Page 51 of 101
1 49 50 51 52 53 101

Educating Australia – why our schools aren’t improving

Australia/Febrero de 2017/Autores: Tom Bentley/Glenn C. Savage/Fuente: The Conversation

RESUMEN: En esta serie vamos a explorar cómo mejorar las escuelas en Australia, basado en ensayos de un nuevo libro, Educating Australia: Challenges for the Decade Ahead. Algunos de los expertos más prominentes en el sector abordan cuestiones clave, entre ellas, por qué no estamos viendo mucho progreso; Si evaluamos a los niños de la manera más efectiva; Por qué los padres necesitan escuchar lo que la evidencia nos dice, y mucho más. La escuela australiana ha sufrido cambios importantes durante la última década, principalmente a través de las reformas de políticas nacionales acordadas por los gobiernos federal y estatal.

In this series we’ll explore how to improve schools in Australia, based on essays from a new book, Educating Australia: Challenges for the Decade Ahead. Some of the most prominent experts in the sector tackle key questions, including why we are not seeing much progress; whether we are assessing children in the most effective way; why parents need to listen to what the evidence tells us, and much more.

Australian schooling has undergone major changes over the last decade, mainly through national policy reforms agreed by federal and state governments. These include:

  • an Australian Curriculum
  • standardised national assessments in literacy and numeracy (NAPLAN)
  • national reporting on schools through the My School website
  • professional standards for teachers and principals
  • a universally accessible year of pre-school
  • partial implementation of the “Gonski” needs-based funding reforms.

During the same decade, rapid economic, social, technological and cultural changes have generated new pressures and possibilities for education systems – and the people who work in them.

For example, Australia continues to become more ethnically and culturally diverse, and more closely connected to the Asia-Pacific region. It is more active in its use of mobile and digital technology, more urbanised and more unequal in wealth and income.

These broader shifts, and the political responses to them, increasingly place education in a vice. It faces mounting pressure to achieve better outcomes for more people, while expected simultaneously to innovate and solve wider problems of society. And this is all to be done in a context of growing fiscal austerity.

Lots of change, but very little impact

Despite significant reforms over the past decade, there is unfortunately very little sign of positive impacts or outcomes. For example:

  • The percentage of Australian students successfully completing Year 12 is not improving.
  • State and federal school funding policies are still reproducing a status quo that entrenches sectoral division and elitism.
  • New evidence-informed methods, such as clinical and targeted teaching models (which focus on careful monitoring and evaluation of individual student progress and teaching impact), are being taken up very slowly in teacher education degrees and schools.
  • The status and efficacy of vocational learning have shown little meaningful improvement.
  • NAPLAN and My School have not led to improvements in literacy and numeracy, with 2016 data showing either stagnation or decline.
  • The performance of Australian students in international assessments of maths, science and literacy skills has steadily declined.

Replicating a failing system

The national reforms since the mid-2000s were designed to address many of these persistent issues.

Yet somehow, despite hard-fought political battles and reforms, and the daily efforts of system leaders, teachers, parents and students across the nation, we continue to replicate a system in which key indicators of impact and equity are stagnating or going backwards.

The school funding impasse exemplifies this problem.

The policy area is continuously bedevilled by the difficulties of achieving effective collaboration between governments and school sectors in our federal system.

It also remains hamstrung by highly inequitable funding settlements, established over many decades. These continue to entrench privilege in elite schools, while consistently failing to provide “needs-based” funding to schools and young people who need the most support.

As a result, educational opportunities and outcomes become further polarised. Young people from privileged backgrounds are accruing further advantage. Those from disadvantaged backgrounds are increasingly locked out of competitive education and job markets.

The global growth of identity politics, fostering conflict over class, race, gender and migration, puts these trends in stark context.

So what are we doing wrong?

In Educating Australia: Challenges for the Decade Ahead, we tackle this question and seek to create a more innovative and productive interaction between ideas, evidence, policy and practice in education.

The scholars, practitioners and policy thinkers involved in the book examine key issues in education and canvas opportunities for improving outcomes on a wide scale. This includes areas like teaching, assessment, curriculum, funding and system-wide collaboration.

Across all these areas, it is clear that huge value would be created in Australia if the ways of framing and delivering teaching, learning and community engagement were adjusted to reflect new methods and perspectives arising from innovative practice and research.

Yet this is easier said than done. And despite many commentators claiming so, there are no magic-bullet solutions.

Over the past decade, the policy landscape has become riddled with reform “solutions” that subject students, teachers, administrators and policymakers to mounting levels of pressure and stress. The short-term cyclical churn of today’s politics and media clearly exacerbates these problems.

There have, however, been some important and substantive reforms that prove not all political change is superficial. And not all aspects of national reform have failed to generate positive impacts.

For example, the Gonski reforms have channelled powerful resources to some schools. And My School has allowed us to see clearly where inequalities lie and interventions must be targeted.

Policy interventions, however, rarely achieve their objectives in isolation, or in predictable or linear ways, when they encounter complex systems and realities.

That is why we need to rethink the purposes of education as we go, and align these with the workings of curriculum, assessment, regulation and funding, along with the daily efforts of teachers, students and other community members.

Discussions about purposes will not thrive if separated or abstracted from the practices and politics of education: the places and spaces where policies are implemented, where students experience schooling, where professional identities are formed and challenged.

As such, far greater attention and skill is needed to craft and build the institutional capabilities that render goals achievable, ensure fairness, and foster innovation and systemic learning in the public interest.

Practical lessons arising from recent innovations in teacher education, professional learning, curriculum alignment and inter-school collaboration can help here.

We also need to move beyond a fascination with divisions between governments in Australia’s federal system. We must focus instead on harnessing the potential of networks and collaborations across systems.

That is why a coherent reform “narrative” that genuinely reflects evidence about the nature of effective learning and teaching matters so much.

Ultimately, the future success of Australian school-age education hinges on whether powerful ideas can be realised in practice, across tens of thousands of classrooms and communities.

If we want reforms to be effective, their design must be grounded in wide-ranging dialogue about the nature of the problems and evidence about what will help to solve them.

Fuente: http://theconversation.com/educating-australia-why-our-schools-arent-improving-72092

Comparte este contenido:

Australia: Literacy and numeracy tests for Australian Year 1 students

Australia/Enero de 2017/Fuente: The Australian

RESUMEN: Es probable que los niños de seis años de Australia tengan que mostrar sus habilidades de contar, nombrar formas y pronunciar palabras bajo una prueba de «toque ligero» para comprobar su progreso escolar. El ministro de Educación, Simon Birmingham, ha nombrado un panel de cinco personas para desarrollar las nuevas evaluaciones para los estudiantes del primer año. Informarán a los ministros de educación de la nación a mediados de este año. El senador Birmingham ha estado presionando para las pruebas de habilidades después de varios estudios, incluyendo comparaciones internacionales, encontró que los niños australianos se estaban quedando atrás.

Australia’s six-year-olds are likely to have to show off their counting skills, name shapes and sound out words under a “light touch” test to check their schooling progress.

Education Minister Simon Birmingham has appointed a five-person panel to develop the new assessments for Year 1 students.

They’ll report back to the nation’s education ministers in the middle of this year.

Senator Birmingham has been pushing for the skills tests after several studies, including international comparisons, found Australian children were falling behind.

Performance is at best plateauing and the gap between the brightest students and those struggling is growing.

“These skills checks are not expected to be a confronting test but rather a light touch assessment that ensures teachers, parents and schools know at the earliest possible stage if children aren’t picking up reading or counting skills as quickly as they should, enabling them to intervene rapidly,” Senator Birmingham said today.

He says the nation can’t afford to wait any longer to act on turning around declining education results.

The Year 1 tests are likely to be based on assessments used in England that involve children verbally identifying letters and sounds in real and made up words, simple counting, recognising numbers, naming shapes and demonstrating basic measurement knowledge.

The plan was first flagged in the budget last year and is reportedly expected to lead to a shake-up in phonics teaching.

The panel will also consider the best way to implement the tests, including a trial and when and how often they should be conducted.

The teachers union has labelled the tests a distraction from school funding issues.

Australian Education Union president Correna Haythorpe doubts the tests will help lift literacy and numeracy standards without schools also getting resources to help students identified as struggling.

Panel designing Year 1 skills check

* Mandy Nayton – chief executive of Dyslexia-SPELD Foundation

* Pamela Snow – head of the La Trobe Rural Health School, registered psychologist, having qualified originally in speech pathology

* Jennifer Buckingham – education research fellow at Centre for Independent Studies

* Steven Capp – principal, Bentleigh West Primary School, Victoria

* Geoff Prince – director of Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute

* Allason McNamara – maths teacher and president of Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers

Fuente: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/education/literacy-and-numeracy-tests-for-australian-year-1-students/news-story/fa826a1ae116a9a954abb1ff303b37c2

Comparte este contenido:

Australia:How to tell if your child’s educational needs are being met at school

Oceanía/Australia/Enero 2016/Noticias/https://theconversation.com/

As a new school year begins, your child will most likely have a new teacher. With a new teacher comes a new opportunity for your child to learn the academic and personal skills important for school – and beyond.

From an educational psychology perspective, there are lots of ways teachers greatly influence children’s outcomes. These include:

  1. Motivation and engagement
  2. Buoyancy, resilience, and adaptability
  3. Personal best goals
  4. Load reduction instruction (not overloading a child with work)
  5. Interpersonal relationships and social support

These can also be used to help parents consider how their child’s educational needs are being met at school.

Motivation and engagement

The teacher’s capacity to motivate and engage the class is vital to your child’s journey this year.

“Motivation” refers to children’s inclination, interest, energy and drive to learn, work effectively, and achieve their academic potential.

“Engagement” is the behaviour that accompanies this inclination and energy.

The Motivation and Engagement Wheel is a useful way to understand your child’s motivation and engagement.

The Wheel comprises positive motivation (self-belief, valuing of school, learning focus), positive engagement (planning, task management, persistence), negative motivation (anxiety, fear of failure, low control), and negative engagement (self-sabotage, disengagement).

Motivation and Engagement Wheel. Lifelong Achievement Group

It can be helpful in identifying and sustaining specific motivational strengths in your child. It can also be used to target specific areas that might need further assistance.

The teacher’s task is to help support your child’s positive motivation and reduce your child’s negative motivation.

Resilience and adaptability

In this coming year, your child will experience academic setback, difficulty, and adversity. How your child deals with academic adversity is very important.

How the teacher helps your child work through this adversity is also very important.

Research has identified two types of academic adversity.

The first type is low-level or everyday adversity. All children experience this. Examples include struggling to complete difficult schoolwork, receiving a disappointing result, imminent deadlines, and clashing due dates.

The second type of academic adversity is major adversity. Fewer children will experience this. Examples include poor physical and/or mental health, learning difficulties or disabilities, chronic failure, bullying, suspension or expulsion, changing schools or repeating a grade.

A third factor in this area is the capacity to navigate uncertainty, change, variability, novelty, and transition.

During any school day, your child will change tasks and lessons, interact with different teachers and school staff, work with different groups of students, and frequently experience new or changing conditions.

Children need to be able to adapt to help them deal with these sorts of changes, transitions, and uncertainties.

Personal best goals

There is growing awareness of the limits of comparative approaches to assessing students. Assessment along these lines typically involves ranking and comparing your child with other children.

There is useful information in knowing how your child is travelling compared to other children – but it tends to be narrow information and gives little insight into some important aspects of your child’s development.

Research shows it is beneficial to benchmark a student against him/herself (not just against other students). This is called a growth approach to academic development. Here, children are assessed against their previous best performance or efforts.

There are great motivational and achievement benefits in encouraging a student to compete with him/herself. Teachers play a major role in the goals students set. With teacher and parental support, personal best goals might be something for your child to consider this year.

Load reduction instruction

In the initial stages of learning any new skill or knowledge, your child is a novice. Because of this, it is important not to overload them in these early learning stages.

Reducing the load on your child involves teaching that is structured, organised in small and manageable tasks, provides clear examples, and is explicit in the content to be learned.

It also involves practice and repetition, so that key skills and knowledge can be readily implemented or recalled when needed.

This approach is called “load reduction instruction” and describes ways the teacher can reduce the load on your child in the initial stages of learning.

As your child develops these skills and knowledge, the teacher then moves onto more open-ended and guided discovery learning approaches.

Both explicit and discovery approaches are critical to your child’s academic development. It is the sequencing of these that is really important to get right. With core skills and knowledge under your child’s belt, high quality discovery learning then follows.

Interpersonal relationships and social support

The extent to which your child will be receptive to the teacher’s efforts I have described here will depend on the relationship the teacher builds with your child.

There are three key relationships that help children learn:

  1. The interpersonal relationship – the extent to which the teacher is interested in, helps, and encourages your child.
  2. The substantive relationship – the extent to which your child relates to and is interested in the content of what is being taught.
  3. The pedagogical relationship – the extent to which your child relates to the methods the teacher uses to teach.

Parents/carers also share a substantial part of the responsibility – and children are greatly assisted when parents/carers and the teachers are on the same page.

Fuente:

https://theconversation.com/how-to-tell-if-your-childs-educational-needs-are-being-met-at-school-71265

Fuente imagen:

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/3mLGErWlwk96YsUZovDWpKIgDOdRUiMWnJ–uxMwrVFX7jEsvx7m5GYaRCOwROy79Fvv=s85

Comparte este contenido:

New Zealand children could start school at age four under cohort entry proposal

Nueva Zelanda/Enero de 2017/Fuente: Stuff

RESUMEN: Los padres pronto podrían enviar a sus hijos a la escuela a los cuatro años bajo un cambio de ley propuesto para los arreglos de entrada a la escuela. La propuesta de que las escuelas tengan la opción de «entrada de cohortes» significaría que los niños comiencen la escuela primaria al comienzo del período más cercano a su quinto cumpleaños, antes que de su sexto. Los padres decidirían si sus hijos entran a la educación formal a la edad de cuatro o cinco años y el Ministerio de Educación creía que el esquema ofrecería mayor flexibilidad a las escuelas, limitaría los costos de educación de la primera infancia para las familias y daría a los nuevos participantes la oportunidad de comenzar la escuela juntos. En su informe sobre la entrada de cohortes, el ministerio observó una tendencia lenta y no reglamentada hacia las escuelas que experimentan con la práctica presentando un «riesgo emergente» para las finanzas de la Corona al incrementar los costos de la educación primaria y de la primera infancia.

Parents could soon be sending their children to school at age four under a proposed law change to school entry arrangements.

The proposal that schools have the option of «cohort entry» would mean children start primary school at the start of the term closest to their fifth birthday, rather than before their sixth.

Parents would decide whether their children enter formal education at age four or five, and the Ministry of Education believed the scheme would offer greater flexibility to schools, limit early childhood education costs for families and give new entrants the opportunity to start school together.

In its report on cohort entry, the ministry noted a slow, unregulated trend towards schools experimenting with the practice presented an «emerging risk» to Crown finances by increasing primary and early childhood education costs.

Several national education groups have opposed the change, which would cost the early childhood sector $11 million if it was adopted by all schools.

The proposal is one of a raft of changes proposed in the Education (Update) Amendment Bill, which is at the select committee stage in Parliament. Submissions on the bill close at the end of the month.

Early Childhood Council chief executive Peter Reynolds called the cohort proposal a «funding cut by stealth».

Childcare centres had lost an average of $900,000 in subsidies since 2010 and the law change, while not necessarily bad for schools, would further hurt smaller early childhood centres if large numbers of their charges left at the same time, he said.

He said suggestions children starting school in groups would be less isolated were a «red herring» as most – 90 per cent according to Government figures – started within two weeks of their fifth birthday and were not long separated from their preschool friends.

Of 1117 public submissions on the cohort proposal, nearly three-quarters were supportive, including 76 per cent of parents and 80 per cent of teachers.

Teachers’ union NZEI, the New Zealand Principals’ Federation, school trustees association, council for educational research and New Zealand Kindergartens are among those who oppose cohort entry.

NZEI president Lynda Stuart said there was no research to suggest group entry provided educational benefits over the current individual system.

«Age five is really early when you look at other countries and the potential is kids could start at age four.

«We have got a really nice way of children entering into schools, it’s almost a rite of passage. It’s an exciting time and also a time where a child can still be evaluated as an individual.»

New Zealand Kindergartens chief executive Clare Wells said if schools were already using cohort entry systems, the education sector could benefit from hearing their experiences.

Portobelo​ Preschools principal leader Dr Sandy Radford was concerned starting school before age five would hinder children’s cognitive and social development and change the culture of new entrant classrooms.

«Instead of having a culture already established where children already know the ropes, there is whole group who don’t have experienced children to show them how it’s done.»

She hoped children’s individual maturity and abilities would be prioritised over administrative preferences.

Isleworth School principal and Canterbury Primary Principals’ Association president Jeanette Shearer said cohort entry could simplify schools’ enrolment processes.

«In some ways it would be easier to know you are starting with a cohort of children on a particular day rather than constantly transitioning children into your school.»

While it was possible parents whose children were enrolled at age five might feel disadvantaged, it was hard to gauge the community’s feelings because very few families were aware of the proposed change, she said.

Dr Peter Ferrar at Cornerstone Christian School in Palmerston North said he thought most schools would be happy with the change.

He said the school might «have a crack» at cohort entry twice a term but held reservations about starting school before age five, saying it was already too early for many pupils.

Fuente: http://www.stuff.co.nz/national/education/88750698/new-zealand-children-could-start-school-at-age-four-under-cohort-entry-proposal

Comparte este contenido:

Australia inaugura la Marcha mundial de Mujeres anti-Trump

Australia/23 enero 2017/Fuente: Hispantv

Miles de australianos y neozelandeses son los primeros del mundo en dar inicio a la ‎llamada Marcha de Mujeres contra el nuevo presidente de EE.UU., Donald Trump.‎

Mujeres y hombres se han congregado este sábado en Sídney y Melbourne, en Australia, y en Wellington y Auckland, en Nueva Zelanda, para iniciar la Marcha de Mujeres que se realiza a nivel mundial, en protesta por el manifiesto desprecio que Trump muestra a las mujeres.

Las protestas (se estima que sean 600 alrededor del mundo) culminarán en Washington, donde se espera que 200 000 personas se reúnan en la extensa explanada delante del Capitolio, el mismo sitio donde el magnate republicano fue investido el viernes como 45º presidente de EE.UU.

El mismo día de su investidura se realizaron numerosas protestas y un gran número de manifestantes acabaron detenidos.

Esta Marcha de Mujeres es el resultado de un mensaje de Teresa Shook, una abogada jubilada residente en Hawái, cuyo llamamiento en Facebook se extendió rápidamente por todas las redes sociales.

Por otra parte, miles de personas también se han congregado frente a la embajada estadounidense en Londres, capital del Reino Unido, como parte de esta marcha mundial.

En España, estudiantes españoles y estadounidenses se han concentrado en la embajada de Estados Unidos en Madrid para protestar en contra del nuevo inquilino de la Casa Blanca.

La secretaria general del sindicato de estudiantes, Ana García, ha explicado a la agencia de noticias española Europapress que el objetivo de la protesta es enviar un mensaje a Trump de que «no va a poder gobernar sin ningún problema», ya que los jóvenes que están en su contra no van a «aceptar sus maneras machistas y homófobas».

«Hoy empieza la lucha, va a ser el presidente más breve de toda la historia de los EE.UU. porque desde luego no vamos a parar de movilizarnos con las mujeres y los inmigrantes hasta que abandone la Casa Blanca y cerremos la posibilidad de que lleve a cabo sus políticas», asegura García.

 Fuente: http://www.hispantv.com/noticias/ee-uu-/330917/protestas-trump-mundial-mujeres-australia-washington

Comparte este contenido:

Estudiantes iberoamericanos acusan de estafa a asesoría australiana

Oceania/Austrialia/22 Enero 2017/Fuente: eltiempo/Autor: EFE

Decenas de estudiantes iberoamericanos han denunciado ante las autoridades australianas a una agencia local de servicios en educación que les ha estafado al menos 749.500 dólares (705.500 euros), informaron hoy Efe fuentes oficiales.

La oficina australiana del defensor de los estudiantes internacionales indicó que han recibido 40 denuncias contra la empresa «Tu futuro en Australia», domiciliada en Brisbane, la capital del estado de Queensland (noreste).

«La mayoría de las quejas se recibieron durante el cierre del período de Navidad y enero de 2017. El defensor empezó a preocuparse y descubrió que un número de agencias gubernamentales también había recibido quejas», explicó a Efe en un correo.

El organismo señaló que no tiene «potestad para investigar directamente a los agentes de educación» y aconsejó a los demandantes que presenten sus reclamaciones directamente a través de Educación y que acudan a ellos en caso de que no se solucione el asunto a su satisfacción.

Según la cadena pública ABC, los afectados son al menos un centenar de estudiantes de países como Brasil, Colombia o México, entre otros, que acudieron a esta agencia en Australia para que les tramitase la inscripción en centros de enseñanza y les procurase alojamiento.

La compañía cobraba una entrada de 376 dólares (353 euros) y pedía por adelantado el dinero de las matrículas. Entre los afectados también podría figurar un número indeterminado de estudiantes españoles, de acuerdo con fuentes diplomáticas.

«Tu futuro en Australia» cerró a mediados de diciembre pasado por vacaciones y tenía previsto reanudar sus actividades el lunes pasado, pero en la oficina en Brisbane nadie contesta las llamadas telefónicas efectuadas por Efe. El silencio de la agencia ha causado desconcierto e indignación en decenas de los supuestos afectados, quienes han expresado su descontento en las redes sociales.

El colombiano César Moreno, uno de los afectados, declaró desde su país a la emisora australiana SBS que los dueños del negocio han huido y se encontrarían en España, Nueva Zelanda o Arabia Saudí. Moreno, que nunca llegó a ingresar en la escuela de inglés en la que planeaba estudiar, explicó que los afectados se están agrupando por países «para presentar las denuncias correspondientes».

Por su lado, el Ministerio de Educación de Australia aseguró que trabaja para encontrar una forma de asistir a los afectados, mientras que la Policía de Queensland se limitó a responder que colabora con las autoridades del país.

Phil Honeywood, representante de la Asociación de Educación Internacional de Australia, explicó por la citada emisora que el seguro no cubre a los estudiantes extranjeros que no estén en Australia y recomendó a las víctimas que se asesoren con las autoridades de sus países.

Fuente de la noticia: http://www.eltiempo.com/estilo-de-vida/educacion/estafa-a-estudiantes-en-australia/16796021

Fuente de la imagen:http://images.et.eltiempo.digital/contenido/estilo-de-vida/educacion/IMAGEN/IMAGEN-16796031-2.jpg

Comparte este contenido:

Australia names first indigenous minister

Australia/Enero de 2017/Fuente: News

RESUMEN: Australia el miércoles nombró a su primer ministro indígena, un antiguo trabajador que ha acreditado la educación para su ascenso desde humildes comienzos en un país donde los aborígenes siguen siendo los más desfavorecidos. Ken Wyatt se convirtió en Ministro de Atención a los Ancianos y para la Salud Indígena cuando el Primer Ministro Malcolm Turnbull reorganizó a su ejecutivo tras la renuncia del ministro de Salud en un escándalo de gastos. Wyatt fue la primera persona aborigen elegida a la cámara baja de Australia en 2010 y anteriormente había sido asistente del ministro de salud. «Así como Ken fue el primer indígena elegido para la Cámara de Representantes y el primero en ser nombrado para el ejecutivo del Gobierno de la Commonwealth, ahora es el primer indígena nombrado para el ministerio de la Commonwealth», dijo Turnbull a periodistas en Sydney .

Australia on Wednesday appointed its first indigenous minister, a former labourer who has credited education for his rise from humble beginnings in a country where Aborigines remain among the most disadvantaged.

Ken Wyatt became Minister for Aged Care and for Indigenous Health when Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull reshuffled his executive following the resignation of the health minister in an expenses scandal.

Wyatt was the first Aboriginal person elected to Australia’s lower house in 2010 and had previously been assistant health minister.

«Just as Ken was the first indigenous person to be elected to the House of Representatives and the first to be appointed to the executive of the Commonwealth Government, he is now the first indigenous person appointed to the Commonwealth ministry,» Turnbull told reporters in Sydney.

«His extensive knowledge and experience as a senior public servant in indigenous health, coupled with his work as an assistant minister in this portfolio, makes him an ideal minister for this area.»

Aborigines — who make up about three of the national population of 24 million — suffer disproportionate levels of disease, imprisonment and social problems as well as significantly lower education, employment and life expectancy.

Western Australian Wyatt, a former teacher who worked in indigenous health and education, made a moving maiden speech upon entering parliament.

Wearing a traditional kangaroo cloak, he spoke of humble beginnings — from trapping rabbits as a child to his life as a labourer — saying education was a driver for his success.

A member of Australia’s conservative Liberal Party, Wyatt said indigenous people should be empowered to determine their own solutions, calling for greater representation for Aboriginals in parliament.

In the shake-up, Turnbull moved Industry Minister Greg Hunt to the health and sport portfolios, taking over from Sussan Ley who resigned last week.

Turnbull is setting up an independent agency to monitor and administer all expenses claims by parliamentarians.

Fuente: https://au.news.yahoo.com/world/a/34164982/australia-names-first-indigenous-minister/#page1

Imagen de archivo

Comparte este contenido:
Page 51 of 101
1 49 50 51 52 53 101