Congolese Students Face Costly Delays Due to Shortage of Professors

Africa/ Congo/ 07.04.2020/ Por: Zita Amwanga/  Source: globalpressjournal.com.

 

Trained teachers have not kept pace with a boom in universities, leading to massive staff shortages and leaving hundreds of students in limbo. School closures tied to the coronavirus pandemic threaten to further delay their future.

KISANGANI, DEMOCRATIC REPUBLIC OF CONGO — Jean Marie Tulume walked into his first day of class to discover one thing missing: the professor.

Thousands of university students face delays in schooling, due to a higher education boom in this provincial capital that has far outpaced the number of qualified teachers.

“We traveled back and forth, believing that the professor would be there, but to no avail,” says Tulume, who waited more than three weeks to start class.

The conundrum of too many schools and not enough instructors has upended higher education in the country’s third-largest city, leading to staff shortages, a decline in academic standards and a delayed future for aspiring graduates.

Officials recently shut down schools amid concerns about the new coronavirus, potentially delaying students’ education even further. DRC has reported 148 cases of the virus and 16 deaths as of April 4, according to the Johns Hopkins University & Medicine Coronavirus Resource Center.

Tulume also faced school delays last year. “I have to put up with it,” he says. “I have no choice.”

Higher education institutions in Kisangani are popping up like mushrooms. A decade ago, students could attend the city’s single university. Now they can choose from eight, six of which are private. About 300 professors are spread across the entire system, says Benoit Dhed’a Djailo, rector of the University of Kisangani — the main public university — and the city’s representative for the Ministry of Higher and University Education.

Some schools can’t afford to pay traveling expenses for visiting professors, forcing them to wait until tenured professors have time to teach. Courses go unstaffed through much of the year. And students get stuck with quarterly tuition fees even if their professor doesn’t show up.

Tuition fees vary annually, but public universities generally charge about $300 a year; private school costs roughly $500. Average income in DRC is less than $3 a day, according to a 2018 report by the national statistics office, making it difficult for many students to afford extending their education.

DRC already is reeling from a decline in commodity prices, according to the International Monetary Fund, one of the world’s worst Ebola outbreaks and violent conflict between armed groups, which has displaced around 5 million people in the country’s northeast. This compounds the slow recovery from a brutal civil war in the 1990s. Last year marked the first-ever peaceful transition of presidential power.

“The political and economic situation in our country disrupts the education system,” says Kasimir Ngoubi, a political analyst and professor at University of Kisangani. It doesn’t help, he says, that the path to an associate professor position can take up to a decade. The system is caught in a self-perpetuating cycle: a lack of professors means students don’t get the education they need to fill the teaching hole. Ngoubi advocates for government incentives that encourage talented pupils to consider a track in academia.

Officials argue they can’t afford to make such scholarships available.

The political and economic situation in our country disrupts the education system.

“The shortage of professors is a result of the lack of a substantial budget to overcome the crisis,” says Dhed’a Djailo, the education ministry representative. The ministry can’t cover operating costs to meet demand, recruit promising students or offer financial assistance for continued education, he says. “The government used to provide young people with student grants to encourage them to go to university, but given the country’s socioeconomic climate, there are no student grants anymore, and those who wish to pursue a scientific career will have to bear the university costs themselves.”

Current professors, while taxed with demanding schedules and frustrated pupils, prove the biggest beneficiaries. “The increase in the number of universities is welcome,” says Henri Paul Basthu, a professor who has taught for the past decade. “This helps me become more professional and earn a very good living.”

But it hasn’t worked well for students, many of whom find themselves thrust into vulnerable situations. They worry about the impact it will have, not just on their course schedule but on their future.

“I repeated my fourth year of study because of my refusal to obey a teaching assistant who asked me to have sex with him,” say Vivianne Mudunga, who is studying law at the University of Kisangani. She says she couldn’t get in touch with the professor to prove her valid grades and was therefore held back.

Other students tell stories of teaching assistants who control grades in the professor’s absence and demand money to access course outlines. Fabien Kitenge, a public health student at the same university, was held back because he didn’t pay the assistant’s bribe.

Beyond the immediate delays, students and administrators worry about the long-term degradation of academic rigor in a country struggling to improve its economy.

“I defended my end-of-cycle dissertation under a lot of stress, as my supervisor made me wait for months to complete it,” says Doris Bamba, a political science student who had a position waiting in his hometown – if he could conclude his studies.

The professor didn’t show up to grade his work until after the offer expired. Bamba lost the job.

Source of the notice: https://globalpressjournal.com/africa/democratic-republic-of-congo/congolese-students-face-costly-delays-due-shortage-professors/

Comparte este contenido:

NYS to Seek Further Input on Education Guidelines

Education Guidelines

NEW YORK –New York state appears poised to delay or amend proposed guidelines on private-school education, after having received over 140,00 comments from private-school advocates objecting to the guidelines.

At a meeting to be held Monday, the Education Department will recommend “going back out for stakeholder feedback on the proposed” guidelines, according to an agenda it released.

Last July, the New York state Education Department published proposed guidelines for secular-studies instruction in private schools. The guidelines, which provide detailed instructions for how private schools must fulfill the longstanding legal requirement that they provide an education “substantially equivalent” to that provided in public schools, mandate specific courses and the minimum number of hours to be dedicated to the study of each. The time requirements would obligate yeshivos, with a four-day week, to teach an average of more than four hours per day of secular studies in seventh and eighth grades, and an average of more than three hours per day in high school.

Among the required subjects are arts, visual arts and music, which many yeshivos and Orthodox Jewish parents either object to or believe is time that could be better spent on other pursuits.

Yeshivos would be placed under the purview of the local school authority which would visit each yeshivah to determine whether it is fulfilling the substantial-equivalency requirement.

Following publication of the guidelines, a 60-day public-comment period commenced, during which private-school advocates, mostly from the yeshivah community, submitted over 140,000 comments opposing the guidelines.

The guidelines only become law after a vote by the Board of Regents, but the Board has not yet voted on them at any of its monthly meetings. On the recently released agenda for Monday morning’s meeting, the Education Department says it will discuss the proposed guidelines, and notes, “From July 3, 2019 to September 3, 2019, the Department received over 140,000 comments on the proposed regulations. Department staff have been working to review and assess these extensive comments in the months since. A summary of the comments and an overview of the common themes, concerns, and suggestions raised will be provided for review and discussion.”

Under an item titled “timetable for implementation,” the agenda says, “Based on the unprecedented amounts of comments received, Department staff recommends going back out for stakeholder feedback on the proposed amendments.”

While the exact implications are unclear, this item apparently means that the Board will not be voting now on the guidelines, but will enter into further negotiations with private-school advocates on the substantial-equivalency issue.

Yeshivah advocates who spoke with Hamodia on Sunday said they are cautiously optimistic about the outcome of Monday’s meeting.

“I am happy that it seems the Board of Regents has realized the profound impact these guidelines would have on our community,” said a yeshivah parent who asked to be identified only as Benjy. “I am hopeful that the Board will work with the yeshivah community and negotiate in good faith to arrive at a mutually acceptable agreement.”

rborchardt@hamodia.com

Fuente de la Información: https://hamodia.com/2020/02/09/nys-seek-input-education-guidelines/

Comparte este contenido:

Homeschooling is on the rise in Australia. Who is doing it and why?

By: Rebecca English.

 

This is the first article in our four-part series on homeschooling in Australia. The series will answer common questions including whether homeschooled children have enough opportunities for socialisation, and how their outcomes compare with children who attend formal schooling.


Home education is a legally recognised alternative to enrolling a child in school in all Australian states and territories. Children need to be enrolled in either a school or home education from around the age of 6 until completion age (around 17 years-old). If the parent chooses home education, they must apply to the state or territory authority for permission.

In most states and territories, the parent or a hired registered teacher is responsible for the education of the child, usually at the child’s home. Any parent, regardless of their educational background, is legally able to apply for, and homeschool their child.

Parents must submit a plan for their home education, which, in most cases, should show an alignment between their child’s learning and the national curriculum. Parents can buy a program, but in most cases, they develop their own, in line with their philosophies of education.

 


How many Australian children are being homeschooled?

Across Australia, there are around 20,000 homeschooled students and the numbers are growing. Around 1,100 students were being homeschooled in Queensland in 2013. By 2018, this had increased to 3,232 students.

This means there are around the same number of homeschooled students in Queensland as the population of Brisbane State High School.

The numbers are rising in other states too. In New South Wales an estimated 4,700 students were enrolled in homeschool in 2017 compared to around 3,300 in 2013. Around 5,300 children were being homeschooled in Victoria in 2018, compared to 3,545 children in 2013.

These numbers may not tell the whole story as they only represent families who have registered to homeschool their child. Research suggests there may be thousands who haven’t registered, and so are homeschooling their children “illegally”.

Why do families choose to homeschool?

There are many reasons parents choose to educate their children at home. For some families it will be because of religious beliefs. Geography or financial reasons might stop these families from accessing a suitable private school.

Other families might be ideologically opposed to mainstream schooling and see it as an unnecessary or inappropriate intrusion into family life.

Some of the biggest growth in home education is in the “accidental” home education group. These are families for whom school was a first choice, but it did not work. There are many reasons school may not have worked, but often it’s down to special educational need. These families would traditionally have moved their children around between schools but are now homeschooling instead.

Studies suggest families who take their children out of school, when they have a special need, and homeschool are more satisfied with their child’s education than when they were in traditional school.

 


The rise in homeschooling also appears to have links to worldwide changes in education. Many parents see schools as failing their childrenincluding for cultural reasons, and believe homeschooling is a suitable alternative. Some families feel schools are not meeting their primary objectives of education and (healthy) socialisation for their children.

What about assessments?

After a period of time (in Queensland, for instance, it’s ten months) parents report to their state or territory’s education department on their homeschooled child’s progress. The reporting requirements differ across states and territories.

For some states, such as NSW and WA, the report is delivered to a person who visits the family. For others, such as Queensland, the parent writesthe report and sends it to the department.

Unlike traditional schools, parents don’t usually “assess” their child’s learning through exams or assignments. The reports must show progress in key areas. Some homeschooled students might choose to participate in NAPLAN testing while others won’t do any testing at all.

Homeschooled students can choose to go for an ATAR and do a school-based apprenticeship or traineeship, even though they don’t do assessment.

Is it the same as distance education?

Some parents may like the idea of home education but feel they want a more school-like experience. They may choose to enrol their children in distance education.

Distance education is different to homeschooling. Dan Peled/AAP

While it’s also conducted at home, distance education is not home education and the enrolment counts as a “school”. Because it’s technically a school, distance education students are not counted among home education numbers.

The differences are many. Home education is conducted by the parent, but distance education is a school program delivered by teachers at home frequently using the internet. It is also usually delivered to a group of children, rather than a family.

There are private and public distance education schools. Some states, such as New South Wales, limit the enrolment to students who are geographically isolated or may be experiencing a special need that stops them from going to school. In others, such as Queensland, any child can enrol in a distance education school.

What about outcomes?

The volume and quality of the research on outcomes for children in home schooling is limited. In Australia, studies have focused on NAPLAN results. These suggest home-educated students score higher than state averages across every measure. The effect continues even if the child returns to school.

These children may be doing well because they receive one-on-one attention. Or it could be because the child’s learning is personalised and the child has agency over their learning.

 


Studies from the US, where there is far more data, suggest home-educated students enjoy benefits in reading, language, maths, science and social studies. And many families there cite dissatisfaction with schools’ achievements as a reason to home educate. There is no difference between home education in the USA and Australia.

The rise in numbers poses issues for education departments and government authorities charged with managing the practise. They may not be set up to deal with large, and increasing, numbers of registrations. For most departments of education, the numbers of families choosing home education has traditionally been low.

In addition, authorities may be unable to police those families who choose not to register.

The increasing choice of home education is an issue that should be on the radar of every state and territory education authority.

 

Source of the article:

Comparte este contenido: