Page 151 of 392
1 149 150 151 152 153 392

Marcha por la Ciencia en Washington y 200 ciudades del mundo

Estados Unidos/14 de Abril de 2018/Vonoticias

Los científicos saldrán de sus laboratorios y marcharán en Washington y más de 200 ciudades en todo el mundo el sábado para protestar por las políticas gubernamentales en temas que van desde cambio climático hasta violencia con armas que según dicen ignoran evidencia científica.

La actividad tiene lugar un año después de la primera Marcha por la Ciencia, tres meses después del inicio del gobierno del presidente Donald Trump, cuando investigadores temían que la ciencia sería dejada de lado en el fervor del presidente por eliminar regulaciones gubernamentales.

Este año, “Pienso que nuestros peores temores están dando resultado”, dijo Chris Zarba, quien se retiró en febrero como jefe del consejo asesor sobre ciencia de la Agencia de Protección Ambiental, EPA, por sus siglas en inglés. Esos paneles evalúan la evidencia que guía las decisiones sobre regulaciones ambientales del gobierno.

En octubre del año pasado, el administrador de EPA, Scott Pruitt, emitió una directiva que cambió las reglas que gobiernan la membresía en esos paneles.

Pruitt prohibió que investigadores que recibieron subvenciones de EPA. Indicó que fondos de la agencia podrían comprometer su objetividad.

Fuente: https://www.voanoticias.com/a/marcha-por-la-ciencia-washington-eeuu-epa-donald-trump/4347346.html

Comparte este contenido:

Estados Unidos: Arizona obstaculiza educación a Dreamers; quieren que paguen más por colegiaturas

Estados Unidos/14 de Abril de 2018/El Sol del Centro

La corte estatal determinó que universidades y colegios comunitarios no tengan beneficios como descuentos.

La Suprema Corte de Arizona dictaminó hoy que las universidades colegios comunitarios de la entidad no pueden otorgar colegiaturas baratas, reservadas para los residentes del estado, a los jóvenes inmigrantes indocumentados beneficiarios del programa DACA.

El tribunal emitió un breve dictamen este lunes en el que señala que susmagistrados estuvieron de acuerdo por unanimidad con la decisión expresada por la Corte de Apelaciones de Arizona.

Ésta se refiere a que las leyes federales y estatales vigentes no permiten que los Colegios Comunitarios de Maricopa otorguen colegiaturas para residentes a los beneficiarios del Programa de Acción Diferida para Llegados en la Infancia (DACA).

El dictamen precisa que una opinión completa que explicará la decisión del tribunal se dará a conocer antes del 14 de mayo. La Suprema Corte se adelantó a emitir el dictamen para permitir que los estudiantes del Colegio Comunitario de Maricopa tengan tanto tiempo como sea posible para planear, de acuerdo con la decisión.

La diferencia en el costo de las colegiaturas entre estudiantes dentro y fuera del estado en colegios comunitarios y universidades de Arizona es significativo y pudiera decidir el futuro de muchos jóvenes. Se estima que en Arizona residen unos 30 mil jóvenes beneficiarios del programa DACA.

Los estudiantes residentes en el estado pagan en la Universidad Estatal de Arizona una colegiatura de 10 mil 640 dólares este año, mientras quelos estudiantes no residentes pagan 26 mil 470 dólares.

Los residentes pagan 86 dólares por hora de crédito en los Colegios Comunitarios del Condado de Maricopa, en comparación con 241 dólares para no residentes. De acuerdo con el fallo de la Suprema Corte, los jóvenes DACA deberán pagar desde ahora la colegiatura más cara.

La ley de Arizona prohíbe los beneficios públicos, como la matrícula en el estado para estudiantes sin estatus legal, pero los beneficiarios de DACA están autorizados a permanecer y trabajar temporalmente en Estados Unidos.

La Suprema Corte de Arizona comenzó a analizar el caso luego de que una corte de apelaciones dictaminó que los colegios no podían cobrar la matrícula estatal a los jóvenes inmigrantes beneficiarios del programa DACA. Los colegios comunitarios apelaron ante la Suprema Corte.

Los colegios comunitarios y las universidades de Arizona han permitido que los beneficiarios del DACA paguen las colegiaturas como residentes del estado, mientras el caso se mantenía bajo revisión. Otras entidades cómo Texas otorgan desde hace años colegiaturas baratas de resientes a jóvenes indocumentados

Fuente: https://www.elsoldelcentro.com.mx/mundo/arizona-obstaculiza-educacion-a-dreamers-quieren-que-paguen-mas-por-colegiaturas-daca-1601312.html

Comparte este contenido:

United States: Where will the struggle lead Kentucky teachers?

United States / April 14, 2018/Socialistworker

Resumen: Las protestas representan la continua urgencia del recrudecimiento que ha convertido a Kentucky en otro sitio de las rebeliones de los maestros que barrieron al oeste de Virginia Occidental a través de estados que anteriormente se consideraban conservadores como «el país Trump»

Pranav Jani talked to Kentucky teachers on a visit to the state about how their struggle has developed–and what this weekend’s plans for more protests will bring.

KENTUCKY TEACHERS, education workers and their supporters will gather once again on April 13 and 14 for rallies at the state Capitol in Frankfort.

The protests represent the continuing urgency of the upsurge that has made Kentucky another site of the teachers’ rebellions that swept west from West Virginia through states formerly considered to be conservative «Trump country.»

At the same time, the demonstrations today and tomorrow highlight some of the dynamics and debates that teachers need to consider for the movement to succeed.

At the start of April, an estimated 12,000 teachers and supporters descended on Frankfort, sparked into rebellion specifically by a disastrous attack on public employees’ pensions passed late on March 29 under the camouflage of legislation about sewer construction.

The next morning after this late-night legislative sleight of hand, teachers–led by the grassroots group #KY 120 United–shut down schools in 20 counties through coordinated sick-outs, and many traveled to the capital to send a message to lawmakers.

The tactic of the sick-out was used effectively again on April 2 as politicians considered anti-worker budget and tax legislation. Schools that weren’t closed because of spring break in most of Kentucky’s 120 counties were shut down again, and the turnout in Frankfort was the biggest yet.

Though some educators continued sick-outs or other protests in that first week of April, many looked ahead to April 13–when the legislators’ recess ended and lawmakers would convene again–as the next date for a mobilization.

Developments between April 2 and April 13 highlight the questions that need to be addressed if the movement that shook Kentucky at the start of the month is going to be able to break the stranglehold on public education that is choking teachers, education workers, students and parents.

Above all, the need for a united mobilization of teachers–which was the basis for putting pressure on the legislature last week–is clear.

IN MY trip to Kentucky on April 9 and in conversations over the last two weeks, I’ve had the opportunity to speak with teachers who are in the thick of the struggle, parents and activists who are building solidarity, and supporters who understand its historical impact.

These individuals’ dedication to local organizing and the long-term struggle bodes well for the movement. At the same time, people spoke of the challenges they face–from the actions of politicians and school officials, but also debates within the movement–as they try to continue a struggle that has been months and months in the making.

All this has made for a complicated picture in the period between April 2 and April 13–when work stoppages have been attempted, but not continued; when the politicians have been forced to shift, but have slithered into new positions; and when grassroots groups have been built, but have had to fight hard to stay unified.

As we know from history, no movement or struggle ever develops evenly, going from advance to advance.

The situation in Kentucky is complicated by dynamics that will be familiar from past struggles: debates over what to do next when pressure on lawmakers isn’t enough; discussions about whether or not to strike; the complications of people in different communities with different considerations needing to figure out how they can speak with one voice.

As in all struggles, there’s an ongoing debate about the politics and aims of the movement.

As James Miller, a teacher at duPont Manual High School in Louisville said, some people are fighting only to stop the attack on teachers’ pensions or head off measures to undermine public education–whereas others, including himself, want:

to seize this opportunity to demand significant improvements to public education instead of merely defending the status quo. We want to protect our students by demanding the elimination of legislation that would further criminalize Black and Brown youth and an end to zero-tolerance policies. We want to protect our students’ families by opposing regressive sales taxes and flat taxes.

More than 3,000 people have signed a petition created by Miller that ties the fight for schools to the larger struggle for social justice.

Teachers of all views are still in motion to put forward their grievances–and they know they have the support of many people around them.

Krystal Spencer, with Save Our Schools Kentucky and one of the organizers of the rallies on April 13 and 14, says she’s confident that the rallies will be big, «hopefully bigger than [April 2].»

Citing the many groups that are coming together–including Indivisible, Planned Parenthood, Kentuckians for the Commonwealth, and university groups–Spencer noted how many of these organizations don’t represent teachers, but are participating.

Meanwhile, I heard reports of radicalized teachers who are calling off work this Friday and sending delegations to Frankfort–while working patiently with local groups in their schools who aren’t ready for a strike and have never heard the word «wildcat,» but remain very curious about the strategy.

THE LEGISLATIVE details in Kentucky are complicated, but they are important for understanding the strategic obstacles that teachers have to face.

Even as protesters were leaving the statehouse after their biggest demonstration on April 2, the Republican-led legislature passed a budget bill and a tax «reform» bill that are anti-worker and anti-poor. Yet the GOP claims the balance between the two would benefit education.

The legislature put these bills on the desk of Gov. Matt Bevin, a Tea Party favorite, and then left for a short recess until April 13.

Several teachers’ groups aimed to continue the momentum generated by April 2, with calling sick-outs, grassroots food drives and marching through their towns. But the Kentucky Education Association (KEA) send out a memo to members saying that the union didn’t support work stoppages at this time, and everyone should look to April 13.

On April 6, for example, the union issued a statement that, unfortunately, echoes some of the rhetoric that education bosses use against all teachers’ strikes: «Our students need us to show up for them in classrooms and schools. We urge educators statewide not to allow our united efforts to be compromised by continued calls for action that deprive students, parents and communities of the educational services we provide.»

Meanwhile, between April 2 and April 13, crafty Republican politicians and their ruling-class masters were busy creating a lose-lose situation for those seeking a legislative solution to the attack on education and the social crises in Kentucky–while adding lots of confusion to the process.

On April 9, Bevin vetoed the budget and tax bills put forward by his own party, stating that he wants more «comprehensive tax reform» and a «balanced budget»–code words for deeper tax cuts for the wealthy and austerity for the 99 Percent. This set up a challenge to the legislature to try to override the vetoes on April 13 and 14. Bevin signed the pension bill that sparked the teachers’ uprising.

The Democratic minority in the legislature, which has religiously opposed Bevin, supportshis vetoes and will vote against overriding them, on the basis that they are opposed to the budget and tax bills that passed.

On the other hand, the KEA and its affiliates have called for Bevin’s vetoes to be overridden–a de facto defense of the Republican legislature’s bills.

The logic of the position was explained in a statement from the Jefferson County Teachers Association (JCTA), which contended that, while the union «does not agree with some of the regressive ways the revenue bill generates new revenue, but without a revenue bill, Kentucky will lose hundreds of millions of dollars in funding for public education.»

The unions are right that Bevin vetoed these bills from the right, not the left. But it seems problematic to accept the original legislation, which are clearly regressive and harmful in various ways, as a kind of lesser evil.

Indeed, as so many teachers and supporters expressed in face-to-face discussions, what galvanized them to take action is the general and ongoing attack on education in the midst of a deep social crisis in Kentucky–not a dispute between two versions of budget cuts, two versions of tax cuts for the rich, and two versions of tax hikes that hit poor and working people.

EVEN ACTIVISTS who have organized outside the KEA have debated what path to follow in this confusing situation.

Internal discussions within the #KY 120 United this week revealed disagreement about whether or not to call for work stoppages, and whether or not to settle for the legislature’s original budget and tax bills.

Most of the teachers and others I met remained sympathetic to both the KEA and KY 120 United, even if they disagreed with the positions they have taken regarding the legislation.

After Bevin’s open and disparaging attacks on KEA as «a problem,» there was no question about this–even when one teacher defending the KEA against Bevin said she wished they would be «more of a problem.»

Thus, people who are part of KEA, KY 120 United and school-specific groups, many at the same time, are seeking for teachers to figure things out together as part of a longer struggle against a tough set of opponents. Perhaps some of the momentum of April 2 has fallen off, and no one wants to be pushed into choosing between Republican Plan A and Republican Plan B.

Plus, if we look at what teachers and supporters did accomplish in the «in-between» period, it’s clear how powerful the movement is at the grassroots level. With many teachers not being sure about an ongoing strike, a preparation period may have been exactly what was needed.

In Jefferson County–the state’s most populous county that includes Louisville and the surrounding area, there was an attempt to close schools through sick-outs on April 9, though participation wasn’t strong enough to shut down the schools.

In Pike County in eastern Kentucky, along the border with West Virginia, teachers laid out a week of actions leading up to April 13, including pressuring the Chamber of Commerce for supporting the pension bill.

FOR TEACHERS and activists I met from Northern Kentucky and Lexington, the «in between» meant local meetings with activists, talking to parents about the importance of taking action, and working with others to discuss building solidarity.

«Teachers in my building are hungry for info and action in a way they haven’t been before,» said Molly Seifert, a teacher at Beechwood High School in Northern Kentucky. Seifert noted that the organizing meetings she was part of now drew about 10 times more people than KEA meetings months before.

«I’m advocating for ‘the Pike County plan’ for the rest of the week: local action and then Frankfort on Friday,» Seifert said. «I’m also advocating for a long-term group like this that meets regularly and builds on this momentum.»

Laura McMullen, a teacher at Holmes Middle School in Covington, said: «We were ready last week, and we’re still ready.»

McMullen described the impact of the social crisis, especially in poor schools like hers:

Our class sizes are already at cap. So with all of these resources being pulled, and teaching a group of 31-32 kids, how can I ensure that all their needs are getting met, that their IEPs (Independent Education Plans) are being followed…Our school has a very high rate of special needs kids, and our transience rate is very high, with so many kids homeless at any given time.

So when they cut funding for those kids, for after-school programs, for extracurriculars, what are they going to do? We feed kids breakfast, lunch and dinner–where are those kids going to get that? Busing is very expensive–we have no way to bus these students. If the goal isn’t to bankrupt public schools, then I’m not really sure I know what it is.

Rose Curtin, a parent in the Newport Independent Schools system and member of a local School-Based Decision-Making Council and a Family Resource Center board, explained how poorer, non-white schools would be particularly devastated by the legislation being considered:

I’ve served on hiring boards, and I already know how hard it is to hire teachers to come into a high-poverty, urban school where there are a lot of challenges, and I strongly believe that this is meant to target those places first.

Because Fort Thomas schools are not going to have a hard time, with a wealthy tax base and a lot of extra support. They’re not going to struggle to get new teachers the way that I suspect we in Covington and Newport are going to in order to get people to come in, especially if there’s no pensions and they have significant student debt burdens.

THE EFFORTS of Kentucky activists to build solidarity is inspirational–and exactly what will be required to combat a social crisis with no real legislative solution in sight.

In Seifert’s region, KY 120 United made «plans of reaching out to parents in meetings at local libraries,» she said. «For the first time in my 17 years of teaching, activists from Boone County, Kenton County, Dayton Independent, Beechwood and Covington Independent are working together on a project like this.»

Curtin, who is also a member of the Democratic Socialists of America’s Metro Cincinnati and Northern Kentucky branch, heads up the Kentucky Teachers Strike Fund, to organize concrete solidarity should educators decide to walk out.

From the experience of a family member who lost her job after participating in a strike, Rose is aware of «just the amount of work that a work stoppage is [and] the financial and emotional effects that it has.» The fund, organized jointly by four DSA chapters across Kentucky, was formed after consulting with DSA members in West Virginia who had set up a similar fund for a coalition of groups.

Drew Van’t Land, an organizer for the Kentucky Workers League in Lexington, talked about organizing solidarity through helping working-class parents who might have trouble with childcare, and helping to «combat the narrative that their interests are somehow not aligned with those of the teachers.»

Everyone I talked to, even if skeptical about the future given the difficulty of the task before Kentucky teachers, underlined the gains that the struggle had already made.

Geoff Sebesta of the Lexington DSA said that teachers’ self-organization and solidarity had contributed to «the legislature being clearly scared as hell.»

«The floodgates have been opened by what’s happened in West Virginia,» said Drew Gerbel, the sibling of a teacher and an activist in his own right. «The example has been set. Look what power exists in the working class. But I don’t think people realize it 100 percent yet.»

It does take time for people across a whole state and with so many different circumstances and ideas to realize that strength–and there are no guarantees that the teachers will be able to win what they are fighting for.

But with all that remains to be done, something fundamental has already been gained. As Miller said to me:

There are too many unknowns to predict the future….But one thing will not change: Kentucky teachers are angry, and they will not be easily placated.

Already dozens of Kentucky educators have registered to run for state and local offices in campaigns specifically targeting incumbents who voted in favor of the governor’s anti-public education agenda. Already hundreds of Kentucky teachers have repeatedly swarmed the state Capitol in rowdy protests. Already thousands of Kentucky teachers have participated in a wildcat sick-out strike.

The future is unpredictable, but it will belong to us.

Fuente: https://socialistworker.org/2018/04/13/where-will-the-struggle-lead-kentucky-teachers

Comparte este contenido:

Estados Unidos: Donald Trump ordena un ataque contra Siria

Estados Unidos/14 de Abril de 2018/El Nuevo Día

El presidente de Estados Unidos tomó la acción en conjunto con Francia y Reino Unido.

Estados Unidos lanzó «ataques de precisión” contra blancos asociados con el programa de armas químicas de Siria, confirmó esta noche el presidente Donald Trump.

En un discurso pronunciado desde la Casa Blanca, Trump dijo que una “operación combinada” con Francia y Reino Unido está en curso.

La acción bélica que tomó el primer ejecutivo se debe a que el sábado pasado el presidente sirio Bashar Assad llevó a cabo una “significativa escalada de un patrón de uso armas químicas por parte de ese terrible régimen”.

Trump aseguró que Estados Unidos no busca con este ataque «una presencia indefinida» en Siria y prometió que retirará sus tropas una vez que el Estado Islámico sea totalmente derrotado.

Pidió, además, una «oración por nuestros nobles guerreros» que participan de la operación contra el régimen sirio al concluir su mensaje.

Mientras daba su mensaje desde Washington, fuertes explosiones iluminaban el cielo de la capital siria mientras. Poco después, la agencia estatal siria, SANA, aseguraba que las fuerzas de defensa aérea del país «están haciendo frente al ataque estadounidense-franco-británico contra Siria».

En referencia a Rusia e Irán, Trump preguntó: “¿Qué tipo de nación quiere asociarse con el asesinato masivo de hombres, mujeres y niños inocentes?”.

“Esta noche, les pido a todos los estadounidenses que recen por nuestros nobles guerreros y nuestros aliados mientras llevan a cabo sus misiones. Oramos para que Dios traiga consuelo a los que sufren en Siria”, dijo el presidente.

Esta es la segunda ocasión en que Trump ordena ataques en Siria. En abril de 2017 autorizó el lanzamiento de misiles Tomahawk contra una base aérea siria en represalia por el uso de gas sarín contra civiles por parte de Assad.

De inmediato, Mac Thornberry (Texas), el presidente del Comité de Fuerzas Armadas de la Cámara de Representantes, apoyó la decisión de Trump.

«El uso que hace Asad de armas químicas contra civiles inocentes es inaceptable. Igualmente preocupante es que ese ataque es parte de una tendencia en el uso de armas químicas por todo el mundo, con el  apoyo de  Rusia. Estados Unidos y nuestros aliados no pueden tolerar estos ataques. Apoyo la decisión del Presidente de llevar a cabo esta huelga junto con nuestros aliados. Sigue habiendo preguntas difíciles sobre el futuro de nuestra política en Siria, pero esas preguntas no deberían restar justicia a las acciones de esta noche», dijo el republicano.

Por su parte, el vicepresidente estadounidense, Mike Pence, abandonó hoy prematuramente la ceremonia de inauguración de la VIII Cumbre de las Américas y regresó a su hotel en Lima, mientras la prensa especulaba sobre el posible anuncio de Washington relativo a Siria.

Pence, quien debía asistir a la ceremonia de inauguración y después a un banquete, se dirigió a su hotel poco después de llegar al Gran Teatro Nacional de Lima, mientras la Casa Blanca convocaba en Washington a los periodistas sin dar más explicaciones.

Trump se reunió hoy con su equipo de Seguridad Nacional para evaluar su respuesta al presunto ataque químico del pasado fin de semana en Siria, al que había prometido responder de forma «contundente» y probablemente por la vía militar.

Fuente: https://www.elnuevodia.com/noticias/eeuu/nota/donaldtrumpordenaunataquecontrasiria-2414562/

Comparte este contenido:

EEUU: Oklahoma Teachers Begin 110-Mile March To Protest Education Funding

América del NOrte/EEUU/huffingtonpost.com

Resumen: Los educadores en Oklahoma están dejando claro que no se dan por vencidos en su lucha por el aumento de los fondos de las escuelas públicas. El miércoles, más de 100 personas salieron de Webster High School en Tulsa en un  viaje de siete días al Capitolio estatal en Oklahoma City para exigir mayores presupuestos de educación. «Estamos dispuestos a caminar 100 millas para nuestros estudiantes «, dijo Patti Ferguson-Palmer, presidenta de la Asociación de Maestros del Aula de Tulsa, a The Tulsa World. «¿Qué está dispuesto a hacer la Legislatura de Oklahoma? No todos somos jóvenes y en forma «. El miércoles marcó el tercer día consecutivo que los maestros de Oklahoma y sus seguidores han protestado por años de recortes profundos y recortes salariales para los educadores. El lunes, los maestros de todo el estado protagonizaron una revuelta masiva cuando salieron de las escuelas, con muchos  enjambrando al edificio del Capitolio en Oklahoma City. «¿Por qué estamos caminando?», Preguntó Alicia Priest, presidenta de la Asociación de Educación de Oklahoma, el lunes. «Hay 700,000 razones por las cuales: nuestros estudiantes. Y se merecen algo mejor. … Ven sillas rotas en clase, libros de texto obsoletos pegados con cinta adhesiva y tamaños de clase que se han disparado «. Miles de maestros  dejaron de trabajar el martes, y muchos distritos escolares anunciaron que permanecerían cerrados por al menos el resto de la semana. «Oklahoma es mejor que esto, y los educadores continuarán caminando hasta que lleguemos a un acuerdo que nuestros estudiantes se merecen», dijo Priest. Mientras tanto, la gobernadora republicana Mary Fallin comparó a los maestros que desean mejores recursos con » un adolescente que quiere un auto mejor». «


Educators in Oklahoma are making it clear they aren’t giving up in their fight for increased public school funding.

On Wednesday, more than 100 people set out from Webster High School in Tulsa on a seven-day trek to the state Capitol in Oklahoma City to demand bigger education budgets.

“We are willing to walk 100 miles for our students,” Patti Ferguson-Palmer, president of the Tulsa Classroom Teachers Association, told The Tulsa World. “What is the Oklahoma Legislature willing to do? We are not all young and fit.”

Wednesday marked the third day straight that Oklahoma teachers and their supporters have protested years of deep cuts and salary slashes for educators.

On Monday, teachers across the state staged a massive revolt when they walked out of schools, with many swarming the Capitol building in Oklahoma City.

“Why are we walking?” Alicia Priest, Oklahoma Education Association president, asked on Monday. “There are 700,000 reasons why: our students. And they deserve better. … They see broken chairs in class, outdated textbooks that are duct-taped together, and class sizes that have ballooned.”

Thousands of teachers were off the job again on Tuesday, with many school districts announcing they would remain shut down for at least the rest of the week.

“Oklahoma is better than this, and educators will continue to walk out until we get a deal that our students deserve,” Priest said.

Meanwhile, Republican Gov. Mary Fallin compared teachers wanting better resources to “a teenager wanting a better car.

Comparte este contenido:

Universidades de Camagüey y Nueva York estrechan vínculos

Centro América/Cuba/12 abril 2018/Fuente: Prensa Latina
Pese a las limitaciones impuestas por Estados Unidos para evitar la visita de sus ciudadanos a Cuba, estrechan hoy lazos la Universidad de Camagüey (UC) y Lehman College, de la Universidad de Nueva York (LCNY).
Inicios de abril estuvo marcado por un importante Encuentro Científico Académico entre ambas instituciones, como parte de la agenda de internacionalización de la primera casa de altos estudios fundada por la Revolución cubana, que sostiene más de un centenar de proyectos con centros foráneos.

El Congreso Internacional de Educación Superior 2018 evidenció la capacidad de la institución para fortalecer los vínculos con homólogas de diversas latitudes.

Las acciones en conjunto con LCNY, que comenzaron en 2016, potencian las publicaciones científicas entre ambas, además incluye este tipo de encuentros especializados.

Con la intención de tributar al desarrollo sostenible de ambas naciones, la delegación norteña compuesta por estudiantes y profesionales de las áreas de las ciencias médicas, la química, administración de negocio, finanzas y marketing, compartió criterios con su homóloga, en un programa que incluyó la visita a importantes espacios culturales en el área de la ciudad declara Patrimonio de la Humanidad.

En declaraciones a la prensa local, la directora de Relaciones Internacionales de la UC, Yailé Caballero, expresó que tras un memorándum de entendimiento entre ambas instituciones docentes en 2017 ‘se han proyectado diversos acciones en conjunto para fortalecer la relaciones, cursos internacionales y la participación en eventos científicos’.

Las jornadas resultaron aprovechadas para conocer las interioridades de los trabajos de capacitación, además de estar dedicadas a la presentación de proyectos en las áreas de la Economía y Biotecnología, con el protagonismo del estudiantado y el personal docente de la UC y la LCNY .

El primer Encuentro Científico Académico entre el Lehman College y la UC estuvo marcado además por talleres, conferencias, espectáculos artísticos, encuentros deportivos y recorridos por lugares históricos de una ciudad con más de medio milenio de vida.

Fuente: http://www.prensa-latina.cu/index.php?o=rn&id=168903&SEO=universidades-de-camaguey-y-nueva-york-estrechan-vinculos
Comparte este contenido:

EEUU:I Disapprove of School Vouchers. Can I Still Apply for Them?

Por: nytimes.com/Kwame Anthony Appiah/ 11-04-2018

My son attends preschool part time at a private Montessori school, which goes up to middle school. I like the school, and he is very happy there, but I can’t afford to keep him there when he starts kindergarten full time.

I believe that free public education is an important aspect of our society. Our local public elementary school is generally considered a decent option, but I worry about how standardized testing has changed the public-school landscape in recent decades. My son is thriving in his current environment, and the approach of traditional public schools is significantly different from Montessori’s. If money were no object, I would strongly consider keeping him at his current school.

Our state has a school-voucher program, which uses public money to help low-income families pay for private-school tuition. My family would probably qualify. But I believe that taxpayer dollars would be better spent to fortify public-school systems and should not be funneled to private schools. Given my beliefs, may I apply for a school voucher? Name Withheld

Looking after your son’s interests is a special obligation you have as a parent. “Special obligation” is a philosopher’s term, but it simply means that you have duties to him, arising out of your relationship, that you don’t have to other children. You’re not merely entitled to put his education first; you’re obliged to do so. You should feel free to use whatever legal means there are to get him a great education, including vouchers — unless you think they are so wicked that your participation in them would amount to condoning evil. If you just think the voucher program is bad policy, then join the campaign against it. That’s the right way to voice your judgments about the merits of educational policy. You don’t want to sacrifice your son’s education to abstract principle, especially given that you’re not going to end the voucher program by failing to make use of it. Our roles as parents, friends, employees and citizens can make conflicting calls on us.

But be sure you’re right about what’s in your child’s best interests. You should take a closer look at your local public elementary school, and not content yourself with the general skepticism you express about the “public-school landscape” and the effects of “standardized testing.” If it turns out that the private option isn’t obviously better, you can bring your beliefs as a citizen into a more natural alignment with your duties as a parent.

My children are currently in private school, although both were in public school for many years, and my younger one may switch back to public school for high school. I’m a big supporter of public education, so I was already feeling guilty about my choice — and then the federal tax bill passed in December. New tax rules allow pretax 529 savings accounts to be used not just for higher education but also for private precollege education. What should I do, if I want to do all I can to be a public-school ally? It seems there are three options: 1) Not take the tax deduction; 2) Take the deduction and give the money I save to the P.T.A. of a local underresourced public school or an organization working to improve public education; or 3) Take the deduction, figuring that as an N.Y.C. resident it will help offset the huge increase I expect to see in my taxes.Name Withheld

 Under the new federal tax act, you can withdraw up to $10,000 a year from a 529 savings account to pay for a student’s private precollege education. Vouchers lite! Previously, these accounts could be used only for higher education. But the way that the relevant “deduction” works hasn’t changed. When you pay into these accounts in New York State, your state income-tax liability is reduced up to a limit of $5,000 for a single person or $10,000 for a couple. Once in the fund, your money grows federal- and state-tax-deferred; but you don’t have to pay taxes when you take the money out, if it’s for a qualified educational expense. (The details here, as with much tax law, get complicated, but this is the basic picture.) You may well be paying into one of these funds already for your child’s college education and getting the maximum state-tax deduction. If so, this particular change in the tax law should not affect your income taxes very much.

Of course, any money you take out in the next few years won’t be available later for college expenses and won’t have compounded for long. Still, the new federal law does encourage you to save for private school as well as college in one of these funds. If things remain as they are, the federal provision that increases the use of these funds threatens to reduce state income-tax revenue. Then again, a “preliminary report” from New York’s tax department suggests that K-12 payments may not be considered qualified educational expenses and that the state could recapture any associated tax benefits. And, as you’re aware, this new use for 529 funds may do little to offset the loss to you that comes from no longer being able to deduct more than $10,000 in state property and income taxes from your federally taxable income.

None of that is ethics, though. My ethical view is you should take all the tax deductions you’re legally entitled to. Many features of our tax system are ridiculous; many are the product of lobbying without much regard for the public good. But you don’t have a duty to pay more than you are required to by law just because you and people like you are benefiting from bad policies, any more than you have the right to pay less than you’re required to when you take a hit from bad policies. The right thing to aim for is tax reform that makes the system fairer. (We will all have our own views about whether the recent tax reforms did that. Count me a skeptic.)

You’re already helping to pay for New York’s public schools through your taxes. Your choice to give your children a private education doesn’t lessen your financial support for public schools. If you want to lend additional assistance to public schools without sending your kids to them, you can, as you say, support the local P.T.A. You can also pay attention when voting for candidates for public office and vote for those who will do their best for those schools. And you could lobby your state to make sure that it excludes deductions related to 529 funds used for K-12 expenses — deductions that encourage people with your sort of income to leave the public schools. With more people like you as parents, those schools might provide better education for all our children.

*Fuente: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/10/magazine/i-disapprove-of-school-vouchers-can-i-still-apply-for-them.html

Comparte este contenido:
Page 151 of 392
1 149 150 151 152 153 392