Scaling education programs in the Philippines: A policymaker’s perspective

By: Rosalina Villaneza.

In 2016, 586,284 childrenof primary school age in the Philippines were out of school, underscoring demand for large-scale programs to address unmet learning needs. As a chief education program specialist in the Department of Education (DepEd) in the Philippines, I have firsthand experience planning, implementing, and monitoring and evaluating a variety of education programs. One of our main challenges is ensuring that effective initiatives, such as with our teacher professional development program, take root and grow into sustainable, system-wide approaches for improving teacher quality and encouraging responsive instructional practices to improve learning outcomes.

With the implementation of the K-12 Basic Education Program, DepEd has taken significant strides toward fulfilling its mandate of establishing a comprehensive and integrated education system relevant to the needs of people and society. The program aims to develop productive, responsible, and engaged global citizens with the essential competencies and skills for lifelong learning and employment. We believe this begins by ensuring every child of primary school age acquires basic literacy and numeracy skills.

How was DepEd able to improve literacy and numeracy skills in recent years? We began by articulating a clear vision that focused on teachers, as they play a fundamental role in developing these skills among their students. I worked closely with my team of education experts to retool teachers’ mastery of content knowledge and pedagogical skills so they could effectively lead in the classroom. In 2015, we introduced the Early Language, Literacy, and Numeracy Program (ELLN) to improve reading and numeracy skills of K-3 learners. ELLN strengthened teacher capacity to teach and assess reading and numeracy skills, improved school administration and management, established competency standards, and introduced a school-based professional development system for teachers, the “School Learning Action Cell” (SLAC). ELLN trained teachers through a ten-day, face-to-face training module. While this approach had some impact, it was not to the extent we hoped—we wanted to reach the entire country. We understood that scaling an in-person training would be costly and time-consuming to reach primary grade teachers in all schools throughout the country. Because of this, my DepEd colleagues and I began thinking about ways we could harness technology to deliver improved teacher professional development at a national scale.

Before we selected an approach for delivering technology-enabled teacher professional development, we decided to test some things to see what worked. Over a five-month period from November 2016 to March 2017, we piloted ELLN-Digital (ELLN-D) with 4,030 K-3 teachers in 240 public elementary schools that had not participated in the ELLN program. During this piloting phase, we collaborated with the local Filipino NGO, The Foundation for Information Technology, Education, and Development (FIT-ED). ELLN-D is a blended teacher professional development program on early literacy for K-3 teachers with two components: an interactive, multimedia courseware for self-study, and collaborative learning through SLACs. Due to the success of the pilot, DepEd is scaling up the program nationally (with support from FIT-ED) to more than 38,000 public elementary schools throughout the country during this coming school year. We accomplished this by planning for scale from the start: We prioritized a focus on teachers, then pursued digital solutions that could reach teachers across our island nation—experimenting at a small scale first to determine what works—and finally implemented the program through existing SLAC structures instead of creating new ones.

WHAT HAVE WE LEARNED ABOUT SCALING AND SUSTAINING IMPACT?

Analyzing education programs that sustainably scale offers rich insights for people like me who work in government and are trying to serve a massive population with limited resources. What common factors enable programs to scale? Who should programs serve? How can program implementers facilitate the success of programs?

First, programs that sustainably scale are relevant and responsive to the needs of the people they serve. Second, these programs should demonstrate some meaningful change that is visible to citizens. And third, to effectively scale a program, implementers should truly understand and commit to the program, believe in its success, and go above and beyond what is expected to achieve sustainable outcomes.

In the Philippines, the following approaches helped us to create, adapt, and scale programs with the aim of sustainable impact:

  • Identify learning champions at all levels: There is a need to identify and empower a pool of champions at multiple levels of the system—in the regions, divisions, communities, and schools. By doing so, these champions become agents of change. In the case of ELLN, regional directors play a critical role in implementing the program by liaising with school division superintendents and public school leaders.
  • Adapt programs to local context: Those implementing programs at larger scale or in new locations should be equipped to make the programs work in their areas by contextualizing approaches to suit local needs. This includes identifying and articulating the “non-negotiables” of the original design to ensure adherence to a set standard, but those implementing in new contexts should feel agency to adjust to fit local needs. Setting specific standards on program implementation through policy guidelines or memoranda can help maintain the appropriate level of consistency in implementation between different areas. On ELLN-D, we encourage slight variations in the structure and format of SLACs in ways that make sense for a given context.
  • Recognize that every idea is valuable: It is important to allow champions to implement the program with standardized guidance but recognize that adjustments and changes are not only inevitable but also beneficial. Have faith that even when the originating organization or institution is no longer around, others implementing can successfully deliver the programs and have sustained positive impact on the people they serve.

Thirty-four years working in government has provided me ample opportunity to stress-test these principles, which I believe are critically important to sustainably scaling programs. Through the implementation of ELLN, ELLN-D, and similar initiatives as part of the K-12 Basic Education Program, DepEd has fully committed to providing quality, accessible, and relevant basic education to all Filipino learners. The road ahead will not be an easy one, but through adherence to these key principles, scaling effective interventions that reach all Filipino learners will help our country continue down the path toward quality educational opportunities for all citizens.

Source of the article: https://www.brookings.edu/blog/education-plus-development/2019/08/01/scaling-education-programs-in-the-philippines-a-policymakers-perspective/

Comparte este contenido:

Kroton nabs Somos for up to $1.8 bln in Brazil education deal

Brazil/By: Gabriela Mello and Jake Spring. Reuters/Source http://www.dailymail.co.uk/

Brazil’s largest for-profit education firm, Kroton Educacional SA, resumed its buying spree with an acquisition of Somos Educação SA for up to 6.3 billion reais ($1.8 billion), making a bold move into educating children after antitrust regulators knocked down a major university merger.

The deal gives Kroton control of the only listed company focused on elementary and high school education and shows its merger appetite has not vanished since competition watchdog Cade blocked a deal with Estacio Participações SA in June.

Kroton said it had agreed to acquire a 73 percent stake in Somos from controlling shareholder Tarpon Investimentos SA for 4.6 billion reais and would offer to buy out minority shareholders and delist the company.

Kroton shares rose 5 percent, Tarpon jumped 29 percent and Somos soared 49 percent on the deal, which offered a rich premium to lock up an attractive asset in the education sector’s hottest new segment for dealmaking.

For-profit education groups, which have filled the gap left by Brazil’s poorly run public schools, have shifted their focus to early education this year after government-funded college loans went on the chopping block to curb public deficits.

The problem in the segment is the small size of targets, sometimes owning only one or two units, in a very fragmented sector. Kroton’s first acquisition in the pre-college segment was the purchase of Centro Educacional Leonardo Da Vinci earlier this month for an undisclosed value.

Chief Executive Rodrigo Galindo told analysts a third deal would soon be announced, plus Kroton was in advanced talks to strike a fourth deal in the segment.

The Somos deal will lift Kroton’s revenue by 30 percent, boosting elementary and high school education to 27 percent of its revenue, from 3 percent currently, Galindo said.

Kroton agreed to pay 23.75 reais per share, a 66 percent premium on Somos’ Friday closing price.

Galindo said Kroton will use debt to fund the Somos deal, and said the company’s net debt may reach two times its earnings before interest, taxes depreciation and amortization (EBITDA).

«Somos Educacao is a gem and we are confident we’ve taken the right step,» Galindo said.

In December, Galindo laid out an aggressive expansion plan including opening 180 undergraduate programs in 2018 as well as acquisitions in Brazil and abroad.

Galindo said there was little market overlap between its current education programs and the schools run by Somos, but he noted that the deal would give Kroton roughly a fifth of the market for learning systems, which antitrust authorities would need to evaluate.

Cade declined to comment.

For Brazilian buyout firm Tarpon, the sale of its education company is a welcome windfall, as a major investment in food processor BRF SA has suffered heavy losses and fraud allegations, stoking tensions among shareholders.

BRF shares are down 38 percent over the last 12 months. Tarpon shares had lost 37 percent in the same period, before Monday’s news.

($1 = 3.44 reais) (Additional reporting by Carolina Mandl, Leonardo Goy, Bruno Federowski and Tatiana Bautzer; Editing by Brad Haynes, Paul Simao, Scott Malone and Richard Chang)

Source:

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/reuters/article-5647363/Brazils-Kroton-buys-controlling-stake-rival-Somos-1-3-bln.html#ixzz5DZ1OM2r8

 

Comparte este contenido:

New Study: Less Expensive Competency-Based Education Programs Just As Good As Traditional Programs

Por: Forbes.com/Tom Lindsay/28-03-2018

College students and their parents find it increasingly difficult to cope with tuition hyperinflation and historically high student-loan debt. Over the last 30 years, the average tuition for a U.S. bachelor’s degree at a traditional four-year college increased more than 15 times faster than the average household income in the United States. Students who borrow graduate with an average of $27,000 in student loans. Student loan defaults slow economic growth by limiting access to credit, stifling entrepreneurship, and reducing long-term buying power.

In an effort to address this crisis, we at the Texas Public Policy Foundation commissioned Goldman Insights (Joseph Goldman, Phoebe Long, and Lillian Leone) to study of the possibilities of an alternative to traditional higher education—competency-based education (CBE). Under CBE, students earn their degrees by demonstrating their skills and knowledge in required subjects through a series of assessments. As with traditional education, they take tests and write papers; unlike traditional education, CBE degrees do not focus on “seat time” or credit hours. Rather, CBE degrees aim to certify that all its graduates are competent in their fields at or beyond a specific standard. Competency-based bachelor’s degree programs offer an alternative for nontraditional students who may not have the time or resources to complete a four-year program yet still desire a rigorous, meaningful education.

In order to develop a robust understanding of different fields within CBE, we analyzed graduates of three different competency-based programs in teaching, nursing, and organizational leadership.

What we found bodes well for students, especially those from lower-income backgrounds.

 The first paper published from the Competency-Based Education: Graduate Outcomes Study (CBE GO, I) is titled, “Career and Financial Outcomes of Graduates of Competency-based Higher Education Programs.” In it, we surveyed graduates from two leading competency-based courses of study, the Associate Degree in Nursing (ADN) from an anonymous university (Institution X) and the Bachelor of Arts degree from the Teachers College at Western Governors University (WGU). We measured the career and financial outcomes of these graduates with those from other comparable traditional nursing and teaching programs. In addition, we interviewed graduates of South Texas College’s (STC) CBE degree in Organizational Leadership to gauge their experiences and career outcomes.

The findings of the first part of our CBE study suggest that CBE degree programs such as the Associate Degree of Nursing at Institution X and the BA degree at WGU’s Teachers College may be financially more attainable for students from a lower socio-economic background, thus opening the door for more Americans to pursue registered nurse (RN) and teaching credentials.

With regard to the CBE program in nursing (Associate Degree of Nursing), Institution X graduates were assessed using a modified version of the Work Readiness Scale, developed by Arlene Walker of Deakin University. They were also asked grit-related questions developed by Dr. Angela Duckworth as a part of her Short Grit Scale. Institution X graduates scored significantly higher in all areas, including social intelligence, organizational acumen, work competence, personal management, grit, and work readiness overall. Non-Institution X graduates surveyed who borrowed money accumulated 2.3 times more debt during their nursing education than Institution X graduates.

Interestingly, although fewer graduates from Institution X received financial assistance toward their tuition, more graduated debt-free than non-Institution X graduates.

*Fuente: https://www.forbes.com/sites/tomlindsay/2018/03/27/new-study-less-expensive-competency-based-education-programs-just-as-good-as-traditional-programs/#50a8c557674d

Comparte este contenido: