Page 3 of 6
1 2 3 4 5 6

United States: Smaller Class Sizes Not Proven but Teachers Strike for Them

North America/ United States/ 23.01.2019/ Source: www.usnews.com.

Most educators and parents see class size as an indicator of a quality education and have made it a priority in teacher strikes across the United States, but its effectiveness is still up for debate.

Most educators and parents see class size as an indicator of a quality education and have made it a priority in teacher strikes across the United States in the past year, but its effectiveness is still up for debate.

There’s no universal standard for the best class size, though some states and school districts have instituted policies, particularly in lower grades. While many believe smaller is better, studies are mixed on exactly how much it can improve academic outcomes, considering the cost.

The ratio of students to teachers is at the heart of a teacher strike in the nation’s second-largest school district, where tens of thousands of Los Angeles educators walked out Monday. Teachers have complained about having kids sitting on window sills or the floor of overcrowded classrooms that can push past 45 students.

Farther north, some teachers in Oakland called in sick Friday as part of an unofficial rally over their contract negotiations, which also hinge partly on a demand for smaller class sizes.

At the high school level, Los Angeles has routinely had more students per teacher than the national average, said John Rogers, a professor of education at University of California, Los Angeles.

He said there’s no easy way to assess the impact of class size on educational outcomes over the last couple of decades in the Los Angeles Unified School District — in part because classes have been overcrowded despite a state mandate calling for an average class size of 30 students through eighth grade.

Rogers said the question of whether districts should be able to increase class size unilaterally is important because it makes teachers feel they lack control over learning conditions.

«When your class size can be increased dramatically, you lose the ability to ensure that you can do right by the students you are serving,» Rogers said.

United Teachers Los Angeles is demanding the elimination of a longstanding contract clause giving the district authority over class sizes. If the district won’t agree to remove the provision, union leaders say they can’t trust that school officials won’t ignore any deal it cuts on class sizes in the future.

The district has insisted on replacing it with new language that also grants it power to raise class sizes under certain conditions, including a financial emergency. It said its latest contract offer included $100 million to add nearly 1,000 additional teachers, nurses, counselors and librarians in 2019-20 and reduce some class sizes. Schools with the greatest needs would see larger reductions — about four students per class.

But union president Alex Caputo-Pearl said the district’s offers were limited to one year and then class sizes could spike again and new staff could be cut. He has called class size a «fundamental issue» that’s directly «about educator working conditions.»

Superintendent Austin Beutner has said he would like to reduce class sizes even more but the district simply doesn’t have the money. He has suggested the union might consider trading other contract demands for greater reductions in class size.

Brent Smiley, a 23-year district veteran who teaches at Sherman Oaks Center For Enriched Studies, said he’s had as many as 42 students in one class and that his smallest has 39.

«Struggling to keep them focused can be an impossible task,» he said this week.

A 2016 report by the National Education Policy Center suggested class sizes be set as low as 15 students in lower grades and found that all things being equal, the student ratio affected their academic achievement.

William Mathis, who authored the study as an education policy expert at the University of Colorado, pointed to a 1979 study that tracked young students in smaller classes in Tennesseeand saw lasting effects. The children had better grades and test scores, fewer disciplinary issues and an increased likelihood of going to college.

The gains were twice as large for poor and minority students and so convincing that in 1998 President Bill Clinton pushed a $12 billion class size reduction program through Congress, though academic disparities remain.

Mathis contends that smaller class sizes in younger grades work because teacher quality improves and getting more attention helps children develop skills, such as establishing peer groups and positive attitudes, that are needed to progress to more intense learning.

«The bigger the class, the more likely you are to treat kids as a big group, and you don’t read papers as good, you don’t read them as closely, you don’t have as much attention to give to each child,» Mathis said of teacher quality.

But Matthew Chingos, vice president of the Urban Institute’s Center on Education Data and Policy, is skeptical of a one-size-fits-all approach. He’s studied state-regulated class sizes and says that it may not be the «biggest bang for the buck» for every classroom.

Requiring a school to have more teachers is expensive and potentially problematic, he argues, because it limits local control at the campus level, which in turn can dilute teacher quality.

California tried to boost its reading and math scores between 1996 and 2013 with a program that gave extra money to schools if they reduced kindergarten through third-grade classes down to 20 students.

That experiment, Chingos said, didn’t prove its worth because there was no prior data for comparison.

Without more high-quality research, Chingos said parents and teachers both push for smaller class sizes based largely on their intuition that it’s better for children. Teachers also benefit, including adding to the union ranks, he said.

«Class sizes are a political winner. No one thinks it’s bad. If money grew on trees, then sure,» Chingos said.

 

Source of the notice: https://www.usnews.com/news/us/articles/2019-01-20/smaller-class-sizes-not-proven-but-teachers-strike-for-them

Comparte este contenido:

Japan to give 500m yen for primary education

Asia/ Japan / 05.12.2018/ Source: www.theindependentbd.com.

Japan will provide 500 million Japanese yen or approximately Taka 36.89 crore as grants to Bangladesh for the Fourth Primary Education Development Programme aimed to impart quality education to all children from pre-primary to grade 5.  “In this regard, ‘Exchange of Notes’ and ‘Grant Agreement’ will be signed on December 10 at the NEC-2 Conference Room in the city’s Sher-e-Bangla Nagar area,” said an official at the Economic Relations Division (ERD). The official told BSS that ERD Secretary Monowar Ahmed will sign both the documents, while Japanese Ambassador to Dhaka Hiroyasu Izumi will sign the ‘Exchange of Notes’ while Chief Representative of JICA, Bangladesh Office Hitoshi Hirata will sign the ‘Grant Agreement’.

Officials at the Ministry of Primary and Mass Education said the programme will strengthen the capacities of institutions at all levels of primary education offices and increase the support for schools and upazilas with more resources linked to their needs and performance. The programme is expected to directly benefit 18.6 million students, about 340,000 teachers, and more than 65,000 schools that are under the management of the Ministry of Primary and Mass Education. The government will provide $13.2 billion of the total $14.7 billion programme cost, while the other co-financiers are the World Bank, ADB, UNICEF and European Union.

Bangladesh achieved almost universal access to primary education by 2016 with a 98 per cent net enrollment rate. The efficiency of primary education has also improved. The funding will help the government to improve the quality and equity of primary education through the Fourth Primary Education Development Programme. The program aims to reduce double-shift operations at schools by recruiting more teachers and building more classrooms, step up teacher education and provide needs-based training for teachers and teacher educators, reform examinations and assessments, as well as enrich teaching and learning resources such as with digital materials.

It will also expand education services for out-of-school children through learning centers, bring more children with special education needs and disabilities to schools, improve school-level performance and management, and strengthen institutions.

Source of the notice: http://www.theindependentbd.com/post/177108

Comparte este contenido:

Supporting teachers in developing nations

Asia/ Mauritania/ 21.11.2018/ Source: www.teachermagazine.com.au.

Which career would I have chosen if not the law, followed by politics? I’ve been asked that many times over the years, and the answer is simple: teaching.

I enjoyed going to school – the learning, the playmates and, of course, the teachers. I respected them. I still do.

Great teachers can foster talent, instil confidence and help students to realise their full potential. A teacher’s enthusiasm for a particular subject can open doors in a student’s mind and set them on a pathway of lifelong learning. I experienced this from my own schooling, and some of the wonderful teachers who helped me forge my path in life.

While I ultimately chose a different career to teaching, I have remained interested in learning and teaching throughout my life.

Now I Chair the Global Partnership for Education (GPE), which is a catalyst for education investment, and works together with governments in developing countries to strengthen their education systems. Our goal at GPE is to ensure that every child in a developing country receives a quality education ­– and a quality education always starts with a great teacher.

Investing in teachers for better learning

Teachers are, and will always be, the backbone of the education system. It is why they constitute the largest single expenditure in education budgets around the world.

It would come as no surprise to those in the teaching profession that in a survey conducted by GPE with partner countries, ‘teacher competence’ rated as the most common cause of low learning outcomes for students.

So while it seems obvious that investing in teachers equals better learning; improving the overall quality of education is complex.

The learning process is affected by multiple factors that vary significantly amongst contexts and countries. This is why GPE is working in a number of different ways to ensure teachers in developing countries are equipped with the training and support that will set them on a path of success.

To date, we’ve had some pleasing results. The number of teachers trained with the support of GPE has more than doubled in recent years, going from around 98 000 teachers in 2014 to 238 000 in 2016. However, there remains many challenges to recruit, train and support teachers in developing nations.

What’s happening around the globe?

When recruiting teachers within a country where the rate of school completion is already low, it can be difficult to find candidates who have the baseline skills required. Take for example, the northwest African country of Mauritania, where decades of low learning outcomes meant something had to change.

The government began a structural reform of its education sector back in 1999. Now, with the support of GPE, World Bank and the French Development Agency, progress is being made to ensure those who train and go on to become teachers in Mauritania have the fundamental knowledge and capability to undertake the role.

These reforms have helped people like Mariam Mohamed Vall to realise her dream of becoming a teacher. Mariam always wanted to be a teacher but put her ambitions on hold to take care of her family. She took the entrance exam multiple times but failed, then two years ago she finally passed.

Together with other trainers, Mariam has helped to redesign the three-year program for training teachers. Now training is done with more practice in the classroom and regular evaluations, to ensure teachers are really qualified to empower the next generation of students.

We have to get teacher training right, but there is also the challenge of scale. It is estimated that 69 million primary and secondary school teachers need to be recruited by 2030 in order to meet demand, with the teacher shortages highest in Sub-Saharan Africa.

When teachers are in short supply, it is often the poorest children who miss out. GPE uses a framework to track the equitable distribution of teachers across education systems. We have found in many partner developing countries, the number of teachers in a school is not proportional to the number of students, with remote and disadvantaged areas receiving fewer teachers.

All these problems can be compounded by the fact that in many developing countries, the teaching profession is still considered to be of low status. This makes it difficult to recruit and retain good teachers.

There is never a one-size-fits-all solution to these complex problems. This is why GPE is continuing to support a diversity of programs in partner countries.

In the West African nation of Togo, the partnership is supporting teacher training on the new curriculum, the development of a new teacher training policy informed by an assessment of teacher competencies, as well as resources and equipment for the teacher training department and teacher training institutes.

In Niger, GPE is supporting the construction of three teacher training institutes, the training of trainers and the development of new training modules on reading.

A GPE funded program in Afghanistan includes social support systems and incentives for new female teachers working in challenging areas with low levels of girls participating in education.

Teachers will always play a critical role in helping to improve learning outcomes. GPE will continue to advocate on a global stage to fund programs that give teachers the training and resources they need.

A quality education can transform lives, communities and ultimately nations. That’s why an investment in teachers is an investment in our global future.

Source of the notice: https://www.teachermagazine.com.au/columnists/julia-gillard/supporting-teachers-in-developing-nations

Comparte este contenido:

What Australian children want for World Children’s Day: A quality education and practical skills

Oceania/ Australia/ 19.11.2018/ Source: www.unicef.org.au.

Around Australia, children say that education, both in school and beyond the classroom is the best way to equip them for the futures they want. For World Children’s Day tomorrow (20 November), UNICEF Australia will release the results of research with students about how they experience our education system and what children say they need to achieve their full potential.

Across all our work, UNICEF Australia is committed to ongoing consultation with children and young people. UNICEF’s nine Young Ambassadors are travelling around the country to visit schools and consult with children about the issues that matter to them and ensure that their voices are heard. From Dubbo to Gympie, and Perth to Sydney, children say they want equal access for all children to be able to learn.

UNICEF Australia Young Ambassador Lachlan Arthur said, “Children are telling us that they want to be able to learn more life-skills and practical skills for the future in school including basic finance skills such as budgeting. Almost all the children we have spoken to so far recognise that the future is in technology and want their education to help them harness opportunities in this area in the future.”

This year’s World Children’s Day is all about how we can best equip children for the future.

“World Children’s Day is a fun day with a serious message,” said UNICEF Australia CEO Tony Stuart. “It is a day when all children are encouraged to speak out about what matters to them. It is also an opportunity for adults, whether they be parents or politicians, to make a special effort to listen to children about how we can best support them.”

To celebrate the day, leaders from entertainment, government, sport and business will rally for children and there are a number of special events. These include:

  • Iconic landmarks including the Sydney Opera House and the Ferris wheel at Luna Park in Sydney will light up in blue on the night of 20 November.
  • A free photography exhibition is open on the Western Broadwalk of the Sydney Opera House to shine a light on how education can transform children’s lives. City of Sydney Councillor Jess Miller will officially open the exhibition with UNICEF Australia CEO Tony Stuart on Tuesday 20 November.
  • UNICEF Australia’s corporate partner Qantas will release a video with sports partner, the Westfield Matildas, in which team members Claire Polkinghorne, Sam Kerr, Katrina Gorry and Gema Simon “go blue” during a game of football with 20 young fans.
  • Together with learning technology company Entropolis, UNICEF is launching the Futurepreneurs Patrons’ Fund, a collective giving opportunity to fund entrepreneurship education for children in remote socio economic communities.
  • UNICEF Australia Ambassadors including Carrie Bickmore Tim Cahill, Ken Done, Adam Liaw, Callan McAuliffe and The Wiggles are showing their support for children.
  • Statues of children in major cities are sporting UNICEF backpacks as a symbol of our commitment to children and education.

UNICEF’s annual World Children’s Day is commemorated each year on 20 November and marks the anniversary of the adoption of the Convention on the Rights of the Child. The global day raises awareness and vital funds for the millions of children who are unschooled, unprotected and uprooted. This year, UNICEF is inviting the public to Go Blue for every child by doing or wearing something blue on 20 November. For this World Children’s Day, children chose the theme of education by voting online.
Source of the notice: https://www.unicef.org.au/about-us/media/november-2018/what-australian-children-want-for-world-children%E2%80%99s

Comparte este contenido:

Germany: united for a greater investment in quality education

Europa/Alemania/PrensaIE

Reseña: La Gewerkschaft Erziehung und Wissenschaft (GEW) y la Verband Bildung und Erziehung(VBE) han subrayado que Alemania finalmente debe invertir más dinero en educación de calidad. «Las recomendaciones confirman que todavía estamos por debajo del promedio de la UE y aún gastamos muy por debajo del 10 por ciento del producto interno bruto (PIB) en educación. Para un país tan rico que es un signo de pobreza «, criticó el presidente de VBE, Udo Beckmann. «Resulta que los sindicatos están siendo respaldados por la Comisión de la Unión Europea (UE) y la Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económico (OCDE), y todos piden una mayor inversión en educación de Alemania», dijo. Acordando que los políticos finalmente deben actuar e invertir más dinero en educación, la presidenta de GEW Marlis Tepe señaló que «la profesión educativa debe hacerse más atractiva para contrarrestar con éxito la grave escasez de personal, especialmente en las instituciones de educación infantil y las escuelas primarias». Denunciando «un escándalo sociopolítico», deploró que hasta hoy no haya sido posible resolver el problema fundamental del sistema educativo alemán, es decir, el estrecho vínculo entre el origen social y el éxito educativo, la brecha social cada vez más amplia. Tepe siguió insistiendo en que el gasto en educación de calidad valía la pena: conduce a una mayor igualdad de oportunidades y participación en la sociedad, mejora las perspectivas profesionales y de vida de las personas y fortalece su salud. «La política ahora debe tomar un rumbo diferente, de lo contrario estamos claramente dirigiéndonos hacia una crisis educativa», subrayó. El Semestre Europeo es parte del marco de gobernanza económica de la Unión Europea.Es un ciclo anual durante el cual los Estados miembros de la UE coordinan sus políticas económicas y fiscales. Con este fin, la Comisión de la UE realiza periódicamente recomendaciones específicas para cada país. Una vez más, la Comisión de la UE le ha dado a Alemania malas notas porque el país está invirtiendo muy poco dinero en educación. En sus recomendaciones específicas para 2018, la institución de la UE observa una considerable falta de inversión para Alemania, y que el gasto público en educación del país en 2016, al 4,2 por ciento del PIB, no alcanzó la media de la UE del 4,7 por ciento. Con solo el nueve por ciento del PIB, el gasto total en educación e investigación también estaría por debajo del objetivo nacional del diez por ciento. La Comisión de la UE también reconoce que el gasto adicional en educación, investigación e innovación es crucial para el potencial de crecimiento de Alemania. Los desafíos, de acuerdo con esta institución, tales como el número creciente de estudiantes, la escasez de docentes y el mayor desarrollo de la educación de la primera infancia solo pueden abordarse si la financiación pública de la educación aumenta significativamente. Más información aquí También puede leer el «Comité de Sindicatos Europeos para la Educación» «Recomendaciones específicas para el país 2018 – Evaluación, contexto y recomendaciones del Semestre Europeo en el campo de la educación y la formación»aquí


Reacting to the recommendations of the European Union’s Commission in the framework of the “European Semester”, German teachers’ unions have insisted on the need to provide public education with adequate funding.

The Gewerkschaft Erziehung und Wissenschaft (GEW) and the Verband Bildung und Erziehung (VBE) have stressed that Germany must finally invest more money in quality education.

“The recommendations confirm that we are still below the EU average and still spend well below 10 percent of gross domestic product (GDP) on education. For such a rich country that is a sign of poverty,” VBE President Udo Beckmann criticised.

“It turns out that trade unions are being backed up by the European Union (EU) Commission and the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD), and everyone is calling for more investment in education from Germany,” he welcomed.

Agreeing that politicians must finally act and invest more money in education, GEW President Marlis Tepe noted that “the education profession must be made more attractive in order to successfully counter the serious staff shortage, especially in early childhood education institutions and primary schools”.

Denouncing “a socio-political scandal”, she deplored that until today it has not been possible to solve the fundamental problem of the German education system, i.e. the close link between social origin and educational success, the social gap getting even broader.

Tepe went on stressing that spending on quality education was worthwhile: it leads to more equality of opportunity and participation in society, improves people’s professional and life perspectives, and strengthens their health. “Politics must now take a different course, otherwise we are clearly steering towards an educational crisis,” she underlined.

Background

The European Semester is part of the European Union’s economic governance framework. It is a yearly cycle during which EU Member States coordinate their economic and fiscal policies. To this end, the EU Commission regularly makes country-specific recommendations to the Member States.

Once again, the EU Commission has given Germany bad marks because the country is investing too little money in education. In its 2018 country-specific recommendations, the EU institution notes a considerable lack of investment for Germany, and that the country’s public expenditure on education in 2016, at 4.2 per cent of GDP, fell short of the EU average of 4.7 per cent. At only nine percent of GDP, the total expenditure on education and research furthermore would be below the national target of ten percent.

The EU Commission also acknowledges that additional spending on education, research and innovation is crucial for Germany’s growth potential. Challenges, according to this institution, such as the growing number of students, the shortage of teachers and the further development of early childhood education can only be tackled if the public financing of education rises significantly.

More information here

You can also read the European Trade Union Committee for Education’s “Country Specific Recommendations 2018 – Assessment, Context and Recommendations of the European Semester in the education and training field” here

Fuente: https://www.ei-ie.org/en/detail/15888/germany-united-for-a-greater-investment-in-quality-education

Comparte este contenido:

Nigeria: Address quality education at home first, not by sending teachers abroad

Africa/Nigeria/prensaIE

Resumen: La solicitud de Liberia de maestros nigerianos en virtud del acuerdo del Cuerpo de Asistencia Técnica ha sido recibida con la condena de las uniones educativas de las autoridades nigerianas, argumentando que Nigeria misma está luchando por brindar una educación de calidad. Los sindicatos de educación de Nigeria han destacado la escasez de docentes de su país y la dificultad para garantizar una educación de calidad. La reacción fue provocada por una solicitud de más de 6.000 maestros del recién inaugurado presidente de Liberia, George Weah, durante una visita de cortesía al presidente de Nigeria, Muhammadu Buhari. Weah dijo que los problemas heredados por su gobierno solo podrían abordarse con ayuda de países como Nigeria. El presidente de Liberia identificó el desempleo juvenil y la necesidad de reactivar los sectores de educación, agricultura, minería y salud como algunos de los problemas urgentes que enfrenta su país. Le dijo a su homólogo nigeriano que «su asistencia técnica sostenida para el desarrollo de capacidades en estos sectores es bienvenida».Más específicamente, en el marco del programa de Intercambio Bilateral de Maestros, estamos buscando 6.000 maestros más para compensar la escasez de buenos maestros en nuestro sistema educativo «.


Liberia’s request for Nigerian teachers under the Technical Assistance Corps agreement has been met with condemnation of the Nigerian authorities by education unions, arguing that Nigeria itself is struggling to deliver quality education.

Nigerian education unions have highlighted their country’s shortage of teachers and struggle to ensure quality education. The reaction was prompted by a request for over 6,000 teachers from the newly inaugurated President of Liberia, George Weah, during a courtesy visit to Nigeria’s President, Muhammadu Buhari. Weah said the issues inherited by his government could only be tackled with assistance from countries like Nigeria.

The Liberian president identified youth unemployment and the need to revive the education, agriculture, mining and health sectors as some of the urgent problems facing his country. He told his Nigerian counterpart that “your sustained technical assistance for capacity building in these sectors is most welcome.

More specifically, under the Bilateral Teacher Exchange programme, we are seeking 6,000 more teachers to make up for the shortage of good teachers in our educational system.”

NUT: Address issues at home

The Nigeria Union of Teachers (NUT) insisted that “the country does not have enough teachers to go around and the union has still not come to an agreement with the government over the issue of salaries”.

In fact, Nigeria still needs to find a solution concerning 25,000 teachers in Kaduna, in North-West Nigeria, who were fired because they could not pass tests the government forced them to take, said Kalaama Toinpre, Chairman of the Bayelsa State NUT branch.

The Nigerian government should employ quality teachers in schools without such teachers, take adequate care of its teachers, and tackle the myriad of problems undermining the education sector, instead of sending Nigerian teachers work abroad, he added.

“Our schools are suffering; even some subjects do not have teachers. The country cannot take adequate care of its teachers and they are talking about sending them abroad to teach,” he said.

Comparte este contenido:

Education International assesses World Bank’s Development Report on education

Prensa Internacional de la Educación

Resumen: Justo antes de las Reuniones de Primavera del Banco Mundial, la Internacional de la Educación está lanzando una publicación que reúne múltiples voces de todo el mundo para proporcionar un Chequeo de la realidad en el Informe sobre el desarrollo mundial de educación de 2018 del Banco Mundial. El lanzamiento de esta publicación marca el final de la serie de blogs semanales Reality Check del Informe de Desarrollo Mundial (WDR) de la IE que se ha estado ejecutando enwww.worldsofeducation.org durante casi 6 meses. Si bien es importante que el Banco Mundial haya dedicado un tema del WDR a la educación por primera vez, los docentes y académicos del mundo han encontrado algunas deficiencias significativas en su contenido. Esto es aún más difícil ya que la política del Banco Mundial afecta directamente a los educadores a través del asesoramiento sobre políticas a los ministros y la política impuesta a través de préstamos condicional del Banco Mundial. Hay una oportunidad perdida bastante importante en el informe: el Banco debería haber presentado argumentos sólidos sobre cómo cerrar la brecha financiera en educación para cumplir con el ODS 4. De acuerdo con el Informe Global de Monitoreo Educativo, existe una brecha financiera de $ 39 billones por año desde ahora hasta el 2030 en los países de ingresos bajos y medianos. Esta brecha no se aborda en absoluto en el informe. En resumen, el Banco debería haber enfatizado que las prioridades políticas deberían ser determinadas por los gobiernos nacionales en consulta con los maestros y el personal de apoyo educativo que conocen de primera mano las necesidades sobre el terreno para lograr una educación de calidad para todos.  David Edwards, Secretario General de la IE, dice en su introducción a la publicación: «Los educadores son los que mejor pueden usar la evaluación para mejorar el aprendizaje. Los educadores pueden proporcionar la evidencia contextual específica que debe informar la reforma de políticas, de lo que funciona y de lo que no funciona en el aula. Y, por lo tanto, los educadores deben tener un lugar en la mesa para guiar la reforma de las políticas. La promesa de la educación no se logrará a menos que se fortalezca y amplíe el diálogo social. Por esta razón, la Internacional de la Educación pide que en materia de educación, el Banco Mundial intenta algo nuevo, da un paso atrás y escucha a la comunidad educativa «. «Verificación de la realidad de la Internacional de la Educación: El Informe sobre el desarrollo mundial de la educación de 2018 del Banco» está disponible aquí: http://go.ei-ie.org/WDR2018RealityCheck


Just ahead of the World Bank Spring Meetings, Education International is launching a publication that brings together multiple voices from around the world to provide a Reality Check on the World Bank’s 2018 World Development Report on education.

This publication launch marks the end of EI’s World Development Report (WDR) Reality Check weekly blog series that has been running on www.worldsofeducation.org for nearly 6 months.
While it is important that the World Bank has dedicated an issue of the WDR to education for the very first time, the world’s teachers and academics have found some significant shortcomings in its content. This is all the more difficult as World Bank policy directly affects educators through policy advice to ministers and imposed policy through conditional World Bank loans.
There is a quite substantial missed opportunity in the report: The Bank should have made a strong case for how to close the financing gap in education to meet SDG4. According to the Global Education Monitoring Report, there is a financing gap of $39 billion a year from now until 2030 across lower and middle income countries. This gap is not addressed at all in the report.
To summarize, the Bank should have emphasized that policy priorities should be determined by national governments in consultation with teachers and education support personnel who know firsthand the needs on the ground to achieve quality education for all.
EI General Secretary David Edwards says in his introduction to the publication: «It is educators who can best use assessment formatively to improve learning. It is educators who can provide the context-specific evidence, that should inform policy reform, of what works and what does not work in the classroom setting. And it is, thus, educators who must have a place at the table to guide policy reform. Education’s promise will not be achieved unless social dialogue is strengthened and expanded. For this reason, Education International asks that on matters of education, the World Bank tries something new, takes a step back, and listens to the education community.»
«Education International’s Reality Check: The Bank’s 2018 World Development Report on Education» is available here: http://go.ei-ie.org/WDR2018RealityCheck
Comparte este contenido:
Page 3 of 6
1 2 3 4 5 6