Page 16 of 19
1 14 15 16 17 18 19

Los programas para combatir la crisis educativa en Uruguay

Uruguay/Agosto de 2016/El País

Hay 140 programas para combatir la crisis educativa. El Instituto Nacional de Evaluación Educativa revisó 17 de ellos y se encontró con dudas y más dudas. No está claro si sirven o no.

Primaria

* Programa de Maestros Comunitarios (Primaria y Mides) – consiste en asignarle a cada centro uno o dos maestros, según la matrícula, quienes trabajan con los jóvenes con bajo rendimiento, problemas de asistencia o repetidores. Atiende a 16.000 niños.
* Proyecto Maestro más maestro (Primaria) – dirigido a alumnos de primer y segundo año con bajo rendimiento. Busca a mejorar aprendizajes en lengua.
* Programa de Alimentación Escolar (Primaria) – brinda a diario desayuno, almuerzo o merienda (según la modalidad y quintil). Atiende a unos 240.000 niños.
* Proyecto Inter-In (ASSE, Primaria, INAU y Mides) – Sus objetivos son fortalecer los espacios educativos con acciones  dentro de los centros y ayudar así a mejorar los aprendizajes de niños de 4 a 5 años y de primero y segundo de escuela. Atiende dificultades lingüísticas, psicomotrices y pedagógicas. Llega a 500 niños.
* Proyecto Educativo de Verano (Primaria) – Tiene como objetivo la extensión del tiempo pedagógico, con la premisa de no perder el ambiente vacacional. Las actividades se realizan durante 28 días. Atiende a unos 12.000 niños.
* Programa Huertas en Centros Educativos (IMM, Primaria y UdelaR) – Se propone fortalecer el desarrollo sustentable con la creación de huertas en las escuelas. Atiende a 15.000 niños.
* Programa Puente de Acreditación (Codicen y Mides, se suspendió en 2013)- Apuntaba a jóvenes de 13 a 17 años que no habían culminado primaria, ya sea por abandono o asistencia irregular, o que presentaban antecedentes de repetición.  Alcanzaba a 100 estudiantes.

Secundaria

* Becas de acceso a la continuidad educativa (MEC) – Se trata de becas de 8.000 pesos para alumnos de educación media de hogares con dificultades socioeconómicas. Atiende a unos 5.000 jóvenes.
* Centro de Lenguas Extranjeras (Secundaria) – Se ocupa de centros Que dan cursos de alemán, francés, italiano, portugués y lenguaje de señas. Llega a unos 10.000 jóvenes.
* Gol al Futuro (Dirección Nacional de Deporte)- Su cometido es estimular a los jugadores a transitar y culminar sus estudios. Para esto asigna un educador a cada club. Atiende a 3.500 jóvenes.
* Interfase (Secundaria)- Se enfoca en la transición del ciclo básico al bachillerato. Atiende a 1.200 jóvenes.
* Boleto gratuito (MTOP, Codicen, intendencias) – Busca evitar que el pago de transporte sea un impedimento para ir a estudiar. Financia 50 boletos mensuales. Llega a unos 300.000 jóvenes.
* Programa aulas comunitarias (Secundaria y Mides) – Apunta a jóvenes de 12 a 17 años que no han logrado pasar primero de liceo o ni siquiera se matricularon. Alcanza a unos 1.000 jóvenes.
* Proyecto de Tutorías (Secundaria) – Otorga apoyos a los liceos a fin de mejorar los aprendizajes de los estudiantes. Llega a 25.000 jóvenes.
* Compromiso Educativo (Codicen, Consejo de Formación en Educación (CFE), Mides, INJU, INAU, MEC y UdelaR) – Propicia la permanencia de los estudiantes que están cursando educación media superior. Alumnos seleccionados por el Mides reciben cuatro cuotas de 8.000 pesos, a cambio de un acuerdo firmado por ellos y sus padres sobre rendimiento y conducta. Llega a 7.000 jóvenes.

Programas multinivel

* Tránsito Educativo (Codicen y Mides) – Busca que los egresados de primaria tengan una transición exitosa hacia el siguiente nivel. Funciona con equipos de maestros y profesores. Alcanza a unos 2.700 jóvenes.
* Complementos Educativos (Codicen y el Consejo Nacional  de Educación No Formal (Conenfor) – Consiste en campamentos que buscan motivar procesos de aprendizaje y estimular la convivencia con los docentes. Participan al año 33.000 personas.
* Uruguay Estudia (MEC, Primaria, UTU, BROU, CND, MEF, OPP y MTSS) – Está dirigido a mayores de 14 años y su cometido es contribuir, mediante distintas acciones como becas o tutorías, a la culminación de los procesos educativos. Alcanza a unos 5.000 jóvenes.
Fuente: http://www.elpais.com.uy/informacion/programas-combatir-crisis-educativa-uruguay.html
Comparte este contenido:

Sudáfrica: 0% university fee increase for 2017 will be unsustainable

África/Sudáfrica/14 de Agosto de 2016/Autor: Dineo Bendile/Fuente: EWN

RESUMEN: El Consejo de Educación Superior ha recomendado un aumento en todos los ámbitos relacionadossegún la inflación para las universidades de Sudáfrica en 2017. A principios de este año, el ministro de Educación Superior Blade Nzimande pidió al consejo para que le asesore sobre un marco regulador para la gestión de los aumentos de tasas tras numerosas protestas de los estudiantes. Ahora el cuerpo ha presentado un informe al Nzimande, donde se dice que un aumento de tasas cero por ciento el próximo año será insostenible. El Consejo de Educación Superior ha aconsejado a las universidades para acordar un aumento de tasa uniforme que será implementado en el año 2017. Se cree que un aumento de la manta en el nivel del índice de precios al consumidor es el método más favorable para su uso. Según el informe, este método equilibra los intereses de los estudiantes con la sostenibilidad del sector de la educación superior. Sin embargo, muchas asociaciones de estudiantes que han hecho presentaciones ante la comisión de investigación sobre la educación superior gratuita esta semana todavía mantienen el rechazo hacia el aumento de tasas el próximo año.

The Council on Higher Education has recommended an across the board inflation-related increase for South Africa’s universities in 2017.

Earlier this year, Higher Education Minister Blade Nzimande asked the council to advise him on a regulatory framework for managing fee increases following numerous student protests.

Now the body has submitted a report to Nzimande, where it says a zero percent fee increase next year will be unsustainable.

The Council on Higher Education has advised universities to agree on a uniform fee increase which will be implemented in 2017.

It believes a blanket increase at the level of the consumer price index is the most favourable method to use.

According to the report, this method balances the interests of students with the sustainability of the higher education sector.

The council says universities are better off negotiating as one unit than having individual exchanges with students over increases.

However, many student bodies that have made presentations to the commission of inquiry into free higher education this week still maintain they want no fee increase next year.

‘THERE’S NO MONEY’

Yesterday, National Treasury said it hadn’t budgeted for another zero percent fee increase in the higher education sector next year.

Treasury said it hadn’t made any plans for the decision to be rolled over to 2017 but it had planned for fee increases to resume next year and will now continue with involvement in fee discussions.

Treasury Deputy Director General Michael Sachs said, “We’ve budgeted on the basis that we will return to the situation of normal fee increases.

“But of course we’re prepared to respond to changes if they’re there.”

Sachs said continuing with no fee increases will mean sourcing money from other aspects of the Budget.

With Treasury saying it’s not willing to take out loans to spend more on higher education, it said the only other alternative is to increase taxes.

Lobby group Students for Law and Social Justice (SLSJ) said it believed students should only pay university fees based on what they can afford.

The group made its presentation to the commission of inquiry into free higher education yesterday afternoon.

Like other student groups, it was also calling fees to remain flat despite National Treasury saying it hadn’t budgeted for this next year.

Representatives from SLSJ said they didn’t agree with calls for higher education to be free for everyone.

Nikhiel Deeplal said the rich, who can afford to pay, must do so to ease the burden of government having to subsidies universities.

“The rich must be able to subsidise the poor, therefore remove the billions that are being pumped into State institutions and we give it to individual students.”

The group believed its proposed method will work better than the current system which sees National Student Financial Aid Scheme funding given to poor students, while those who don’t qualify are disadvantaged.

Fuente: http://ewn.co.za/2016/08/13/Council-on-Higher-Education-recommends-inflation-related-increase-for-universities

 

Comparte este contenido:

Italia y Grecia, a la cabeza de Ni-Nis de la Unión Europea

Europa/España/12 de Agosto de 2016/Fuente: El Pueblo Digital

El número de personas con edades comprendidas entre los 15 y los 29 años alcanzan en la Unión Europea (UE) a casi 90 millones, que representan el 17% de la población.

Pues bien, según Eurostat, la oficina estadística de la Unión Europea, la proporción de estos jóvenes que ni trabajan ni reciben educación o formación (NEET, en sus siglas en inglés) aumenta considerablemente con la edad. Así, en la UE casi 5 millones de personas jóvenes de 20-24 años (17,3%) ni trabajaban ni estudiaban el año pasado.

La tasa NEET, que se situó en el 6,3% para el grupo de edad 15-19 en 2015, alcanzó casi el triple -hasta el 17,3%- para el grupo de edad de entre 20 y 24 años y afectó a 1 de cada 5 jóvenes de entre 25 y 29 años (19,7%).

Por nacionalidad, más de 1 de cada 4 jóvenes “ni-nis” de entre 20 y 24 años era italiano (31,1%), o griego (26,1%); y más de 1 de cada 5 de estos jóvenes están en esta situación en Croacia (24,2%), Rumanía (24,1%), Bulgaria (24,0%), España y Chipre (ambos 22,2%).

Por el contrario, las tasas más bajas de NEET de 20-24 años se registraron en los Países Bajos (7,2%), Luxemburgo (8,8%), Dinamarca, Alemania y Suecia (todo el 9,3%), Malta y Austria (ambos 9,8%) como así como la República Checa (10,8%).

Fuente: http://www.elpueblodigital.es/espana/italia-y-grecia-a-la-cabeza-de-ni-nis-de-la-union-europea/

Comparte este contenido:

Argentina Conflicto docente: Un maestro gana $ 9.800 de básico con una canasta básica de $ 15.000

América del Sur/Argentina/12 de Agosto de 2016/Fuente: Urgente 24

Ya suman cuatro provincias las que se ven afectadas por el paro docente este jueves 11-08 (Buenos Aires, Entre Ríos, Chubut y Santa Cruz) en reclamo por la reapertura de las paritarias salariales. El secretario gremial de la Federación Nacional Docente, Francisco Torres, sostuvo que «el sistema público no está colapsado, es una decisión política.»

En declaraciones a AM 950 Belgrano, Torres sostuvo que «los gobiernos tienen una política de impulsar a la familia a la privatización educativa, donde si quiere educación de calidad, debe pagarla.»

«Queremos instalar la necesidad de un instituto de evaluación de las políticas educativas y los gobiernos que las aplican», sostuvo Torres.

En tanto, remarcó: «Estamos preocupados por esta situación, la paritaria nacional y la reunión de comisión técnica salarial fueron un fracaso.»

«El ministro Triaca, Marcos Peña y Finocchiaro dijeron que no hay motivos para reabrir la paritaria salarial porque según ellos la inflación estaría en el 28% y el acuerdo es del 34,6%, pero esto en lo formal porque es en cuotas y termina siendo anualizado del 27%», explicó.

«No estamos discutiendo solamente los salarios de los docentes, sino también el presupuesto educativo. Esperamos que Vidal escuche el reclamo», aclaró.

«Un maestro de grado que trabaja 4 horas está cobrando un salario inicial de 9.800 pesos y la canasta básica está valuada en 15 mil. Están pagando salarios por debajo de la línea de pobreza«, manifestó.

A su vez, criticó: «El maestro para llegar al salario promedio tiene que trabajar en dos o tres colegios, pero eso atenta contra la calidad educativa.»

«Seguramente habrá docentes que van a ir a trabajar hoy porque están presionados por la Patronal que amenaza con echarlos si no van a trabajar, contratando a otro«, aclaró.

«Si no hay solución habrá un nuevo paro general a fines de agosto o en el mes de septiembre», concluyó.

Fuente: http://www.urgente24.com/255613-conflicto-docente-un-maestro-gana-9800-de-basico-con-una-canasta-basica-de-15000

Comparte este contenido:

México: Sindicatos toman Dirección General de Educación Primaria

América del Norte/México/12 de Agosto de 2016/Fuente: El Diario Martinense

Las instalaciones de la Dirección General de Educación Primaria, localizadas en la avenida Lázaro Cárdenas, fueron tomadas por miembros el Sindicato Independiente de Trabajadores de la Educación de Veracruz (Sitev) y del Sindicato de Trabajadores del Magisterio de a Veracruz (Setmav), para exigir el pago pendiente de retroactivo salarial, Carrera Magisterial y la Rezonificación 2016.

Uno de los manifestantes, el docente Octavio Rivera Flores, explicó que en asamblea del sindicato, llegaron al acuerdo de tomar las instalaciones de Educación Primaria con el propósito de “presionar” a la Secretaría de Finanzas y Planeación (Sefiplan), para que haga los depósitos pendientes.

Refirió que la Sefiplan pagó 25 por ciento del retroactivo al aumento salarial para personal docente y administrativo, y pretende otorgar el resto de manera parcial, pero no están de acuerdo.

“Son bastantes compañeros a los que no se les ha pagado, por ejemplo el pago de Rezonificación 2016 es a nivel estatal”, explicó.

Los trabajadores de la educación explicaron que al no contar con recursos, sus familias se quedan sin ingresos, y que al igual que otros veracruzanos, tienen hijos y deben hacer la compra de útiles escolares.

Fuente: http://diarioelmartinense.com.mx/estado/xalapa/43042-sindicatos-toman-direccion-general-de-educacion-primaria.html

 

Comparte este contenido:

Higher Education in Africa: Who is Going to Pay?

Africa/31 de Julio de 2016/Autor: /Fuente: All Africa

RESUMEN: Los últimos 18 meses han sido turbulentos para muchas universidades de todo el continente africano. De Ciudad del Cabo a Ibadan a Nairobi, los campus se han convertido en sitios de protesta y debate acerca de las tarifas, la igualdad de acceso a la educación, el carácter colonial de los planes de estudios, la desigualdad social, y muchos otros temas. El centro de atención ha sido la cuestión de cómo hacer la educación accesible a millones de jóvenes estudiantes, en un continente con el más rápido crecimiento de la población juvenil en el mundo. Al mismo tiempo, las universidades e institutos de investigación de África tienen el mandato de producir una investigación independiente, socialmente relevante dentro de un sector de la educación superior en forma global cada vez más por la privatización, la competencia, la comercialización de la investigación académica y la inseguridad laboral. La cuestión de cómo garantizar el acceso de estudiantes a la educación e invertir en investigación, en un contexto de estancamiento económico, el aumento de los costos de vida, y la amenaza de recesión mundial, es una controvertida.

The past 18 months have been turbulent for many universities across the African continent. From Cape Town to Ibadan to Nairobi, campuses have become sites of protest and debate about fees, equal access to education, the colonial character of curriculums, social inequality, and many other issues.

Under the spotlight has been the question of how to make education accessible to millions of young students, in a continent with the fastest growing youth population in the world. At the same time, Africa’s universities and research institutes are mandated to produce independent, socially relevant research within a global higher education sector increasingly shaped by privatisation, competition, the commercialisation of research and academic job insecurity. The question of how to ensure student access to education and invest in research, against a backdrop of economic stagnation, rising living costs, and the threat of global recession, is a vexed one.

Today, SciDev.Net is holding an online debate to discuss these issues with academics, students and education specialists from across Africa and its diaspora. In this feature, we set out some of the main issues and what to do about them.

What are the challenges?

Universities face myriad funding problems. In a continent of 54 countries, with different economic policies, political structures and histories, it’s obviously problematic to generalise. But there are some features more widely found.

Often, the histories of universities have loosely mirrored those of the state: the university as site of anticolonial struggle; the idealism and intellectual exuberance of the post-independence years; the growing poverty and damage of 1970s and 1980s structural adjustment policies; and the lingering effect of underinvestment and neglect.

Many universities are still reeling from the effects of the policies imposed by the World Bank and International Monetary Fund from the 1970s in return for loans. These institutions framed Africa’s universities not as the backbone of development, but as a misuse of resources. [1] Money for education was channelled away from universities and into primary and secondary schools. «To this day, many countries have not been able to recover from that onslaught on African higher education,» wrote Ann Therese Ndong-Jatta in 2002, when she was Gambia’s education minister. [1]

Underinvestment in infrastructure, staff salaries that have failed to keep pace with inflation and living costs, and inadequate research funding have poleaxed many universities. Universities that were once beacons of intellectual vigour and research excellence are struggling. Faced with economic stagnation and poor tax revenues, many governments claim their tax base is too small to prop up a free higher education system, while their critics argue that corruption and bulging public sector salaries must be rapidly reined in and the money raised directed towards education.

All this means that in many places, the dream of free higher education is fading fast. Rather than improving accessibility, education is instead growing increasingly elitist.

Students in the firing line

For students, the situation can be dire. In South Africa, the average annual cost of fees and board exceeds the average household income. While the poorest students are supposed to get government assistance, «there are a group of people caught in between» who neither qualify for assistance nor can afford to pay fees, explains Lesley Le Grange, higher education professor at Stellenbosch University. This means universities not only perpetuate, but also actively widen South Africa’s social inequalities, say both Le Grange and Kealeboga Mase Ramaru of campaigning organisation Equal Education.

For those students who do get in, university can involve a struggle to balance studying with paying the bills. Underinvestment in labs, teaching and basic infrastructure also undermines learning. Poor salaries among staff mean strikes are frequent in many African countries, which can extend the time it takes to complete a degree by years. And then many graduates who can afford to leave do so, worsening Africa’s infamous ‘brain drain’ problem.

Things can be particularly acute for female students. In many countries, female students find it harder than men to gain access to university, or can encounter serious issues once there, from teaching methods that favour men, to sexism, discrimination and rape.

Staff struggles

For staff, academic careers are increasingly becoming the preserve of those who can afford them. Salaries can fail to match rising living costs. Many in the state tertiary sector now top up low salaries with consultancy fees or jobs at the many private colleges proliferating in countries such as Uganda.

Academics often find themselves struggling to meet the demands of unreasonable teaching loads, including vast undergraduate classes, unwieldy responsibilities for PhD supervision and enormous amounts of administration. This can harm research, says Goolam Mohamedbhai, former secretary-general of the Association of African Universities.

Impact on research

Heavy work burdens and underinvestment in research also starves many African countries of the knowledge they need to meet certain twenty-first century challenges.

On paper, the continent’s 54 countries have noble research goals. Spurred on by the African Union, many governments have said they intend to spend one per cent of GDP (gross domestic product) on research, as laid out in the Lagos Plan of 1980 and reaffirmed in the Science, technology and innovation strategy for Africa. This ambitious strategy aims to put science «at the epicentre of Africa’s socio-economic development».

But few countries look close to meeting this target, and the strategy has been criticised for failing to match rhetoric with action or to commit governments to spending targets. Furthermore, funding and research policy experts decry the lack of efficiency in grant management systems – one they say hampers science across the continent.

Clearly something has to change if African countries are to fund the kind of research they need. The Ebola crisis in West Africa is just one example of a poor research landscape preventing local researchers from taking the lead on vaccine research or the public health response.

Education is also considered a buffer against extremism – both because it can bring jobs and because it opens students to the value of cultural diversity and bridges divides in an increasingly fractured world, and a continent plagued by militant groups from Boko Haram in Nigeria and Chad to Al-Shabaab in Kenya and Somalia.

Other challenges include the growing pressure neoliberalism places on universities. Universities are increasingly expected to compete with each other for students, monetise research and audit research outputs, within a highly competitive, global higher education sector. The growing power of league tables to compare and rate universities, not just on research but also on other assessments such as ‘student experience’, adds to the pressure.

What are the solutions?

Many of those in government and university management claim that introducing fees is now the best way to fund universities. But others argue that fees will always be inadequate and that a diversified funding structure is required.

Beyond fees, there are many examples of universities cutting costs while ensuring quality research. Collaboration is one option. In Ghana, the Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology has opened a US$6.5 million ‘superlab’ that is available for use by students across West Africa. The idea is to reduce costs by sharing equipment.

Cross-disciplinarity is another route. This aims to bring together different disciplines and sectors to tackle the complex, intertwined challenges of modern life. But it can have economic benefits too. Rather than duplicating research in different labs and departments, academics can pool resources and streamline research.

Another route includes South-South partnerships, or North-South partnerships. The latter have underpinned scientific research in Africa for decades. But here again the charge of postcolonial legacies and unequal power balances are hard to shake off. African researchers complain of being treated as secondary partners, the poor cousins to the wealthy research institutes of the North. Others complain Africa is seen as a ‘petri dish’ where Northern scientists test out new ideas.

These criticisms also extend to the many aid programmes focused on higher education partnerships. Many are of value, from the British Council’s long history of investing in education, to the new SPHEIR programme launched by the UK Department for International Development and partners. But these also need interrogation. What model of higher education are rich nations exporting? Where does power reside and who designs courses and management structures? How are privatised models for education reshaping universities across the world?

Centres of excellence

Academics across Africa and its diaspora often advocate turning certain institutions into centres of excellence for particular science and innovation subjects, rather than spreading resources thinly across many universities. For example, Calestous Juma debates the merits of innovation universities, a new kind of institute that combines research, teaching, community service and commercialisation.

Digital futures

Digital technology also offers rich opportunities for delivering better education at a fraction of the cost of conventional teaching. The internet and mobile tech can link academics, students and staff as never before, building pan-African networks, while also bringing education to those in volatile or war-torn regions. One example is online training programmes for Somali medics. Digital tech enables MOOCs (massive open online courses), distance learning and blended courses that combine classroom and online learning. Tunisian digital education expert Houda Bouslama describes this as a powerful force for change in Tunisia: through information and communications technologies, universities can support far more students, far more cheaply.

Growing university-industry links

The call for closer links between industry and universities is getting louder. Higher education specialist Beatrice Muganda argues that universities need to position themselves far more clearly as part and parcel of the societies they supposedly serve, and to nurture research landscapes where innovations can thrive and reap dividends for universities. Ghanaian-British politician Paul Boateng says that intellectual property systems must drastically improve if African countries are ever to become knowledge economies – a view echoed by Nigerian intellectual property specialist Umar Bindir among others.

There is also a growing call for universities to team up with local innovation sectors, such as the tech hubs flourishing in towns and cities across the continent. Technology businesswoman Mariéme Jamme has long campaigned for better regulatory frameworks and government investment to help pioneering African technologists and coders turn creative projects into viable, sustainable businesses.

Many also call for closer links between African universities and big business. Mauritian President Ameenah Gurib-Fakim argues that African universities must work more closely with industry – whether local businesses or multinationals – and that this should include industry directly funding courses.

This obviously poses a risk. Industry-sponsored PhDs for specific research outcomes are one thing, but what happens when industry funds an institute: what might the compromises be then? UCT engineering student, activist and writer Brian Kamanzi says «one of the hugest battles that we have is to protect our public institutions from interference» from industry, particularly when so many businesses in South Africa, as in other African countries, are foreign owned or controlled.

Meanwhile many other avenues for funding higher education in Africa are opening up – not least the growth of Chinese investment in the continent’s universities.

Taxing the wealthy

The small tax base of many African countries is often held up as a reason why governments can’t invest enough in education and in other services. «Someone has to pay,» says Le Grange. «But we have a responsibility to students who are unable to afford higher education, but have the ability to study and perform.» One route to bridging the impasse is a wealth tax, he says. «I think a lot of people would agree to that as long as that money is ring-fenced and channelled to higher education, because people are concerned about corruption within the government.»

Others suggest a graduate tax could be the best way forward, while still others say the tax base is already overburdened, and that the focus instead should be on higher corporation tax, reining in corruption and reducing the salaries of senior ministers.

The future

Worldwide, the higher education sector is undergoing radical change. Globalisation and privatisation are reshaping universities, while mechanisation and the internet are altering industry and employment in ways that we are only just beginning to grasp. While access to university in Africa and across the world remains beset by challenges, having a degree no longer guarantees work.

In a continent where over 200 million people are under 24 years old, wider changes are needed to provide jobs. Shaking up how universities are funded, and laying the foundations for a more robust public and higher education funding landscape, are good steps to making universities accessible and sustainable. But there are enormous challenges ahead.

These need scrutiny and debate – something we hope today’s online discussion, from 1-3pm BST (GMT+1) will provide. Do join us.

References

[1] Joel Samoff and Bidemi Carrol Conditions, coalitions, and influence: the World Bank and higher education in Africa (Annual Conference of the Comparative and International Education Society Salt Lake City, 7 February 2004)

Fuente: http://allafrica.com/stories/201607300146.html

Fuente de la imagen: http://blogs.elpais.com/africa-no-es-un-pais/2013/08/volver.html

Comparte este contenido:

Película: Esperando a Superman

Esperando a Superman

  • Título original: Waiting for Superman
  • Año2010: Duración102 min.
  • País: Estados Unidos
  • Director: Davis Guggenheim
  • Guión: Davis Guggenheim, Billy Kimball
  • Productora:Electric Kinney Films

Sinopsis: Documental denuncia del sistema educativo público de USA, dirigido por Davis Guggenheim (ganador del Oscar por «An Inconvenient Truth») y que se centra en lo que Bill Gates (productor del film) y el propio cineasta aseguran es «un desastroso sistema educativo en las escuelas públicas norteamericanas».

El documental relata la situación pública educativa estadounidense que- a pesar de tratarse de un potencia económica mundial- persisten las brechas socio-económicas entre una zona del país y otra, o entre diferentes instituciones de educación. En las zonas de mayor riesgo la educación no asegura movilidad social creando un aire de desesperanza entre sus estudiantes quienes-aceptando la idea de que no podrán ingresar a una universidad- dejan de lado la formación académica de sus vidas. Las mayores trabas son para los niños de escuelas públicas, ya que dependen de la disponibilidad de espacios que la escuela pueda ofertar año con año.

Fuente de la reseña:

  • http://www.filmaffinity.com/es/film298841.html
  • https://psicoeducat2013.wordpress.com/2013/10/31/analisis-documental-esperando-a-superman/

Fuente de la imagen: http://pics.filmaffinity.com/waiting_for_superman-416099347-large.jpg

 

Comparte este contenido:
Page 16 of 19
1 14 15 16 17 18 19