set Another Record, But the Picture Isn’t All Bad
Can Bernie Sanders’s Tax Plan Fund Free College?
Between 2005 and 2010, college enrollment grew 20%, the biggest increase since the 1970s, the report notes. Individual, not just aggregate, student-debt burdens also grew, but they remain manageable. Borrowers owed an average $17,900 in debt from college, but not grad school, in 2015. (The report doesn’t cite a source for that figure. Other studies show that, upon graduation at least, undergraduate borrowers owe, on average, between $29,000 and $37,000).

The White House report, as with other studies, largely divides student borrowers into two groups: Graduates and dropouts. The first group, the majority, are doing just fine, even though tend to carry the heaviest student-debt balances. They are among society’s highest earners, thanks in large part to the degrees that the debt financed. They’re well-positioned to buy homes, and they’re helping improve the nation’s productivity because they learned skills that employers need.

The dropouts—a sizeable minority—are hardly doing fine. They’re making very little, they’re not buying homes and they’re damaging their credit. But because they are a contained group—there are about 7 million people in default on their federal student loans, out of a nation of more than 321 million—they don’t represent a systemic threat to the economy. And the White House concludes that many of these borrowers would still be suffering financially even without student debt, suggesting other factors are holding them down.

To highlight this divide, the White House points out that borrowers owing the smallest balances are the ones most likely to default. Take the cohort of borrowers who were first required to start making payments on their debt in 2011. Two-thirds of those who defaulted in the following three years owed less than $10,000, the White House says. More than a third of defaulters, 35%, owed less than $5,000. These borrowers owe little because they typically attended college for one or two years and then dropped out.

The report later cites data showing that Americans with high-debt balances are more likely to own a home than those with smaller balances. Borrowers with high-debt balances typically attended graduate school and earn more than those with just a bachelor’s degree. Borrowers who are delinquent on their student debt—a large share of which owe small balances– are the least likely to buy a home, even compared to those with no student debt at all.

“It is education, not student debt, that drives the persistent differences in homeownership,” the report states.

Similarly, the White House also strongly refutes any comparison between the housing market bubble and student debt. “Student debt is less likely to make a recession more severe or slow an expansion in the way that mortgage debt may have,” the paper says.

For that, it cites several factors.

For one, student debt is still low as a share of Americans’ disposable income. In 2015, student debt made up 9% of aggregate income, up from 3% in 2003. By comparison, mortgage debt at its peak in 2007 comprised 84% of aggregate income, up 25 percentage points in five years, the report states. Mortgage debt dropped back down to 61% in 2015.

Secondly, the White House says, “student loan debt is an investment in human capital that typically pays off through higher lifetime earnings and increase productivity.”

Its conclusion: “The main macroeconomic impact of student loans, particularly over the longer run, is via the boost to output and productivity form a more educated workforce.”

Tomado de: http://blogs.wsj.com/economics/2016/07/19/student-debt-helps-not-harms-the-u-s-economy-white-house-says/

Comparte este contenido:
Page 31 of 33
1 29 30 31 32 33