What India needs at higher education institutions

Asia/ India/ 09.09.2019/ Source: www.financialexpress.com.

There is a need for expert management, and innovative and professional human resource development systems at higher education institutions.

Higher education is now a priority area for the government, as is obvious from the recommended standards and budgetary provisions for the same in the recent Union Budget. While higher education is booming in many countries, including in India, managing the massive expansion of higher education has become challenging for governments and regulatory bodies alike. In many countries, higher education is suffering from problems such as falling standards and quality, poor infrastructure and maintenance services, inadequate support systems, capacity overload, and inadequate manpower and good faculty.

In the context of growing global competition in the higher education space, a university or a higher education institution (HEI), as an organisation, may have to cope with changes in demographic structures, descriptive technologies, regulatory reforms, new learning products and frontier research. The paradigm of a university being a static instrumental entity appears to be obsolete in terms of scope and scale. While a modern university seeks to explore new frontiers of knowledge through learning and research, it also faces issues relating to scale and scope. By scale what is implied is the capacity of a university to absorb the growing number of learners and their unmet needs in pursuit of learning and research. For a dynamic university, enrolment tends to grow over time rather than remain

Higher education is now a priority area for the government, as is obvious from the recommended standards and budgetary provisions for the same in the recent Union Budget. While higher education is booming in many countries, including in India, managing the massive expansion of higher education has become challenging for governments and regulatory bodies alike. In many countries, higher education is suffering from problems such as falling standards and quality, poor infrastructure and maintenance services, inadequate support systems, capacity overload, and inadequate manpower and good faculty.

In the context of growing global competition in the higher education space, a university or a higher education institution (HEI), as an organisation, may have to cope with changes in demographic structures, descriptive technologies, regulatory reforms, new learning products and frontier research. The paradigm of a university being a static instrumental entity appears to be obsolete in terms of scope and scale. While a modern university seeks to explore new frontiers of knowledge through learning and research, it also faces issues relating to scale and scope. By scale what is implied is the capacity of a university to absorb the growing number of learners and their unmet needs in pursuit of learning and research. For a dynamic university, enrolment tends to grow over time rather than remain constant over the years. Scaling up may generate quality concerns with regard to learning and research outcomes. What transforms a scaling-up university to an innovative one is its ability to invent progressive processes that coordinate between scaling up and quality concerns. In the context of scaling up that induces more quality in terms of scope for new research and learning streams, the pivotal aspect in transforming the organisation to an innovative and resilient one depends on how a university is evolving as an organisation through systems, processes and praxis (practice). In this milieu, along with other organisation processes, human resource management is an indispensable component in organising a dynamic and innovative university into a globalised higher education system.

The term ‘human resource development (HRD)’ has been widely used by management experts in the corporate sector. Given the recent development of HEIs metamorphosing from an institute to an organisation, HRD has to play a key role. Initially, the governance of a university or an HEI was fully taken care of by academic staff members. However, given the various challenges, objectives, accountability, governance structure, challenges of fund management in absence of full support from the government, dependence on student fees, brand-building, etc, the responsibility has at least partially shifted to trained HRD professionals for taking care of such challenges. This responsibility includes manpower management, recruitment, training and development, designing good HR policies for attracting and retaining talent, performance evaluation systems, staff welfare measures, etc. Currently, the role and importance of HRD is ignored at most Indian academic institutions. Given that human resources of an HEI is extremely important, whether it is academic or non-academic, both need to be taken care of professionally to achieve the ultimate goals—bright graduates and research output—in a consistent manner.

India’s HEIs have grown enormously since 1947, but the condition of higher education is still not up to global standards, and very few Indian HEIs make it to the list of the top universities in the world.

Most HEIs in India still follow traditional management systems such as the old personnel management style; instead, we need expert management systems and innovative development systems.

The primary objective of an academic institute is to develop the knowledge, skills and all-round personality of its students, and provide them high-quality and comprehensive educational training, development and opportunities. The realisation of these goals is only possible if the development and motivation of academic and non-academic staff is also taken care of.

In this context, HEIs in India should develop dynamic professional human resource management systems that should focus on (1) recruitment and selection, (2) training and development, (3) strategic human resource management, (4) higher education and development, (5) performance management, (6) human resource planning, (7) labour relations, (8) social welfare development, and (9) compensation and benefits.

Source of the notice: https://www.financialexpress.com/opinion/what-india-needs-at-higher-education-institutions/1699982/

Comparte este contenido:

Kenya to Spend U.S.$50 Million to Stop Third Lecturers’ Strike

Kenya/November 27, 2017/Allafrica

Resumen: Kenia gastará u $ s 50 millones para detener la tercera huelga de profesores.

The government is spending Sh5.2 billion in the current fiscal year in a bid to resolve the current strike by lecturers in public universities – the third in a year.

The sum was authorized by the National Treasury in a letter dated November 6 in which the ministry’s Principal Secretary Kamau Thugge allowed the State Department for University Education to spend the money on enhanced salaries of public universities staff, pending the regularization of the same in supplementary estimates for the 2017/18 Financial Year.

«To avert the ongoing strike by universities staff approval has been granted to the State Department for University Education to spend Sh5,286,708,183 under Article 223 of the Constitution to enable payment of the enhanced salaries and allowance,» the letter which the Education Ministry acknowledged receipt on Tuesday reads.

The authorization is in response to a request for an additional Sh7.7 billion to cater for salaries of public university staff under the 2013-2017 Collective Bargaining Agreement within the 2017/18 Financial Year.

Under the 2013-2017 CBA inked on March 13, the government awarded lectures 17.5 and 3.9 per cent increment on basic salary and house allowance respectively following a strike that lasted 44 days.

The CBA negotiated between three universities workers unions – University Academic Staff Union (UASU), Kenya University Staff Union (KUSU) and the Kenya Union of Domestic, Hotels, Education Institutions, Hospitals and Allied (KUDHEA) workers – and the Inter-Public Universities Consultative Council Forum (IPUCCF) was valued at Sh10 billion.

The Sh10 billion was released in two phases – Sh4.8 billion being wired to universities in June during the 2016/17 Financial Year with the remaining Sh5.2 billion being disbursed under the current Financial Year.

Pending the release of the second instalment, lectures in public universities under UASU declared yet another strike in June demanding for the full implementation of the 2013-2017 CBA.

The protracted dispute was reignited on November 1 when UASU Secretary General Constantine Wasonga called for yet another strike accusing public universities and IPUCCF of negating new salary structures and reverting to old rates.

Wasonga demanded that the enhanced pay rates be retained failing which learning in institutions of higher learning will remain paralyzed.

UASU has since insisted that dons will only resume duty if the 2013-2017 CBA is fully implemented and a CBA for the 2017-2021 phase is negotiated.

Following the hard-line position by the union Education Cabinet Secretary Fred Matiangi told universities to forthwith cease hiring staff on a permanent and pensionable basis, a move UASU has vehemently opposed.

«University employees should now be hired on contract basis. This business of hiring every university worker even those working in the kitchen should come to an end,» Matiangi told university managers who included Vice Chancellors during a meeting at the Kenya School of Monetary Studies on Wednesday last week.

«The proposal to introduce contract-based employment in universities will start in the next financial year, the time has come when we must reflect on how to run universities,» he announced during the meeting.

The three strikes have had a negative impact on this year’s learning calendar in public universities, the initial 54-day-strike having significantly eaten into time allocated for the January-April semester.

Already, some public universities have closed midway the September- December semester owing to the ongoing strike.

Fuente: http://allafrica.com/stories/201711240046.html

Comparte este contenido: