Page 3525 of 6179
1 3.523 3.524 3.525 3.526 3.527 6.179

Indígenas de Guatemala, ante una discriminación social y económica arraigada

Guatemala/07 de Agosto de 2017/WRadio

Los indígenas de Guatemala, casi la mitad de la población, continúan hoy enfrentando una discriminación social y económica arraigada en la sociedad y en las políticas públicas del Estado, por lo que es necesario hacer una «reflexión colectiva» para cambiar esta situación.

Los indígenas de Guatemala, casi la mitad de la población, continúan hoy enfrentando una discriminación social y económica arraigada en la sociedad y en las políticas públicas del Estado, por lo que es necesario hacer una «reflexión colectiva» para cambiar esta situación.

Esta es una de las principales conclusiones de un análisis hecho hoy en Ciudad de Guatemala sobre la situación de este colectivo, en el que participaron miembros de la ONU, de la Defensoría de la Mujer Indígena, la Comisión Presidencial Contra la Discriminación y el Racismo, entre otros.

El representante en Guatemala de la Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura (FAO), Diego Recalde, destacó que en el país, al igual que en el mundo, aún persisten «grandes desafíos» para hacer efectivos los derechos de los pueblos originarios, como la justicia, la salud, la educación, la alimentación, el derecho a la tierra o el trabajo.

«Hay que lugar contra el racismo y la discriminación arraigada» en la sociedad guatemalteca, enfatizó Recalde, y señaló que esta situación particular «de alta vulnerabilidad» de los pueblos indígenas es un problema mundial que requiere «redoblar» los esfuerzos para ponerle fin.

«La sociedad guatemalteca tiene esa oportunidad de cambiar estas cifras tan lamentables», señaló al recordar que la desnutrición crónica afecta a más del 70 % de los niños menores de 5 años en el occidente del país, cuando el promedio es de 56, o la falta de acceso a educación y salud.

Es por ello que abogó por promover nuevos modelos de desarrollo, con un enfoque de derechos humanos y desde el aspecto inclusivo e incluyente, máxime ahora que se cumple el décimo aniversario de la proclamación de la declaración de las Naciones Unidas sobre los derechos de los pueblos indígenas.

Guatemala, que celebrará la próxima semana el Día Internacional de los Pueblos Indígenas con diversas actividades, es un país multicultural y plurilingüe compuesto de cuatro grandes culturas: Maya, Xinca, Garífuna y ladina, y en su territorio conviven 25 comunidades lingüísticas.

Según datos facilitados por Naciones Unidas, se calcula que en la actualidad existen unos 370 millones de personas de diferentes comunidades indígenas repartidos por noventa países alrededor del mundo.

En Guatemala, el porcentaje de la población indígena es de un 41 %.

Entre los departamentos de Guatemala con mayor porcentaje de población indígena figuran Totonicapán (98,3 %), Sololá (96,4 %), Alta Verapaz (92,9 %), Quiché (88,8 %), Chimaltenango (79 %) y Huehuetenango (65,1 %).

De la inversión pública total, Guatemala dirige hacia los pueblos indígenas tres veces menos que a la destinada a la población no indígena, un hecho que no hace más que aumentar la brecha y la discriminación racial económica.

Según un estudio divulgado recientemente por el Instituto Centroamericano de Estudios Fiscales (Icefi), por cada quetzal (14 centavos de dólar) invertido en los pueblos no originarios, el Estado tan solo destina 33 centavos (4 centavos de dólar) a los pueblos indígenas.

El análisis, realizado sobre el presupuesto de gasto público de Guatemala ejecutado durante 2015, identifica que del total dirigido al ciudadano, 42.623 millones de quetzales (5.818 millones de dólares), solo la cuarta parte se destinó a los pueblos indígenas, 10.646 millones de quetzales (1.453 millones de dólares).

Estas cifras dejan entrever que las inversiones dirigidas a la población no indígena (mestiza o ladina) representaron un 6,5 % del producto interno bruto (PIB), en contraposición al 2,2 % de los pueblos originarios.

Fuente: http://www.wradio.com.co/noticias/internacional/indigenas-de-guatemala-ante-una-discriminacion-social-y-economica-arraigada/20170803/nota/3539144.aspx

 

Comparte este contenido:

Estados Unidos: Estudiantes de minorías en la mira

Estados Unidos/07 de Agosto de 2017/La Opinión

Los programas de Acción Afirmativa que facilitan los estudios universitarios a jóvenes pertenecientes a minorías están siendo atacados.

El Departamento de Justicia prepara una ofensiva contra los programas de Acción Afirmativa para el ingreso en las universidades. Esta es parte de la estrategia de la administración Trump de desbaratar las políticas que protegen y promueven los derechos civiles a lo largo del gobierno federal.

Un comunicado interno revelado por The New York Times informó a la División de Derechos Civiles que se busca interesados para trabajar en un nuevo proyecto de “investigaciones y posible litigación relacionada a la discriminación intencional basada en la raza, en las admisiones en colegios y universidades.”

Los conservadores se han opuesto por décadas a los programas de Acción Afirmativa por considerarlos una discriminación a la inversa. Ellos dicen que es un beneficio que pone a los candidatos o aspirantes latinos y afroamericanos por delante de los anglos, por el solo hecho de ser una
minoría.

En realidad, hoy la consideración del factor racial en el ingreso a las universidades está muy lejos de ser decisivo. Un fallo de la Corte Suprema de Justicia del año pasado aceptó el uso del factor racial de una manera “holística” como se usa en varias instituciones.

En muchas universidades, como en este caso de la Universidad de Texas en Austin, se acepta el 10% de los mejores estudiantes. Si quedan cupos se utiliza una combinación de criterios como actividades extracurriculares, un ensayo, el resultado de entrevistas, y otros factores como la raza. Dentro de esta fórmula, el elemento racial no es determinante.

La Acción Afirmativa surgió bajo la idea de que los efectos de la discriminación perjudican las oportunidades de las minorías para competir con otros, ya sea en empleos o contratos federales. En algunos como este último establece una cuota de participación, en otros se ayuda a competir sin exigir un resultado final.

En el caso de las universidades es reconocido que la experiencia educativa se enriquece en un ambiente estudiantil diverso. Lo que no ocurre en las principales colegios del país, por un tipo de discriminación que no es racial.

En estas universidades se da prioridad a los hijos y nietos de exalumnos porque ayudan a la recaudación de fondos, como a los hijos de donantes. Hay alumnos que tiene ventaja por ser hijos de empleados o simplemente venir de familias prestigiosas y adineradas.

La importancia de asistir a una universidad de élite, por ejemplo como Harvard, Yale, Princeton o Stanford, es más que la calidad de la enseñanza. Allí se establecen conexiones, se dan oportunidades laborales y de progreso que no existen en otros ámbitos.

Si se busca una igualdad de condiciones, estos también deberían desaparecer.

La idea de que la falta de oportunidades laborales y educativas se deben a un supuesto privilegio que reciben las minorías hoy integra un discurso populista de resentimiento.

Es más fácil señalar chivos expiatorios que lidiar con una educación que está fuera del alcance universitario de la mayoría, por una preparación deficiente y por ser muy costosa.

Fuente: https://laopinion.com/2017/08/03/editorial-estudiantes-de-minorias-en-la-mira/

Comparte este contenido:

Maestros peruanos llegan a acuerdo con Gobierno

Perú/07 de Agosto de 2017/Telesur

A casi 60 días de iniciada la huelga convocada por el Sindicato Unificado de Trabajadores de Educación en Perú, alcanzaron acuerdos con el Gobierno.
A casi 60 días de iniciada la huelga de docentes convocada por el Sindicato Unificado de Trabajadores de Educación del Cusco (SUTE), se realizó este jueves una reunión en la que se generaron acuerdos entre el sector y el Gobierno.

En el encuentro estuvieron presentes la ministra de Educación, Marilú Martens; el presidente del Consejo de Ministros, gobernadores regionales y los maestros en huelga por más de 50 días.

En la mesa de trabajo, el Gobierno se comprometió a incrementar el salario básico de los docentes a S/ 2,000 para diciembre de 2017, por lo cual, los maestros acordaron reiniciar las actividades en todas las escuelas del país este próximo lunes 07 de agosto.

Asimismo, entre otro de los acuerdos se estableció que para el año 2018 los Gobiernos Regionales dispondrán de un presupuesto de 70 por ciento que será destinado al sector educación.

 

View image on Twitter

En los últimos días se ha incrementado la preocupación en el país por este conflicto, el cual, según palabras de Martens, a quien más perjudica es a los estudiantes, especialmente a los estudiantes de último año de secundaria, quienes a partir de los 60 días de ausencias a clases regulares, perderían el año escolar y la posibilidad de aplicar para estudios universitarios.  

El Gobierno declaró el pasado 20 de julio estado de emergencia en seis distritos del país, en los que se han mantenido los huelguistas reclamando sus derechos. El estado de emergencia implica la suspensión de derechos de reunión y de tránsito, la libertad y seguridad personales y la inviolabilidad de domicilios.

A mediados de julio, Martens informó que presupuestariamente sería imposible para Perú aumentar los sueldos de los docentes este año, lo cual generó rechazo e indignación entre los maestros, quienes advirtieron que de ser necesario radicalizarían las acciones y la lucha por sus reivindicaciones laborales.

Fuente: http://www.telesurtv.net/news/Maestros-peruanos-llegan-a-acuerdo-con-Gobierno-20170803-0055.html

Comparte este contenido:

Argentina: Con “sentata”, alumnos piden sillas pedagógicas

Argentina/07 de Agosto de 2017/La Nación

Alumnos de varios colegios del departamento de Alto Paraná realizaron sentatas como protesta por la falta de sillas pedagógicas en sus respectivas instituciones. La medida asumida fue contra la Junta Municipal de Ciudad del Este porque esta rechazó la adjudicación a la empresa Classic Muebles SA, realizada por el Ejecutivo Municipal, para la compra de sillas y mobiliarios a ser destinados a escuelas y colegios públicos de esta ciudad.

La «sentata» de los estudiantes se realizó en varias instituciones educativas como la Escuela Graduada N° 354 «San Blas», el Centro Regional de Educación «Dr. Gaspar Rodríguez de Francia» y en el Centro Educativo Municipal, solventado por la institución comunal, en los turnos mañana y tarde. La medida de los alumnos duró una hora por turno, pero se sumaron a la misma los que son de las aulas más afectadas.

Algunos docentes también se unieron a la protesta porque expresaron que la falta de sillas y demás mobiliarios es un gran problema para ellos. En el caso del Centro Regional de Educación, explicaron, que en el tercer ciclo hacen falta 800 sillas.

Docentes y directores de las instituciones citadas, que critican la decisión de los concejales de la oposición, de rechazar la adjudicación, mantuvieron esta semana una reunión con la intendenta Sandra MacLeod, en la que se habló sobre el impasse con la Junta.

Por su parte, los concejales argumentan que la adjudicación se realizó sin que la empresa cumpliera con varios puntos del pliego de bases y condiciones. La inversión solicitada por la intendencia municipal es de 843 millones de guaraníes.

Mientras la intendenta municipal, Sandra MacLeod Zacarías, argumenta que la justificación de los concejales no corresponde porque la empresa cumplió con todas las exigencias, los legisladores comunales aseguran que no pueden aprobar una concesión en la que claramente ven que la empresa no cumplió con algunas normas.

Fuente: http://www.lanacion.com.py/pais_edicion_impresa/2017/08/04/con-sentata-alumnos-piden-sillas-pedagogicas/

Comparte este contenido:

Panamá: Se agudiza crisis, ante evidente ausencia de políticas públicas en educación

Panamá/Agosto de 2017/Fuente: Panamá América

La ausencia de políticas públicas en educación en Panamá, por parte del Gobierno, deja en evidencia la grave situación  laboral que atraviesan los docentes del país.

Por ello, tras el inicio de la huelga de docentes en áreas de difícil condición laboral el pasado 26 de junio, ayer, se sumaron el resto de los docentes de los lugares de difícil acceso.
También fue denunciada la falta de nombramientos de los docentes de disciplinas especiales en las escuelas, lo cual es una carencia común. «El servicio de educación preescolar es deficiente en el 85%  de las escuelas, y el 100%  carecen de gabinetes sicopedagógicos», sostuvieron.
Incluso, un estudio que realiza la Asociación de Educadores Veraguenses (Aeve), sobre condiciones de educabilidad de la red escolar en áreas de difícil condición laboral muestra que en la comarca Ngabe-Buglé, donde hay más de 100 escuelas en huelga en estos momentos, el 100% de las escuelas de esta zona no tienen planes de gestión de riesgo ni planes de atención primaria en salud para docentes y para estudiantes.
Además agregaron que no existe ningún plan de salud ocupacional para los docentes, y que el Ministerio de Educación (Meduca) adeuda a algunos docentes hasta más de cinco años de compensación económica de Difícil Condición Laboral.
«Vivimos una realidad educativa en la que podemos afirmar sin temor a equivocarnos que lo poco que funciona del sistema educativo panameño funciona en gran medida gracias al trabajo de miles de docentes y al apoyo de las comunidades», asegura Aeve.
Fuente: http://www.panamaamerica.com.pa/nacion/se-agudiza-crisis-ante-evidente-ausencia-de-politicas-publicas-en-educacion-1078943
Comparte este contenido:

Canada Has Homework If It Wants To Be An ‘Education Superpower’

Canadá/Agosto de 2017/Fuente:  Huffpost

Resumen:  En el artículo publicado el 2 de agosto por la BBC, «Cómo Canadá se convirtió en una superpotencia de la educación», Sean Coughlan toma los resultados de la evaluación de la última prueba PISA y concluye que Canadá es una «superpotencia de la educación». Los resultados del rendimiento de 2015 indican que Canadá ha subido al nivel más alto de los rankings internacionales y está en la posición número 10 en matemáticas, lectura y ciencia. A nivel universitario, Canadá tiene la proporción más alta del mundo de adultos en edad laboral que han pasado por la educación post-secundaria – 55 por ciento en comparación con un promedio en los países de la OCDE de 35 por ciento. Más de un tercio de los adultos jóvenes en Canadá son de familias donde ambos padres son de otro país. Los hijos de las familias migrantes recién llegadas parecen integrarse rápidamente y desempeñarse al mismo nivel que sus compañeros de clase. La variación de las calificaciones en Canadá causada por los estudiantes «favorecidos» y «desfavorecidos» era baja y las diferencias socioeconómicas en Canadá eran del 9%, frente al 20% en Francia y el 17% en Singapur.

Cherry picking a single test point and creating a generalization based on a single set of data can lead to inaccurate assessments and conclusions. In the article published on August 2 by the BBC, «How Canada became an education superpower,» Sean Coughlan takes assessment results from the latest PISA test and concludes Canada is an «education superpower.»

Coughlan uses the following reasons to give Canadian education such an honorary standing:

  • 2015 performance results indicate Canada has climbed into the top tier of international rankings and ​​​is in the top-10 position in math, reading and science.
  • At university level, Canada has the world’s highest proportion of working-age adults who have been through post-secondary education — 55 per cent compared with an average in OECD countries of 35 per cent.
  • More than a third of young adults in Canada are from families where both parents are from another country. Children of newly arrived migrant families seem to integrate quickly and perform at the same level as their classmates.
  • The variation in scores in Canada caused by «advantaged» and «disadvantaged» students was low, and that socio-economic differences in Canada was nine per cent, compared with 20 per cent in France and 17 per cent in Singapore.

Thank you for the gracious pat on the back, Mr. Coughlan and the BBC, but let’s look at more data before our Canadian school policy makers and universities believe their «achievements.»

Where other countries are systematically and carefully investing in their education, we are falling behind.

International assessment rankings

Looking at the historic data dating back to early 2000s, Canada’s performance on PISA tests is in decline. We are definitely not climbing any ranks. In PISA 2003, only two countries performed better than Canada on the combined mathematics scale. In PISA 2015, Canada ranked in the 10th position. Our students today aren’t as strong in their knowledge and problem-solving skills as those who took the test a decade earlier, and we have been outranked by more than a handful of countries during this time.

HTTP://WWW.OECD.ORG/CANADA/PISA-2015-CANADA.HTM
Source: PISA 2015

(Source: PISA 2015)

The downward trend isn’t only in our PISA scores. Two Chinese universities took giant steps forward in the 2017 Times Higher Education World University Ranking and outranked the University of British Columbia and McGill University, two of Canada’s top universities. In the midst of global competition where other countries are systematically and carefully investing in their education, we are falling behind.

Canada’s high proportion of working-age adults with post-secondary education

Pumping out post-secondary students doesn’t say much about the health of a country’s education system. Post-secondary studies are more accessible for Canadian students, as university and college tuition isn’t as astronomical as countries like the United States or the U.K. Also, our low population density and the presence of ample universities and colleges ready to accept tuition money creates an atmosphere where a larger percentage of our population gets a post-secondary education. This has led to our degrees losing their worth — even minimum-paying jobs require a post-secondary education. An exchange student commented on UBC Confessions Facebook page:

«As an exchange student at Sauder, there’s something I don’t understand. I come from a country where we have around 30-35 hours of classes a week, with essays to write and presentations to make as often as here, and where the grading system is way more harsh. However, I see more students getting overwhelmed by the amount of work here at UBC in one semester than in my three years at my home university. This semester honestly felt like holidays to me while I passed all my classes with better grades than what I’m used to.»

Canada’s high proportion of post-secondary degree holders doesn’t tell the entire story or indicate the health of our education system.

YAKOBCHUKOLENA VIA GETTY IMAGES

Quick integration of migrant children

I see that most of the time the children of new migrants are a couple of years ahead in math and science courses compared to their Canadian schoolmates. And often they come from countries where education is highly respected and valued. They have already achieved a level of mastery in learning and study skills that allows them to adapt to their new environment quickly. This is not a true indicator of the health of our education system, either.

We have a lot of work to do to stop the decline in our education.

Low performance variation in ‘advantaged’ and ‘disadvantaged’ children

It’s important to look closer into who is in the «disadvantaged» group to get a full picture of the situation. A large group that is «disadvantaged» in Canada is the children of first-generation immigrant parents who are highly educated and highly skilled, but because their training and education was from another country they struggle to find relevant work in Canada. Although their socio-economics may be low, these families place a high priority on their children’s education, giving our PISA results a false boost in equity. Canadian education equity needs a lot of work, as many of our students from a poor background or students with learning disabilities struggle and don’t receive the support they need.

Our students have a lot of potential. They want to learn. They want to create high quality work. Are our schools and universities willing to raise the bar on Canadian education and give our teachers the training and the support they need?

As much as it feels good for policy makers to have their egos stroked and be proud for their work being viewed as having some «superpower» status, we have a lot of work to do to stop the decline in our education. As long as we refuse to recognize the symptoms of our failing system and accept there is a problem, our situation will not get any better.

Fuente: http://www.huffingtonpost.ca/mehrnaz-bassiri/canada-has-homework-if-it-wants-to-be-an-education-superpower_a_23062342/

Comparte este contenido:

Japan Might Be What Equality in Education Looks Like

Japón/Agosto de 2017/Fuente: The Atlantic

Resumen:  En muchos países, incluidos los Estados Unidos, los antecedentes económicos de los estudiantes a menudo determinan la calidad de la educación que reciben. Los estudiantes más ricos tienden a ir a las escuelas financiadas por altos impuestos a la propiedad, con instalaciones de primera categoría y personal que les ayudan a tener éxito. En los distritos donde viven los estudiantes más pobres, los estudiantes a menudo obtienen instalaciones de mala calidad, libros de texto obsoletos y menos consejeros de orientación. No en Japón. Según la Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos (OCDE), un grupo de 35 países ricos, Japón ocupa un lugar destacado entre sus pares en proporcionar a sus estudiantes ricos y pobres con igualdad de oportunidades educativas: La OCDE estima que en Japón sólo alrededor del 9 por ciento De la variación en el rendimiento estudiantil se explica por los antecedentes socioeconómicos de los estudiantes. El promedio de la OCDE es del 14 por ciento, y en los Estados Unidos, del 17 por ciento. «En Japón, usted puede tener áreas pobres, pero usted no tiene escuelas pobres,»

In many countries, the United States included, students’ economic backgrounds often determine the quality of the education they receive. Richer students tend to go to schools funded by high property taxes, with top-notch facilities and staff that help them succeed. In districts where poorer students live, students often get shoddy facilities, out-of-date textbooks, and fewer guidance counselors.

Not in Japan. According to the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), a group of 35 wealthy countries, Japan ranks highly among its peers in providing its rich and poor students with equal educational opportunities: The OECD estimates that in Japan only about 9 percent of the variation in student performance is explained by students’ socioeconomic backgrounds. The OECD average is 14 percent, and in the United States, it’s 17 percent. “In Japan, you may have poor areas, but you don’t have poor schools,”

John Mock, an anthropologist at Temple University’s Japan campus, told me.

Perhaps as a result, fewer students in Japan struggle and drop out of school—the country’s high-school graduation rate, at 96.7 percent, is much higher than the OECD average and the high-school graduation rate in the United States, which is 83 percent. Plus, poorer children in Japan are more likely to grow up to be better off in adulthood, compared to those in countries like the U.S. and Britain (though Scandinavian countries lead in this regard). “It’s one of the few [education] systems that does well for almost any student,” Andreas Schleicher, who oversees the OECD’s work on education and skills development, told me, adding, “Disadvantage is really seen as a collective responsibility.”

For instance, in the village of Iitate, which was evacuated after being contaminated by radiation after the Fukushima nuclear-power-plant disaster in March 2011, many families still have not come back. Piles of contaminated soil, covered up, still dot the landscape, and many homes are shuttered. The local primary school has just 51 students, compared to more than 200 before the accident. Yet the quality of education given to returnees is top-notch. The government built a new school for students outside the radiation zone, in a town called Kawamata, and though the classes are still very small—first grade has only two students—the school is well staffed. In a classroom I visited, all five second-graders in the school watched a teacher demonstrate flower-arranging as three other teachers surrounded them, helping them with each step. In another, a math teacher quizzed students on odd and even numbers, and as the students split into groups to discuss a problem on the board, another teacher leaned in to help. Walking around the school, it almost seemed there were as many teachers as students.

“The quality of education is better than before March 11th [2011],” Tomohiro Kawai, a parent of a sixth-grader and the president of the school’s parent-teacher association, told me, citing the low student-teacher ratio. Many of the children who returned to the area are from single-parent families, a group prone to struggling economically; some parents moved back to Iitate because they needed help from their own parents in watching their children, according to Satoko Oowada, one of the school’s teachers. But the federal government takes pains to prevent economic hardship from affecting the quality of students’ education. It gave a grant to Iitate so that all students in the school would get free lunch, school uniforms, notebooks, pencils, and gym clothes. “Equality of education is very important for children in Iitate Village,” the school’s principal, Takehiko Yoshikawa, told me. “Everywhere, students receive the same education.”

The equity in Iitate stands in stark contrast to a place like New Orleans, which was also hit by a disaster. While Japan’s national government tried to ensure that students in the affected area got more resources after the accident, officials in New Orleans disinvested in the public educational system in their city. Public-school teachers were put on leave and dismissed, many students disappearedfrom schools’ rolls, and the New Orleans system now consists almost entirely of charter schools. (To be sure, New Orleans is something of an outlier—districts in New York and New Jersey, for example, received federal money to help deal with Hurricane Sandy’s impact on education.)

There are a number of reasons why Japan excels in providing educational opportunities. One of them is how it assigns teachers to schools. Teachers in Japan are hired not by individual schools, but by prefectures, which are roughly analogous to states. Their school assignments within the prefecture change every three years or so in the beginning of their careers, and then not quite as often later on in their careers. This means that the prefectural government can make sure the strongest teachers are assigned to the students and schools that need them the most. “There’s a lot going on to redirect the better teachers, and more precious resources, towards the more disadvantaged students,” Schleicher said.

It also means that teachers can learn from different environments. Young teachers are exposed to a series of different talented peers and learn from their methods. That’s a big contrast to some place like the United States, said Akihiko Takahashi, a onetime teacher in Japan and now an associate professor of elementary math at DePaul University’s College of Education. “Here in the U.S., the good teachers go to the good schools and stay there the whole time,” he told me.

Japan’s educational equality is also a matter of how funds are distributed. Teacher salaries are paid from both the national government and from the prefectural government, and so do not vary as much based on an area’s median household earnings (or, more often, property values). The same goes for the funding of building expenses and other fees—schools get more help from the national government than they would in the U.S. According to Takahashi, the Japanese educational system aims to benefit all students. “Their system is really carefully designed to have equal opportunity nationwide,” he said. This contrasts with the U.S. education system, he said, which he judges to raise up the best students but often leave everyone else behind.

What’s more, Japan actually spends less on education than many other developed countries, investing 3.3 percent of its GDP in education, compared to the OECD average of 4.9 percent. It spends $8,748 per student at the elementary school level, compared to the $10,959 that the United States spends. But it spends the money wisely. School buildings are not much to look at. Textbooks are simple and printed in paperback, and students and teachers are responsible for keeping schools clean. Japan also has fewer administrators on campuses—there is usually just a principal and a few vice principals, and not many others in the way of staff.

Despite the country’s relatively low spending on education, Japan’s teachers are paid more than the OECD average. And the profession has high barriers to entry: Much like the bar exam for American lawyers, Japan’s teacher entrance exams, which are administered by prefectures, are very difficult. Oowada told me she took the Fukushima Prefecture teaching exam five times before she passed it. She’s now a permanent teacher, guaranteed a pension and a job in the prefecture until age 60; she said that the year she passed, 200 people took the test, and only five passed. (Her co-teacher, Yuka Iinuma, had still not passed the test, and was working as a one-year contract teacher, moving from school to school each year. Many people who think they want to become teachers eventually give up when they can’t pass the exam, Oowada and Iinuma told me.) And even after their full certification, teachers have an incentive to perform better and better, as every three years they get reviewed for a promotion.

There are of course some downsides to being a teacher in Japan. Because they feel responsible for all students in their classes, teachers often spend lots of time outside of normal hours helping students who are falling behind. Yoshikawa, the school principal, told me of a teacher from Iitate who, when there was a gasoline shortage that prevented him from driving, rode his bike 12 miles to school each day from the evacuation zone to Kawamata, which includes an impressively hilly stretch. One teacher in Tokyo I talked to, who didn’t want her name used, said it wasn’t uncommon to work from 7 a.m. to 7:30 p.m., and said some teachers stayed until 9 at night. (There are teachers’ unions in Japan, but their power has eroded somewhat in recent years.)

Still, Japanese teachers are rewarded with a great deal of autonomy on how to improve student outcomes, Takahashi said. In a process called a “lesson study,” teachers research and design a new lesson over a set time period, and then present it to other teachers, who give feedback. Teachers also join together to identify school-wide problems, and organize themselves into teams to address those problems, sometimes writing a report or publishing a book on how to solve them, he said. “It’s not about an individual star teacher, but about teamwork,” he said.

Schleicher says that teachers’ focus on pedagogy contributes to the Japanese education system’s equality. The emphasis, he says, is not as much on absorbing content as it is on teaching students how to think. “They really focus on problem-solving, which means the ability to attack problems they had never seen before,” Takahashi said. In subjects like math, Japanese teachers encourage problem-solving and critical thinking, rather than memorization. For instance, Japanese students were explicitly taught how to solve just 54 percent of the problems on the international Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) test, but received an average score of 565, according to the Lesson Study Alliance, an education nonprofit. Students in the U.S. were explicitly taught how to solve 82 percent of the problems, yet received a lower average score, 518. Ironically, some of these Japanese teaching methods came from the United States—in particular, from an American group, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, which urged American teachers to change their methods throughout the 1980s. But it was Japanese teachers who listened to this advice.

Japan’s educational equality is also a matter of how funds are distributed. Teacher salaries are paid from both the national government and from the prefectural government, and so do not vary as much based on an area’s median household earnings (or, more often, property values). The same goes for the funding of building expenses and other fees—schools get more help from the national government than they would in the U.S. According to Takahashi, the Japanese educational system aims to benefit all students. “Their system is really carefully designed to have equal opportunity nationwide,” he said. This contrasts with the U.S. education system, he said, which he judges to raise up the best students but often leave everyone else behind.

What’s more, Japan actually spends less on education than many other developed countries, investing 3.3 percent of its GDP in education, compared to the OECD average of 4.9 percent. It spends $8,748 per student at the elementary school level, compared to the $10,959 that the United States spends. But it spends the money wisely. School buildings are not much to look at. Textbooks are simple and printed in paperback, and students and teachers are responsible for keeping schools clean. Japan also has fewer administrators on campuses—there is usually just a principal and a few vice principals, and not many others in the way of staff.

Despite the country’s relatively low spending on education, Japan’s teachers are paid more than the OECD average. And the profession has high barriers to entry: Much like the bar exam for American lawyers, Japan’s teacher entrance exams, which are administered by prefectures, are very difficult. Oowada told me she took the Fukushima Prefecture teaching exam five times before she passed it. She’s now a permanent teacher, guaranteed a pension and a job in the prefecture until age 60; she said that the year she passed, 200 people took the test, and only five passed. (Her co-teacher, Yuka Iinuma, had still not passed the test, and was working as a one-year contract teacher, moving from school to school each year. Many people who think they want to become teachers eventually give up when they can’t pass the exam, Oowada and Iinuma told me.) And even after their full certification, teachers have an incentive to perform better and better, as every three years they get reviewed for a promotion.

There are of course some downsides to being a teacher in Japan. Because they feel responsible for all students in their classes, teachers often spend lots of time outside of normal hours helping students who are falling behind. Yoshikawa, the school principal, told me of a teacher from Iitate who, when there was a gasoline shortage that prevented him from driving, rode his bike 12 miles to school each day from the evacuation zone to Kawamata, which includes an impressively hilly stretch. One teacher in Tokyo I talked to, who didn’t want her name used, said it wasn’t uncommon to work from 7 a.m. to 7:30 p.m., and said some teachers stayed until 9 at night. (There are teachers’ unions in Japan, but their power has eroded somewhat in recent years.)

Still, Japanese teachers are rewarded with a great deal of autonomy on how to improve student outcomes, Takahashi said. In a process called a “lesson study,” teachers research and design a new lesson over a set time period, and then present it to other teachers, who give feedback. Teachers also join together to identify school-wide problems, and organize themselves into teams to address those problems, sometimes writing a report or publishing a book on how to solve them, he said. “It’s not about an individual star teacher, but about teamwork,” he said.

Schleicher says that teachers’ focus on pedagogy contributes to the Japanese education system’s equality. The emphasis, he says, is not as much on absorbing content as it is on teaching students how to think. “They really focus on problem-solving, which means the ability to attack problems they had never seen before,” Takahashi said. In subjects like math, Japanese teachers encourage problem-solving and critical thinking, rather than memorization. For instance, Japanese students were explicitly taught how to solve just 54 percent of the problems on the international Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS) test, but received an average score of 565, according to the Lesson Study Alliance, an education nonprofit. Students in the U.S. were explicitly taught how to solve 82 percent of the problems, yet received a lower average score, 518. Ironically, some of these Japanese teaching methods came from the United States—in particular, from an American group, the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, which urged American teachers to change their methods throughout the 1980s. But it was Japanese teachers who listened to this advice.

Japan’s schools can also be extremely stressful places for students, who are sometimes bullied if they fall behind. “As long as I performed well in school, things were okay. But once I started to deviate just a little—they [parents and teachers] went to the extreme and started treating me incredibly coldly,” one student told Anne Allison, a cultural anthropologist at Duke University who has written extensively on Japan. Japanese students are also expected to belong to after-school clubs for sports or dance, which can keep them at school until 6 p.m. “When they come home, it’s already dark and all they have left to do is eat dinner, take a bath and do their home assignment and sleep,” the Tokyo teacher told me.

Despite these flaws, Japan’s educational system still sets an example for other countries to follow. That’s partly because Japan has different goals for its schools than somewhere like the United States does. “The Japanese education system tries to minimize the gap between the good students and everyone else,” Takahashi told me. That means directing more resources and better teachers to students or schools that are struggling. It also means giving teachers the freedom to work together to improve schools. This could be difficult to transplant to the United States, where education has long been managed on a local level, and where talk of sharing resources more often leads to lawsuits than it does to change. But Japan’s success is relatively recent, according to Schleicher. About 50 years ago, Japan’s schools were middling, he said. Countries can make their schools more equitable. They just need to agree that success for all students is a top priority.

Fuente: https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2017/08/japan-equal-education-school-cost/535611/

 

 

 

 

Comparte este contenido:
Page 3525 of 6179
1 3.523 3.524 3.525 3.526 3.527 6.179