Saltar al contenido principal
Page 2580 of 6195
1 2.578 2.579 2.580 2.581 2.582 6.195

South Africa’s apartheid schools

By Inside_Education/23-05-2018

Francois Cleophas

South Africa’s history of segregation has left its footprints in many places. Take the case of semi-rural Franschoek in the country’s Western Cape province. In one part of the town, which draws tourists from around the world to enjoy award winning wine and food, is a private school that boasts excellent sports facilities.

There’s an indoor sports gymnasium where tennis, hockey, netball and soccer are played. There are two swimming pools – one for beginners who are just learning and one for water polo and senior swimming. Elsewhere on the school campus are six tennis courts and two cricket ovals with turf wickets. New sports fields, including two more cricket ovals, are being developed.

A few kilometres up the road is a public school that caters for pupils from an informal settlement. It has no sporting facilities.

This scenario is repeated across South Africa; a modern echo of the country’s history of racial segregation. Patterns of neglect, established in the 19th century when formal schooling was introduced in South Africa, persist.

An understanding of and reckoning with segregation history is important in coming to grips with the current state of poor school sport provision in black and coloured communities. South Africa will not address the great inequalities that still exist in school sport if it keeps ignoring history.

The mission years

Formal schooling was introduced in South Africa during the 19th century. Black pupils were largely educated at mission schools run by a wide range of denominations.

Most mission schools had no decent sporting facilities. They practiced and played sport separately from white organisations and schools. For instance, when the Western Province Rugby Football Union created the Junior Challenge Shield League in 1898, the competition was open only to learners of “European extraction” – that is, white.

This exclusion stretched across sporting disciplines. When the Good Hope Education Department organised the Physical Training Coronation Competition in 1902 at the Green Point Track, a separate division was organised for “coloured” or mission schools. The winner of the 1902 Coronation competition in the Mission School division was the St Cyprian’s School in Ndabeni Location.

This location, as living areas for black Africans were called, was established for families who were forcibly removed from District Six in Cape Town in 1901. The school was a zinc structure with no playing facilities.

In 1928 mission schools set up the Central School Sport Union. Its first athletic meeting was held at the Mowbray sports ground, the home ground of the City and Suburban Rugby Union. Newspapers from the time, which I’ve studied, reported that the grass was knee high. This situation existed by design: the South African Institute of Race Relations reported regularly on how much more money was spent to provide sporting facilities for white schools.

At a national level, the first inter-varsity athletic meeting was held in 1921 at the Wanderers Club in Johannesburg between the Transvaal University College (later Pretoria University), Grey University College (later Free State University) and the Johannesburg University College. These were all white colleges in the northern parts of the country. When institutions from southern regions were included the following year, black colleges were excluded.

These black colleges established the Ciskei Bantu Amateur Athletic Association in the Eastern Cape under the auspices of the South African Bantu Amateur Athletic Association.

Apartheid school sport

Then came formal apartheid, and the situation worsened.

During the 1950s and the decades that followed, the education department wouldn’t provide black and coloured schools with decent facilities like rugby fields or athletics tracks. This was because, according to the influx control laws, Africans could not obtain permanent residence in cities. Why, apartheid authorities reasoned, spend money on people who legally weren’t allowed in certain areas?

The colleges playing in the Ciskei Bantu Amateur Athletic Association, meanwhile, received no support for sporting facilities while the nearby prestigious St Andrew’s College and Rhodes University benefited from excellent fields and tracks.

Apartheid legislation closed the Mowbray sports ground, leaving the Central School Sports Union without a place to play. A whites only school was built on the facility. The sporting past of this lost facility is largely unknown; no commemoration plaque, for instance, exists to mark its history. Another example of history forgotten and heritage ignored.

Few shifts after democracy

With the arrival of democracy in 1994 some organisations dedicated to championing non-racial school sport, like the Western Province Senior Schools’ Sports Union, closed their doors. But while desegregation in school sports was introduced in theory, the reality was rather different.

Many historically white schools appear reluctant to compete with township schools in mass competitions. They continue to hold closed inter-school derbies and athletic meetings catering for other similarly resourced schools on their well maintained sport fields.

But ironically, former whites-only schools have realised the potential of black and coloured pupils to shine on the sports field. A cursory overview of the senior national rugby and cricket teams in 2018 shows that more than 90% of black and coloured players attended historically white schools. Such players were often “poached” from township schools with scholarships and bursaries.

This “poaching” has benefited individual players but it’s happened at the expense of township schools.

Addressing history

The colonial and apartheid education project still echoes in South Africa’s post-1994 school system. For real change to start happening, it’s important for administrators, school authorities, parents and pupils to look to and understand the imbalances of history – and start working to set them right.

Read original article here

Comparte este contenido:

EEUU: Students inspire hope for bright future

By Brandon Butler/ duboiscountyherald.com/ 23-05-2018

My first semester as an adjunct instructor ended last week. I taught a class I created called Communications in Natural Resources. It was an experience I’ll treasure forever. Over the course of 15 weeks, I came to realize if my students are a reflection of their generation, the future of our natural world is good hands.

I spend a lot of time talking and writing about topics relating to the outdoors, specifically fish and wildlife. Most of the time, I am not an expert on the subject. While I may know a little about a lot of things, it’s people who know a lot about one thing who communicators like me use as sources for stories. Unfortunately, too often, the expert sources are poor communicators. They possess incredible knowledge. Yet struggle to deliver what they know to the general public in a way that makes it relevant to the masses.

As a member of a Natural Resources Advisory Council, I have come to know and respect some of the challenges of higher education leadership. During a meeting last year, I was asked if I saw any opportunity to improve the curriculum. I suggested we do a better job of teaching these brilliant young minds how to tell their stories. I was empowered to create a curriculum and teach it.

To begin with, I examined beliefs I feel justified the need for this class. Number one being; no matter what your job is, communication is important. And the more prepared you are to offer input on the efforts of your work the more likely you are to build support for what it is you do and care about. Also, as far as personal advancement, if you become known as someone who can both complete the work and communicate the outcomes, you are much more valuable to the business, agency or organization you’re part of. Who would remember the revolutionary work of Aldo Leopold had he not written a “Sand County Almanac?”

I broke the course down into lessons about different communication platforms and had guest lecturers discuss their expertise. We covered magazine writing, letters to the editor and opinion pieces in newspapers, television and radio interviews, social media, websites, photography, public speaking and more.

Communication is critical in conservation, and not all citizens gather information in the same ways. Agencies have to communicate across the many different platforms from which the public consumes information. Through out the semester, guest speakers emphasized the importance of communications in all natural resource professions, the students listened and learned.

One great guest lecturer was my buddy Nathan McLeod who hosts a morning radio show. McLeod talked about how much he values natural resources and enjoys sharing messages of conservation with his listeners, but finds guests often struggle with the rapid fire pace of a radio interview. He wants guests on his show to talk conservation, but needs them to be fun and personable, and to talk in a way most people can relate to.

“Leave the rocket science at home,” McLeod said. “Give them the elevator speech. Quickly explain to listeners why this important and why they should care. Tell them how it impacts them personally.”

At the end of the class, students were paired into four groups with the assignment of building and implementing a communications plan around a natural resources topic of concern. The four topics they selected and worked on were: Open New State Parks, Reintroductions of Wildlife Species, Wildflowers in Urban Settings and The Effects of Climate Change on Wildlife. You can see the minds of tomorrow have their priorities.

I hope my students gained a better understanding of how important it is to communicate scientific knowledge in a way most citizens can understand. Our natural world faces incredible challenges requiring the support of the public to address and fix. Once these students are in professional roles, if I did my job, they will try a little harder to share their expertise.

See you down the trail…

*Fuente: https://duboiscountyherald.com/b/column-students-inspire-hope-for-bright-future

Comparte este contenido:

The Future of Higher Education Is Social Impact

How can we transform the university research enterprise to enhance its social impact?

Over the last decade, universities have faced steady criticism for elitist practices such as political bias, hoarding wealthy endowments, and providing insufficient economic returns for students. In light of this, institutions that turn their attention to serving the public good may be best poised to thrive and deliver lasting value. Some universities are embarking on innovations to support social engagement among students, and initiating university-wide efforts to educate students for social impact. These ideas rightly aim to prepare public-minded leaders for the future. But a powerful innovation is also available for the present: reshaping incentives within the university to support faculty research that responds to real-life challenges.

Typically, researchers are insulated from the criticisms of pundits and politicians who question whether universities deserve the status and privileges they enjoy. University faculty operate within a system that rarely asks them to prove their value to a broader public. Rather, academics are rewarded for developing and testing theories, and publishing findings in books and journals in their fields. Their charge is to generate knowledge, and many do so prolifically. But unlike in engineering and medicine, where transferring new knowledge into workable technology is often regarded as the ultimate professional accomplishment, such “tech transfer” is uncommon in the social sciences. Despite innovation in the content of research, research institutions in the social sciences have not been innovative when it comes to ensuring that the outside world uses research. Yet such innovation may be the key to social impact, and thus demonstrating the value of research to those who question its worth.

Some writers argue that social science research fails to break into the mainstream because it is not sufficiently timely, relevant, or accessible—and that is no doubt part of the story. But studies about the use of research paint a more complex picture. More than any quality of the evidence itself, it turns out that the quality of relationships between producers and consumers of evidence, as well as the intermediaries who knit evidence producers and consumers together, is at the heart of increasing research use in policy and practice. Universities do not typically reward faculty for the time and effort needed to build and nurture these relationships, but doing so would be a transformative step in increasing the positive social impact of academic research.

Relationships between producers and consumers of evidence are at the heart of increasing research use in policy and practice. (Photo by Tanya Braganti for the William T. Grant Foundation)

The idea that universities should foster relationships with and respond to their communities is not new. The University of Wisconsin-Madison, where I taught for three decades, has long promoted the notion that “the boundaries of the university are the boundaries of the state,” meaning that the university should produce knowledge that promotes a thriving social, cultural, political, and economic life across the state. While this notion persists, it has lately battled with a competing view among leading members of state government, who believe the primary role of the university is to prepare workers for the state’s labor market. Meanwhile, other large universities are making progress in developing and incentivizing the types of relationship-building that can improve and strengthen communities outside of campus. Rice University, for example, has adopted as one of its main goals to “engage Houston and empower its success,” proclaiming, “We will engage Houston as a focus and partner for research and education, leveraging our broad expertise on critical urban issues to be a driving force in enabling Houston’s success as a 21st-century metropolis.” Among the specific efforts supported by the university is the Houston Education Research Consortium (HERC), a partnership between the university and the Houston Independent School District that conducts research aimed at addressing the challenges of educating Houston’s urban population. Since 2013, HERC has provided 25 research reports to the district on topics such as English learners and school choice, the effectiveness of the district’s pre-kindergarten program, and predictors of high school dropout, and others. The district has used these reports its decisionmaking. Partnerships of this sort help strengthen communities by growing their human and social capital, while also brandishing the value of the university to the state and city: HERC and its parent organization have attracted considerable philanthropic support from civic-minded allies who support the university’s local engagement.

Without support at the institutional level, most university researchers have little professional incentive to participate in such partnerships or address questions more in line with local contexts. It is time for this to change. To spur such action and provide an example for universities across the nation, my colleagues and I at the William T. Grant Foundationrecently launched a grants competition for universities willing to re-think their incentive structures, and reward engaged scholarship and research-practice partnerships. TheInstitutional Challenge Grant program calls on universities to partner with a public agency or nonprofit, develop a joint research agenda, provide research fellows to execute the research, and build the capacity of the agency to use evidence from research in its decisionmaking. In addition, the grant asks that the university propose new ways to support and reward faculty members who participate in this type of work. For example, universities might provide teaching releases or summer salary, or count the influence of research on policy and practice in career advancement decisions.

After receiving bids from 41 institutions, in April we awarded the first grant to Cornell University, which is working in partnership with the Cornell Cooperative Extension of Tompkins County to address the opioid crisis in upstate New York, particularly the increasing rate of child maltreatment that has accompanied rising opioid addiction. Researchers will evaluate two evidence-based interventions based in the judicial and child welfare systems, and help providers develop effective responses to the problems they confront. Even before applying for the grant, Cornell had taken steps to engage its local community through auniversity initiative that fosters research and other activities with community partners. The current work will push the university even further in thinking about how to develop an infrastructure in which faculty are rewarded for participating in partnerships and conducting research that responds to community concerns.

Professors Laura Tach (foreground) and Rachel Dunifon of Cornell University and Anna Steinkraus (background) of Cornell Cooperative Extension of Tompkins County plan their partnership. (Photo courtesy of Cornell University)

Ultimately, pursuing positive social impact by harnessing the talent and knowledge of university faculty can turn around perceptions of the value of higher education. But faculty will need to become more fully engaged in directly responding to real-world problems. As currently structured, universities offer few rewards for researchers who participate in partnerships primarily designed to improve policy and practice. Reorienting incentives in the university—not to diminish theory-driven, internationally renowned studies, but to enhance the value and visibility of work that provides answers for those who confront the daily challenges of today’s world—can go a long way toward making the change possible.

*Fuente: https://ssir.org/articles/entry/the_future_of_higher_education_is_social_impact

Comparte este contenido:

Education trade unions enhancing gender equality in and through education Published: 15 May 2018

By: csee-etuce.org/23-05-2018

Addressing all aspects of gender equality in education and the teaching profession is essential, especially promoting gender equality through social dialogue and collective bargaining with a focus on increasing salaries and decent working conditions, concluded participants of the ETUCE Conference on “Enhancing gender equality in and through education” on 7-8 May 2018 in Baku, Azerbaijan.

The Conference was organised with the support of the ETUCE member organisation in Azerbaijan, the Independent Trade Union of Education Workers of the Azerbaijan Republic (AITUCEW). Minister of Education of the Republic of Azerbaijan Jeyhun Bayramov and President of Azerbaijan Trade Unions Confederation Satar Mohbaliyev addressed participants highlighting the importance of providing equal opportunities for men and women in education and socio-economic system of the Republic of Azerbaijan.

The Conference provided the opportunity for trade unions representatives from more than 15 countries to exchange experience and ideas on how education trade unions can address challenges for gender equality in education and the teaching profession, in particular in Central and Eastern European countries. Members from Poland, Tajikistan, Belarus, Bulgaria, Azerbaijan, Romania, Georgia, and Kazakhstan presented trade unions’ good practices looking at how to overcome gender stereotypes, enhance the representation and participation of women in decision-making in all education sectors, and make the teaching profession more attractive to both men and women.

European Director Susan Flocken highlighted that gender equality is one of the top priorities in ETUCE’s work: “ETUCE promotes gender equality within the teaching profession and seeks to provide education trade unions and education personnel with the knowledge and tools necessary to enhance gender equality in and through education in their national, regional and local contexts and to address new challenges for gender equality arising from technological, economic, and social changes in our societies”.

Participants also learned about gender mainstreaming actions and gender equality standards of the Council of Europe, presented by Dr Anne Nègre, Vice-President in charge of Equality of the Conference of INGOs in the Council of Europe. Gender equality challenges and their solutions in education system and in the society of the Republic of Azerbaijan were also presented by Jamilya Sattarova, President of the Republican Committee of the Trade Union of Cultural Workers of Azerbaijan.

During smaller working group sessions the conference participants discussed concrete education trade union activities aimed to promote a gender sensitive approach in education, challenge gender stereotypes in education and society as a whole, and overcome gender segregation among different education sectors and subjects.

*Fuente: https://www.csee-etuce.org/en/news/archive/2569-education-trade-unions-enhancing-gender-equality-in-and-through-education

Comparte este contenido:

La OCDE aboga por «conectar» universidades y mercado laboral para no generar «rebeldía» en jóvenes

OCDE/ 22 de mayo de 2018/Fuente: http://www.europapress.es

El secretario general de la Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos (OCDE), Ángel Gurría, ha apostado por «poder conectar» los sistemas de la educación superior con el mercado laboral para evitar que los jóvenes sufran «frustración», que les lleve a la «rebeldía», tras terminar su formación y encontrarse con un panorama «con muy pocas oportunidades». Según sus palabras, esa falta de acceso a un puesto de trabajo tiene como resultado «frustración», «rebeldía» e incl …

Según sus palabras, esa falta de acceso a un puesto de trabajo tiene como resultado «frustración», «rebeldía» e incluso «rechazo a la democracia», pues esa «fragmentación» a nivel económico «provoca fragmentación de nivel social o político».

En esta línea, ha puesto como ejemplo los resultados que registraron la consulta para el ‘Brexit’ en Reino Unido, las elecciones en Estados Unidos, o «los siete meses para formar gobierno en Holanda, cinco en Alemania».

Incluso, Ángel Gurría, durante su intervención en la inauguración del Encuentro Universia en Salamanca, ha hecho referencia a los últimos resultados en las elecciones italiana o la «mayor fragmentación en cuanto a la voluntad electoral» en España. El secretario general de la OCDE, ya en alusión a la Universidad de Salamanca y a los asuntos a tratar en Universia, ha reseñado que «cada universidad es distinta, es diferente, es original, es única, pero las claves del éxito o del fracaso de las universidades tienen muchos elementos comunes».

Sobre esos aspectos que comparten las instituciones académicas, Ángel Gurría ha puesto de relieve los modelos de financiación; los sistemas de rendición de cuentas, con «más autonomía pero siempre más necesidad y obligación de rendir cuentas»; o los modelos de gobernanza y de selección del profesorado, con sistemas «abiertos y transparentes».

«Las universidades son las fábricas de habilidades, competencias y destrezas de nuestros jóvenes», ha apuntado el representante de la OCDE durante la apertura del encuentro Universia, al que asisten más de 600 rectores y representantes de universidades de 26 países diferentes.

Fuente de la Noticia:

http://www.europapress.es/sociedad/educacion-00468/noticia-ocde-aboga-conectar-universidades-mercado-laboral-no-generar-rebeldia-jovenes-20180521134033.html

 

Comparte este contenido:

ONU: Un fondo de 10.000 millones de dólares para alcanzar la educación universal

ONU/ 22 de mayo de 2018/Fuente: http://www.onunoticias.mx

El Secretario General de las Naciones Unidas, António Guterres, ha recibido este viernes a los embajadores de la juventud de la organización TheirWorld, acompañados por enviado especial de las Naciones Unidas para la Educación Mundial, Gordon Brown, declaró que “actualmente, no se pone suficiente énfasis en la educación universal ni en la financiación para educadores, servicios ni para el futuro de los niños”.

El titular ha manifestado el apoyo de la Organización a la propuesta de creación de un Servicio Financiero Internacional para la Educación, un mecanismo de inversión para cumplir con estos objetivos, que ha sido respaldada por el Banco Mundial y los bancos de desarrollo regional.

Fuente de la Noticia:

http://www.onunoticias.mx/un-fondo-de-10-000-millones-de-dolares-para-alcanzar-la-educacion-universal/

Comparte este contenido:

Países de menos ingresos concentran esfuerzos de ONU en educación

ONU/ 22 de mayo de 2018/ Fuente: Prensa Latina

Una nueva iniciativa de la ONU, que apenas da sus primeros pasos para recaudar fondos destinados a mejorar la enseñanza en todo el mundo, se concentra hoy en los países de menos ingresos.
Por ejemplo, en el caso de América Latina y el Caribe una de las prioridades es Haití, donde si bien persisten numerosos problemas, los retos en términos de acceso a la educación van cambiando y ahora se trata también de aumentar la calidad de la enseñanza.

Así explicó a Prensa Latina el director del Banco Interamericano de Desarrollo, Luis Alberto Moreno, quien habló de cómo los avances en la educación contribuirán además a elevar el nivel en términos de fuerza laboral y mercado de trabajo.

El Fondo Internacional de Finanzas para la Educación (Ifeed, por sus siglas en inglés) busca, precisamente, cerrar las brechas que existen en ese sector entre diferentes países, indicó.

La semana pasada, en el lanzamiento de la iniciativa, Moreno destacó la necesidad de acelerar acciones para evitar que más generaciones pierdan las oportunidades de educación.

En ese sentido, enfatizó cómo millones de latinoamericanos han sido dejados atrás, por ello resulta vital centrarse en las brechas e intentar cerrarlas.

Las áreas rurales de ese continente merecen especial atención, dijo, pues allí se encuentran las mayores necesidades.

Moreno también llamó a invertir más en educación para asegurar el futuro, salir de la pobreza y aumentar las posibilidades de acceso de mujeres y niñas.

Actualmente, 260 millones de niños en todo el mundo no asisten a la escuela y si se mantienen las actuales tendencias, en 2030 unos 400 millones no tendrán acceso a la educación más allá de los 11 años, según alertó el enviado de Naciones Unidas para la Educación Global, Gordon Brown.

Un grupo que merece especial atención son los refugiados. De acuerdo con Gordon, de los fondos humanitarios de la ONU dirigidos a cubrir las demandas de esa población, solo un dos por ciento se destinan a las labores educativas.

Debemos tratar de cambiar esa situación: los refugiados no necesitan solo de techo y comida, señaló al presentar el proyecto del Ifeed la semana anterior.

Asimismo, se refirió a la situación de la Agencia de Naciones Unidas para los Refugiados Palestinos (Unrwa, por sus siglas en inglés), una de las que priorizaba la atención y la enseñanza de los menores de edad.

Pero el recorte de fondos realizado por parte de Estados Unidos a esa entidad pone en riesgo ahora su importante trabajo, advirtió.

Según datos de la ONU, el mundo enfrenta una crisis educativa que crea en estos momentos una división amplia y persistente entre los niños que poseen acceso a las oportunidades, y aquellos que no lo tienen.

arc/ifb

Fuente de la Noticia:
http://www.prensa-latina.cu/index.php?o=rn&id=180389&SEO=paises-de-menos-ingresos-concentran-esfuerzos-de-onu-en-educacion
Comparte este contenido:
Page 2580 of 6195
1 2.578 2.579 2.580 2.581 2.582 6.195
OtrasVocesenEducacion.org