Using SCOPE to teach educational development

By GEM REPOTY/ Anne Campbell, Ph.D. and students at the Middlebury Institute of International Studies

It is not a simple task to prepare students about educational development around the world. At the Middlebury Institute of International Studies, we try to do this by providing international perspectives, practical learning, and immersive education for international careers. To better align the time and resources available with current events and students’ interests, we re-design our Education and Development course annually.

Teaching this course involves introducing students to the most recent and relevant perspectives, initiatives, organizations, and debates in education and development. To better prepare students for careers in the field or future study, they must understand and appreciate the importance of data-driven decision making—a process which begins with the awareness of and ability to find and analyze global education data. This year we included The GEM Report’s Scoping Progress in Education (SCOPE) tool (education-progress.org) as a formal resource for further exploration.

Why and how is SCOPE useful to students?

The tool provides students with a broad, comparative perspective on the state of educational development across five key themes: access, equity, learning, quality, and finance. Further, it complements the themes in the Global Education Monitoring (GEM) Report, which students also explored in class, while providing them with the opportunity to interact with the most recent data available. Users are also able to easily compare data among countries and engage with powerful, eye-catching visualizations. Additionally, the portal also allowed students to apply and connect knowledge from other classes, including topics such as inequality in education, data-driven policymaking, and data analysis and visualization.

FN SCOPE HORIZONTAL GEM BLUE Background RGB

How did we incorporate SCOPE into the course?

We began by exploring the role of UNESCO in international education and development. Next, we were joined virtually by a MIIS alumnus who works with UNESCO in the Dakar office. Students were then introduced to both the GEM Report and to the SCOPE website. With this foundation in place, students worked in small groups to explore one of the five key themes, investigating what the data seems to indicate (interpretation), how it is presented (visualization), and what seems irregular or missing (critique). After students presented their initial impressions, we discussed the reliability and validity of quantitative data, the challenges inherent to collecting accurate and comparable data, and the usefulness and limitations of cross-national comparisons. This activity also allowed the students to understand the types and extent of quantitative data available in the Education Progress portal.

Students were then tasked with completing a course assignment building off this knowledge and incorporating the findings from SCOPE. Each student was asked to select one of the five themes that interested them or aligned with other classes or projects. Then, within that theme, students were asked to select a relevant data presentation or specific country. Their assignment was to write and share a blog post of up to 1000 words explaining the story behind the data, focusing on history, policy, or other context. In other words, students were invited to bring the quantitative data to life by using qualitative evidence. Accordingly, the assignment also included practical strategies for writing and designing compelling blog posts on WordPress. Finally, before publication, we incorporated a semi-formal peer review component to help students improve each others’ drafts before their blog posts went live on the class website.

What was the result?

A variety of fascinating topics! Students wrote about the relationship between national wealth disparity and education access in Guatemala (Muff) and in Colombia (Weston), the influence of war on educational access in Somalia (Davis), and barriers to educational access in the Marshall Islands (Mongelluzzo). In terms of educational quality, Saint-Phard wrote about challenges facing the Haitian education system, Dumouza wrote about Afghanistan’s efforts to rebuild their education system, and Majri wrote about sanitation facilities for female students in Senegal.

Posts related to student learning outcomes included a discussion of access to the internet in Burundi (Nguyen) and of literacy programs in Cuba (Salay) and in Nepal (Ennen). Teacher training and multilingual education were also popular themes: Tanen wrote about teacher recruitment and training in Ghana, Magyar wrote about teacher training and indigenous education in Peru, and Terkel discussed mother-tongue based education in Pakistan. In terms of financing for education, Ngaboyisonga wrote about financing German higher education and Mockler discussed higher education quality and expense in the United States.

For several students, their chosen topics were new to them, providing an opportunity to explore new themes. For other students, they built upon longstanding relationships with a country or specific population. In the end, each of us learned a lot about these diverse topics in the education and development sphere, while also surfacing additional topics for further inquiry. Without question, our hands-on exploration of SCOPE helped us better understand and appreciate the stories behind the numbers, bringing education systems and their complex challenges to life.

Fuente: https://gemreportunesco.wordpress.com/2020/06/18/using-scope-to-teach-educational-development/

Comparte este contenido:

Global education monitoring report, 2020: Inclusion and education: all means all

ISBN: 978-92-3-100388-2
Collation: 424 pages : illustrations, maps
Language: English
Year of publication: 2020
Licence type: CC BY-SA 3.0 IGO [7241]
Type of document: book
Descargar en: unesdoc.unesco.org/in/rest/annotationSVC/DownloadWatermarkedAttachment/attach_import_1ed46d67-eda4-437b-b054-7777e8743ffe?_=373718eng.pdf&to=444&from=1
Fuente: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373718
Comparte este contenido:

New 2020 GEM Report shows inclusion has never been as relevant as countries count the education cost of Covid-19

Noticia Global

The 2020 GEM Report on inclusion and education, All means all, was launched this morning at an online event featuring an interactive high-level panel and clips of videos and animations of its key messages and recommendations.

This year’s report shows that, all over the world, layers of discrimination on the basis of gender, remoteness, wealth, disability, ethnicity, language, migration, displacement, incarceration, sexual orientation, gender identity and expression, religion and other beliefs and attitudes deny students the right to be educated with their peers or to receive education of the same quality.

It identifies an exacerbation of exclusion during the COVID-19 pandemic estimating that about 40% of low and lower-middle income countries have not supported disadvantaged learners during school shutdown. It calls for countries to focus on those left behind as schools reopen so as to foster more resilient and equal societies.

Exclusion in education is persistent

Even before the pandemic, 258 million children and youth were entirely excluded from education, with poverty as the main obstacle to access. In low- and middle-income countries, adolescents from the richest 20% of all households were three times as likely to complete lower secondary school as were as those from the poorest homes. Among those who did complete lower secondary education, students from the richest households were twice as likely to have basic reading and mathematics skills as those from the poorest households.

Language can be a barrier to quality education for some: 10-year old students in middle and high-income countries who were taught in a language other than their mother tongue typically scored 34% below native speakers in reading tests.

Learners with a disability also face challenges. In 10 low- and middle-income countries, children with disabilities were found to be 19% less likely to achieve minimum proficiency in reading than those without disabilities.

The Report shows the weight of intersecting disadvantages for some learners. Despite the proclaimed target of universal upper secondary completion by 2030, hardly any poor rural young women complete secondary school in at least 20 countries, most of them in sub-Saharan Africa.

It emphasizes the importance of countries starting to monitor students’ experiences, and not just learning, noting that one in four 15-year-old students reported feeling like outsiders at school. One-third of 11- to 15-year-olds have been bullied in school. In the United States, LGBTI students were almost three times more likely to say that they had stayed home from school because they were not feeling safe.

Some countries’ laws and policies blatantly exclude

Alongside the Report, we are also launching a new website today: Profiles Enhancing Education Reviews, PEER, at education-profiles.org, with information on laws and policies concerning inclusion in education for every country in the world. PEER informed the 2020 GEM Report, showing that fewer than 10% of countries have laws that help ensure full inclusion in education. The report calls for countries to widen their definition of inclusion, which often do not cover all marginalised groups, but single some out, as though inclusion can be reached one group at a time.

PEER also shows that many countries still practice education segregation, which reinforces stereotyping, discrimination and alienation. Laws in a quarter of all countries require children with disabilities to be educated in separate settings, rising to over 40% in Latin America and the Caribbean, as well as in Asia.

Two countries in Africa still ban pregnant girls from school, 117 allow child marriages, while 20 have yet to ratify Convention 138 of the International Labour Organization which bans child labour. In several central and eastern European countries, Roma children are segregated in mainstream schools. In Asia, displaced people, such as the Rohingya, are taught in parallel education systems.

Education systems often fail to take diverse learners’ needs into account

Just 41 countries worldwide officially recognize sign language and, globally, schools are more eager to get internet access than to cater for learners with disabilities. Girls need water, sanitation and hygiene services to continue attending class during menstruation, but some 335 million girls attend schools that do not have them.

Reflecting learners’ diverse needs requires textbooks and curricula to be inclusive, yet many still alienate by omission or false representation. Girls and women only made up 44% of references in secondary school English-language textbooks in Malaysia and Indonesia, 37% in Bangladesh and 24% in the province of Punjab in Pakistan. The curricula of 23 out of 49 European countries do not address issues of sexual orientation, gender identity and expression.

Moving towards an inclusive education can be costly, but there are many teaching methods that can be done for free to make children feel more wanted in school. Teachers need and want training on inclusion, which fewer than 1 in 10 primary school teachers in 10 Francophone countries in sub-Saharan Africa said they had received. A quarter of teachers across 48 countries reported they wanted more training on teaching students with special needs.

Almost half of low- and middle-income countries do not collect enough education data about children with disabilities. Household surveys are key for breaking education data down by individual characteristics. But 41% of countries – home to 13% of the world’s population – did not conduct surveys or make publicly available data from such surveys. Figures on learning are mostly taken from school, failing to take into account those not attending.

Policy makers must recognise that they need to bring communities and parents on board with the idea of inclusion, given that parents’ discriminatory beliefs are sometimes a barrier to change. Some 15% of parents in Germany and 59% in Hong Kong, China, feared that children with disabilities disturbed others’ learning. Parents with vulnerable children wish to send them to schools that ensure their well-being and respond to their needs. In Queensland, Australia, for example, 37% of students in special schools had moved away from mainstream establishments.

Signs of progress towards inclusion

Many countries go out of their way to accommodate different learners’ needs: Odisha state in India, for example, uses 21 tribal languages in its classrooms, Kenya has adjusted teaching to the nomadic calendar and, in Australia, the curricula of 19% of students were adjusted by teachers so that their expected outcomes could match students’ needs.

Download and share the Report with your networks. On our home website, which has a new look and fresh feel, you can also find additional resources on the 2020 GEM Report page, including the summary, the background papers and the social media pack.

Join the conversation on #AllmeansALL and our various online activities happening over the coming weeks:

  • Read the recommendations in our digital campaign and tell your education minister which you think should be prioritised in your country.
  • If you are an academic, join our Any Questions Answered session on this blog on 29 June
  • Take part in our Twitter Q&As with Ministers of Education on inclusion and education, starting with @MatthewOPrempeh from Ghana and @dsengeh from Sierra Leone. We will work with them to provide their answers in the form of a podcast in the coming weeks

Fuente: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000373718

Comparte este contenido:

Volviendo la atención a los datos en el Día Internacional de la Educación

Por Manos Antoninis, Directora del Informe de Monitoreo de la Educación Global (GEM) y Silvia Montoya, Directora del Instituto de Estadísticas de la UNESCO

En el primer Día Internacional de la Educación, el Instituto de Estadística de la UNESCO ( UIS ) y el Informe de Monitoreo de la Educación Mundial (GEM) anuncian una nueva asociación para demostrar las desigualdades en la educación y mostrar a los que se quedan atrás en el logro de la meta global de educación de las Naciones Unidas, ODS 4.

El Informe GEM y el UIS han trabajado juntos para mejorar los datos disponibles en la Base de datos de educación sobre desigualdad en el mundo ( WIDE ), destacando las disparidades en el acceso a la educación, la participación y el logro que se esconden detrás de las estadísticas promedio. La base de datos reúne datos de encuestas demográficas y de salud (DHS), encuestas de indicadores múltiples (MICS) y otras encuestas nacionales de hogares y evaluaciones de aprendizaje de más de 160 países.

Los usuarios pueden comparar los resultados de la educación entre países y entre grupos dentro de los países, según los factores asociados con la desigualdad, incluidos el sexo, la ubicación, la riqueza y el origen étnico.

Los nuevos datos publicados hoy resaltan la necesidad de medidas urgentes para reducir las desigualdades, que deberían ocupar un lugar destacado en las agendas de los países y los socios para el desarrollo.

wide_intdayofed 1

  • Los niños y jóvenes más pobres tienen menos de la mitad de probabilidades de completar la escuela primaria que los niños y jóvenes más ricos, menos de una cuarta parte de las probabilidades de completar la escuela secundaria inferior, y una décima de las probabilidades de completar la escuela secundaria superior en los países de bajos ingresos.
  • Los niños en áreas rurales tienen más del doble de probabilidades de no asistir a la escuela que los niños que viven en áreas urbanas en países de bajos ingresos

La base de datos muestra que los niños que enfrentan múltiples desventajas enfrentan los mayores desafíos:

  • Solo el 2% de las niñas más pobres en países de bajos ingresos completan la escuela secundaria superior.

wide_intdayofed 2

En el primer Día Internacional de la Educación, este recurso está destinado a mantener la atención de los países centrada en las brechas que necesitan para cumplir con sus compromisos de educación inclusiva y equitativa para todos, una prioridad que corre a través de la Agenda 2030 para el Desarrollo Sostenible.

Explore las desigualdades de los países y comparta la información con sus redes.

Comparte este contenido: