Ecuador: La educación y el trabajo inquietan al votante joven

América del  Sur/Ecuador/03 Diciembre 2016/Fuente: El comercio

Las proyecciones del Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Censos (INEC) dan cuenta de que en el 2017 un 33,5% de la población será joven (entre 16 y 29 años). Es decir, estará habilitado para votar. El Presidente puede ser elegido en primera vuelta con al menos el 40% de votos, por lo que ese grupo etario podría pesar en los comicios de febrero. Pablo Romero, docente de teoría política en la Universidad Salesiana y especialista en juventudes, sostiene que hay al menos dos inquietudes fuertes en los jóvenes frente a los comicios: educación y empleo. En el primer caso hay un énfasis en el libre acceso a las universidades públicas, que ahora se rige por los resultados del Examen de Educación Superior y en las críticas a la Secretaría de ese ramo. El segundo tema preocupa por los índices de desempleo en la juventud. En la Encuesta de Empleo del INEC, de septiembre pasado, se registra que el 29,8% de los desempleados corresponde a personas de entre 25 y 34 años, la categoría más joven. Además, según un estudio de la firma Deloitte, realizado en 29 países con 7 700 ‘millennials’ (18-24 años), hay un contraste entre lo que pasa con esta generación en Ecuador y el resto de países participantes. “Dos tercios de los ‘millennials’ manifiestan su deseo de marcharse de sus trabajos para el 2020. Y el 44% para el 2018 (…) Por su parte, en Ecuador no piensan en dejar sus trabajos porque todavía no tienen uno”, es una de las conclusiones del estudio, hecho en marzo. Además, según la encuesta de octubre de Cedatos sobre la situación del país, los jóvenes marcaron entre los principales problemas al empleo, con 27% y la educación, con el 6%. En lo político, en cambio, hay una polarización entre las principales organizaciones de jóvenes. Un sector pugna por la continuidad del Gobierno y otro por un cambio radical. En el último estudio de Cedatos también se consultó a los cerca de 2 200 encuestados ­cómo analizan la situación actual del país. Un 32% de jóvenes, de entre 16 y 25 años, consideró que el Ecuador va por buen camino con la dirección del Gobierno actual, mientras que el 60% consideró que iba por mal camino. La Federación de Estudiantes Universitarios del Ecuador (FEUE) simboliza esas posiciones. Hay dos directivas. Una encabezada por Daniela Oviedo, quien es candidata alterna a la Asamblea Nacional por Alianza País. La otra la lidera Andrés Quishpe, que se reconoce como de oposición. Oviedo cuenta que su FEUE está elaborando un manifiesto de propuestas para los candidatos. Es el Mandato 2035, iniciativa paralela a la Agenda del Gobierno en temas educativos. En este programa, a través de reuniones provinciales y nacionales, delinean un plan sobre trabajo, salud, educación, ambiente, cultura, deporte y participación ciudadana. El documento final será entregado “a los candidatos que lo quieran”, dice Oviedo. Aunque no hay fecha definida. Quishpe, por su lado, explica que sus propuestas están listas. Las principales -relata- son la eliminación del Bachillerato Unificado y un plan de libre acceso a la universidad pública. En el tema de empleo, en cambio, su FEUE busca que se refuercen las pasantías y prácticas preprofesionales, para que sean pagadas y también para que sirvan como la primera experiencia laboral. “Cuando salimos de la universidad nos encontramos con que nos piden un título universitario, corta edad y experiencia laboral, pero con el actual régimen es difícil conseguirlo”, explica el dirigente. En el sector secundario el panorama es parecido. Coexisten la Federación de Estudiantes Secundarios (FESE), de oposición al actual Régimen; y la Asociación Nacional de Estudiantes Secundarios (Andes), afín al Gobierno. Luis Tacuri, titular de Andes, dice que en diciembre entregarán un manifiesto a los candidatos. Empezaron a construir estas propuestas con el aporte del exministro de Educación, Augusto Espinosa (candidato a la Asamblea por AP). La idea es reforzar las políticas de educación del actual Régimen. Romero añade que hay otros sectores de jóvenes que buscan presencia política en las “nuevas sensibilidades”. Por ejemplo, los derechos sexuales, el uso terapéutico del cannabis, el ambientalismo y los derechos de género. En contexto En las elecciones seccionales del 2014, el grupo de jóvenes representó el 30,6% del padrón. La mayoría de candidatos a la Presidencia ha incluido en sus discursos propuestas de educación y empleo para este grupo poblacional.

Fuente: http: //www.elcomercio.com/actualidad/educacion-elecciones2017-votante-joven-ecuador.html

 

Comparte este contenido:

Japón: Teachers say Japan’s young voters need to have political awareness nurtured in schools

Asia/japón/Julio 2016/Autor: MIZUHO AOKI / Fuente: japantimes.co.jp

Resumen:  Tres estudiantes de secundaria, de 18 años de edad, en Shinagawa Joshi Gakuin en Tokio dijeron que estaban contentos de emitir su voto en las elecciones de la Cámara Alta del domingo, estando entre los primeros adolescentes de la nación a unirse al electorado.

Three 18-year-old high school students at Shinagawa Joshi Gakuin in Tokyo said they were excited to cast their ballots in Sunday’s Upper House election, being among the nation’s first teenagers to join the electorate.

“Just the thought of having a chance to possibly change the future (of this country), and the prospects of seeing more policies addressed to younger generations makes me excited,” said Rena Yamaguchi, a third-year student at the school, while her two fellow students nodded.

“It’s a historic event, and I’m proud to be among the first 18-year-olds to vote,” agreed Mizuki Inoue.

The students also admitted, however, to being slightly bewildered, and were not exactly confident about selecting a party or a candidate.

They have studied campaign pledges and followed media coverage. But rather than making things clear, the long lists of policy pledges have left the girls uncertain about how to make the best decision.

“We want to know what we are supposed to look for before casting our votes,” Inoue said.

Now that the voting age has been lowered from 20 to 18, the nurturing of political literacy among young people is becoming increasingly important to overcome the strong sense of apathy and inertia that has characterized them in recent decades.

Observers naturally see this as an opportunity to get younger generations more involved in politics.

Educators, however, are caught in a dilemma, trapped between cultivating students’ political literacy and maintaining political neutrality as required by law.

Education ministry guidelines require teachers to maintain this “neutrality” by refraining from expressing their personal political views.

“It’s easily said. But in reality, it’s hard to maintain that neutrality,” said Shigeyuki Yamane, a social studies teacher at Kokugakuin Kugayama High School in Tokyo.

In light of the new minimum voting age, the school held a special class about the importance of voting and the basic rules of an election. It also conducted a mock election last year, hoping to raise student awareness.

But when it comes to teaching students about contentious political issues, it can get difficult, he said.

“Even just nodding when a student expresses an opinion about a certain political party may give the impression that I support that party,” Yamane said.

When discussing contentious issues such as the constitutionality of the Self-Defense Forces, he made sure to introduce the different stances of political parties to ensure neutrality.

“It makes us nervous,” Yamane said. “Political neutrality, after all, is to introduce both sides of an argument.”

In Japan, political education had long been almost a taboo topic, observers say.

Shigeo Kodama, a professor of education at the University of Tokyo, said the taboo originally functioned to keep certain ideologies from manifesting themselves in school education.

From the late 1950s to 1970s, the Japan Teachers’ Union (Nikkyoso), which was a strong supporter of opposition parties and mainly leftist-leaning, staged strikes to fight the conservative government’s education policies, particularly the textbook screenings and rating system for teachers.

To prevent ideological confrontations, schools gave short shrift to political issues, Kodama said.

Also, university student movements in the 1960s against issues such as Japan’s security alliance with the United States were rife, later spreading to high school students, with some setting up barricades to close schools in protest.

In response to those events, in 1969, the education ministry issued guidelines banning high school students from engaging in political activities.

“With the guidelines, politics were put on a par with alcohol and tobacco,” Kodama said.

Rather than cultivating students’ social awareness, schools put weight on nurturing their ability to pass high school and university entrance exams, though that focus has been changing slowly in the past two decades, he said.

One recent change was the education ministry’s scrapping of the 1969 guidelines last year, lifting the longtime ban on political activities by high school students.

“Schools avoided exposing young people to politics for a long time,” Kodama said. “Considering that, it’s not something that can be changed overnight.

“Japan is still struggling to transform the educational system it adopted during the period of rapid economic growth (between the 1950s and 1970s),” Kodama said.

One lingering concern is that educators are still refraining from raising political issues in class due to fears of violating neutrality. But teachers need to understand, Kodama said, that ensuring political neutrality means teaching students about both sides of contentious issues, and explaining why political parties are fighting over them.

“Otherwise students may never understand,” Kodama said. “The teacher’s role is to fully explain a current situation without taking sides, and to think together with students.”

Shigeo Kawaguchi, a social studies teacher at Denen Chofu Gakuen High School, agreed, saying teachers must provide students with many different points of view on current political issues.

He attempted to stimulate students think about such issues by introducing several newspaper articles in his classes.

He has also shown a placard used in a rally to oppose the security legislation to expand the scope of overseas operations of the Self-Defense Forces. Kawaguchi was among the participants in the rally .

“I don’t think I’m violating political neutrality,” Kawaguchi said. “I’m showing them that adults should have opinions on (political issues).

“I believe children won’t form political opinions unless teachers say what they think,” he said. “I always tell students it is OK to have different opinions from mine.”

Shiori Ito, 16, one of Kawaguchi’s students, said his introduction to current political issues helped deepen her understanding of what was going on in society.

“I think it has given me the chance to gain more knowledge about society,” said Ito, a second-year student who will be speaking in the United States this summer about the voting age change on a travel-abroad program.

Although Ito is not eligible to vote in Sunday’s election, she welcomed the change. “It is a great opportunity for society to hear the voices of teenagers. We could change society.”

Kawaguchi also said it is important for adults to discuss social issues to cultivate political awareness among young students.

“Their parents and their grandparents need to discuss politics in front of them,” Kawaguchi said. “But sadly, many don’t.”

Fuente de la noticia: http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/07/08/national/politics-diplomacy/teachers-say-japans-young-voters-need-political-awareness-nurtured-schools/#.V4CoINLhC01

Fuente de la imagen: https://www.google.co.ve/search?q=Teachers+say+Japan%E2%80%99s+young+voter&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjVpv6CuuXNAhWEJB4KHaxvAQEQ_AUICCgB&biw=1366&bih=637

Comparte este contenido: