Africa: UNESCO Calls On Governments to Make Higher Education Equitable, Affordable

África/Abril de 2017/Autor: James Karuanga/Fuente: All Africa

Resumen: Dice un nuevo informe que conseguir y garantizar la equidad y la asequibilidad en los marcos regulatorios son dos de las formas que los responsables políticos deben considerar para hacer que la educación superior sea equitativa y asequible para todos. El nuevo Informe de Seguimiento de la Educación Global, publicado por la UNESCO, también recomienda que los gobiernos establezcan agencias nacionales para asegurar la igualdad de oportunidades; Y varían los criterios de admisión para responder a las necesidades de diferentes individuos. «Al crear y transmitir conocimientos vitales, habilidades y valores fundamentales, la educación superior es una piedra angular para alcanzar los Objetivos de Desarrollo Sostenible», dijo Irina Bokova, Directora General de la UNESCO. «La demanda de educación superior va a seguir aumentando y los gobiernos deben responder introduciendo una serie de nuevas políticas que aseguren que la expansión no deje atrás a los marginados y que el acceso se base en el mérito y no en el privilegio».

Ensuring those who need help the most are getting it and guaranteeing equity and affordability in regulatory frameworks are two of the ways policy makers need to consider in order to make higher education equitable and affordable for all, says a new report.

The new Global Education Monitoring Report, released by UNESCO, also recommends that governments establish national agencies to ensure equal opportunities; and vary admissions criteria to respond to different individuals’ needs.

«By creating and transmitting vital knowledge, skills and core values, higher education is a cornerstone for achieving the Sustainable Development Goals,» said Irina Bokova, Director-General of UNESCO.

«Demand for higher education is going to continue rising. Governments must respond by introducing a range of new policies that will ensure the expansion doesn’t leave the marginalised behind, and that access is based on merit, not privilege.»

Governments have also been urged to limit student loan repayments by combining low tuition and fees with income-based loans to cap student repayment burdens at less than 15 percent of monthly income as anything more threatens to leave the disadvantaged behind.

The UNESCO paper released countries are struggling to keep pace with rapidly rising demand and large disparities in access, with a large cost of higher education often falling to families, many of whom cannot afford it.

And it shows that the number of university level students doubled to 207 million between 2000 and 2014.

Analysing global trends, it outlines, Six ways to ensure higher education leaves no one behind, addings that the fast expansion of higher education is mostly happening in countries with an expanding middle class.

«Access to higher education has expanded most rapidly in wealthier countries: Only eight percent of young adults are enrolled on average in the poorest countries, compared to 74 percent in the richest countries. The greatest gender disparities are found among the poorest countries as well. Women made up only 30 percent of bachelor students in low-income countries in 2014.»

«In certain countries with deeply rooted social inequities, affirmative action through quota or bonus systems may be necessary to expand access to underrepresented groups, even if these mechanisms are controversial,» says Suzanne Grant Lewis, director of the International Institute for Educational Planning (IIEP), the UN’s only specialised organisation with the mandate to support educational policy, planning and management.

The paper draws on a range of examples to show how different countries are expanding and diversifying higher education offerings to achieve greater equity.

It is noted that loan boards and education trust funds in Kenya, Ghana, South Africa, and Tanzania addressed «some of these administrative challenges by instructing employers to deduct repayment from wages.»

Though not cited in the report, in Rwanda, the Development Bank of Rwanda (BRD) last year requested all people who benefited from the student loans scheme from 1980 to comply with the 2015 law governing the student loans and bursaries.

«The last thing we want is for higher education to be the ball and chain around students’ ankles,» said Aaron Benavot, Director of the GEM Report.

«Coping with dramatic student expansion is not easy, but there are policy solutions governments can put into place to stop the bill falling to households.»

Insufficient funds are reportedly a key reason for the fact that some disadvantaged groups are being left behind.

Governments simply can’t afford to pay for the growing number of students, and this is leaving households footing the bill, it adds, and this issue will become even more salient in the future with demand for higher education rising and enrollments growing.

UNESCO says governments have an array of policy tools – which work hand in hand – to foster equity and help families afford not just tuition fees, but all the other costs of attending higher education like books, housing and transportation.

Fuente: http://allafrica.com/stories/201704210054.html

Comparte este contenido:

Reino Unido: Can British universities make the most of May’s new industrial strategy?

Europa/ Reino Unido/Enero 2017/Noticias/https://theconversation.com/

The UK government has given universities something to sink their teeth into. Prime Minister Theresa May’s plan for a national industrial strategy offers the higher education sector an excellent opportunity to bring precision to the project, and to emphasise its role in a 21st century knowledge economy.

This industrial strategy is positive. It recognises that the UK must become more innovative and build on its world-leading science base; that it must develop its skills-base; that it must create the right institutions to bring together sectors and places; and that it must cultivate its world-leading sectors.

It is worth remembering that all of these things are universities’ core business. And the consultation that will now help shape the policy should be a moment to make that point vigorously. Universities must argue that it makes little sense to create new institutions for innovation, and to bring entrepreneurs and innovators together, when in most cities, and all regions, universities already do some of this.

Certainly, there is room for our academic institutions to do more – for a start, leadership teams should listen to local and regional businesses about what else is needed. But the best place for innovation is where people with different skills come together. If universities build on their existing relationships with employers, skills organisations and further education colleges, then they could form a network of ideal hubs.

At the heart of things? Thomas Hawk/Flickr, CC BY-NC

Taking the lead

The government seems to draw a sharp distinction between academic and technical education. This distinction is not one we should allow to gain currency and it is becoming increasingly irrelevant anyway. Some of the most august institutions have always taught “technical” subjects like engineering and medicine and engaged in partnerships with business and industry.

Evidence suggests that one of the best routes to long-term increases in productivity is through more highly-skilled graduates. The problems the UK faces, then, are two-fold. First, it must develop more flexible routes to university so that more people can access the opportunities on offer at appropriate stages of their lives. Second, universities must offer the right courses to develop the skills employers need and deliver those courses in more accessible ways. Take the example of Degree Apprenticeships, designed to develop the skills of those who want to combine work and study. You will start to see more of these in the next academic year.

There are other ways that universities are already addressing other aspects of this. Portsmouth’s University Technical College is focused on engineering and is run in partnership with the Royal Navy, Portsmouth City Council, and the defence firms BAE Systems and QinetiQ. And there are plenty of other University Technical College’s around the country doing similar work.

Getting serious about teaching engineering. NASA HQ PHOTO/Flickr, CC BY-NC-ND

Changes to higher education – in particular the removal of student number controls – are also causing universities to reform their offer to students. Creativity is vital to economic success in a knowledge economy and for this students must learn to become comfortable collaborating with others on subjects outside their academic specialism. One key element will be more diverse options, so English literature students can take courses in computer programming and engineers can study philosophy. Narrow over-specialisation is one of the curses of England’s education system and it risks re-inforcing this if it focuses only on STEM subjects and technical education as do the industrial strategy proposals.

The goal for universities must be to offer more routes to higher education to people who currently do not go to university and improve the all-round education of those who do, all the while improving partnerships with employers. Not only are universities capable of doing this but utilising their expertise will be more cost-effective. The sector would certainly be able to deliver improvements sooner than the government’s plan to spend £170m to create new and untried “Institutes of Technology”.

Seeking promotion

Universities also need to convince the government to join the dots between an industrial strategy and its higher education policies. The government wants the UK to be better at commercialising its world-class, basic research. But the next assessment of universities’ research will require them to include all academic staff, rather then being able to exclude some people as they have previously. That will have the effect of making universities re-balance their staff’s priorities so that there is more focus only on peer-reviewed research and less on outward-facing activities like business collaborations.

May has effectively issued a challenge to universities. EPA/WILL OLIVER

The plan for the Prime Minister’s industrial strategy talks about “cultivating” certain sectors: life sciences, low carbon vehicles and others. Universities are themselves a world-leading export sector which will play a huge role in delivering Theresa May’s strategy.

However, talk of “cultivating” the competitive advantage of UK universities is notably absent in the government’s rhetoric around the Higher Education and Research Bill. If universities are to compete globally, they need the right support to strengthen their brand. Implied threats on international student numbers, for instance, do nothing but help their competitors.

None of this should hide the challenges that Britain’s new industrial strategy presents to the university sector. It does need to do more to equip its students with the right skills, to open its doors wider to all who can benefit from a university education, and to close the gap between its rhetoric and the reality about its role in local and regional economies. It now has an opportunity to show that it can and will do this.

Fuente:

https://theconversation.com/can-british-universities-make-the-most-of-mays-new-industrial-strategy-71829

Fuente imagen:

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/KKWTXNmHfm-ZszfaTX57K3caVVsYC5UElaZNaQXi1VOY2Fl4_DZPGlV6842-vKewDCv2=s85

Comparte este contenido: