A-level results are out, but what about those not going to university?

By Fiona Millar

A significant number of young people are turned off by traditional higher education. They should have a decent alternative

This year’s A-level results day saw grades down slightly, universities awash with places, and signs that young people might be starting to vote with their feet, and not in the direction successive governments have predicted. What is going on? For the past 20 years, encouraging more young people into higher education has been a central aim of education policy. Until now there was no real reason to think this plan wasn’t working.

Around a third of all school-leavers go on to higher education at 18, and that figure rises to almost 50% by the age of 30. But a survey tracking aspirations for a university education among pre-GCSE pupils released on Thursday by a social mobility charity, the Sutton Trust, suggests that the wind might now be blowing in a different direction. The trust has been monitoring aspirations for the past 15 years and reports a falling proportion of young people who think university matters. The survey also shows there is still a marked difference in attitudes towards higher education between students from different social backgrounds.

A blip or a worrying straw in the wind? We should fear the latter as it would point to a growing and glaring omission at the heart of our education system – the failure to cater adequately for those for whom university may not be the right choice. One obvious reason for disenchantment (reflected in the survey) is the high cost of tuition fees and living expenses. A degree generally leads to higher wages, and employers increasingly seek this level of education when recruiting – even for non-graduate jobs. Up to a third of graduates may now be working in low-skilled jobs.

But the survey also reveals that of those not planning to attend university, 58% cite not enjoying “that type of learning”. We need to understand why this is, what we might do about it. The assumption that everyone can and should enjoy an academic education is almost certainly flawed. Like many other graduates from a Russell Group university – in my case at a time when only 10% of the population went to university and were fully funded to boot – I believe every young person should have the chance I had. Not just of an academic education and a route into professional work, but also the opportunity to learn and develop socially and emotionally, preferably away from home, without the pressure of having to earn a living.

However, as a parent and a school governor I also know this path isn’t right for everyone. The over-academisation of the school curriculum and the devaluation of any sort of assessment that doesn’t involve a high-stakes exam may now be demoralising many young people, in particular those who most need to see the point of education.

There have been signs throughout this academic year that the latest incarnation of the GCSE – increased content, no coursework and lengthy exam papers – might be a massive switch-off to key groups of pupils. And the failure over decades to develop alternatives to academic study, in the form of high-status technical education and apprenticeships, is starting to look like a criminal act, especially in the run-up to Brexit when skilled workers from elsewhere may not be readily available. Over the past 50 years, a series of vocational qualifications have come and gone and never garnered the kudos of O-levels, GCSEs or A-levels. So we should not be surprised that traditional qualifications still reign supreme, that university still sits at the pinnacle of the education system and that growing numbers of students see no realistic alternative routes into fulfilling work.

Most people probably haven’t even heard of the new T-levels – the current government’s answer to this endemic English problem. These apparently “world-class” qualifications won’t even come on stream until 2020; and they will have to be delivered in woefully underfunded further education colleges. Even worse – there are barely 100 degree apprenticeships on offer, a drop in the ocean compared with thousands of more conventional courses. So for the growing number of young people who feel university is not for them there really isn’t anything concrete to aspire to.

The Sutton Trust is right: more maintenance grants and apprenticeships would probably help. But what is really needed is a huge culture shift, away from the assumption that academic is best and towards a broader vision of what makes a real education. A vision that should include what might be seen as “that other type of education”: practical, creative, technical, engaging – and, above all, of equal status to a university degree.

Source of the article: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/aug/16/a-levels-results-higher-education-alternatives

Comparte este contenido:

Year of 2019: Education and building the Egyptian character

Asia/Egypt/By Dania Akkawi/Source: www.egypttoday.com.

The Information Center of the Council of Ministers published an infograph on the recommendations of the Sixth National Youth Congress that took place July 28-29.

The recommendations included naming the year 2019 as the «Year of Education», launching the National Project for the Development of the New Education System, the allocation of 20 percent of the scholarships within and outside Egypt to the teaching staff for 10 years and training teachers of technical education in accordance with international standards.

Alongside other developments, the Council of Ministers was mandated to link, or rather correlate, the university plans with the need of the state and to prepare a plan for the return of sports and cultural activities.

The conference consisted of top-scoring 2017/2018 thanaweya amma graduates, officials, ministers and other important figures, who came together to primarily discuss finding a way to build a generation fit for the future.

“We don’t want to reclaim the Egyptian character…but to work to develop it to keep up with our times,” said President Abdel Fatah al-Sisi.

Focusing on education is a top priority for the progression of Egypt and the development of youth.

“Do you want real education or do you want your kids to just get ‘degrees?’ A real educational reform is a harsh, long trip that requires sacrifice from students, teachers and parents,” said Sisi.

The first session, titled “The Strategy of Building the Egyptian Person,” focuses on character building that will be achieved via healthcare reform, proper education and sports.
Amongst the recommendations published by the Information Center is boosting the coordination between ministries to provide school students with opportunities to practice sports, cultural and artistic activities in youth centers and cultural palaces.

Minister of Youth, Ashraf Sobhy, explained that the ministry is aiming to enhance sports facilities and that programs regarding physical education will be made available for various age groups.

Interestingly, some of these discussions not only concern students in upper grades, but also nursery students. Parts of the recommendations mention the establishment of nurseries for creativity and innovation; these will be under the auspices of the Supreme Council of Universities to provide support for creative youth in all fields.

Although this recommendation is based on Prime Minister, Mostafa Madbouly’s point that character building is a Cabinet priority, as he stated in the first session, improving the standard of living will not be ignored.

«Egypt Take Off» program focuses on improving the standard of living via establishing housing projects and eliminating slums, stated Madbouly.
These developments will aid the economy by both creating jobs and bringing about the concept of entrepreneurship, he explained.

MP and Secretary of Human Rights Committee, Sherif al-Wardani stressed the importance of this conference, particularly in terms of science, education and development of youth.

Wardani pointed out that the process of developing education is a fundamental and important goal for the development of the Egyptian human.

He stressed the need to implement the recommendations of the youth conference as it is a link between the state and the youth.

 

Source of the notice: http://www.egypttoday.com/Article/2/55079/Year-of-2019-Education-and-building-the-Egyptian-character

Comparte este contenido:

Skills Gap – The achilles of Sri Lanka’s education sector

Sri Lanka/October 24, 2017/Source: Lanka Bussines Online

As Sri Lanka enters an increasingly competitive international environment with a renewed emphasis on transforming itself into a modern economy, the importance of promoting technological innovationsand generating an educated workforce with market oriented skills cannot be over emphasized. High quality human resources with science and technology knowledge and a skilled labour force are necessary to keep up and improve on the country’s global competitiveness.

Link between Access to Tertiary Education and Skills Mis-match

As of 2014, only 5 per cent of 20-24 year olds were enrolled at a university, while another 8 per cent were enrolled in other educational institutions and only a 3 per cent of the same age group were enrolled in technical education and vocational training (TEVT) courses. The main reasons behind this lower tertiary enrolment include capacity constraints of the state university system, unavailability of a proper parallel higher education system with private sector involvement, and an underdeveloped TEVT sector. Given these, most of the school leavers usually find unskilled work or engage in casual jobs. This limited higher educated human capital acts as a constraint in catering to the labour market demand for advanced skilled workers.

ICT and English language are the most demanded soft skills in the country. Individuals competent in English have access to better quality jobs with higher salaries and benefits in the domestic labour market as well as internationally. However, the Census of Population and Housing 2012 dataconducted by the DCS reveals that of the age 15 and above population, English literacy (ability to speak, read and write) and computer literacy were around 22 per cent and 23 per cent, respectively. This situation creates a gap in meeting the demand for soft skills as previously noted.

The primary reason behind this skills mismatch is that the quality of the general and higher education systems – provided mainly by the public sector – does not transmit much productive skills to students. Also, there are supply side bottlenecks for more demanding subjects such as Science, ICT education, etc. at the school level — out of 10,162 schools only 10 per cent have the facilities to teach A-Level in the science stream.These have resulted in mismatches between the demands of the market and the skills of school and university graduates.

Sri Lanka also does not appear to produce graduates with the necessary skills needed for the job market. There is a mismatch in the courses offered by universities and competencies needed by the private sector. A major reason for the skill mismatch is the outdated curricula, aggravated by the lack of interaction with the private sector when designing degree programmes. For example, of those who do attend a university, nearly one-third are studying in the Arts Stream, whereas these Arts graduates are less employable when compared to graduates of other subject streams.Finally, there is no proper career guidance system to advise school leavers leading to an inadequate flow of information between youth and the labour market. Inadequate information flows between the youth and the labour market such as of the types of job opportunities in the labour market, limit the aspirations, and life goals of youth.

Reforms to BridgeSkill Gaps to World of Work

It is essential to reform the school and university curricula by introducing more market oriented subjects such as ICT/technological subjects as core subject in each A-Level subject stream, especially in the arts stream, in order to bridge the gap between demand and supply for these vital skills.

It is also a necessity to provide access to equal opportunities for education to all students across the country. Opportunities for education in science should be extended to remove involuntary discrimination for science education. While the number of science teaching schools needs to be increased to address equitable distribution, the technology stream should be strengthened where provision of science teaching is not possible.

It is essential setting national standards for all tertiary providers to revamp controversy surrounding of private higher education providers. Also, state universities should change to become dynamic centers of teaching and learning that will react to changes in the market in a timely manner. Curriculum should be reformed to match the skills demands of the globalized labour market with sufficient practical applications. Linkages should be developed between universities and private sector when designing the courses, securing the relevance of training to the changing needs of enterprises and labour markets.

A minimum of two years training is recommended for students after sitting for O-Levels to address the skill gaps of school leavers. Training programme should be more work-oriented technical training in different fields such as hotel, construction, textile and garment sectors, etc. Vocational education systems should be linked with industries that can absorb these students.

To address the labour market information gap among school leavers, awareness and absorptive capacities of industries, as well as education and training institutes needs to be developed. Raising awareness should be done at the school level after sitting for O-Levels. This awareness campaign should be done in a well-planned manner, with the involvement of vocational training authorities, private sector institutes, etc.

Source:

http://education.einnews.com/article/411285973/pEyjzJxrAfoM0Pk0?lcf=eG8zt30RHq4WcGF5PkFdHg%3D%3D

Comparte este contenido: