Australia: Universities oppose foreign influence legislation

Oceania/Australia/universityworldnews.com

Reseña: La legislación federal para rastrear la influencia de los gobiernos extranjeros en Australia afectaría el trabajo de miles de académicos que colaboran con investigadores fuera del país, dice Universities Australia. La organización ha pedido a los parlamentarios federales que respalden las enmiendas del gobierno a su propuesto Plan de Transparencia de Influencia Extranjera. Sostiene que la legislación impondría una nueva burocracia y restricciones significativas a los esfuerzos de Australia para trabajar con socios internacionales «en tecnologías de vanguardia». El proyecto de ley también enfureció a las autoridades chinas que lo consideran un ataque contra los vínculos cada vez más estrechos de China con empresas australianas y otras organizaciones, incluidas universidades. Más de 170,000 estudiantes de China están estudiando en Australia y representan un asombroso 45% de las matrículas de estudiantes internacionales, con mucho la mayor proporción de extranjeros de un solo país. Pero la preocupación ha estado creciendo entre los principales políticos, y muchos en el público en general, sobre la influencia que China está tratando de ejercer sobre las políticas australianas. El gobierno afirma que la legislación no está dirigida a ningún país en particular, aunque China es claramente el objetivo principal. Y también lo está Rusia, siguiendo la experiencia de los Estados Unidos con esa otra nación comunista durante sus últimas elecciones presidenciales. Duncan Lewis, jefe de la Organización de Inteligencia de Seguridad de Australia, se refirió a las amenazas extranjeras como evidencia que dio a una audiencia en el Senado el mes pasado. Lewis describió la escala actual de la actividad de inteligencia extranjera contra los intereses australianos como «sin precedentes». «Los actores extranjeros intentan de forma encubierta influir y dar forma a las opiniones de los miembros del público australiano, los medios australianos, los funcionarios del gobierno australiano y los miembros de las comunidades de la diáspora aquí en Australia», dijo en la audiencia. Entre las comunidades más grandes de Australia nacidas en el extranjero, hay personas de China. En una presentación ante el Comité Conjunto Parlamentario sobre Inteligencia y Seguridad, Universities Australia dijo que las enmiendas propuestas por el gobierno a su legislación de influencia extranjera habían «recorrido un largo camino» para resolver las preocupaciones del sector de educación superior con la propuesta original. La directora ejecutiva de Universities Australia, Catriona Jackson, dijo que las enmiendas propuestas eran una forma sensata de hacer que el plan fuera más factible. «Cada vez que un académico australiano trabaja junto con un colega en el extranjero, aportan nuevas ideas y experiencia valiosas a Australia», dijo. «Estas enmiendas significan que nuestros investigadores increíblemente talentosos pueden dedicar más tiempo a resolver los grandes problemas de Australia y menos al papeleo». En declaraciones al comité, Jackson agradeció al Fiscal General Christian Porter y al gobierno por resolver los problemas planteados por las universidades.


Federal legislation to track the influence of foreign governments in Australia would affect the work of thousands of academics collaborating with researchers outside the country, says Universities Australia.

The organisation has called on federal parliamentarians to support the government’s own amendments to its proposed Foreign Influence Transparency Scheme.

It argues that the legislation would place significant new red tape and restrictions on Australia’s efforts to work with international partners “on cutting-edge technologies”.

The bill has also infuriated Chinese authorities who see it as an attack on China’s increasingly close links with Australian business and other organisations, including universities.

More than 170,000 students from China are now studying in Australia and they comprise a startling 45% of international student enrolments, by far the largest proportion of foreigners from just one country.

But concern has been growing among senior politicians, and many in the general public, about the influence China is trying to exert on Australian policies.

The government claims the legislation is not aimed at any individual country although China is clearly the main target. And so is Russia, following the United States’ experience with that other Communist nation during its last presidential elections.

Duncan Lewis, head of the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation, referred to foreign threats in evidence he gave to a Senate hearing last month. Lewis described the current scale of foreign intelligence activity against Australian interests as “unprecedented”.

“Foreign actors covertly attempt to influence and shape the views of members of the Australian public, the Australian media, officials in the Australian government and members of the diaspora communities here in Australia,” he told the hearing.

Among the largest of the overseas-born communities in Australia are people from China.

In a submission to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security, Universities Australia said the amendments proposed by the government to its foreign influence legislation had “gone a long way” to resolve the higher education sector’s concerns with the original proposal.

Universities Australia Chief Executive Catriona Jackson said the proposed amendments were a sensible way to make the scheme more workable.

“Every time an Australian academic works together with an overseas colleague, they bring valuable new ideas and expertise home to Australia,” she said.

“These amendments mean that our incredibly talented researchers can spend more time solving Australia’s big problems, and less on paperwork.”

Speaking to the committee, Jackson thanked Attorney-General Christian Porter and the government for resolving the issues raised by the universities.

Compromise amendments

Porter has agreed to present compromise amendments to government legislation that sets out a register of foreign agents. The amendments would limit how many groups the bill would apply to.

The changes are designed to resolve criticisms of the legislation by universities, charities and others, as well as ensuring acceptance by the opposition Labor Party.

The bill for establishing the register is being considered by the Parliamentary Joint Committee on Intelligence and Security. On 14 June, the committee released a bipartisan report that accepted 60 amendments to counter the threat of foreign interference.

Porter said that having the legislation passed by the end of the month would allow for Australia’s new legal framework to be adopted promptly.

He said this was designed to address espionage, interference and foreign influence in Australia’s democratic processes and would be fully operational before the next scheduled general election.

The bill currently provides that people be required to register if undertaking certain activities on behalf of a foreign government, public enterprise, political organisation, business or individual.

The amendments would limit ‘foreign principals’ to foreign governments, foreign government-related entities, political organisations and government-related individuals.

“This ensures that only organisations or individuals ultimately working at the direction of a foreign government or political party are required to register,” Porter said.

In response to criticisms by universities and charities, Porter said the definition of ‘undertaking activity on behalf of a foreign principal’ would be amended.

This would mean a person would not be deemed to be undertaking an activity merely because they were supervised by, received funding from or collaborated with ‘a foreign principal’.

Fuente: http://www.universityworldnews.com/article.php?story=20180621094856451

Comparte este contenido:

Ireland: May warns universities over high cost of tuition fees

Ireland/ 19.02.2018/ By: www.theguardian.com.

Theresa May is to press ahead with attempts to force universities to charge less for some courses based on their costs and potential graduate earnings, despite critics within her own party and the higher education sector branding the move incoherent and unworkable.

Announcing a long-awaited review of education funding for over-18s in England, the prime minister will say that reserving university for the middle class and vocational training “for other people’s children” is outdated.

Her comments come after the new education secretary, Damian Hinds, hinted on Sunday that the review would recommend that some universities cut their fees for social science and humanities courses, particularly if recent graduates earned salaries below those of others.

In a speech in Derby on Monday afternoon, May will say that higher education institutions should change the existing structure whereby all undergraduate courses cost £9,250 a year in tuition fees.

“The competitive market between universities which the system of variable tuition fees envisaged has simply not emerged,” she is to say. “All but a handful of universities charge the maximum possible fees for undergraduate courses. Three-year courses remain the norm. And the level of fees charged do not relate to the cost or quality of the course. We now have one of the most expensive systems of university tuition in the world.”

May’s speech is the Conservative party’s latest attempt to grapple with the complexities of the funding system it created as part of the coalition government in 2012, which has pushed up average graduate debt toward £50,000 and up to £57,000 for students from the poorest backgrounds.

The hike in fees from £3,600 to £9,000 has not dented the appetite for undergraduate study, but universities have been heavily criticised for swiftly raising the pay of their vice-chancellors and other senior leaders.

Labour’s performance among young voters and their parents at the last election has been attributed to Jeremy Corbyn’s promise to scrap tuition fees entirely and reintroduce maintenance grants for the less well-off.

In her speech May will attempt to tackle Labour’s policy head on, criticising her government’s own support for the current system even as ministers defend it by arguing that more people from disadvantaged backgrounds are now in higher education than ever before.

According to May, widening access to university “is not made easier by a funding system which leaves students from the lowest-income households bearing the highest levels of debt, with many graduates left questioning the return they get for their investment”.

May also hints that the review, which the Guardian understands will be led by a senior figure from the City, will look at restoring income-related grants in some form by examining “how we can give people from disadvantaged backgrounds an equal chance to succeed. That includes how disadvantaged students and learners receive maintenance support, both from government and universities and colleges”.

The review panel is likely to include Prof Alison Wolf, an economist at King’s College London with a strong interest in further education provision and qualifications. Other members will include a former vice-chancellor and head of an Oxford college.

May has been determined to make universities offer variable fees for many years, backed by her former special adviser Nick Timothy, who last year complained about receiving a haircut from a university graduate. Timothy also accused the former education secretary Justine Greening of blocking May’s efforts to cut tuition fees. May removed Greening earlier this year and replacing her with Hinds, a more enthusiastic supporter.

On Sunday Greening appeared to confirm the rift over tuition fees, suggesting that the review would be more talk than action. She proposed more radical moves, such as doing away with interest payments on student loans and bringing back grants for poor students.

“The thing that really matters from my perspective is social mobility, and making sure we don’t end up with a system where young people from more disadvantaged backgrounds feel like they ought to do one of the cheaper degrees, rather than doing the degree they actually want that will unlock their potential in the future,” she said.

Greening’s comments echoed those of Angela Rayner, Labour’s shadow education secretary, who said the Conservatives had lost touch with reality over education funding. “Charging more for the courses that help graduates earn the most would put off students from the most disadvantaged backgrounds from getting those same qualifications. So much for the prime minister’s talk about social mobility,” Rayner said.

“To make science and maths degrees more expensive flies in the face of what our economy’s going to need in the future. As part of our industrial strategy we need to ensure that we get more students on those courses.”

Prof Janet Beer, the president of Universities UK and the vice-chancellor of the University of Liverpool, took issue with May’s claims of an academic-vocational divide. “The perception may be of academic versus technical qualifications, but the reality is very different. Universities are key to developing the skills needed by employers and students across a wide range of industries, sectors and professions,” she said.

Mark Leach of the higher education thinktank Wonkhe said the government’s arguments were incoherent and could damage the sector. “Forcing struggling universities to charge lower fees to poorer students, and therefore have less money to spend on their retention, learning, facilities and other real value for money indicators, could simply entrench a cycle of poverty,” he said.

From: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2018/feb/18/cutting-tuition-fees-would-backfire-justine-greening-warns-theresa-may

Comparte este contenido:

Vietnam: Irish and VN higher education institutions promote co-operation

Vietnam/November 28, 2017/Source: http://english.vietnamnet.vn

Irish Aid will grant 578,000 euros (US$685,000 ) to support ten partnerships between Irish and Vietnamese higher education institutions on teaching and research co-operation during 2017-2018.

The partnerships were launched on Thursday under the Việt Nam-Ireland Bilateral Education Exchange (VIBE) Programme which aims to encourage co-operation and research links between higher education and research institutions of the two contries.

Under the programme, during 2016-2017, five such partnerships were granted about 250,000 euros.

Minister of Education and Training Phùng Xuân Nhạ and Minister of Education and Skills of Ireland Richard Bruton who is on a working visit to Việt Nam from November 23-25, attended the launch ceremony.

They also discussed potential co-operation opportunities in education between the two countries, especially those relating to higher education.

Nhạ said that Việt Nam wanted to change the structure of its economy from labour-intensive to a service-based one, so it was in need of high quality human resources.

However, Nhạ admitted that Việt Nam’s higher education quality was not good enough and its students faced difficulties after graduating from universities because of a lack of skills desired by employers.

Assistance from other countries with high-quality higher education like Ireland would be very useful to Việt Nam, he said.

Minister Richard Bruton said that Irish higher education institutions are strong in fields such as technology and applied research, implying that Ireland and Việt Nam had huge potential co-operation.

Over the last ten years, as many as 219 Vietnamese students have been offered scholarships from the Government of Ireland Scholarship Programme. In Ireland, Vietnamese students usually study Finance and Economics, Pharmaceuticals, Management, Engineering, Marketing and Computer and Data Science.

Before his visit to Việt Nam, he said: “Increasing international cooperation is a key objective under my Action Plan for Education, which aims to make Ireland’s education and training service the best in Europe within a decade, and our International Education Strategy. I am looking forward to increasing opportunities for Irish students to travel to Vietnamese and South Korean higher level institutions, by strengthening and building partnerships with institutions in these countries. By building these bilateral relationships, we can ensure mutual benefit for both the institutions and students alike.” — VNS

Source:

http://english.vietnamnet.vn/fms/education/190916/irish-and-vn-higher-education-institutions-promote-co-operation.html

Comparte este contenido: