Estados Unidos: Here are answers to your questions about education in Alabama

Here are answers to your questions about education in Alabama

We asked readers to submit their questions about education in Alabama, through a question and answer service called Hearken. Here we’re answering those questions, and will continue to answer more as they come in. Scroll to the bottom of this post to submit your own!

We received a number of questions about school buses, which seems appropriate given that as of today, 129 school districts and three of the state’s charter schools (out of four) have started school.

I’d love to know why kids way down on 280 by Grandview Hospital have to be bused into Birmingham City Schools instead of going where the surrounding area is zoned. Considering the fact that most of these kids are minorities, this seems to be a direct violation of Brown v. The Board of Education. – Anna

The simple answer is that the city limits of Birmingham extend down Highway 280 into that area. Because of the 12 different school districts in Jefferson County, kids can be bused past a nearby school if it is in another district.

Here’s what the city limits of Birmingham look like on a map. Zooming in, you can see that the city limits extend down Highway 280.

Are school buses optional for school systems or just city systems? – Michael

Under Alabama law, county school districts are required to offer transportation. City school systems and public charter schools are not required by law to offer transportation except for students who are served by special education.

Why do Homewood, Vestavia Hills, Mountain Brook, and some others not have city school buses? Has this always been the case? Have there been efforts to get schools (sic) in these districts? (Very difficult as working parent!) – Mieke

As stated in the previous answer, Alabama law only requires county school districts to offer school bus transportation for students. The law does not require city school districts nor public charter schools to offer transportation.

Why do we pay bus drivers so little if we really value the lives of our children? – Dennis

Though we aren’t able to say exactly why, school bus drivers have traditionally been paid low amounts in Alabama. However, it wasn’t until we were researching this question that we found that Alabama’s school bus drivers are among the lowest paid in the nation.

According to the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics’ measures for all 50 states plus the District of Columbia, Guam, the Virgin Islands and Puerto Rico in 2018, the hourly average for Alabama’s school bus drivers at $9 per hour ranked 53rd—the next-to-lowest amount, but just above Puerto Rico’s average pay of $8.71 per hour.

Bus drivers in the District of Columbia earned the highest average hourly wage, at $21.55 per hour, followed by Alaska at $21.12 per hour.

In the Southeast, Florida is the highest-paying, at $13.80 an hour on average, with Georgia close behind at an average of $13.79 an hour. Even Mississippi, at $10.34 an hour on average, pays more than Alabama.

Bus drivers in Florida and Georgia earned on average $28,700 and $28,670 per year, respectively. Those amounts are nearly $10,000 higher than Alabama’s $18,720 average.

School bus drivers in Mississippi earned $21,520 on average.

The amount school districts in Alabama pay can vary. A quick look at Hoover City Schools, for example, showed starting bus driver pay to be $15,865 which equals $21.55 per hour, working four hours per day for 184 school days. Benefits typically add 19% on top of Alabama educators’ salaries, which comes out to $19,586 with benefits.

Bus drivers can earn extra money by driving for field trips and extracurricular activities.

How do school systems look different, administratively? Birmingham doesn’t have assistant principals in elementary schools, for instance. How much of a system’s budget is spent in classrooms compared to central office or transportation? – Michael

Administration in school systems across the state by and large look similar, judging by the personnel reports they submit to the state department of education. Depending on the measure used (dollars per student, central office staff to student ratio, etc.), there are outliers.

Regarding assistant principals, the state funding formula for schools, called the Foundation Program only provides funding for assistant principals when student enrollment reaches a certain level. Elementary schools with fewer than 500 students don’t receive any state funding for assistant principals. In middle and high schools, student enrollment must reach 250, and then the state will provide half of the funding.

School systems have to use local tax support to pay for whatever the state doesn’t. In rare cases, federal funding may be used to support schools with high percentages of students in poverty.

Here’s a chart showing at what enrollment level the state funds assistant principals. It’s taken from the “State Guide to School Allocations, 2018-19.”

The second question, regarding how money is spent in schools, is partially answered in this data visualization, published with our big look at school-level spending during the 2017-18 school year.

The visualizations are best viewed on a laptop, desktop, or large tablet.

Narrow down by what function (transportation, school administration, etc.) you’re interested in. Narrow down further by system. Click the top of the bar column to sort.

Seeing how much is spent on classrooms versus central office is a little bit trickier. The information published by the state department doesn’t delve into detail in that particular way. But it does break down expenditures by “direct” versus “pooled” expenditures.

“Direct” means the money was spent at the school level for students enrolled in that school. For example, that means the cost of teachers and staff that work at the school (salary and benefits), the cost of supplies or maintenance at the school, and any

“Pooled” means the money was spent on a function or service that was delivered as a result of a function housed at the central office or other non-school-based facility.

Here’s a look at that data. Narrow down by system. Click the top of any column to sort.

How do educators sign up to be trained in LETRS? – Kathy

Any Alabama public school pre-K through third-grade teacher can sign up for LETRS training at this link. LETRS training is offered to help teachers understand the science of reading, meaning how children learn to read. Read more here about the new Alabama law that requires third-grade students to be reading on grade level by 2021-22. .

Why don’t they start back after Labor Day like they did when I went to school. Get out the middle of May instead of the later part of May. It would save the systems money on air conditioning the schools in the hot August month. Their always saying they don’t have enough funding for the schools and that would be a way to cut back on expenses. – Sue

AL.com recently covered this topic, which showed 85% of voters agree with you. The director of the superintendents’ association gave a lot of reasons why school systems spread out the school year and why local boards of education should retain control the school calendar. Read more here.

These are just a few of the questions we received. Some required much more research than others, and we wanted to share these that we were able to find fairly quickly. Stay tuned for more answers.

Fuente de la Información: https://www.al.com/news/2019/08/here-are-answers-to-your-questions-about-education-in-alabama.html

 

Comparte este contenido:

Estados Unidos: Maestros DACA, no solo pierden ellos sino la educación de California

Estados Unidos / 1 de octubre de 2017 / Autor: Araceli Martínez Ortega / Fuente: La Opinión

Mientras que los distritos escolares luchan porque las escuelas sean zonas seguras, no saben cómo manejarían la salida de estos profesores

Las oportunidades que se le abrieron a Saúl Jiménez para ejercer su carrera de maestro en 2012 al calificar para la Acción Diferida para los Llegados en la Infancia (DACA), están a punto de caduca, si para el 5 de marzo, no hay una solución para los 800,000 jóvenes beneficiados por el programa.

El problema es que de acabar DACA no solo impactará a profesores como Jiménez, quienes perderán su empleo al ya no poder renovar su permiso de trabajo, sino a la educación en momentos en que se habla de que California vive una seria escasez de maestros.

“Con DACA estaba feliz, contento. Cuando me enteré del fin del programa, primero anduve enojado, con mucho coraje hacia el sistema. No es mi culpa, decía. Después me sentí triste y confundido.No solo me va a afectar a mi, sino a los estudiantes”, reconoce Jiménez.

El Instituto de Políticas de Migración estimó que en el país hay 80,000 de los llamados dreamersque son maestros.

El Distrito Escolar Unificado de Los Ángeles (LAUSD) no sabe exactamente cuántos de sus maestros tiene DACA, pero su portavoz, Bárbara Jones, reveló que cuentan con 187 profesores con permisos de trabajo. “Nosotros no preguntamos cómo obtuvieron la autorización para trabajar. Por lo tanto, no sabemos si alguno de ellos es beneficiario de DACA”, señaló.

Los estudiantes serán los más afectados si no hay una solución en el Congreso para que los maestros beneficiados con DACA puedan continuar en la enseñanza.

Las consecuencias de dejarlos ir

Desde hace dos años,  Jiménez es maestro de educación especial en las materias de historia y matemáticas para el LAUSD.

“La cancelación de este alivio migratorio en el área de educación afectará mucho porque cuando a un maestro lo corren o lo mandan a otra escuela, sufren los estudiantes porque se tienen que acostumbrar a otro profesor, a otra rutina, a un salón diferente”, opina.

Jiménez primero se graduó de maestro en educación física y después en educación especial. “Antes de DACA no podía trabajar como maestro”, admite. DACA detuvo su deportación y le otorgó un permiso de trabajo. Él fue traído de Colima, México cuando era un menor de un año de edad.

Considera que en algunos casos, los despidos de maestros DACA puedan incluso provocar que los alumnos pierdan interés en la educación.

“Y puede afectar hasta el tamaño de las clases. Los estudiantes se tienen que ir a otros salones ya llenos o les ponen un sustituto. Vamos a tener más escasez de maestros, y eso va a afectar las escuelas, la educación de los niños, y va a ver muchos padres molestos”, observa.

Padres de familia y sus hijos llegan a la escuela intermedia Griffith STEAM Magnet en el Este de Los Ángeles. (Aurelia Ventura/ La Opinion)Muchos jóvenes DACA trabajan como maestros en escuelas públicas y charter en California. (Aurelia Ventura/ La Opinion)

Agravará escasez 

Frank Wells, portavoz del poderoso Sindicato de Maestros de California (CTA), dijo que el fin de DACA solamente empeorará la masiva escasez de maestros en el estado al colocar a los profesores actuales y los potenciales que califican para este alivio, en un limbo migratorio.

“Los maestros afectados están contribuyendo con el país que conocen como su hogar al trabajar duro, obtener una educación universitaria y educando a nuestros jóvenes”, mencionó.

Completó que las acciones del presidente Trump no toman en cuenta el importante trabajo que ellos hacen, y van a dañar al sistema de escuelas públicas, además de a un gran número de estudiantes cuyas vidas están en caos. “El Congreso tiene que actuar rápido para resolver este asunto y proteger a los soñadores”, expuso.

Con un tercio de los maestros cerca de su jubilación, el Centro para el Futuro de la Enseñanza y Aprendizaje estima que California necesitará 100,000 maestros más en la próxima década.

¿Qué pasará con los estudiantes?

José González es un maestro DACA de matemáticas en una secundaria chárter de Lake View Terrace – en el Valle de San Fernando- desde hace cuatro años. González fue traído a los 2 años de México. En 2013 se benefició de DACA cuando aún estaba en la universidad, estudiando economía.

“Sin DACA, mis opciones profesionales serían muy limitadas”, dice. Pero le preocupa más las repercusiones que la eliminación de este programa tenga en los estudiantes.

“Tengo 120 alumnos divididos en cuatro grupos. Son niños de entre 10 y 12 años. No sé cuántos maestros DACA – como yo – haya, pero si sacamos números, y cada uno atiende un promedio de 120 alumnos, el impacto sería muy grande“, expone.

González dice que es muy difícil poder explicar cómo se siente: “La mayor parte de mis alumnos son inmigrantes o son hijos de inmigrantes. Yo me identificó con mis alumnos. Ser maestro es algo que no cambiaría”, expone.

Impacto emocional

Alfonso Álvarez, miembro de la Junta Directiva del Distrito Escolar Unificado de Santa Ana, no tenía a la mano el número de maestros DACA que han empleado, pero aseguró que no están preparados para dejarlos ir cuando se les venza su permiso de trabajo.

“No los tenemos identificados. No sabemos cuántas clases tienen. No sabemos si vamos a poder encontrar maestros para que tomen su lugar”, señaló.

Aún más delicado, observó, es que el anuncio de acabar con DACA se da en momentos en que el Distrito hace todo lo posible por decirle a sus alumnos que no va a pasar nada con las redadas y operativos de migracion.

“Les estamos diciendo que en las escuelas están seguro, pero qué les vamos a decir ahora si un maestro DACA desaparece. ¿Qué explicación les vamos a dar cuando su maestro DACA favorito ya no pueda regresar porque se le expiró su permiso de trabajo? Esto va a tener un gran impacto emocional en los alumnos”, considera.

Fuente de la Noticia:

https://laopinion.com/2017/09/26/maestros-daca-no-solo-pierden-ellos-sino-la-educacion-de-california/

Comparte este contenido:

EE.UU: After charter school defeat, what’s next for Massachusetts education reform?

América de Norte/EE.UU/11 de noviembre de 2016/www.masslive.com

Resumen: A pesar de la expansión de las escuelas autónomas fueron derrotadas en las urnas, en una dura discusión sobre el tema de cómo financiar y mejorar la educación de Massachusetts. Padres, maestros y reformadores de la educación hicieron una campaña de mérito para proporcionar más opciones de educación para los estudiantes atrapados en la lucha distritos. La importancia de este objetivo no ha cambiado, el Gov. Charlie Baker, un republicano y un firme defensor de la expansión escuela autónoma, dijo en un comunicado que esperaba con interés trabajar estrechamente con todas las partes interesadas hacia el objetivo común de asegurar una buena educación para todos los niños en Massachusetts, independientemente de su código postal, este gobernador defiende las escuelas Charter. La votación por el si o el no en el estado ha permitido aprobar hasta 12 escuelas nuevas o ampliadas de alquiler de un año, en las afueras de una tapa existente. Actualmente, más de 32.000 estudiantes están en listas de espera para las escuelas autónomas. A pesar de que los votantes rechazaron la iniciativa, es decir, habrá ningún cambio en el límite actual, el debate se ha planteado cuestiones que los legisladores pueden ser presionados a reconsiderar. ¿Cómo debe mejorar el estado que fallan los distritos escolares?

Although an expansion of charter schools was defeated at the ballot box, the discussion of how to fund and improve Massachusetts education is far from over, advocates on both sides of the ballot question said Tuesday night.

«I am proud to have joined with thousands of parents, teachers and education reformers in a worthwhile campaign to provide more education choices for students stuck in struggling districts, and while Question 2 was not successful, the importance of that goal is unchanged,» Gov. Charlie Baker, a Republican and a strong advocate for charter school expansion, said in a statement. «I look forward to working closely with all stakeholders toward our common goal to ensure a great education for every child in Massachusetts, regardless of their zip code.»

The ballot question would have allowed the state to approve up to 12 new or expanded charter schools a year, outside of an existing cap. Currently, more than 32,000 students are on waiting lists for charter schools.

Although voters rejected the initiative, meaning there will be no change to the current cap, the debate has raised issues that lawmakers may be pressed to reconsider. How should the state improve failing school districts? Do changes need to be made to a funding formula to provide more money for all schools? Should the charter cap be lifted at all?

«Now that the debate about how we improve our school system has been engaged, I hope that the Legislature will see that the public wants all schools to be able to succeed, and it will lead us to a serious discussion about what the foundation budget should look like and what the level of state support for public education should be,» said Auditor Suzanne Bump, a Democrat who opposed charter school expansion. «We have not had that kind of discussion in the 20 years since charter schools were created.»

Attorney General Maura Healey, a Democrat who opposed charter school expansion, said now that the question was defeated, «We really need to get back and roll up our sleeves and figure out what do we need to do to invest in public education.»

Healey said charter school expansion would have been «too much of a band aid and a quick fix» that does not fundamentally address the issue of how to shore up education in all schools.

Healey declined to offer specifics about what she wanted to see happen. But, she said, «I hope that the right players and the right stakeholders are at the table to do the work that needs to be done to make sure that we are taking the steps necessary to ensure that all schools, particularly the lower performing schools, have the kind of educational attainment and opportunities that we want.»

It is far from certain that there is any kind of legislative will to act on charter schools or school funding. While some lawmakers have been trying to lift the charter school cap, the Legislature has been unable to agree on a legislative fix. A new study this year that detailed underfunding in the formula used to pay for public education was largely ignored because of a lack of money to increase education funding.

Lisa Guisbond, executive director of Citizens for Public Schools, one of the organizations opposing a charter cap lift, said her coalition now plans to focus on increasing resources for all schools. «One thing that’s come out of this whole campaign is the need for more resources for all of our students, all of our schools,» Guisbond said.

Liam Kerr, state director for the pro-charter school Democrats for Education Reform Massachusetts, said, «We all have to come together after this and look at our political leaders and acknowledge they have to make hard decisions. And we have to support them in making those hard decisions so that the resources that are dedicated to education are going to things that we know work.»

Kerr said it is clear that some districts are not meeting the needs of students and that charter schools are effective in some of those districts. «People need to come together and figure out if we acknowledge there’s a need, we acknowledge that certain reforms are working, including charters, we need to come together and do more of them,» Kerr said. «I’d hope both the Legislature and municipal leaders would move on and know that more action is needed, both district reform and possibly a targeted charter expansion.»

The Yes on 2 campaign said in a statement that existing charter schools will continue to provide «first-rate education choices» to students. «The creation of the charter movement, and the effort to reform a system that has changed so little in a hundred years isn’t easy, but we know the thousands of parents, teachers and students that have fueled this campaign will press on,» the campaign said.

Senate President Stan Rosenberg, D-Amherst, who voted against charter school reform, said, «The voters have spoken and the matter is resolved. It’s time to shift our focus to 100 percent of the students in our public education system. They deserve the best education possible so they can be engaged citizens and find a meaningful place in our increasingly competitive economy.»

The Senate made its own recommendations this past year for reforming charter schools while lifting the cap, but the proposal was a non-starter in the House, which had passed its own version of a cap lift the previous session.

Tomado de: http://www.masslive.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/11/after_charter_school_defeat_wh.html

Comparte este contenido: