Page 30 of 47
1 28 29 30 31 32 47

Australia: se reclama una financiación garantizada para la educación preescolar mientras el gobierno se dispone a efectuar recortes

Oceanía/Australia/10 de febrero de 2017/Fuente: ei-ie.org

Los educadores han emprendido una campaña para reclamar una financiación sostenible para los centros de educación preescolar, que consideran vitales para el desarrollo de los niños, al proporcionarles las habilidades sociales y educativas que necesitan para obtener unos buenos resultados escolares.

El 3 de febrero, el sindicato de la educación de Australia (AEU), una organización nacional afiliada a la Internacional de la Educación, lanzó su campaña “Protejamos nuestras escuelas preescolares” para pedir al gobierno federal que garantice una financiación continua para los centros de educación preescolar y ponga fin a la incertidumbre con la que se enfrentan los padres y el personal de la educación.

A pesar de que más del 95% de los niños de cuatro años de Australia estén matriculados en un programa de educación preescolar de 15 horas semanales financiado por el gobierno, este programa está amenazado por parte de las autoridades públicas que no garantizarán su participación en la financiación más allá de 2017. Esto ha impedido que los centros preescolares puedan hacer planes para el futuro, lo cual pone en peligro los puestos de trabajo de los educadores.

Ejercer presión sobre las autoridades públicas

Todos los niños merecen tener acceso a una educación preescolar de calidad que les ayude a prepararse para la escuela, dijo la presidenta federal de AEU, Correna Haythorpe. La nueva campaña del sindicato promoverá el valor de la educación preescolar y aumentará la presión ejercida sobre el gobierno federal para que proporcione una financiación a largo plazo.

“El ministro de educación, Simon Birmingham, ha defendido reiteradamente los beneficios de la educación preescolar; debe hacer algo más que hablar, debe dar a los centros preescolares la financiación que sin duda necesitan”, subrayó.

AEU, sus miembros y sus simpatizantes ya han llevado a cabo campañas exitosas en dos ocasiones para que se ampliara la financiación de la educación preescolar, dijo. “La prórrogas a corto plazo no son suficientes; nuestros hijos merecen que se garantice el acceso a la educación preescolar de calidad y los educadores merecen tener seguridad con respecto a su futuro”.

La mejor preparación preescolar y de calidad para un aprendizaje a lo largo de la vida

Haythorpe hizo hincapié en que la investigación demuestra que una educación preescolar de calidad constituye la mejor preparación para una vida de aprendizaje, porque da un impulso a la preparación para la escuela y mejora los resultados a largo plazo.

Preguntó por qué el gobierno federal podía considerar la posibilidad de recortar la financiación de los programas que ofrecen enormes beneficios a los niños. Todos los niños merecen tener un buen comienzo en su aprendizaje y un acceso a 15 horas a la semana de educación preescolar, impartida por un docente que cuente con una formación universitaria, dijo Haythorpe.

Rezagados en materia de financiación

Esta campaña ofrece a los padres y a los educadores la oportunidad de decir al gobierno de Turnbull que todos los niños merecen 15 horas de educación preescolar.

Australia ya invierte mucho menos en la educación de la primera infancia que la media de los países de la Organización para la Cooperación y el Desarrollo Económicos (OCDE). Su financiación nacional representa solo el 0,5% del producto interno bruto (PIB) en comparación con el promedio de los países de la OCDE que es del 0,8%, dijo Haythorpe, y agregó que “esto supone hacer caso omiso de las investigaciones que consideran que los programas preescolares constituyen una manera rentable de mejorar el rendimiento escolar”

Fuente: https://www.ei-ie.org/spa/news/news_details/4274

Imagen: https://www.ei-ie.org/kroppr/eikropped/Australia_AEU_ECE_Preschool_148646625014864662509453.jpg

Comparte este contenido:

Young Australians at Heywire Summit debate access to education in regional areas

Australia/Febrero de 2017/Autor: Robert Virtue/Fuente: ABC

RESUMEN: La Cumbre Regional Anual ABC Heywire de la Juventud en Canberra está discutiendo muchos de los problemas desafiantes que afectan a los jóvenes australianos regionales. Casi 40 jóvenes de diversas partes de Australia regional se han reunido para desarrollar ideas para abordar estos problemas y crear cambios positivos en sus comunidades. Bajo la oscilante bandera y los techos cubiertos de paja del Parlamento, el acceso a la educación fue un punto central en un debate transmitido en vivo por el programa Life Matters de RN. El debate se centró en la premisa: «¿Las escuelas regionales podrán dar a los estudiantes de los países las mismas oportunidades que sus primos de la ciudad?»Los debatedores participaron en el programa Heywire Trailblazers, que forma parte de la cumbre de este año.

The annual ABC Heywire Regional Youth Summit in Canberra is discussing many of the challenging issues affecting young regional Australians.

Almost 40 young people from diverse parts of regional Australia have gathered to develop ideas to tackle these problems and create positive change in their communities.

Under the fluttering flag and sloped grassed roofs of Parliament House, access to education was front and centre in a debate broadcast live on RN’s Life Matters program.

The debate centred on the premise ‘Will regional schools ever be able to give country students the same opportunities as their city cousins?’

The debaters were participants in the Heywire Trailblazers program, which is part of this year’s summit.

Regional students ‘can never have the same opportunities as city kids’

Katie McAllister from Western Australia said there were significant barriers for students in regional areas.

«We live in an information age, where Australia’s economy is changing from primary industries and moving fast into a service economy, where knowledge and wisdom and information is going to be the currency of the next couple of years,» she said.

«There is so much pressure on schools to do everything, to be everything, to prepare students for this fast-changing world.»

Ms McAllister said accepting lower ATAR scores to assist regional students enter university showed an inherent belief that rural schools were disadvantaged.

«We suffer the tyranny of distance,» she said.

«When we look at the resources of schools, we see that there’s a higher turnover of teachers, which means the teachers that are really passionate are not going to be there in the next five years.

«When we look at IT, there’s not the hardware, there’s not the internet that students need to pursue high-quality education.»

During the debate, Ms McAllister said more infrastructure and updated curriculums were needed.

«Currently schools aren’t keeping up with this fast-changing world; we have curriculums that are a little bit outdated, and they’re not plugging the gaps with information that students need to see,» she said.

«We need to see these extra-curricular opportunities offered to students, but currently they’re not in regional areas because of the lack of infrastructure.»

‘Access to education in the city and country is equal’

Arguing the opposite side of the debate was Cohen Auguston from Western Australia.

He said regional students did have equal educational opportunities as city students, and mindsets needed to change.

«Opportunity is not measured in education. Opportunity is measured in potential,» he said.

«The same opportunities are offered in regional and metropolitan Australia, but just with different methodology.

«Kids in metropolitan Australia learn resilience from being knocked back.

«They learn resilience from failing a test, from being held up in traffic and missing a meeting, whereas kids in regional Australia learn resilience from being caught in drought-ridden Queensland for five years.

«The same thing is learned, the same opportunity is reached, but just in two very different respects.»

Mr Auguston said students in regional and city areas had the same access to educational leaders.

«Teachers at regional schools are usually from the city, and they have the same education as metropolitan teachers,» he said.

«Is there a physical barrier between teachers in the regions and metropolitan centres? They teach the same things; resources are irrelevant.

«People bring change; change is not embedded in a location.

«The people of once-small regional communities that did something great stood up and said ‘I want something better’. That is why we are here.

«We are here because we have the same opportunities to make change.»

Fuente: http://www.abc.net.au/news/2017-02-08/young-australians-debate-access-to-education-in-regional-areas/8252398

Comparte este contenido:

Australia: El personal de apoyo a la educación, vital para el éxito de los estudiantes.

Junto con Claude Carroué de la Internacional de la Educación, Daniel Lafrenière de la Central de Sindicatos de Quebec (CSQ) examina la situación del personal de apoyo a la educación y su importancia para la educación de los estudiantes.

Oceanía/Australia/07.01.2017/Autor y Fuente: https://www.ei-ie.org

En el último programa emitido por EdVoices, la serie de podcasts producidos por la Internacional de la Educación (IE), Daniel Lafrenière, secretario-tesorero de la Central de Sindicatos de Quebec (CSQ), insiste en que el personal de apoyo a la educación debe ser reconocido “como un actor privilegiado para el éxito de la educación en el marco de una educación de calidad”, ya que “estas personas apoyan directamente al personal docente en las escuelas y en los centros de enseñanza superior”.

Señala que el personal de apoyo a la educación representa 81 categorías de trabajo diferentes que son esenciales “para el éxito educativo de un gran número de estudiantes”. Se trata de una profesión en sí misma, afirma, un camino que han elegido: “estas personas están entregadas a sus funciones”.

Cuando se le pregunta más concretamente por la educación de la primera infancia, Lafrenière dice que todo el personal de la educación de este sector contribuye al desarrollo educativo de los niños y tiene un impacto en su futura escolarización.

“La educación va desde la primera infancia hasta la universidad”, dijo, y agregó que para la CSQ “la primera infancia es el momento en que se estimula a los niños a través de programas educativos”. Añadió: “No consiste en el cuidado de los niños, sino que son unos proyectos educativos reales que se llevan a cabo para preparar a los niños para la escuela y para socializarlos con otros niños”.

Sin embargo, critica al actual gobierno de Canadá por reducir significativamente la financiación del sector público y favorecer los centros de la primera infancia privados. El hecho de dar a los padres que optan por el sector privado una ventaja indebida repercute negativamente en la esfera pública subvencionada. «Nos parece verdaderamente inquietante ver que los gobiernos favorecen al sector privado, que está menos sujeto a normas, porque no queremos retroceder 10 años, cuando teníamos ‘cuidadores de niños’ que no tenían un programa educativo, cuando los vecinos o las tías cuidaban a los niños. Tenemos la suerte de tener ahora un sistema de la primera infancia que incluye una serie de normas, que obliga a ofrecer un programa educativo que sea seguro, y en el que los niños pueden contar con educadores cualificados”.

Fuente: https://www.ei-ie.org/spa/news/news_details/4269

Imagen: http://www.clarin.com/educacion/Ignacio-Australia-Finanzas-Aplicadas-University_CLAIMA20130517_0192_17.jpg

Comparte este contenido:

Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority data show half of SA’s childcare centres failing to meet quality standards

Australia/Febrero de 2017/Autor: Matt Smith/Fuente: The Advertiser

RESUMEN: Más de la mitad de los proveedores de cuidado infantil de Australia del Sur aún no han sido evaluados o no cumplen con los estándares de calidad nacionales, revelan los nuevos datos de educación. El análisis de los registros nacionales de la Autoridad de Calidad de la Educación y el Cuidado de Niños de Australia por el Sunday Mail muestra que 607 de los 1165 proveedores del estado -o 52,1 %- están clasificados como «aún no evaluados» o «trabajando hacia» estándares nacionales de calidad. Las cifras muestran que 558 – o el 47,9 por ciento – de los proveedores de cuidado infantil SA cumplen o superan los estándares nacionales de calidad – el porcentaje más bajo en el país y muy por debajo del promedio nacional del 62,7 por ciento. Los registros de la Autoridad de Calidad de la Educación y el Cuidado de Niños de Australia están diseñados para ayudar a los padres a tomar decisiones informadas sobre los mejores lugares para enviar a sus hijos.

MORE than half of South Australia’s childcare providers are yet to be assessed or are failing to meet national quality standards, new education data reveals.

Analysis of the Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority national registers by the Sunday Mail shows 607 of the state’s 1165 providers — or 52.1 per cent — are either classified as “not yet assessed” or “working towards” national quality standards.

The figures show 558 — or 47.9 per cent — of SA childcare providers are meeting or exceeding national quality standards — the lowest percentage in the country and well below the national average of 62.7 per cent.

Australian Children’s Education and Care Quality Authority registers are designed to help parents make informed choices about the best places to send their children.

As part of the process, providers are expected to meet 58 elements in seven quality areas that cover educational programs.

These include children’s health and safety, physical environment, staffing arrangements, relationships with children, partnerships with families and communities and leadership and service management.

The authority’s chief executive, Gabrielle Sinclair, said “parents should be assured that services rated ‘working towards’ are providing safe education and care programs” with providers needing to meet “minimum operating requirements … before they can even begin to care for children.”

“Over time, all services should aim to be meeting or exceeding the (national quality standards), however it is realistic to expect that as part of the reform some services first identify the areas they need to improve on,” Ms Sinclair said.

The register shows 263 of South Australia’s 1165 centre-based and family day care providers are still working toward the national quality standards.

A further 344 are classed as “provisional — not yet assessed” despite 91 per cent (314) being registered between 2012 and 2015.

The figures mean the parents of potentially up to 14,000 children are unable to get a gauge of how the providers rate compared to their peers.

The data does however show some good signs for South Australia with no centres where “significant improvement is required.” and an above average number of centres exceeding the national quality standards.

An Education Standards Board spokesman said it was working at completing unassessed providers this year.

“The board has visited 97 per cent of all education and care services in SA and developed a strategy to increase the rate of assessments,” he said.

“The board is committed to completing the remaining assessments in 2017.”

“The national quality standard is a quality assurance system that is over and above minimum operating requirements and supports continuous improvement in services.

“This system sets a high benchmark for services.”

Fuente: http://www.adelaidenow.com.au/news/south-australia/australian-childrens-education-and-care-quality-authority-data-show-half-of-sas-childcare-centres-failing-to-meet-quality-standards/news-story/f1e59500d40e1d2316a500f1dfa0a0aa

Comparte este contenido:

Educating Australia – why our schools aren’t improving

Australia/Febrero de 2017/Autores: Tom Bentley/Glenn C. Savage/Fuente: The Conversation

RESUMEN: En esta serie vamos a explorar cómo mejorar las escuelas en Australia, basado en ensayos de un nuevo libro, Educating Australia: Challenges for the Decade Ahead. Algunos de los expertos más prominentes en el sector abordan cuestiones clave, entre ellas, por qué no estamos viendo mucho progreso; Si evaluamos a los niños de la manera más efectiva; Por qué los padres necesitan escuchar lo que la evidencia nos dice, y mucho más. La escuela australiana ha sufrido cambios importantes durante la última década, principalmente a través de las reformas de políticas nacionales acordadas por los gobiernos federal y estatal.

In this series we’ll explore how to improve schools in Australia, based on essays from a new book, Educating Australia: Challenges for the Decade Ahead. Some of the most prominent experts in the sector tackle key questions, including why we are not seeing much progress; whether we are assessing children in the most effective way; why parents need to listen to what the evidence tells us, and much more.

Australian schooling has undergone major changes over the last decade, mainly through national policy reforms agreed by federal and state governments. These include:

  • an Australian Curriculum
  • standardised national assessments in literacy and numeracy (NAPLAN)
  • national reporting on schools through the My School website
  • professional standards for teachers and principals
  • a universally accessible year of pre-school
  • partial implementation of the “Gonski” needs-based funding reforms.

During the same decade, rapid economic, social, technological and cultural changes have generated new pressures and possibilities for education systems – and the people who work in them.

For example, Australia continues to become more ethnically and culturally diverse, and more closely connected to the Asia-Pacific region. It is more active in its use of mobile and digital technology, more urbanised and more unequal in wealth and income.

These broader shifts, and the political responses to them, increasingly place education in a vice. It faces mounting pressure to achieve better outcomes for more people, while expected simultaneously to innovate and solve wider problems of society. And this is all to be done in a context of growing fiscal austerity.

Lots of change, but very little impact

Despite significant reforms over the past decade, there is unfortunately very little sign of positive impacts or outcomes. For example:

  • The percentage of Australian students successfully completing Year 12 is not improving.
  • State and federal school funding policies are still reproducing a status quo that entrenches sectoral division and elitism.
  • New evidence-informed methods, such as clinical and targeted teaching models (which focus on careful monitoring and evaluation of individual student progress and teaching impact), are being taken up very slowly in teacher education degrees and schools.
  • The status and efficacy of vocational learning have shown little meaningful improvement.
  • NAPLAN and My School have not led to improvements in literacy and numeracy, with 2016 data showing either stagnation or decline.
  • The performance of Australian students in international assessments of maths, science and literacy skills has steadily declined.

Replicating a failing system

The national reforms since the mid-2000s were designed to address many of these persistent issues.

Yet somehow, despite hard-fought political battles and reforms, and the daily efforts of system leaders, teachers, parents and students across the nation, we continue to replicate a system in which key indicators of impact and equity are stagnating or going backwards.

The school funding impasse exemplifies this problem.

The policy area is continuously bedevilled by the difficulties of achieving effective collaboration between governments and school sectors in our federal system.

It also remains hamstrung by highly inequitable funding settlements, established over many decades. These continue to entrench privilege in elite schools, while consistently failing to provide “needs-based” funding to schools and young people who need the most support.

As a result, educational opportunities and outcomes become further polarised. Young people from privileged backgrounds are accruing further advantage. Those from disadvantaged backgrounds are increasingly locked out of competitive education and job markets.

The global growth of identity politics, fostering conflict over class, race, gender and migration, puts these trends in stark context.

So what are we doing wrong?

In Educating Australia: Challenges for the Decade Ahead, we tackle this question and seek to create a more innovative and productive interaction between ideas, evidence, policy and practice in education.

The scholars, practitioners and policy thinkers involved in the book examine key issues in education and canvas opportunities for improving outcomes on a wide scale. This includes areas like teaching, assessment, curriculum, funding and system-wide collaboration.

Across all these areas, it is clear that huge value would be created in Australia if the ways of framing and delivering teaching, learning and community engagement were adjusted to reflect new methods and perspectives arising from innovative practice and research.

Yet this is easier said than done. And despite many commentators claiming so, there are no magic-bullet solutions.

Over the past decade, the policy landscape has become riddled with reform “solutions” that subject students, teachers, administrators and policymakers to mounting levels of pressure and stress. The short-term cyclical churn of today’s politics and media clearly exacerbates these problems.

There have, however, been some important and substantive reforms that prove not all political change is superficial. And not all aspects of national reform have failed to generate positive impacts.

For example, the Gonski reforms have channelled powerful resources to some schools. And My School has allowed us to see clearly where inequalities lie and interventions must be targeted.

Policy interventions, however, rarely achieve their objectives in isolation, or in predictable or linear ways, when they encounter complex systems and realities.

That is why we need to rethink the purposes of education as we go, and align these with the workings of curriculum, assessment, regulation and funding, along with the daily efforts of teachers, students and other community members.

Discussions about purposes will not thrive if separated or abstracted from the practices and politics of education: the places and spaces where policies are implemented, where students experience schooling, where professional identities are formed and challenged.

As such, far greater attention and skill is needed to craft and build the institutional capabilities that render goals achievable, ensure fairness, and foster innovation and systemic learning in the public interest.

Practical lessons arising from recent innovations in teacher education, professional learning, curriculum alignment and inter-school collaboration can help here.

We also need to move beyond a fascination with divisions between governments in Australia’s federal system. We must focus instead on harnessing the potential of networks and collaborations across systems.

That is why a coherent reform “narrative” that genuinely reflects evidence about the nature of effective learning and teaching matters so much.

Ultimately, the future success of Australian school-age education hinges on whether powerful ideas can be realised in practice, across tens of thousands of classrooms and communities.

If we want reforms to be effective, their design must be grounded in wide-ranging dialogue about the nature of the problems and evidence about what will help to solve them.

Fuente: http://theconversation.com/educating-australia-why-our-schools-arent-improving-72092

Comparte este contenido:

Australia: Literacy and numeracy tests for Australian Year 1 students

Australia/Enero de 2017/Fuente: The Australian

RESUMEN: Es probable que los niños de seis años de Australia tengan que mostrar sus habilidades de contar, nombrar formas y pronunciar palabras bajo una prueba de «toque ligero» para comprobar su progreso escolar. El ministro de Educación, Simon Birmingham, ha nombrado un panel de cinco personas para desarrollar las nuevas evaluaciones para los estudiantes del primer año. Informarán a los ministros de educación de la nación a mediados de este año. El senador Birmingham ha estado presionando para las pruebas de habilidades después de varios estudios, incluyendo comparaciones internacionales, encontró que los niños australianos se estaban quedando atrás.

Australia’s six-year-olds are likely to have to show off their counting skills, name shapes and sound out words under a “light touch” test to check their schooling progress.

Education Minister Simon Birmingham has appointed a five-person panel to develop the new assessments for Year 1 students.

They’ll report back to the nation’s education ministers in the middle of this year.

Senator Birmingham has been pushing for the skills tests after several studies, including international comparisons, found Australian children were falling behind.

Performance is at best plateauing and the gap between the brightest students and those struggling is growing.

“These skills checks are not expected to be a confronting test but rather a light touch assessment that ensures teachers, parents and schools know at the earliest possible stage if children aren’t picking up reading or counting skills as quickly as they should, enabling them to intervene rapidly,” Senator Birmingham said today.

He says the nation can’t afford to wait any longer to act on turning around declining education results.

The Year 1 tests are likely to be based on assessments used in England that involve children verbally identifying letters and sounds in real and made up words, simple counting, recognising numbers, naming shapes and demonstrating basic measurement knowledge.

The plan was first flagged in the budget last year and is reportedly expected to lead to a shake-up in phonics teaching.

The panel will also consider the best way to implement the tests, including a trial and when and how often they should be conducted.

The teachers union has labelled the tests a distraction from school funding issues.

Australian Education Union president Correna Haythorpe doubts the tests will help lift literacy and numeracy standards without schools also getting resources to help students identified as struggling.

Panel designing Year 1 skills check

* Mandy Nayton – chief executive of Dyslexia-SPELD Foundation

* Pamela Snow – head of the La Trobe Rural Health School, registered psychologist, having qualified originally in speech pathology

* Jennifer Buckingham – education research fellow at Centre for Independent Studies

* Steven Capp – principal, Bentleigh West Primary School, Victoria

* Geoff Prince – director of Australian Mathematical Sciences Institute

* Allason McNamara – maths teacher and president of Australian Association of Mathematics Teachers

Fuente: http://www.theaustralian.com.au/national-affairs/education/literacy-and-numeracy-tests-for-australian-year-1-students/news-story/fa826a1ae116a9a954abb1ff303b37c2

Comparte este contenido:

Australia:How to tell if your child’s educational needs are being met at school

Oceanía/Australia/Enero 2016/Noticias/https://theconversation.com/

As a new school year begins, your child will most likely have a new teacher. With a new teacher comes a new opportunity for your child to learn the academic and personal skills important for school – and beyond.

From an educational psychology perspective, there are lots of ways teachers greatly influence children’s outcomes. These include:

  1. Motivation and engagement
  2. Buoyancy, resilience, and adaptability
  3. Personal best goals
  4. Load reduction instruction (not overloading a child with work)
  5. Interpersonal relationships and social support

These can also be used to help parents consider how their child’s educational needs are being met at school.

Motivation and engagement

The teacher’s capacity to motivate and engage the class is vital to your child’s journey this year.

“Motivation” refers to children’s inclination, interest, energy and drive to learn, work effectively, and achieve their academic potential.

“Engagement” is the behaviour that accompanies this inclination and energy.

The Motivation and Engagement Wheel is a useful way to understand your child’s motivation and engagement.

The Wheel comprises positive motivation (self-belief, valuing of school, learning focus), positive engagement (planning, task management, persistence), negative motivation (anxiety, fear of failure, low control), and negative engagement (self-sabotage, disengagement).

Motivation and Engagement Wheel. Lifelong Achievement Group

It can be helpful in identifying and sustaining specific motivational strengths in your child. It can also be used to target specific areas that might need further assistance.

The teacher’s task is to help support your child’s positive motivation and reduce your child’s negative motivation.

Resilience and adaptability

In this coming year, your child will experience academic setback, difficulty, and adversity. How your child deals with academic adversity is very important.

How the teacher helps your child work through this adversity is also very important.

Research has identified two types of academic adversity.

The first type is low-level or everyday adversity. All children experience this. Examples include struggling to complete difficult schoolwork, receiving a disappointing result, imminent deadlines, and clashing due dates.

The second type of academic adversity is major adversity. Fewer children will experience this. Examples include poor physical and/or mental health, learning difficulties or disabilities, chronic failure, bullying, suspension or expulsion, changing schools or repeating a grade.

A third factor in this area is the capacity to navigate uncertainty, change, variability, novelty, and transition.

During any school day, your child will change tasks and lessons, interact with different teachers and school staff, work with different groups of students, and frequently experience new or changing conditions.

Children need to be able to adapt to help them deal with these sorts of changes, transitions, and uncertainties.

Personal best goals

There is growing awareness of the limits of comparative approaches to assessing students. Assessment along these lines typically involves ranking and comparing your child with other children.

There is useful information in knowing how your child is travelling compared to other children – but it tends to be narrow information and gives little insight into some important aspects of your child’s development.

Research shows it is beneficial to benchmark a student against him/herself (not just against other students). This is called a growth approach to academic development. Here, children are assessed against their previous best performance or efforts.

There are great motivational and achievement benefits in encouraging a student to compete with him/herself. Teachers play a major role in the goals students set. With teacher and parental support, personal best goals might be something for your child to consider this year.

Load reduction instruction

In the initial stages of learning any new skill or knowledge, your child is a novice. Because of this, it is important not to overload them in these early learning stages.

Reducing the load on your child involves teaching that is structured, organised in small and manageable tasks, provides clear examples, and is explicit in the content to be learned.

It also involves practice and repetition, so that key skills and knowledge can be readily implemented or recalled when needed.

This approach is called “load reduction instruction” and describes ways the teacher can reduce the load on your child in the initial stages of learning.

As your child develops these skills and knowledge, the teacher then moves onto more open-ended and guided discovery learning approaches.

Both explicit and discovery approaches are critical to your child’s academic development. It is the sequencing of these that is really important to get right. With core skills and knowledge under your child’s belt, high quality discovery learning then follows.

Interpersonal relationships and social support

The extent to which your child will be receptive to the teacher’s efforts I have described here will depend on the relationship the teacher builds with your child.

There are three key relationships that help children learn:

  1. The interpersonal relationship – the extent to which the teacher is interested in, helps, and encourages your child.
  2. The substantive relationship – the extent to which your child relates to and is interested in the content of what is being taught.
  3. The pedagogical relationship – the extent to which your child relates to the methods the teacher uses to teach.

Parents/carers also share a substantial part of the responsibility – and children are greatly assisted when parents/carers and the teachers are on the same page.

Fuente:

https://theconversation.com/how-to-tell-if-your-childs-educational-needs-are-being-met-at-school-71265

Fuente imagen:

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/3mLGErWlwk96YsUZovDWpKIgDOdRUiMWnJ–uxMwrVFX7jEsvx7m5GYaRCOwROy79Fvv=s85

Comparte este contenido:
Page 30 of 47
1 28 29 30 31 32 47