Australia: Students stick to attendance guidelines as schools welcome kids back

Oceania/ Australia/ 12.05.2020/ Source: www.smh.com.au.

Balloons and confetti greeted year 3 students as they entered their classroom at Emu Plains Public School on Monday, enthusiastic to return to school grounds after five weeks of learning from home.

But it wasn’t the usual set-up: desks were arranged to allow for 1.5 metres between students, and teacher Kylie Hamersma supervised rather than taught lessons while students completed independent learning activities.

Most parents and students abided by the state government’s guidelines on the first day of its phased return to school plan, where 25 per cent of students attend school each day and complete one mode of remote learning.

Twenty-six per cent of secondary school students and 39 per cent of primary school students worked from inside school gates on Monday, which included students who were rostered to attend school as well as children of essential workers.

An average of 37 per cent of all public school students were on campus, which is more than the 15 to 17 per cent who showed up last week but far from the influx of students some principals were concerned would show up.

NSW Education Minister Sarah Mitchell on Monday said the Department of Education’s 2200 schools had been supplied with 550,000 hygiene products to prepare them for the return of students, including 20,000 rolls of toilet paper, 20,000 bars of soap and 40,000 bottles of hand sanitiser.

«The list is extensive and those supplies will continue to be rolled out across our school communities throughout this term,» she said. «Parents should have that reassurance knowing our schools are safe spaces, and we have prepared well for our students to go back to the classroom.»

Teacher Kylie Hamersma with her Year 3 students in their classroom at Emu Plains Public School.
Teacher Kylie Hamersma with her Year 3 students in their classroom at Emu Plains Public School.CREDIT:LOUISE KENNERLEY

NSW independent schools have crafted their own plans for the return of students to face-to-face teaching, with many reporting high attendance rates on Monday.

About 95 per cent of students who were rostered to attend Cranbrook School showed up, and 90 per cent of those scheduled for face-to-face learning at Trinity Grammar School went along.

«Numbers were at the upper end of our expectations, with almost all who were eligible to return to face-to-face [classes] attending, and more sent to school for remote learning supervision than before,» Trinity headmaster Tim Bowden said.

Only seven students were absent from Pymble Ladies College’s year 3 cohort, which was invited back on Monday, while the majority of rostered students attended MLC.

Meriden in Strathfield saw 99 per cent of year 12 and 95 per cent of year 7 back, with most of the senior school otherwise staying home. But about a quarter of the primary school students came to school, even though they were not rostered to attend.

North-west Sydney school Barker College, which invited all students back full-time from Monday after an extended school holiday, registered about a 90 per cent return rate.

Premier Gladys Berejiklian on Monday repeated her hope to have all school students back in public schools full-time by May 25 if the next two weeks progressed smoothly.

But she warned parents they should be prepared for schools to temporarily close due to new cases of coronavirus, as the state eases lockdown restrictions.

«That will be the new normal when it comes to education,» she said. «Your schools might be temporarily disrupted, but as far as the education system is concerned, we’d like to think that now that schools are back they will stay back for the duration of the pandemic.»

Source of the notice: https://www.smh.com.au/national/nsw/students-stick-to-attendance-guidelines-as-schools-welcome-kids-back-20200511-p54rra.html

Comparte este contenido:

Australia’s back-to-school plans explained: the evidence about children and coronavirus

Oceania/ Australia/ 05.05.2020/ Source: www.theguardian.com.

The federal and Victorian governments are in disagreement over whether it is safe for students and teachers to return to school, as a number of other states prepare for their students to come back to class.

While New South Wales and Queensland are planning a phased return to on-site schooling, Victoria is holding steadfast against bringing students, other than those from essential workers, back into the classroom.

The matter blew up on Sunday when federal education minister Dan Tehan was forced to withdraw comments he made on the ABC questioning Victorian premier Daniel Andrews’ leadership over the split on the issue, stating Andrews should be listening to the national health panel, not just his chief health officer.

What is the federal advice?

The advice from the Australian Health Protection Principal Committee, on which the Victorian chief health officer also sits, says there is “very limited evidence” of transmission between children in a school environment.

On Sunday, chief medical officer Brendan Murphy pointed to research about school transmissions of coronavirus both locally in NSW and in Europe.

“Our advice is transmission between children in schools is not well established,” he said. “And in fact there is increasing data now, data from Europe and the NSW study, we think children are not high transmitters of the virus in the school environment.”

He said there is a potential risk for adults in the staffroom, and at drop-offs, and a range of mitigations have been recommended to reduce the risk.

Australia’s chief medical officer Brendan Murphy (left) with the prime minister Scott Morrison.
Pinterest
 Australia’s chief medical officer Brendan Murphy (left) with the prime minister Scott Morrison. Photograph: Lukas Coch/AAP

What does the NSW study say?

The NSW study, released last month, assessed the initial 18 cases between March and April of teachers and students testing positive for coronavirus.

The study looked at 735 students and 128 staff who were close contacts of the 18 cases. No teacher or staff member contracted coronvirus from those cases, and one child from a primary school and one child from a classroom may have contracted coronavirus from one of the initial 18 cases.

“The findings from this detailed investigation are preliminary. However, they do suggest that spread of Covid-19 within NSW schools has been very limited.”

What do international studies say?

Murphy admits that studies have been limited, but has pointed specifically to studies out of Europe to support the AHPPC position.

study out of the Netherlands reported children are less likely to get infected from the virus from adults, and adults are much less likely to pass it on to children, except in a home environment.

UK study of a child who returned from the French Alps with coronavirus, and subsequently went to three schools while asymptomatic and did not transmit the virus argued it could lend evidence to the notion the transmission rate for children might be different to adults.

An analysis of over 100 studies that have been done on coronavirus transmission stated there is limited evidence of children transmitting the virus, but more data is needed.

“The role of children in transmission is unclear, but consistent evidence is demonstrating a lower likelihood of acquiring infection, and lower rates of children bringing infections into households,” the analysis states.

However, German research released last month suggested children can be as infectious as adults.

Why does Victoria disagree with the federal government’s position?

Victoria’s chief health officer Brett Sutton
Pinterest
 Victoria’s chief health officer Brett Sutton says children at school with minimal symptoms could end up contributing to community transmission. Photograph: James Ross/AAP

Victoria’s chief health officer Brett Sutton has said he doesn’t disagree that infection rates among children are lower, but he viewed keeping schools closed as a measure to lower overall community transmission, particularly for teachers, staff and parents.

“I know there haven’t been significant outbreaks in schools … but again it may be that kids who are very minimally symptomatic could transmit to other children, and it can be a contribution to community transmission,” he said.

“I’ve also been very clear that I don’t see schools as a dangerous place to be, but to the extent that kids learning from home can contribute to suppressing transmission at a community level, I think that’s a useful thing to consider.”

Andrews has said his decision on schools will be based on Sutton’s advice and Sutton has refused to reconsider his advice on sending children back to school until the state of emergency is reviewed on 11 May.

There have been indications that students in Victoria could stay learning from home for the entirety of term two.

Source of the notice: https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2020/may/05/australias-back-to-school-plans-expose-schism-around-children-and-coronavirus

Comparte este contenido: