Page 60 of 144
1 58 59 60 61 62 144

Students Learn From People They Love

By: David Brooks.

 

A few years ago, when I was teaching at Yale, I made an announcement to my class. I said that I was going to have to cancel office hours that day because I was dealing with some personal issues and a friend was coming up to help me sort through them.

I was no more specific than that, but that evening 10 or 15 students emailed me to say they were thinking of me or praying for me. For the rest of the term the tenor of that seminar was different. We were closer. That one tiny whiff of vulnerability meant that I wasn’t aloof Professor Brooks, I was just another schmo trying to get through life.

That unplanned moment illustrated for me the connection between emotional relationships and learning. We used to have this top-down notion that reason was on a teeter-totter with emotion. If you wanted to be rational and think well, you had to suppress those primitive gremlins, the emotions. Teaching consisted of dispassionately downloading knowledge into students’ brains.

Then work by cognitive scientists like Antonio Damasio showed us that emotion is not the opposite of reason; it’s essential to reason. Emotions assign value to things. If you don’t know what you want, you can’t make good decisions.

Furthermore, emotions tell you what to pay attention to, care about and remember. It’s hard to work through difficulty if your emotions aren’t engaged. Information is plentiful, but motivation is scarce.

That early neuroscience breakthrough reminded us that a key job of a school is to give students new things to love — an exciting field of study, new friends. It reminded us that what teachers really teach is themselves — their contagious passion for their subjects and students. It reminded us that children learn from people they love, and that love in this context means willing the good of another, and offering active care for the whole person.

Over the last several years our understanding of the relationship between emotion and learning has taken off. My impression is that neuroscientists today spend less time trying to locate exactly where in the brain things happen and more time trying to understand the different neural networks and what activates them.

Everything is integrated. Mary Helen Immordino-Yang of the University of Southern California shows that even “sophisticated” emotions like moral admiration are experienced partly by the same “primitive” parts of the brain that monitor internal organs and the viscera. Our emotions literally affect us in the gut.

Patricia Kuhl of the University of Washington has shown that the social brain pervades every learning process. She gave infants Chinese lessons. Some infants took face-to-face lessons with a tutor. Their social brain was activated through direct eye contact and such, and they learned Chinese sounds at an amazing clip. Others watched the same lessons through a video screen. They paid rapt attention, but learned nothing.

Extreme negative emotions, like fear, can have a devastating effect on a student’s ability to learn. Fear amps up threat perception and aggression. It can also subsequently make it hard for children to understand causal relationships, or to change their mind as context changes.

Even when conditions are ideal, think of all the emotions that are involved in mastering a hard subject like algebra: curiosity, excitement, frustration, confusion, dread, delight, worry and, hopefully, perseverance and joy. You’ve got to have an educated emotional vocabulary to maneuver through all those stages.

And students have got to have a good relationship with teachers. Suzanne Dikker of New York University has shown that when classes are going well, the student brain activity synchronizes with the teacher’s brain activity. In good times and bad, good teachers and good students co-regulate each other.

The bottom line is this, a defining question for any school or company is: What is the quality of the emotional relationships here?

And yet think about your own school or organization. Do you have a metric for measuring relationship quality? Do you have teams reviewing relationship quality? Do you know where relationships are good and where they are bad? How many recent ed reform trends have been about relationship-building?

We focus on all the wrong things because we have an outmoded conception of how thinking really works.

The good news is the social and emotional learning movement has been steadily gaining strength. This week the Aspen Institute (where I lead a program) published a national commission report called “From a Nation at Risk to a Nation at Hope.” Social and emotional learning is not an add-on curriculum; one educator said at the report’s launch, “It’s the way we do school.” Some schools, for example, do no academic instruction the first week. To start, everybody just gets to know one another. Other schools replaced the cops at the door with security officers who could also serve as student coaches.

When you start thinking this way it opens up the wide possibilities for change. How would you design a school if you wanted to put relationship quality at the core? Come to think of it, how would you design a Congress?

Source of the article: https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/17/opinion/learning-emotion-education.html

 

Comparte este contenido:

La huelga de los docentes de Los Ángeles por la educación pública

Por: Ben Fredericks/ Diario La Izquierda

Este artículo fue publicado originalmente en el sitio Left Voice

El pasado lunes, primer día de la huelga docente llamada por la UTLA (Docentes Unidos de Los Ángeles) caía una espesa lluvia sobre los coloridos paraguas y ponchos de la clase obrera californiana. Decenas de miles de docentes, enfermeras y consejeros, padres, alumnos y miembros de la comunidad marcharon desde la sede del gobierno de la ciudad hasta las oficinas del sindicato. En realidad, muchos no lograron llegar ya que las calles estaban atestadas de gente que expresaba su solidaridad por el Red-For-Ed(«Rojos por la Educación», la consigna que se usó en la ola de huelgas docentes del año pasado en estados gobernados por el Partido Republicano, cuyo color es el rojo). Fue un largo día para los huelguistas: empezó a las 5 de la mañana con cortes de calles y piquetes, a las 10:30 la masiva marcha y de vuelta a los piquetes hasta las 4 de la tarde. En toda la ciudad se escucharon los cánticos de “U-T-L-A “.

Más de 31.000 docentes han vuelto a utilizar la huelga como arma contra las patronales, algo que no ha sucedido en Los Ángeles desde 1989 y, antes de eso, en 1970, en un hecho que fue fundacional para el sindicato UTLA. La resistencia de los trabajadores de la educación, largamente pospuesta, constituye una muy importante y bienvenida dosis de lucha de clases a lo que, por lo demás, ha sido una guerra de clase unilateral contra los trabajadores. Que más de 50.000 personas entre huelguistas y simpatizantes se hayan enfrentado a la lluvia y el frío demuestra la determinación de los docentes de Los Ángeles.

La lucha por mejores condiciones de enseñanza se ganó el apoyo de la mayoría de los padres y alumnos. Muchos sindicatos también expresaron su solidaridad, incluso uniéndose a los piquetes en una de las mejores tradiciones obreras. La seccional local del sindicato de camioneros (Teamsters) llamó a sus miembros a “participar de los piquetes… hacer que se sepa que estamos con los maestros”. A ellos se sumaron trabajadores del transporte, de los puertos y otros.

Algunos elementos dentro del movimiento obrero encontraron excusas para cruzar los piquetes que bloqueaban el acceso a varios establecimientos y así debilitar la huelga. La dirigencia del sindicato SEIU (Unión Internacional de Empleados de Servicios) que agrupa a personal de los comedores escolares y conductores de buses, vergonzosamente comunicó a sus miembros que se presentaran a trabajar a menos que el 80% de los docentes de cada colegio votara a favor de los bloqueos. Estos supuestos líderes prefieren traicionar a los trabajadores de la educación que arriesgarse a romper una ley o perder un día de sueldo. Los elementos más conscientes del SEIU se han organizado junto a sus compañeros en huelgas de solidaridad con los docentes por lo menos en 10 establecimientos.

Luchando por la educación y la Igualdad

Las huelgas de este lunes son parte de toda una rebelión que lucha por educación pública y de calidad, iniciada el año pasado por docentes de West Virginia, Oklahoma, Colorado, Arizona y Kentucky. En Los Ángeles, la lucha se centró en demandas que tienen impacto directo en la vida de los estudiantes, la mayoría de los cuales son latinos, de clase trabajadora. Exigen menor cantidad de alumnos por clase, más personal de enfermería y orientadores, y restricciones a la expansión de las escuelas charter(escuelas privadas subsidiadas por el estado, NdT). La UTLA también exige un aumento de sueldo del 6,5% inmediato cuando el distrito escolar de Los Ángeles ofrece 6% repartido en 2 años. Los maestros apuntan a un fondo de reserva de dos mil millones de dólares para financiar los recursos y el personal que se necesitan urgentemente.

A pesar de ser la quinta economía más grande del mundo y que las compañías que tienen sede en California generan ganancias siderales, el estado tiene las aulas de clase más sobrepobladas del país. El estado gasta alrededor de $70 mil dólares por año por cada persona encarcelada en el gigante sistema penitenciario californiano pero Los Ángeles se encuentra entre las ciudades con menor gasto por alumno del país. Los colegios charter tienen más presencia en el gran Los Ángeles que en cualquier otro lugar del país. Esto ilustra la tendencia general: los distritos escolares en zonas de bajos ingresos, con mayoría de estudiantes afroamericanos, son sistemáticamente desfinanciados.

El Partido Demócrata: una vez más atacando la educación pública

Como muchos han observado, una diferencia clave entre la huelga de la UTLA y laprimavera docente que floreció el año pasado es el “escenario” de gobierno local y estatal al que se enfrentan. Las luchas del año pasado ocurrieron en estados profundamente Republicanos. En West Virginia, por ejemplo, muchos demócratas salieron en defensa de los maestros que luchaban contra sus rivales republicanos en el gobierno. Pero en Los Ángeles, Oakland, Chicago y New York, entre otros, no son los republicanos los que presionan por la privatización del sistema educativo sino el gobierno demócrata.

Al igual que los docentes que en 2012 se enfrentaron al gobernador demócrata Rahm Emanuel, en Los Ángeles se ven las caras con otro funcionario del partido azul. Austin Beutner, un multimillonario que no tiene nada que hacer dirigiendo los colegios de la ciudad, fue nombrado por la Junta Educativa que controlan los demócratas. El alcalde Eric Garcetti y el Gobernador Gavin Newsom pertenecen al mismo partido.

Los Ángeles, Oakland, Matamoros: la misma lucha

Mientras la huelga en Los Ángeles entra en su tercer día, los ecos del malestar laboral llegaron hasta la ciudad de Oakland, California, donde los docentes enfrentan problemas similares y podrían ir a la huelga muy pronto. Entre tanto, cientos de trabajadores de maquiladoras llevan 4 días de huelga en el estado de Matamoros, en México, exigiendo salarios impagos y, en algunos casos, nuevos sindicatos, afectando más de 40 empresas. La solidaridad que anima los piquetes de la UTLA se debe extender a nuestros hermanos y hermanas trabajadoras no solo en California sino internacionalmente.

*Fuente: http://www.laizquierdadiario.com.ve/La-huelga-de-los-docentes-de-Los-Angeles-por-la-educacion-publica

Comparte este contenido:

Public education governance should rest with the public

By: Laurie French.

In some areas of the country, there is an increasing erosion of the fundamental rights of Canadians with regard to local democratic voice in public education. Governance of the education of children and youth in Canada has been entrusted to locally elected trustees across the country for decades. Protecting local voices to ensure local choices is the responsibility of citizens.

Local education governance requires regular focused attention by trustees close to the community. Education is a significantly funded portfolio, and the governance provided by locally elected school boards helps to ensure a transparent and accountable system.

Adding public education to the long list of responsibilities already held by MLAs or MPPs is untenable and is a loss of responsive local voice when questions or concerns at the grassroots arise. This can be seen in ill-informed decisions at the provincial level to make cuts to education and programming that will have drastic effects on students at the local level. Without an understanding of community needs, decisions made at a higher level can be devastating. No two communities are alike, and the needs of one education district can differ from those of another. School boards, accountable to their local constituents, ensure that decisions reflect the needs and priorities of their community.

While school advisory/planning councils play an important role in providing advice to local schools, it is essential to understand that councils are advisory and do not take the place of democratically elected school boards, nor are they accountable to their broader communities. Citizens are encouraged to connect with their local school board trustees to discuss the role they play and gain a better understanding of their work.

Any erosion of democratic representation in the governance of public education must be a concern to all Canadians, regardless of whether their first language is French or English, and whether or not they have school-aged children. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the right of minority language parents to govern the education of their children. However, we should all be concerned when majority French and English parents are losing their right to have a local democratic voice in the education of their children.

In areas where school boards have been eliminated, communities, media, and education partners have felt the loss of transparency in public education. Democratically elected school boards and trustees have one portfolio on which to focus – public education. They meet and make decisions in open meetings, ensuring the public and media have access to debate and insight into how taxpayer money is allocated. This influence is at risk where locally elected school boards are eliminated or when their authority is reduced.

It is incredibly concerning that Canadians are increasingly placed in situations where we must fight to maintain the vital right to be democratically involved in public education. Centralization of control is, by definition, an erosion of local voice and greatly affects the education of children and youth.

In provinces where governing school boards, their provincial associations, and the provincial ministry enjoy a positive, productive co-governance relationship, great things are happening. This is not about power and control – this is about being responsive and responsible to communities and citizens to ensure the success of future generations of students.

We therefore call upon all Canadians to contact their MPP or MLA to express support for locally elected trustees and school boards. At the end of the day, supporting elected school boards is support for public education and the future. As Canadians, we have a right to local voices, local choices.

Fuente del artículo: https://www.thechronicleherald.ca/opinion/opinion-public-education-governance-should-rest-with-the-public-274812/

Comparte este contenido:

Indonesia: How much time Asians spend helping their child with education?

Asia/ Indonesia/ 16.01.2019/ Source: globalnation.inquirer.net.

Indian parents spend far more time helping their child with their education compared to other countries of the world.

According to the report published by Varkey Foundation, parents in lower income and emerging economies are more likely to spend significant amounts of time helping their children outside the classroom than those in established economies.

India tops the list of Asian countries and also globally with parents taking education under serious consideration for the growth and development of their children. Parents in India dedicate around 12 hours per week to help children in their studies, according to the survey.

The survey report says better educated parents were more likely to spend some time every week helping their children with their education. Also, Asian households spend about 15% of their income on supplemental education services.

Vietnam follows India closely.

Vietnamese parents spend around 10.2 hours per week by helping children in their studies and homework. Indonesia comes third among Asian countries with parents spending 8.6 hours per week to help their children with education, followed closely by Malaysia ranking fourth in Asia and spending 8 hours per week to support the education of their children.

Singapore is ranked fifth among Asian countries where parents spend around 7.9 hours per week to help their kids in their studies.

China takes the sixth position among Asian countries where parents give 7.2 hours per week to help their children in their studies at home.

Japanese and South Korean parents spend far less time helping kids in their learning process, spending only 2.6 hours and 5.4 hours per week.

Source of the notice: https://globalnation.inquirer.net/172461/how-much-time-asians-spend-helping-their-child-with-education

Comparte este contenido:

My Dreams for Indigenous Education in Canada

  1. By: Jo-ann Archibald.

Stó:lō educator Jo-ann Archibald, new Order of Canada recipient, imagines the brightest future for her field.

[Editor’s note: Jo-ann Archibald, University of British Columbia professor emeritus of education and member of the Stó:lō First Nation, is one of 15 people appointed Officer of the Order of Canada for 2019. Archibald, whose Indigenous name is Q’um Q’um Xiiem, spent her 45-year academic career Indigenizing education, from teaching, to teacher education and curriculum development, to university education. Archibald spoke to Tyee reporter Katie Hyslop about where she wants to see Indigenous education in 20 years.]

I’d like to be able to look back in 20 years and say, “Gee, we’ve really made some big steps, instead of the small steps we’ve been making over the years.” For example, ensuring Indigenous ways of knowing are more firmly embedded in all areas of education, moving from the margins to core parts of learning in early learning, Kindergarten to Grade 12, and post-secondary education.

Now we’re at the stage where we have pockets where Indigenous ways of knowing have been introduced, and in some areas we actually have Indigenous programs. We have had success for those who are lucky enough to experience these programs. But those are few.

In 20 years, Indigenous ways of knowing should be more widespread and shared in ways that are meaningful, of good quality and engaging. Teachers who take on this role should feel more confident in introducing the topics, the resources and most importantly work with Indigenous families and community members to supplement what the teachers are doing. Research should be connected to these approaches so that we can learn what’s working, what needs to be improved, and share that widely.

Some teachers will say, “I can’t do anything about the Indigenous kids; they come from poor homes,” and feel hopeless. I would hope this feeling shifts to excitement and confidence in working with Indigenous students and parents, rather than feeling it’s a dismal situation. That point came out in a 2015 auditor general’s report in British Columbia; it is called the racism of low expectations. I hope we wouldn’t have that anymore in 20 years time.

And we need to question our biases and keep examining our own perspectives: “What’s my attitude to Indigenous peoples or the history? What has shaped my attitudes and how I approach these areas in my own practice?” Those questions are so important, and even somebody who feels they are not biased, when they look at their assumptions might think, “Oh, maybe I need to get more informed, get some help from others to deal with some of these questions that I have.” I think it’s really important to question, but you need to act on those questions.

More Indigenous teachers!

We seem to have more Indigenous teachers who act as resource teachers in the public school system, which is important, but at the same time we need to have the Indigenous teachers as classroom teachers, too. That leads up to post-secondary education, where many more Indigenous faculty members are needed for teaching and doing research.

I do see more Indigenous people entering post-secondary education now, and these could be the future teachers and educational leaders at all levels of education. The teachers to me are so central to Indigenous students’ success, which is why I have dedicated much of my educational career to teacher and graduate education.

Including more Indigenous ways of knowing in curriculum

We’ve been working on many areas of Indigenous curriculum, preparation of teachers and educational leaders and increasing the educational involvement of community members. But we really need to ensure that the funding for these approaches continues, and that’s a difficult area, because if educational systems and universities start to have a financial issue the Indigenous programs are often the ones that suffer the most.

Currently, there is a requirement from the B.C. Ministry of Education to include Indigenous topics and resources at every grade level and subject area. Some innovative approaches ensure that students have opportunities to be out in nature to learn about the rivers, the land and the affinity and kinship one can acquire by being on and with the land. They have stories to help them, Elders or knowledge holders doing activities with them out on the land, and the teachers help relate this Indigenous knowledge to science, math, reading, physical activity and more. It can be holistic and integrated, starting with the use of Indigenous traditional stories.

In contrast, it’s not doing a little bit and feeling, “Okay, that’s my Indigenous activity for the year,” which may give students the impression that this learning is not that important. It’s important that teachers, whether they are K-12 or at university, try something, and that could be their first time. But it should not be their last time.

Non-Indigenous students benefiting, too

Non-Indigenous students may develop an awareness that Indigenous people were living on this land going back thousands of years. They managed to survive, to live on and with the land, learned or developed technologies to help them and had their own values and laws.

The other part that students have to know is the history of colonization and to think about the results. If they then hear on the news that Indigenous people are protesting some of the pipelines, logging or the missing and murdered Indigenous women, they will have an understanding about why our society is in this predicament today. Whereas when they don’t learn the history, all they see are the images on the news, and they’re not given an understanding about what are the issues, how they’ve come about, what people want to happen and the racism and how that plays out.

More emphasis on education as a life-long journey

I’d like to see more Indigenous families and community members feeling positive about their engagement with the school, that school is not for them a scary place or a place they don’t belong, which is often a prevalent feeling.

We need to also put the same attention on this lifelong or long-term commitment. It is important for these different systems to work co-operatively: the early childhood education to K-12, then K-12 into post-secondary, then post-secondary to career/business/industry. Right now, it’s not a seamless kind of journey for the learners.

Indigenous learners have often been channelled into some areas that are limited, where they may not take the math or English courses that would get them into a university, for example. That can be problematic when it’s done through bias; we want to make sure if learners decide they want to go into a trades program, they do it knowingly and they feel good about it. At the same time, they should have the option to go to college and university.

Twenty years from now we would have much more flexible educational systems where Indigenous learners feel included, that they belong, that they feel good about who they are as Indigenous people, and that there is this caring and meaningful trajectory for them.

Stronger connections between education systems, community

Where I see a lot of exciting things happening right now is in the Indigenous early childhood programs. Across the country they have been working on ensuring the programs are Indigenous — learning an Indigenous language, Indigenous stories — while they’re also doing child development, learning and communication activities that all children should get at that level.

At the same time, post-secondary Indigenous education in Canada is expanding to include more Indigenous courses, programs and support units for students and faculty. What is needed are ways to connect these various public and Indigenous educational systems so that those students who experience Indigenous learning transition successfully to their next level of learning, where that system is also responsive to Indigenous learners and to Indigenous ways of knowing.

If Indigenous students do need any particular supports, there are ways to find the supports, or draw on the strength that child has or strength from the family and community. That’s where the educational systems could then work with the community.

Or later, for career or job areas, there are partnerships where students can have internships and co-op placements. So that child knows, ‘Hey, somebody cares about me,’ and they are prepared and they are given options. In 20 years, that continuum should be a standard way of thinking about Indigenous students.

That kind of approach is starting to happen. I have been involved with a non-profit society, Dogwood 25, that’s trying to look at this Indigenous learning continuum going from the early years right through into career and work. We are trying to get school districts, post-secondary, business and industry working in partnership so we can develop this kind of continuum planning and program approach.  [Tyee]

Source of the article: https://thetyee.ca/Opinion/2019/01/14/Indigenous-Education-Dreams/

Comparte este contenido:

Afkar-e-Taza ThinkFest: Pakistan’s education system based on injustice: Shafqat

Asia/ Pakistan/ 15.01.2019/ Source: www.thenews.com.pk.

The government is trying to mobilise graduates across the country to improve literacy ratio from 58 per cent to 70 per cent and working to create national curriculum to remove the disparity in education system as the present education system is based on injustice.

Shafqat Mahmood Federal Minister for Education and National Heritage said this while opening the third edition of Information Technology University (ITU) Centre for Governance and Policy’s Afkar-e-Taza ThinkFest two-day conference here on Saturday.

The minister said, “Education provides frame of reference and perception while we practice different streams of educational institutes, including madrasas, government and private schools, which create different minds and classes, which never helped in the making of a nation.” Our society has decided that only English medium would go forward,” he added.

He stated that improving quality of education had been taken as a challenge by the government through broadening the pool and resolving serious economic issues. In his welcome message, read by ITU Registrar Zaheer Sarwar, ITU acting Vice-Chancellor Dr Niaz Ahmad Akhtar underlined the objectives of the conference initiated in 2016 and said that it provided creation of newer spaces and opportunities for flourishing new thoughts and ideas to bridge the gap between the academia and society, providing academic discourse in an accessible yet robust manner and to engage with leading scholars from around the world.

Discussing the topic of “Future of Democracy in Pakistan,” Aqil Shah from Oklahoma University, USA, said that democracy ensured freedom of expression. Hussain Nadim from Sydney discussed the Economists Democracy Index, which revealed that only 19 countries were considered democratic, 57 with flawed democracy, including US, 39 hybrid regimes and 52 authoritarian regimes.

Deliberating on the “Types of Populism Nationalism, Demography and Authoritarianism,” Dr Christophe Jaffrelot from Paris said that parliaments had lost their powers and the role of media was the only space for free media.

Najam Sethi, chairman of the organising committee of the conference, highlighted the areas of interest, including history, olitics and international relations and said that Lahore was fertile with ideas.

Dr Yaqoob Khan Bangash appreciated the idea of organising such literature festivals. On Sunday, the second day of the ThinkFest, will have Federal Minister for Information and Broadcasting Fawad Chaudhary and Punjab Finance Minister Hashim Bakht.

Source of thenotice: https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/418750-afkar-e-taza-thinkfest-pakistan-s-education-system-based-on-injustice-shafqat

Comparte este contenido:

Does Zimbabwe have a higher literacy rate than SA?

Africa/ Zimbabwe / 15.01.2019/ Source:  bulawayo24.com.

South Africa is set to hold national elections in 2019, a year the ruling African National Congress marks its 107th anniversary.

Radio 702 talk show host Bruce Whitfield spoke to Bonang Mohale, head of Business Leadership South Africa, about what he expects from the party’s election manifesto at its launch on 12 January.

Mohale said he was looking at six issues. One was education, which he described as «the most tragic story of the last 25 years».

He said Zimbabwe’s former president, Robert Mugabe, «boasts of 94% literacy rate. South Africa’s is nowhere near that.»

Do statistics back up his claim?

Education experts previously told Africa Check that comparing literacy rates can be difficult, as countries often have different definitions of literacy.

Zimbabwe’s most recent labour force survey estimated that 97,6% of people older than 15 were literate in 2014. These were people who said they had completed Grade 3.

South Africa’s 2017 general household survey estimated that 94,3% of people older than 20 were literate. But these were people who said they could read and write with «no difficulty» or «some difficulty».

The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organisation (Unesco) calculates its own estimates of literacy.

Its latest estimate for both countries is for 2014. That year South Africa’s literacy rate was 94,1% for people 15 years and older.

Unesco used data from Zimbabwe’s 2014 Multiple Indicators Cluster and Health Survey to estimate the country’s literacy rate as 88.7% of people 15 years and older.

The data for Zimbabwe was based on a reading assessment – not self-reporting. A reading test is likely to produce a lower rate, Unesco says.

Literacy rate comparisons should be made with caution, as there are differences in the definitions used and the way people are surveyed.

 

Source of the notice: https://bulawayo24.com/index-id-opinion-sc-national-byo-153568.html

Comparte este contenido:
Page 60 of 144
1 58 59 60 61 62 144