Australia: More than 150 private schools over-funded by hundreds of millions of dollars each year

Oceanía/Australia/Octubre de 2016/Autores: Matthew Knott and Fergus Hunter/ Fuente: The Sidney Morning Herald

RESUMEN: Más de 150 escuelas privadas están siendo financiados por más de cientos de millones de dólares de los contribuyentes cada año, a expensas de otros estudiantes necesitados, de acuerdo con un nuevo análisis que detalla las distorsiones y desigualdades en el sistema de financiación de las escuelas de Australia. El análisis por Fairfax Media revela algunas escuelas ricas están sobre-financiados por $ 7 millones al año, mientras que muchas escuelas en los sectores público y privado siguen siendo significativamente con fondos insuficientes. Los gobiernos federales y estatales tendrían más de $ 215 millones adicionales al año para distribuir a escuelas necesitadas si dejaran de financiar los demás por encima de lo que se tienen derecho bajo la fórmula Gonski, el análisis muestra. Escuelas considerarán financiados por el gobierno federal recibirá más de $ 1 mil millones al año en fondos de los contribuyentes.

More than 150 private schools are being over-funded by hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars each year at the expense of other needy students, according to a new analysis that details the distortions and inequities in Australia’s school funding system.

The analysis by Fairfax Media reveals some wealthy schools are over-funded by $7 million a year while many schools in both the public and private sectors remain significantly underfunded.

Federal and state governments would have more than $215 million extra a year to distribute to needy schools if they stopped funding others above what they are are entitled to under the Gonski formula, the analysis shows. Schools deemed to be over-funded by the federal government receive more than $1 billion a year in taxpayer funding.

Education Minister Simon Birmingham this week sparked a national debate by saying some schools are over-funded and may need to have their funding reduced from 2018. It would take more than 100 years for some over-funded schools to return to their appropriate funding under the current model, he said.

Fairfax Media’s analysis, based on available data from the My School website and the Department of Education, shows the over-funding of schools is particularly acute in NSW.

Private schools in NSW received a combined $129 million above their notional entitlement in 2014.

These include elite girls school Loreto Kirribilli, which received $7.3 million in government funding – 283 per cent of its entitlement.

Peter Goss, school education program director at the Grattan Institute, said: «There is no public policy justification for over-funded schools such as these to continue receiving increasing funding each year.

«At a minimum they should not receive any funding increases.»

Mr Goss said removing generous indexation rates for over-funded schools would not fix the school funding system alone but would free up funds to distribute to needy schools in both the public and private sectors.

More than 150 private schools across Australia received funding above their Schooling Resource Standard in 2014, according to the Department of Education.

The Schooling Resource Standard (SRS) measures how much taxpayer funding each school is entitled to based on a formula including special loadings for disadvantage.

By combining this data with school finance information on the My School website, Fairfax Media calculated the funding entitlement and over-spend for all the nation’s over-funded private schools.

The analysis shows Daramalan College in Canberra, which received $14 million in government funding in 2014, is the most over-funded school in the country in dollar terms.

The school received 198 per cent of its SRS entitlement, meaning it should only have received $7 million a year in funding according to the Gonski formula.

It was closely followed by Oakhill College, an independent Catholic school that sits on an expansive 18 hectare site in Sydney’s Castle Hill.

As well as an indoor swimming pool and gym, the school’s website says it has a recording studio, photography lab and a farm complete with livestock.

Oakhill College received $15.7 million in taxpayer funding in 2014, which is $6.8 million more than its funding entitlement.

Melbourne Grammar School, which charges fees of up to $32,520, was the most over-funded school in Victoria in dollar terms. It received $7.3 million in government funding, more than the $5.1 million it was entitled to.

Meanwhile, some private schools such as the Rossbourne School in Hawthorn, which specialises in educating students with intellectual disabilities, received only 67 per cent of its funding entitlement. Herrick Presbyterian Covenant School in Tasmania received just 41 per cent of its entitlement.

FULL LIST: OVER-FUNDED PRIVATE SCHOOLS ACROSS AUSTRALIA

The department did not break down funding entitlements for individual public or Catholic system schools. It stated NSW public schools are funded at at 86 per cent of their entitlements overall and Victorian public schools at 83 per cent. ACT public schools received 114 per cent of their SRS, making them over-funded overall, while WA schools received 99.7 per cent.

Sixty-five per cent of private schools in NSW and Victoria are underfunded, according to the department.

Senator Birmingham said the government remains committed to providing funding support to all students, regardless of which school they attend.

«The Turnbull government is determined to right the corruption of the Gonski report with a new, simpler distribution model where special deals don’t distort a fair distribution of federal funds,» he said.

Colette Colman, executive director of the Independent Schools Council of Australia, this week said private schools should not be treated as an «easy target» for cuts.

Targeting over-funded private schools would only reduce the federal government’s spending on schools by 0.5 per cent, she said.

The federal government currently pays $6.4 billion a year to public schools and $10.7 billion to non-government schools, with most funding for public schools coming from the states.

For the purpose of the analysis, Fairfax Media excluded special needs schools and some large, well-resourced school networks – such as Brisbane’s Anglican diocese – for which a clear funding breakdown was unavailable.

Fuente: http://www.smh.com.au/federal-politics/political-news/full-list-1-billion-flowing-to-wealthy-private-schools-officially-classed-as-overfunded-20160930-grs6nz.html

Comparte este contenido:

Estados Unidos: From the CIA to the GFE

América del Norte/Estados Unidos/Septiembre de 2016/Fuente: Project Syndicate.org

RESUMEN: Los Estados Unidos tiene que cambiar su gasto de la guerra en la educación, a partir de un cambio de régimen apoyado por la CIA a un nuevo Fondo Mundial para la Educación (GFE). Con cientos de millones de niños en todo el mundo, no en la escuela, o en escuelas con profesores sin titulación, la falta de computadoras, clases numerosas, ni electricidad, muchas partes del mundo están encabezados por la inestabilidad masiva, el desempleo y la pobreza. El desequilibrio actual en los Estados Unidos, el gasto en la educación global y los programas relacionados con militares-es asombrosa: $ 1 mil millones por año en el primero, y más o menos $ 900 millones de dólares en este último. programas relacionados con los militares incluyen el Pentágono (alrededor de $ 600 millones de dólares), la CIA y organismos afines (alrededor de $ 60 mil millones), Seguridad Nacional (alrededor de $ 50 mil millones), los sistemas de armas nucleares fuera del Pentágono (alrededor de $ 30 mil millones), y los programas de veteranos ( alrededor de $ 160 mil millones). Por supuesto, los EE.UU. no está solo. Arabia Saudita, Irán, e Israel están desperdiciando grandes sumas de dinero en una carrera de armamentos, en el que los EE.UU. es el principal proveedor financiero y brazos. China y Rusia también están aumentando drásticamente el gasto militar, a pesar de sus prioridades nacionales urgentes. Estamos, al parecer, cortejando a una nueva carrera de armamentos entre las grandes potencias, en un momento en lo que realmente se necesita es una raza pacífica, educación y  desarrollo sostenible.

The United States needs to shift its spending from war to education, from CIA-backed regime change to a new Global Fund for Education (GFE). With hundreds of millions of children around the world not in school, or in schools with under-qualified teachers, a lack of computers, large class sizes, and no electricity, many parts of the world are headed for massive instability, joblessness, and poverty. The twenty-first century will belong to countries that properly educate their young people to participate productively in the global economy.

The current imbalance in US spending on global education and military-related programs is staggering: $1 billion per year on the former, and roughly $900 billion on the latter. Military-related programs include the Pentagon (around $600 billion), the CIA and related agencies (around $60 billion), Homeland Security (around $50 billion), nuclear weapons systems outside of the Pentagon (around $30 billion), and veterans’ programs (around $160 billion).

What US politicians and policymakers in their right minds could believe that US national security is properly pursued through a 900-to-1 ratio of military spending to global education spending? Of course, the US is not alone. Saudi Arabia, Iran, and Israel are all squandering vast sums in an accelerating Middle East arms race, in which the US is the major financier and arms supplier. China and Russia are also sharply boosting military spending, despite their pressing domestic priorities. We are, it seems, courting a new arms race among major powers, at a time when what is really needed is a peaceful race to education and sustainable development.

Several recent international reports, including two this month by UNESCO and the International Commission on Financing Global Education, headed by former UK Prime Minister Gordon Brown, show that annual global development assistance for primary and secondary education needs to rise from around $4 billion to around $40 billion. Only this ten-fold increase can enable poor countries to achieve universal primary and secondary education (as called for by Goal Four of the new Sustainable Development Goals). In response, the US and other rich countries should move this year to create the GFE, with the needed funds shifted from today’s military spending.

If Hillary Clinton, the likely next US president, genuinely believes in peace and sustainable development, she should announce her intention to back the GFE’s creation, just as President George W. Bush in 2001 was the first head of state to endorse the newly proposed Global Fund to Fight AIDS, TB, and Malaria. She should call on China and others to join this multilateral effort. The alternative – to continue spending massively on defense rather than on global education – would condemn the US to the status of a declining imperial state tragically addicted to hundreds of overseas military bases, tens of billions of dollars in annual arms sales, and perpetual wars.

Without a GFE, poor countries will lack the resources to educate their kids, just as they were unable to finance the fight against AIDS, TB, and malaria until the Global Fund was established.

Here’s the basic budgetary challenge: it costs at least $250 in a poor country to educate a child for a year, but low-income countries can afford, on average, only around $90 per child per year. There is a gap of $160 per child for around 240 million school-aged kids in need, or about $40 billion per year.

The consequences of underfunded education are tragic. Kids leave school early, often without being able to read or write at a basic level. These dropouts often sign up with gangs, drug traffickers, even jihadists. Girls marry and begin to have children very young. Fertility rates stay high and the children of these poor, under-educated mothers (and fathers) have few realistic prospects of escaping poverty.

The cost of failing to create decent jobs through decent schooling is political instability, mass migration to the US (from Central America and the Caribbean) and Europe (from the Middle East and Africa), and violence related to poverty, drugs, human trafficking, and ethnic conflict. Soon enough, the US drones arrive to exacerbate the underlying instability.

In short, we need to shift from the CIA to the GFE, from the expensive failures of US-led regime change (including those targeting Afghanistan’s Taliban, Iraq’s Saddam Hussein, Libya’s Muammar el-Qaddafi, and Syria’s Bashar al-Assad) to investments in health, education, and decent jobs.

Some critics of aid argue that funds for education will simply be wasted. Yet the critics said exactly the same about disease control in 2000 when I proposed a scale-up of funding for public health. Sixteen years later, the results are in: disease burdens have fallen sharply, and the Global Fund proved to be a great success (the donors now think so, too, and have recently replenished its accounts).

To establish a successful counterpart for education, first the US and other countries would pool their assistance into a single new fund. The fund would then invite low-income countries to submit proposals for support. A technical and non-political review panel would assess the proposals and recommend those that should be funded. Approved proposals would then receive support, with the GFE monitoring and evaluating implementation, enabling well-performing governments to build track records and reputations for sound management.

Since 2000, the US and other countries have squandered trillions of dollars on wars and arms purchases. The time has come for a sensible, humane, and professional new approach that would scale up investment in education while scaling back expenditures on wars, coups, and weaponry. The education of the world’s youth offers the surest path – indeed, the only path – to global sustainable development.

Fuente: https://www.project-syndicate.org/commentary/establish-global-education-fund-by-jeffrey-d-sachs-2016-09

Imagen: http://protestantedigital.com/cultural/34004/libros_vs_canones

Comparte este contenido:

Nueva Zelanda: Tertiary staff face immense pressure – survey

Oceania/Nueva Zelanda/24 de Julio de 2016/Autor: Mani Dunlop/Fuente: RNZ

Resumen: Un estudio sobre la educación terciaria dice que más de 1000 personas muestran los niveles de estrés del personal de las universidades y politecnicos, afirmando que ahora son mucho más altos que hace 10 años. Sandra Grey, presidente nacional   dijo que muchos de los encuestados, de 25 instituciones, dijeron que sintieron que no tenían la seguridad laboral y no estaban siendo escuchadas por su empleador. «La encuesta muestra un sistema bajo presión absoluta», dijo. Esto significa que están muy preocupados por la calidad de la enseñanza y los servicios de aprendizaje y de apoyo en el campus porque el personal estresado realmente se esfuerzan por proporcionar una educación de calidad hacer bien su trabajo «. El sindicato recibió 2334 respuestas escritas a partir de 1006 entrevistados para la encuesta y el Dr. Gris dijo que contaron la historia real de lo que estaba ocurriendo en el sector.

A survey suggests budget cuts and restructuring in the tertiary sector is causing increased stress levels for staff who say they are under immense pressure.

The Tertiary Education Union says its own survey of more than 1000 people shows stress levels of staff at universities, polytechnics and wānanga are much higher than 10 years ago.

National president Sandra Grey said a lot of the respondents, from 25 institutions, said they felt they had no job security and were not being listened to by their employer.

«The survey shows a system under absolute pressure,» she said.

«Even since 2013, what we are are seeing are increasing stress levels for staff in the system and in turn this means they are really worried about the quality of teaching and learning and support services on campus because stressed staff really struggle to provide good quality education to do their jobs well.»

The union received 2334 written responses from 1006 respondents for the survey and Dr Grey said they told the real story of what was going on in the sector.

«We had one talking about student support services being cut because of budgets.

«They had a suicidal student and when they went to student support they said ‘come back tomorrow, we don’t have anyone here who can help you because we don’t have the staff.’,» Dr Grey said.

«You can’t do that when it comes to suicidal students. We have got real on-the-ground harm being done in our institutions by underfunding.»

She said one of the contributing factors was the growing student-to-staff ratio and despite drops in enrolments in recent years, there were still fewer staff compared to students.

«Tertiary institutions are cutting staff numbers because they need to make savings, they just don’t have the money. The government is underfunding the sector by more than a million dollars, and that means institutions need to make savings and the savings are in staff.»

Fuente: http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/309292/tertiary-staff-face-immense-pressure-survey

 

Comparte este contenido: