Page 144 of 144
1 142 143 144

Norway: Fewer participate in ad hoc education

Fewer Norwegians participate in ad hoc education

Norway, 24/06/2017.  By http://education.einnews.com

At the first quarter of 2017, 47 per cent of employed persons had participated in ad hoc  education in the past 12 months.

This amounts to a decrease of two percentage points compared to 2016.

The workplace is an important arena for learning, and this can clearly be seen in the 2017 figures, which show that participation in non-formal education is much lower among persons who are not in employment than among employed persons.

Sixteen per cent of persons not in employment participated in non-formal education, a decrease of two percentage points from 2016.

For employed persons, participation is highest among those aged 35-44. In this group, over half participated in non-formal education. The lowest participation was among the 62 to 66-year-olds, with a participation rate of 43 per cent.

The age distribution differs somewhat among persons not in employment. Here, participation is greatest among those aged 25-34, where 22 per cent participate, and lowest in the age group 62-66 years, where five per cent participate.

Participation in non-formal education also varies with the highest completed education level. Among employed persons with a higher education, 58 per cent participated in non-formal education. For employed persons with education at basic school level or with no completed education, the corresponding figure is 33 per cent.

Stable participation in formal education

In 2017, 15 per cent of the employed persons responded that they had participated in formal education in the preceding 12 months.

The corresponding proportion among persons not in employment was 39 per cent. Participation was at the same level the previous year.

At 17 per cent, the share of employed women who participated in formal education is higher than that of employed men, where 12 per cent participated.

The opposite trend can be seen among the persons not in employment, where participation is 42 per cent for men and 36 per cent for women.

© Statistics Norway/ Norway Today

From: http://education.einnews.com/article/388690500/9rpq2vqZ0HN_m-S8?lcf=ZdFIsVy5FNL1d6BCqG9muZ1ThG_8NrDelJyazu0BSuo%3D

Comparte este contenido:

A promise unfulfilled – education in Pakistan

Pakistan, 24/06/2017.  From: einnews.com. By Ghulam Noor Jehanian.

Somewhere between the hardcore cleric’s whims and the ruling elite’s desire for expediency, the future of millions is lost.

The education system of Pakistan is faced with a crisis of an unprecedented level. Millions of dreams have been shattered, billions of hopes squandered and infinite talent frittered away. The crude ignorance towards the educational sector is criminal. The issues facing education in the country are uncountable; the harrowing crises never seem to settle. Stretching from a non-uniform education system to incompetent curricula, and from a below par budget spending to the quintessential patriarchal norms, the problems remain unfazed.

According to a report published by a subsidiary of the Federal Ministry of Education itself, there are 22.6 million out-of-school children. On top of it, these children may never get to see the inside of a school. Then there are millions more who receive a substandard education. Resultantly, only seven per cent of the primary school pass-out students are classified as literate. “A child miseducated is a child lost”. Will the society ever standby its promise?

Adding fuel to fire, the menace of terrorism and the overall law and order instability inside Pakistan has hit where it hurts the most. The number of terrorist attacks on educational institutions has surged. The Washington Post claims that there were 82 attacks from 2000 to 2008, and 642 attacks from 2009 to 2013. Who can forget the wretched morning of 16th December 2014 when seven gunmen massacred 144 students in cold blood in the Army Public School of Peshawar? The idea of returning to school still dreads many of the survivors of that attack. According to a New York Times report, from 2015 to 2017, the number of these heinous attacks has fallen. Nevertheless, through fear, panic and distress, these extremist organizations have successfully discouraged people from receiving an education.

More than half of the out-of-school population of Pakistan is women. The inherently stern environment simply does not allow women to prosper. The Pakistani society has been unfair to its women. The ulema have also not played their part when it comes to assuring civil rights for women. The situation is particularly horrible in the rural areas. In October of 2016 the World Economic Forum’s report ranked Pakistan 143rd on the gender equality index out of 144 countries with only Yemen stalling behind it.

A woman is supposed to be a watchful housekeeper, a caring babysitter, and an outstanding cook. A woman needs to have a “high moral character” as it is required of her to uphold man’s “honor”. A woman also needs to have a white skin and a perfect figure, as it is incumbent upon her to please her husband. Thus, a woman must have everything but an education.

Adding to the dispiriting tale, we have upon us, a ruling elite which feeds on the flesh of the disgruntled and the destitute. This year’s budget with all its charm and glory does little to alleviate the educational crisis. The education spending still hovers around 2 per cent of the GDP. Under-spending in education has wreaked havoc on the country’s overall progress. According to Alif Ailaan, a non-for-profit organisation working for education in Pakistan, this intentional neglect of education is one of the reasons behind illiteracy and intolerance running rampant in the country.

Somewhere between the hardcore cleric’s whims and the ruling elite’s desire for expediency, the future of millions is lost. It has been 69 years since we escaped the shackles of colonialism, however, its leftovers still haunt our society. If possible don’t educate, if you are educating, at least make sure it serves your purpose. This has become the general norm.

The education system has been divisive at best. There are the ever-bourgeoning private schools, which only allow admissions to the elite class. Their fancy buildings, large swimming pools and lush green playgrounds accompanied with the shiny uniforms and the ornamental emblems make the government school graduate a rebel within. Contrary to this, haunted buildings, swamped premises and the brutally savage class teacher add to the sad tale of a public school student.

The constitution of Pakistan enshrines the basic right to education irrespective of gender in its article 25A. However, nearly 40 per cent of the population still remains illiterate. Who is at fault? The “system”?

The opposition parties also seem to remain unmoved. Sit-ins against rigging and rallies demanding the PM’s resignation are the order of the day, yet there is seldom a protest for reforming the shambolic education system and eliminating its misgivings. Whether the umpire raises his finger or not, the uneducated won’t care.

There is no escaping the fact that the level of education determines a country’s progress and its overall rank in the world community. Luxemburg, Switzerland, Norway, the USA and Sweden are countries which spend the most on their education. The results are self-explanatory, Luxemburg, Switzerland, Sweden, and Norway have remained prosperous in peace and neutral in war. On the other hand, USA is the world hegemon. How have these countries got to where they are today?

A fascinating example, in this case, is of Malaysia’s Mahathir Mohammed, who remained the longest-serving Prime Minister of the country, holding the post for a period of 22 years. He made Malaysia great by allocating 30 per cent of the annual budget on education. This is what brought blissful changes in the country. Not only did the measure impact economic growth, it also improved the living standards of the people. Malaysia’s daily “thestar” is still over-flooded with tributes from ordinary citizens to Mahathir Mohamad for his educational reforms.

The education revolution in China of 1949 is also a prime example. The Chinese made education a priority, and made it highly competitive. Much of the progress China sees today is owed to the ’49 revolution, a think tank based in Beijing confirms.

The virtues of a proper education are endless. Only if the Pakistani society and the ruling class overcome their self-centric nature and strive for a better education system, most of the country’s problems can be solved.

For instance, education can alleviate the problems of the oppressed. This is because it helps in getting jobs and making people independent and honourable. Once properly implemented, an educational revolution can very well uplift the socio-economic condition of the society.

Pakistan needs democracy. It needs a lot of democracy. For democracy to prevail, education must precede. Quality education actually makes suffrage worth it; it is known to be the flag carrier of democracy.

Furthermore, fighting intolerance, promoting peace and prosperity and accommodating difference of opinion are all needs of the hour for Pakistan. Studies show, and examples portray, that quality education can make these possible for Pakistan.

As Benjamin Franklin, the founding father of the USA once opined, “The only thing more expensive than education is ignorance.”

If positive energies thrive, there is no way a country so much blessed as Pakistan can’t see the other side of this crossroads.

From: https://education.einnews.com/article/388705846/TmfHlvdnRvzT9_wq?lcf=ZdFIsVy5FNL1d6BCqG9muZ1ThG_8NrDelJyazu0BSuo%3D

Comparte este contenido:

Canberra Refugee Support education scholarships help refugees to a bright future

Europa/Asia/África/Oceania, 17 de junio de 2017.  Fuente:

A new computer for studying and education fees for a semester are just two things refugees will purchase with the money from a scholarship from Canberra Refugee Support.

Others will buy joggers, and some will pay school fees.Muzhgan Gafoori is receiving a scholarship from Canberra Refugee Support to further her studies in accounting.

The 53 recipients of the money will each receive a cheque of up to $1000 to help shape the rest of their lives.

The candidates have been chosen for their hard work and dedication to their education, and for their commitment to making their lives and their family’s lives better.

Muzhgan Gafoori, 23, arrived in Canberra in 2013. She didn’t speak English, but spent a year and a half learning the language.

 She was born in Afghanistan and sought refuge in Australia with her parents and two younger siblings.
Ms Gafoori said her family came to Australia to feel safe.

«If you compare here to Afghanistan, it’s more safe here. But you can’t even compare it. At the moment in Afghanistan it’s all war. Every day there are bomb blasts.»

In the years since her arrival, Ms Gafoori has worked full time to support her family while also studying full time. She hopes to pursue a career in accounting, and is undertaking her diploma at CIT.

«It will help me pay for my diploma, and it will help me save for my advanced diploma next year,» Ms Gafoori said of the scholarship.

Her dream is to finish her accounting degree, become an Australian citizen and get a good job.

«You can do whatever you want here, but you need to work hard for it,» she said.

Mother-of-four Viola Oshan will be paying for a variety of things with her scholarship, putting it towards a new computer, her own education fees and her children’s school fees.

Ms Oshan is from Luo ethnic group from South Sudan, but lived in North Sudan due to the war. She arrived in Australia in 2005.

«We moved from North Sudan to Egypt and I was in Egypt for four years and then from Egypt we came to Australia in 2004,» Ms Oshan said. She was pregnant with her first son when she arrived, and her daughter was four years old.

Her son is now 12, and her daughter 17.

Ms Oshan works part time in a childcare to support her family both in Australia and overseas. She is also studying for her diploma in Early Childhood Education at CIT.

She also volunteers with a playground for children from the South Sudanese community. Ms Oshan said the transition to living in Australia was difficult, particularly the language barrier, but she was grateful for the help of Canberra Refugee Support.

«It’s very hard, it means a lot,» she said of the scholarship.

Canberra Refugee Support vice-president Brian Calder said the money was a recognition of achievement and effort the recipients were making in their education.

«They’ve come to Australia and they’ve really realised how education is a pathway to not only employment but to active involvement and contribution to their new community,» he said.

Canberra Refugee Support is a Canberra-region not-for-profit organisation with a purpose to be a good neighbour to refugees and asylum-seekers.

Fuente: http://education.einnews.com/article/387401136/cVE0ykZ3cQmPCCT3?lcf=ZdFIsVy5FNL1d6BCqG9muZ1ThG_8NrDelJyazu0BSuo%3D

Photo: Dion Georgopoulos

 

Comparte este contenido:

Education a top priority

Europa/17  de junio de 2017. Fuente: education.einnews.com

lmost 80 percent of respondents support more or even much more spending on education, whereas only 20 percent would support more spending on defense policy. In a number of countries, a majority of respondents is even willing to pay higher taxes in order to finance additional spending on education. The details of the study have been published as online pre-prints in the Journal of European Social Policy and the Journal of European Public Policy.

The survey was conducted via computer-assisted telephone interviews as part of the project «Investing in Education in Europe: Attitudes, Politics and Policies» (INVEDUC), which is financed with a Starting Grant from the European Research Council (ERC). It significantly advances scientific knowledge as it is the first international comparative survey of public opinion on details of . It provides evidence on public attitudes on education spending and financing, the distribution of financial and other resources across different sectors of the education system, the governance of education as well as potential fiscal trade-offs between educational investments and other social policies.

The survey covers eight countries with different types of welfare states: Germany, France, the United Kingdom, Ireland, Sweden, Denmark, Spain and Italy. In order to achieve the best possible data quality, the university’s researchers collaborated with a professional survey institute specialising in international comparative surveys. One further innovative feature of the survey is to include experimental components: «Different from previous surveys, we examined whether public support for higher education expenditures changes when people are confronted with various kinds of budget constraints», explains Marius Busemeyer.

When participants were asked to name just one out of several key areas of the welfare state – besides education, these were, for instance, labour market policy, pensions, family policy, health care or social assistance – education policy did best at an approval rate of 29%, closely followed by health policy (22%). Other supposedly popular social policies such as pensions or family policy ranked considerably lower. A majority of participants supported greater state spending on education in countries like Germany and Italy, where expenditure is below average.

When asked about which sectors of education should be prioritized, respondents assigned top priority to general school education and vocational education and training (VET). Across all countries, 62 percent of respondents demanded more or even much more spending in these two sectors. This is surprising given the fact that public debates often focus on expanding opportunities in early child education and higher education. In direct comparison, however, the public rather supports additional investments in general schools and VET.

In basically all surveyed countries, support for VET is higher than for higher education. This is especially true for countries like Italy or Spain, which suffer from high levels of youth unemployment rates. Germany, which is doing well in this respect, makes for the exception to the rule: here, expanding early child education is considered the more urgent issue.

Then there’s the money problem: in view of shrinking public budgets, political attempts to increase education spending can pose a challenge. In order to gauge the robustness of public support for education spending when confronted with budget constraints, the survey contains experimental components, which confronts citizens with different trade-off scenarios. The survey evidencereveals that, as long as people did not have to worry about how to finance additional spending on education, more than 73% came out in favour of more or even much more investment in education. When reminded that this would involve tax hikes or greater national debt, support dropped to 54% and 42% respectively. This effect is even more pronounced in cases where more spending on education would lead to cutbacks in other areas of the welfare state, such as pensions. In this case, support for education plummets to 27%. These findings show that politicians keen on expanding public spending face tough choices, because they are often forced to finance additional spending with cutbacks or tax hikes.

Generally, cutting back spending on other areas of the welfare state is less popular than tax increases or increasing the national debt. Across countries, a majority of respondents would accept higher taxes to bolster the education budget. Here, too, general school education and vocational education and training are deemed particularly worthy of investment with 57% of respondents expressing a willingness to pay additional taxes for the former and 54% for the latter, respectively. In Sweden, the discrepancy between popular demands for more education spending and people’s actual willingness to pay higher taxes is relatively small. In Germany, however, respondents were less willing to tolerate higher taxes: 60% support greater education spending, but only 44% would be prepared to accept higher taxes in return.

Explore further: Canadian public favourable to increased education spending, according to opinion survey

More information: Marius R. Busemeyer et al, Public opinion on policy and budgetary trade-offs in European welfare states: evidence from a new comparative survey, Journal of European Public Policy (2017). DOI: 10.1080/13501763.2017.1298658

Fuente: https://education.einnews.com/article/387244467/1sIJr8y4jQj5RaDi?lcf=ZdFIsVy5FNL1d6BCqG9muZ1ThG_8NrDelJyazu0BSuo%3D

Comparte este contenido:

Jamaica: Education Ministry won’t intervene in dispute between issa and old boy’s associations.

Centroamérica/Jamaica. 17 of june of 2017. Fuente: education.einnews.com

 

Minister of Education, Ruel Reid, says his ministry will not intervene in the dispute between the inter-Secondary Schools Sports Association, ISSA, and the Old Boys’ Associations of five

of Jamaica’s prominent high schools.

The Old boys associations have written a lengthy letter to the Ministry of Education demanding greater accountability and transparency from ISSA.

However, Minister Reid, says there are channels within ISSA that these associations can use to get answers to their enquiries.

Minister of Education, Ruel Reid. ISSA is scheduled to hold an election for President of the Association tomorrow.

Officials say the 170 principals will use the opportunity to discuss the matter.

 

Fuente: http://education.einnews.com/article/387268157/_ogV3DvPV-zXp_ki?lcf=ZdFIsVy5FNL1d6BCqG9muZ1ThG_8NrDelJyazu0BSuo%3D

 

Comparte este contenido:

UNESCO: Policy paper «Aid to education is stagnating and not going to countries most in need»

UNESCO

View the policy paper Aid to education is stagnating and not going to countries most in need

Policy Paper May 2017

Aid to education is stagnating and not going to countries most in need

Domestic expenditures in low and lower middle income countries cannot cover the costs of reaching Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG 4), and so aid must make up the shortfall. But aid to education has been stagnant since 2010, and the aid that is given often does not go to the countries most in need, worsening the prospects for achieving global education goals.

The governments of low and lower middle income countries have increased their spending on education since 2000 (UNESCO, 2015a). Even if they continue to do so in coming years, the Global Education Monitoring Report estimated that these countries would face an annual financing gap of US$39 billion in 2015–2030. In low income countries, this is equivalent to 42% of the total cost of providing quality pre-primary, primary and secondary education to all children (UNESCO, 2015b). Aid to education in low and lower middle income countries needs to be six times higher than 2012 levels, an estimate confirmed by the International Commission on Financing Global Education Opportunity (Education Commission, 2016). But instead, donors continue to place a lower priority on aid to education.

This paper analyses current levels and trends of aid to education using data from three sources: the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) Development Assistance Committee (DAC) and its Creditor Reporting System (CRS) database; the Global Partnership for Education (GPE), which has just launched its 2020 replenishment effort; and the United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Assistance (OCHA).

The most recent data is mainly from 2015, which should serve as a benchmark for monitoring progress during the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.

UNESCO Documento político sobre ayuda educación

Fuente: https://es.unesco.org/gem-report/recursos-de-los-medios-sociales-del-documento-pol%C3%ADtico-para-la-ayuda-la-educaci%C3%B3n

 

Comparte este contenido:

UNESCO: 2017 CCNGO/Education 2030. Global Meeting DECLARATION.

Declaración final de la VIII Reunión Mundial de la CCONG/EPT 2017.

UNESCO, 2017 CCNGO/Education 2030. Global Meeting DECLARATION.

Implementing SDG4-Education 2030

1. We, the representatives of national, regional and international non-governmental and civil society organisations and members of the Collective Consultation of NGOs (CCNGO) for Education 2030 from different parts of the world have gathered in Siem Reap, Cambodia on 8 and 9 May 2017.

2. We re-affirm that education is a fundamental human right and a public good that is key to promoting social, economic and environmental justice. States have the duty to provide free quality equitable public education at all levels and lifelong learning for all, and to ensure the right to education is enshrined in law and enforceable.

3. We have met to take stock and discuss the implementation of SDG4-Education 2030 since its adoption and make recommendations. Participants discussed initiatives undertaken, key challenges encountered, opportunities identified and ways forward, as well as debated the role of civil society organizations in supporting the implementation of SDG4-Education 2030 at national, regional and global levels, and the contributions of the CCNGO in this regard. We furthermore agreed upon the revised working procedures of the CCNGO in light of SDG4-Education 2030 and elected a new CCNGO Coordination Group for 2017- 2019.

In this context, we reaffirm:

 Our endorsement of the vision, principles, goals and targets laid out under SDG 4 within ‘The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development’; the Incheon Declaration; the ‘Education 2030 Framework for Action’; and the 2015 Incheon Final Declaration of the NGO Forum;

 The important role of civil society organisations in the implementation of SDG4-Education 2030, and their engagement and involvement at all stages, from policy formulation and planning through to monitoring and evaluation with their participation institutionalized and guaranteed, as stated in the Education 2030 Framework for Action. -2- Challenges and opportunities in SDG4-Education 2030 implementation.

4. We note that civil society faces challenges in securing its significant role in implementing the agenda. Across all regions, civil society faces shrinking space, with the rise of authoritarian regimes, the weakening of democratic ones and a consequent restriction on the space for the voices of all people, especially the most marginalized. There are also fewer opportunities for broad-based dialogue on education and more limited involvement of civil society in government policy and planning processes.

5. In addition, external factors in the social and political environment, in particular conflict, war, violence, fundamentalism and the insecurity that citizens experience in such situations have exacerbated this challenge. In this context, education for democracy, citizenship and peace is ever more important for upholding civil rights and basic freedoms.

6. We have identified core challenges in implementation of SDG4-Eduction 2030 that revolve around policy, financing, data, governance and accountability cutting across its central pillars: equity, quality, inclusion and lifelong learning. In regard to policies, either these are not in place, or they are not grounded in the perspective of SDG4-Education 2030, in some cases moving away from it, or do not prioritise critical areas, such as is often the case with Early Childhood Education, Youth and Adult Education, Lifelong Learning and Quality. Progress has stalled, or, in certain cases, there has been regression in gender equality and identity policies. Furthermore, the lack or absence of reliable and disaggregated data, are ongoing obstacles for informed policy making.

7. In regard to financing, the enthusiastic approval of the SDGs and the Education 2030 Framework for Action has not been matched by financial commitments and, in some cases, we have seen a decline in both national allocation and ODA to education, as well as support to CSOs working in education. At the same time, new emerging international financing frameworks are positing competing priorities, which could work to the detriment of improved and increased international cooperation. Implementation of the ambitious SDG4-Education 2030 is impossible without dedicated efforts to generate adequate and sustained finances, be it through increased domestic resource allocation, a reversal in the trend of decreasing international cooperation and reforms in the global finance system to address core structural problems to leverage new resources. If current financing trends continue, we will not achieve the targets we have set for SDG4-Education 2030 by the 2030 deadline.

8. We further note the challenge of ensuring education as a right and public good especially in the context of increased privatization and commercialisation of education. We are concerned that the growth of profit making in education and the proliferation of low fee private school chains, supported by some International Financing Institutions and donor agencies, undermine free public quality education and exacerbate inequalities based on wealth, gender, disability, migration status, ethnicity and location. In this regard, we welcome the 2015 Human Rights council resolution A/HRC/29/L.14 that noted with concern the “wide-ranging impact of the commercialization of education on the enjoyment of the right to education” and calls for “significant importance of public investment in education”. 1 This section derives not only from debates of the 8th Global Meeting of the CCNGO, but also on a research conducted on SDG4/ E2030 Implementation, the results of which were developed into a Background Paper. -3- 9. We observe the persistence of wide scale shortage of trained teachers, aggravated by inadequate initial and continued teacher training, poor working conditions as well as low salaries and teacher status, constituting obstacles to the provision of quality education. Despite the apparent consensus around the centrality of the teaching profession to quality education, undervaluing of teachers and other education workers continues to prevail across the continents.

10. Finally, a key challenge to the implementation of SDG4-Education 2030 is the existence of competing international agendas and architectures, based on principles that are not aligned with SDG4-Education 2030.

11. These challenges are limiting the effective implementation of equitable, inclusive, free quality education, further marginalizing vulnerable children, youth, and adults, especially the poor, girls and women, migrants, refugees, conflict-affected children, indigenous and rural people, LGBTQI and people with disabilities and contradicting the principle of leaving no one behind.

12. Notwithstanding these challenges, the holistic, transformative, ambitious Agenda 2030 for Sustainable Development commits all Governments to recognize civil society as key stakeholders and legitimate actors in policy dialogue and decision making at all levels. This provides an opportunity for a strong and vibrant civil society to actively engage and impact the implementation of the SDGs and in particular SDG4.

13. CSO participation is supported by a solid architecture for CSOs to engage in SDG 4-Education 2030 which includes the CCNGO/ED 2030, SDG-Education 2030 Steering Committee, and the Education and Academia Stakeholder Group which is recognized by the UN High Level Political Forum as one of the stakeholder groups.

14. The 2030 Sustainable Development Agenda commitment to strengthened partnerships and crosssectoral collaboration provides key opportunities for inter-sectoral dialogues amongst CSOs. Recommendations 15. Governments are duty bearers to deliver public, quality and free education. We therefore call on governments who have not yet done so to enact legal frameworks on the right to education, according to international human rights standards. Governments must strengthen public education systems and regulate private sector provision in line with related Human Rights Council Resolutions.

16. Noting the continued harmful tax incentives, tax evasion, aggressive tax avoidance, corruption, illicit financial flows and increased military spending, we call upon governments to address these issues both nationally and through coordinated global action. We also call for scaled up efforts to meet the agreed commitments to allocate at least 4 – 6 per cent of GDP to education and/or at least 15 – 20 per cent of public expenditure to education, taking note that progressive additional resources are necessary. Financing for education should be maintained and increased as required even during times of crisis and at all times should respond to equity and quality criteria. Public investments should be directed to public education and be screened against the criteria that they ensure that all people, in particular the most -4- marginalized and vulnerable, realize their right to education. Social accountability of public expenditure is crucial.

17. We strongly recommend that donor countries reverse the decline in aid and meet the agreed benchmark of 0.7 % of GNI for ODA to developing countries and 0.15 % – 0.2 % of GNI to LDCs. GPE replenishment must be seen as an important and timely opportunity to scale up commitments and investments to education, and ensuring that the full SDG 4-Education 2030 is taken up by GPE.

18. We commit to use, promote, and participate in SDG4-Education 2030 accountability mechanisms at national, regional, and global levels such as the UN Special Rapporteur for the Right to Education, Universal Period Review, and the Voluntary National Review process during the annual High-Level Political Forum (HLPF).

19. We call on governments and donors to commit the financial and technical resources required to collect credible data on SDG4-Education 2030. To do this, governments should take immediate action to create robust monitoring, reporting, and follow-up mechanisms for the indicators for SDG4-Education 2030, to be adopted by the IAEG-SDG committee. This data should be disaggregated at a minimum by age, gender, disability, migration, economic, and geographic status.

20. Inclusion and gender equality remain at the heart of the 2030 Agenda. We call on governments to step up their efforts to ensure inclusive education, in particular paying attention to gender equality, disability, migrants and refugees, respect for diversity, including human rights for LGBTQI, by addressing discriminatory policy and practice, access, curriculum, learning and teaching processes.

21. There needs to be recognition that quality needs to be understood in a broad sense, including inputs, processes and enabling learning environments and should not just be reduced to academic learning outcomes. The current global indicator is narrowing quality outcomes to literacy and numeracy. We therefore call upon governments to develop additional indicators which capture the breadth of quality education.

22. We recognize that teachers and educators are the essential pillar for quality education. We urge governments to address the teacher gap through training and recruiting qualified teachers and ensuring their continued professional development, with particular attention to gender.

23. Noting the increasing importance of the role of information and communication in our societies and in education, we urge governments to make efforts to democratize access to communication, foster community-based media, bridge the digital divide and ensure equitable access and improved learning, thus promoting enhanced public debate and citizen engagement.

24. We recommend an integrated approach to skills development that combines work related skills, foundational skills and literacy, as well as skills for sustainable development and participatory citizenship. This requires more investment in adult education, non-formal education, and adult literacy, within a lifelong learning approach that recognizes the equivalency of non-formal education qualifications. -5- Learners should be provided with skills that enable them to adapt to rapidly changing environments and to continue learning to prepare them for the future. Role and actions of civil society in the implementation of SDG4-Education 2030 and the education-related targets in the other SDGs In light of the need for continued action to complete the unfinished EFA agenda and given the more ambitious universal SDG4-Education 2030 agenda, we commit to the following:

25. Build greater awareness of and commitment to SDG4-Education 2030 by governments, civil society, and other stakeholders.

26. Hold governments, donors and other stakeholders accountable for meeting SDG4-Education 2030 through civil society’s active and institutionalized participation in transparent inclusive accountability processes and mechanisms; national, regional and global policy dialogue; inputs to national education and cross-sector development plans; contribution of robust research and field-based evidence; scaledup advocacy; and, programmatic interventions.

27. Continue to promote the inclusion of discriminated groups, broadening public debate and fostering active citizen participation, including parents, teachers, children/learners, in translating the global agenda into national action. We commit to using existing networks and platforms, and creating new ones where necessary, to elevate the voices and views of children, students and learners; empowering them to take ownership of the agenda and their future.

28. Continue to build and strengthen partnerships between civil society and other key education stakeholders and increase networking among civil society actors beyond the education sector, promoting intersectoral dialogue.

29. Civil society, supported by academia, should highlight inadequacies in formal data collection systems, and assist governments in data collection and strengthening data collection systems, including through innovative data collection mechanisms, such as citizen-generated data. Data should be made readily available and accessible to all stakeholders.

30. Support peer-learning among NGOs, sharing of information and knowledge, cross-fertilization of good practice and undertaking of research to generate knowledge that helps inform and support education policy formulation, implementation and monitoring & evaluation.

31. Continue to engage with the development and implementation of the indicator framework at global, regional and national levels as well as with the monitoring and reporting of progress made towards SDG4- Education 2030, including through the development of spotlight reports for SDG 4 as a civil society accountability mechanism, and in particular in the lead up to the 2019 HLPF. -6-

32. Fulfilling an observatory function and building budget and performance tracking capacity at local level by contributing to monitoring educational achievement and strengthening the accountability of governments. CCNGO/ED 2030 Noting that the CCNGO/ED 2030 is UNESCO’s key mechanism for dialogue, reflection and partnerships with NGOs for the implementation of the SDG4–Education 2030 and an important part of the global SDG 4 coordination mechanisms as spelt out in the Education 2030 Framework for Action, we recommend the CCNGO to:

33. Amplify its advocacy and lobbying role at local, national, regional, and global levels.

34. Provide a platform and network to monitor fulfilment of the SDG4–Education 2030 agenda, including through the development of spotlight reports and other monitoring mechanisms.

35. Foster exchange and learning, share knowledge, and engage in wider debates and cross-sectoral engagement, including through increased dialogue with the UNESCO-NGO Liaison Committee and Education and Academia Stakeholder Group.

36. Explore the expansion of membership of the CCNGO to align with the wider constituencies of the broader SDG 4-Education 2030 agenda.

37. In order for UNESCO to fulfil its leadership and coordination of SDG4-Edcation 2030 in line with the Incheon Declaration and the Education 2030 Framework for Action, we call on member states and donors to step up commitments in support of UNESCO.

38. We call upon UNESCO to secure funding and provide dedicated support for the sustained functioning of the CCNGO within the SDG4- Education 2030 architecture.

39. As discussed during this meeting, we agree to change the name of the former Collective Consultation of NGOs for Education for All (CCNGO/EFA) to Collective Consultation of NGOs for Education 2030 (CCNGO/ED 2030), in light of the new education agenda and the revised working procedures.

40. We thank UNESCO for organising the 8 th CCNGO/EFA Meeting in Siem Reap, Cambodia and express our deep gratitude to the Government of the Kingdom of Cambodia for their hospitality. We also congratulate and express our gratitude to our hosts, NGO Education Partnership, for their warm welcome and invaluable support in organizing the meeting. We are also very grateful for the generous financial contribution of the Open Society Foundation, which made it possible for an important number of CCNGO members to participate in this important meeting. Finally, we recognise and appreciate the contributions of all participants to the exchange and dialogue throughout the conference. Siem Reap, 9 May 2017

Comparte este contenido:
Page 144 of 144
1 142 143 144