Page 181 of 231
1 179 180 181 182 183 231

¿Educación para todos?

España/08 junio 2016/ Autor: Sonia Sierra/Fuente: Economía Digital

En los países desarrollados de nuestro entorno, las diferentes fuerzas políticas consensuan acuerdos para no cambiar el sistema educativo cada legislatura lo que aporta la estabilidad necesaria para mantener lo que funciona y cambiar lo que sea susceptible de mejora.

En España, sin embargo, tenemos la educación como arma ideológica arrojadiza y los partidos que se han alternado el poder hasta ahora, lejos de llegar a un acuerdo en el que la mayoría se pueda sentir cómodo, imponen su modelo en cuanto llegan al poder e intentan derogar el anterior.

El resultado de esto es bien conocido: cifras de fracaso y abandono escolar temprano por encima de la media europea en la mayoría de las CCAA, comunidad educativa en pie de guerra constantemente y profesores que tienen que gastar gran parte de su energía en adaptarse a los cambios constantes del sistema. Por eso es tan importante lograr un Pacto Nacional por la Educación que dé estabilidad a toda una generación.

En España, el presupuesto en Educación está por debajo de la media europea y este aspecto, pese ser muy importante, no es el único que explica  el fracaso de nuestro sistema educativo.

Para empezar, cualquier modelo educativo de éxito considera clave la figura del profesor. Para ello se necesita una buena formación inicial y continuada y la valoración social de esta profesión y nada de esto sucede en nuestro país. Es por eso que necesitamos el equivalente al MIR para la formación del profesorado, con prácticas remuneradas para que los nuevos docentes entren en las aulas con la preparación necesaria.

Otro de los aspectos importantes que fallan en nuestro sistema educativo es la falta de equidad. Todos los estudios al respecto nos muestran que la situación socioeconómica de las familias es el factor determinante en el éxito o fracaso escolar. Este se comienza a detectar ya en la Educación Inicial y es precisamente ahí cuando se tiene que empezar a actuar.

Cuando un alumno se empieza a quedar atrás, se ha de iniciar un acompañamiento para que pueda seguir el ritmo de sus compañeros. Si no lo hacemos, ese alumno irá sumando retrasos y eso hará muy difícil que pueda seguir el ritmo escolar.

Por ese motivo, se necesitan más profesores de apoyo para ayudar a aquellos que más lo necesitan y ha de ser el sistema el que los proporcione de forma gratuita porque si no, las familias que no puedan hacerse cargo dejarán a sus hijos en desventaja frente a las que si puedan y la escuela debe de ofrecer igualdad de oportunidades a todo el mundo si de verdad queremos construir una sociedad justa.

Otro de los aspectos que dificulta la igualdad de oportunidades de nuestro sistema educativo es el exceso de deberes. Los informes tanto de la OCDE como de la OMS nos alertan sobre el exceso de tareas extraescolares en nuestro país y la poca efectividad de las mismas. Mientras que en Finlandia tienen una media de 2,8 horas de deberes a la semana y Corea del sur 2,9 –por citar dos países con excelentes resultados en PISA-, en España tenemos 6,5.

El exceso de deberes van en contra de la equidad porque las familias de nivel socioeconómico medio y alto pueden ayudar a sus hijos a hacerlo mientras que las familias con un nivel más bajo, no, lo que tiene como resultado una mayor diferencia en la brecha entre clases sociales. Eso sin contar que también perjudica la salud de los pequeños y la conciliación familiar.

Y, finalmente, tenemos el tema del acceso a los libros de texto. Cada septiembre, las familias se deben enfrentar al enorme coste de los libros de texto. Muchas familias no pueden hacerse cargo del gasto que supone unos 300 euros por hijo lo que tiene como resultado que muchos alumnos empiezan el curso sin el material adecuado, lo cual resulta especialmente perjudicial para el rendimiento académico. Además, esto provoca diferencias entre comunidades autónomas pues ya hay algunas que contemplan el uso de libros socializados y otras, no.

Es imprescindible que todos los niños, hayan nacido donde hayan nacido, tengan las mismas posibilidades de acceso a los estudios. No podemos seguir permitiendo que en España suceda que casi la mitad de los universitarios provengan de clase alta porque el talento no entiende de clases sociales y debemos fomentarlo allá donde esté.

Las personas que creemos en la educación como elemento transformador clave de nuestra sociedad hemos de apostar por una mayor inversión, una mejor formación y consideración del profesorado y por la equidad del sistema educativo para garantizar la igualdad de oportunidades. Nos jugamos nuestro presente y nuestro futuro.

Fuente noticias:

http://www.economiadigital.es/es/notices/2016/06/-educacion-para-todos-84221.php

Fuente imagen:

http://interculturalidadenlaeducacininfantil.blogspot.com/2010/11/fichas-interculturales-para-colorear.html

Comparte este contenido:

México: Marcha magisterio del Senado a Segob

Fuente: La Capital  / 8 de Junio de 2016

Luego de que una comitiva de maestros entró al Senado para entregar el pliego petitorio, inició la movilización de la Coordinadora Nacional de la Educación (CNTE) del Senado de la República hacia la Secretaría de Gobernación (Segob).

El contingente, integrado por las Secciones 18 de Michoacán, 14 de Guerrero, 7 de Chiapas, 9 y 10 de la Ciudad de México y 22 de Oaxaca, caminan sobre Paseo de la Reforma para manifestar su descontento por la Reforma Educativa.

Antes de iniciar la marcha, padres de los 43 normalistas de Ayotzinapa se unieron al contingente para confirmar su apoyo a la lucha del magisterio, así como pedir al pueblo alzar la voz y acabar con el mal gobierno de Enrique Peña Nieto.

Previamente había marchado sobre la misma vía para arribar al Senado de la República.

Sin embargo, elementos de Seguridad Pública bloqueron el paso de los manifestantes en Reforma, rumbo a Chapultepec, en las inmediaciones del Senado.

Según reportes, los contingentes se organizaron por secciones para iniciar la marcha, yendo a la vanguardia los maestros de la Sección 18 provenientes de Michoacán; posteriormente se colocaron los maestros de la Sección 7 de Chiapas, Sección 14 de Guerrero y Sección 22 de Oaxaca.

Además de la movilización, los manifestantes alistan un mitin frente a la Torre del Caballito, donde se concentra el mayor número de manifestantes, los cuales arriban principalmente del estado de Chiapas.

EN DIRECTO en : Llega contingente Chiapas CNTE a Reforma https://www.periscope.tv/w/aicN1zEwMzI2MjQxfDFsRHhMcVBFUkVMS23oso7epSWtyO7t4h7MGd3q5ypYqoaGbqtwHq1yA_vNxA== http://fb.me/6vriraULj 

Photo published for Coordinadora1DMX @Coordinadora1DM

Coordinadora1DMX @Coordinadora1DM

Llega contingente Chiapas CNTE a Reforma

é CNTE bloqueo permanente en Reforma

Maestros de la Coordinadora Nacional de Trabajadores de la Educación bloquearon Paseo de la Reforma. Los contingentes de maestros provenientes de Michoacán, Estado de México, Oaxaca y Chiapas, principalmente, se reunieron el cruce de Reforma y Bucareli lo que impidió el libre paso de los automovilistas.

Granaderos mantuvieron la vigilancia de los manifestantes e impidieron su paso hacia otros puntos del Centro Histórico de CDMX.

Los miembros del magisterio disidente realizarán una conferencia de prensa en el antimonumento a los 43 normalistas desaparecidos de Ayotzinapa. El lugar está resguardado por elementos del cuerpo de granaderos de la Secretaría de Seguridad Pública capitalina, asimismo lo sobrevuela un helicóptero la corporación.

Ambos sentidos de la Paseo de la Reforma, entre avenida Bucareli y avenida Juárez, fueron cerrados.

Vigilan granaderos marcha de la CNTE

Maestros de la Coordinadora Nacional de Trabajadores de la Educación que mantienen plantón en La Ciudadela, se reunirán con la caravana que proviene de Michoacán, Guerrero, Chiapas y Oaxaca para reforzar las movilizaciones en La Capital, en contra de la reforman educativa.

Ante la marcha anunciada para este miércoles, policías de la Secretaría de Seguridad Pública capitalina, vigilan ya Paseo de la Reforma a la altura de la Torre del Caballito.

También hay vallas de policías en los accesos al Zócalo capitailno y al Monumento a la Revolución, donde está instalada la réplica de la Capilla Sixtina. Además de los granaderos que bloquean los accesos por 5 de mayo, Tacuba, Madero y Eje Central.

“Hoy vamos a concentrarnos en Reforma y a las 12:00  estamos concentrándonos” en el cruce de Reforma y Bucareli”, dijo por la mañana el secretario General de la CNTE en Guerrero, Ramos Reyes.

Permiten avance de la CNTE por Calzada Zaragoza 

Después de unos 40 minutos de negociación, se permitió el paso a la caravana de profesores disidentes que ingresó a la Ciudad de México por la carretera México-Puebla, previamente detenida por granaderos a la altura del Metro Acatitla, en avenida Ignacio Zaragoza.

Los elementos policiacos retiraron de carriles centrales, vehículos y motocicletas oficiales.

Alrededor del mediodía, los representantes de los maestros de la sección 22 de la Coordinadora Nacional de Trabajadores de la Educación (CNTE) y de la sección 7 de esa agrupación en Chiapas, José Antonio y Marisol Rodríguez, respectivamente, dialogaron con los elementos policíacos.

Dirigentes de la CNTE habían solicitado a los gobiernos federal y local para que permita el paso de los contingentes.

En tanto, se prevé que en pocos minutos arribe la caravana de docentes del estado de Michoacán que avanza ya hacia el cruce de Paseo de la Reforma y Bucareli, donde comienzan a concentrarse decenas de educadores.

Hace cinco días, la marcha convocada por la CNTE en La Capital pretendía llegar al Aeropuerto de la Ciudad de México, pero policías capitalinos obstruyeron su paso y «encapsularon» a los manifestantes en Reforma.

 

Con información de Milenio y La Jornada 

 

 

Comparte este contenido:

Cash Transfer Programs Succeed for Zambia’s Poor, Offer Lessons for Battling African Poverty, AIR Finds

Fuente AIR / 8 de junio de 2016

Programs designed to alleviate hunger and increase food supply through cash transfers to some of Zambia’s poorest families achieved those goals and more, final evaluations conducted by the American Institutes for Research (AIR) revealed.

Overall, researchers found that a cash-transfer program geared toward families with at least one young child had effects that amounted to a net benefit of 1.5 kwacha—Zambia’s currency—for each kwacha transferred. A second program for households with fewer able-bodied people to farm had effects that amounted to a net benefit of 1.68 kwacha for each kwacha transferred.

Besides eating more meals and building more reliable food reserves, families used the money to improve their housing, buy additional necessities for their children, acquire more livestock and reduce debt.

The studies, commissioned by UNICEF, are likely to be closely watched as African nations increasingly embrace cash transfers to combat the continent’s cycle of poverty. South Africa’s program is the largest, with roughly 16.1 million people—about a third of its population—receiving some kind of social grant.

Notably, the two Zambian programs were unconditional—providing small, consistent sums of money with no strings attached on how they were spent. The programs bucked general criticisms that cash transfers spark dependency. Rather, the discretionary approach empowered families, who used the grants to improve their living standards in ways that made sense given their individual circumstances. At no point during the multiyear grants did alcohol consumption increase. Nor was there any impact on fertility, according to the evaluations.

“The unconditional approach worked,” said Stanfield Michelo, director of social welfare at Zambia’s Ministry of Community Development and Social Welfare. “And because it did, the region is making positive strides. Without a doubt, the changes would not have been possible without AIR’s rigorous evaluations.”

Animated infographic: Zambia cash transfer results

The evaluation of the Child Grant cash-transfer program (CGP) lasted four years, and the evaluation of the Multiple Category Targeting Grant (MCTG) lasted three years. Begun in 2010 in three of Zambia’s poorest districts, the CGP was open to all households with at least one child under age 4. Half were randomly assigned to receive cash transfers of 60 kwacha ($12) a month, and half to a control group that did not receive funds. The MCTG was aimed at poor households with fewer able-bodied people to farm, due largely to a “missing generation” of parents in their 30s and 40s and disproportionally high numbers of adolescents and orphans cared for by widows and grandparents. As with the CGP, half the MCTG participants received the equivalent of $12 a month and half were in a control group that didn’t.

The studies were notable not only for their duration, but also for their use of randomization and control groups to tease out the program’s true effects.

“Few evaluations of cash transfer programs can make such strong causal claims with as much certainty as these two evaluations,” said David Seidenfeld, AIR’s senior director of international research and evaluation and lead study author. “The design of the study, which extended over several years, allowed us to see that the beneficiaries do not grow complacent over time, but instead find ways to grow the value of the transfer beyond benefits related to food security and consumption.”

Although the studies revealed persistent successes, they also offered future researchers and policymakers an idea of cash transfers’ limitations. The studies did not show consistent successes in education or child nutrition, possibly due to large-scale infrastructure issues—namely, the supply of social services, access to clean water, and a lack of health care and education facilities.

Among the studies’ principal lessons, researchers found that the degree of positive impact depended largely on the participants’ characteristics. For example, the multiple-category grants had large impacts on schooling because participating households had more school-age children. Overall, school enrollment jumps of 8 percent for children ages 11–14 and 11 percent for children 15–17 were attributed to the program, and these age groups are at the greatest risk of dropping out in Zambia, according to the report. By contrast, four years into the program, the child grants had no enrollment or attendance impacts for children in three groups: ages 4–7, 8–10 and 15–17.

“Another lesson is that the unconditional nature of the grants gave participants the flexibility to use the money to combat principal life challenges,” said UNICEF Zambia Representative Hamid El-Bashir Ibrahim. “For example, the CGP significantly affected many indicators commonly associated with resiliency—the ability to manage and withstand shocks. Households with transfers significantly improved housing quality and tools, livestock procurement, and opportunities to diversify income-generating activities so they could better withstand emergencies.”

“The overall results demonstrate unequivocally that common perceptions about cash transfers—that they are handouts and cause dependency, or lead to alcohol and tobacco consumption, or increases in pregnancy—are not true in Zambia,” Seidenfeld said. “Quite the contrary. Due to the unconditional nature of the grants, households had the flexibility needed to meet their most pressing challenges head on.”

The final reports on the Child Grant cash transfer program and the Multiple Category Transfer Grant program can be found on AIR’s website. The site also features a video of David Seidenfeld discussing lessons learned from the multiyear studies.

About AIR
Established in 1946, with headquarters in Washington, D.C., the American Institutes for Research (AIR) is a nonpartisan, not-for-profit organization that conducts behavioral and social science research and delivers technical assistance both domestically and internationally in the areas of health, education and workforce productivity. For more information, visit www.air.org.

###

Comparte este contenido:

Universities should ask whether their academics work too much

Fuente: Times Higher Education / 8 de junio de 2016

Scholars say they feel overwhelmed by demands, but there is scandalously little evidence on whether long hours make any sense for knowledge workers, finds David Matthews

Since I started reporting on research last summer, I’ve been surprised by how evidence-lite major bits of science policy seem to be.

For example, last November, I analysed the new Francis Crick Institute in London, a £700 million biomedical “superlab”. Its radically flat organisational structure and high levels of scientific freedom are based not on reams of experimental data on researcher productivity, but (at least in part) on the personal experiences of the chief executive, Sir Paul Nurse, in leading other institutions.

Read more: The Francis Crick Institute: science and serendipity 

Of course this isn’t to say the Crick won’t be a huge success, or that Sir Paul’s experiences aren’t useful guides. But, as I was told by Julia Lane, a professor of practice at New York University’s Center for Urban Science and Progress, “one of the things that gives one pause is that scientists don’t apply the scientific method to their own activities”.

This quote came to mind as I was writing an analysis that asks: how many hours a week should an academic work? It’s clear that faculty, particularly in the US, are putting in hours well above average (one recent study suggested 61 a week, including 10 on the weekend). Some are working even longer, as suggested by a recent blog that argued “you do not need to work 80 hours a week to succeed in academia”.

The research on optimum working hours is pretty patchy, particularly for knowledge workers (and if readers know of any relevant papers, please let me know). But there was nothing I could find that suggests someone toiling 80 hours a week can be as productive as a colleague doing half that, and plenty of research showing long hours leads to accidents and illness (see the conclusion of this paper).

Most gobsmacking of all was an ethnographic study of 100-hour-a-week Wall Street bankers by Alexandra Michel, a former Goldman Sachs employee herself, and now a professor at theUniversity of Pennsylvania.

Some of the quotes from bankers struggling to overcome the physical limits of their bodies in a never-ending work culture could have come straight from Patrick Bateman. Others are much more tragic.

‘‘I totally believe in mind over matter. There are no such things as physical needs. Tell me one physical need and I can tell you a culture in which they have controlled it,” one banker told Michel.

‘‘I fell on my way to a meeting. The leg changed color and I had pain but I chose not to think about it until after the meeting,” explained another. Her leg was broken in two places.

By year six, the latter banker had developed multiple new allergies, suffered from joint and back pain, heart problems and ovarian cancer, and had numerous unshakable colds and flu. Work forced her to miss the funeral of a beloved grandfather. ‘‘I feel like the creative juices are just gone,” she said. But she was still socialised by the bank’s culture: ‘‘I work hard because this work is who I am.’’

Academics can’t be blamed for overwork any more than can these bankers. Many surely feel trapped in a culture that lionises hyper-long hours, with anything else seen as a lack of commitment (Michel told me working at the weekend is seen as a “badge of honour” for faculty.)

Instead, it should be up to universities as employers to measure how long their faculty are working, and test whether there is any basis for them to work 50, let alone 80, hours a week.

You wouldn’t expect a Wall Street bank to do this. But the academy is supposed to adhere to higher standards of evidence. Understanding whether the nine-to-five (which is, after all, a hangover from the Fordist era of manufacturing) makes any economic or social sense in a knowledge economy strikes me as one of the most pressing research questions of our time.

Comparte este contenido:

Global Partnership: Good teachers are essential to achieve quality education

Fuente: globalpartnership.org / 8 de junio de 2016

Teachers are the essential link to delivering a quality education to all children. To achieve the goal of universal education, the world needs more, better trained and better supported teachers.

Teachers have the single biggest impact on children learning (John Hattie, Visible Learning).

The availability of well-trained, motivated and supported teachers, nurturing and stable learning environments and adequate learning materials are among the factors that lead to effective teaching and positive learning outcomes.

While student-teacher ratios have improved – mostly in richer countries – in recent years, many countries continue to have an average of 40 or more students per teacher, inadequate teacher training, and limited teaching resources.

Comparte este contenido:

Times Higher Education: World University Rankings 2015-2016

Fuente: timeshighereducation / 8 de junio de 2016

The Times Higher Education World University Rankings 2015-2016 list the best global universities and are the only international university performance tables to judge world class universities across all of their core missions – teaching, research, knowledge transfer and international outlook.

The top universities rankings employ 13 carefully calibrated performance indicators to provide the most comprehensive and balanced comparisons available, which are trusted by students, academics, university leaders, industry and governments. This year’s ranking includes 800 universities from 70 different countries, compared with the 400 universities from 41 countries in last year’s table. View the World University Rankings methodology here.

This year’s list of the best universities in the world features 147 of the top universities in the US – with 63 American universities making the top 200 of the list, including the California Institute of Technology (Caltech) as the world’s number one university, followed by Stanford University in third place, the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in fifth andHarvard University in sixth. But the US has been losing its dominance of the tables, as institutions in Europe improve their performance, including those in the UK, Germany, the Netherlands and Switzerland. The UK is the second best represented country in the rankings, with 78 universities in the top 800, and 34 in the top 200. The UK’s Oxford University is ranked second in the world, with Cambridge University in fourth. This year’s ranking also marks the first time a university outside the US and the UK has made the top 10 for a decade. Discover more World University Rankings highlights here. Asia has seen a varied performance, with good news for Singapore, which now claims the top institution in the continent with National University of Singapore (NUS) in 26th place. China has two top fifty universities (Peking University and Tsinghua University) while Japan and South Korea have suffered declining performance.

Our list of the best global universities rankings include many performance indicators directly relevant to students and their families, to help them chose where to study, including faculty-student ratios, the university’s global reputation, its total resources, the international mix on campus, and its links to business. But a reason why the rankings are so widely respected is that they cover the full range of a university’s missions, including research excellence.

Key Statistics

The data shown under Key Statistics is that provided by the University itself in its submission to the Times Higher Education World University Rankings. It represents data from the 2013 academic year, and may vary from subsequent or earlier years.

Students

This is the number of full time equivalent students at the University.

Student:staff ratio

This is the ratio of full time equivalent students to the number of academic staff – those involved in teaching or research.

International students

The percentage of students originating from outside the country of the University.

Female:Male ratio

The ratio of female to male students at the University.

Editor notes – World University Rankings 2016

Times Higher Education is committed to transparency and accountability across all of its rankings.

The data used to create the THE World University Rankings and the portfolio of regional and specialist rankings comes from three sources: reputational data from THE’s annual Academic Reputation Survey, institutional data supplied to THE directly by the universities themselves through our secure data collection portal, and bibliometric data provided by Elsevier, from its Scopus database. These data combine to form the 13 performance indicators used to create the World University Rankings.

January 2016 Update

Following the publication of the 2015-16 World University Rankings, Aarhus University notified us that they had submitted inaccurate data. The data error, which was not picked up in our quality control processes, disadvantaged Aarhus in the rankings. We have corrected the data and recalculated the ranking, and this has resulted in Aarhus obtaining a position of joint 106th (up from joint 149th). We have moved Aarhus to the joint 106th position, but we have retained the original ranking places for all other institutions.

It has also emerged that incorrect bibliometric data were supplied to THE by Elsevier for University of Palermo, Argentina, and included some publication data for the University of Palermo, Italy. Unfortunately when using correct data the University of Palermo, Argentina, does not meet THE’s threshold for inclusion*. The data has now been corrected and the University of Palermo, Argentina, no longer appears in the rankings.

* Our bibliometrics threshold is 1,000 papers (and at least 200 papers a year) published in journals indexed by Scopus, between 2010 and 2014.

March 2016 Update

An error relating to the calculation of Purchasing Power Parity (PPP) in the financial data for a small number of institutions has been corrected, which has positively affected the ranking position of six institutions in the 2015-16 rankings.

We use PPP so that comparisons between universities in different countries are fairer. In total, 13 of the 1,126 institutions which submitted data for the 2015-16 rankings submitted financial data in a currency other than their own national currency, resulting in an incorrect PPP calculation. The correction led to a rankings position change for six of the 13 institutions.

An error was also identified for one other institution, meaning seven universities have changed position. We have corrected the data and recalculated the ranking, and this has resulted in changes for University of São PauloTechnion Israel Institute of TechnologyBoğaziçi UniversityMoscow Institute of Physics and TechnologyNational Research Nuclear University MePhIUniversity of Iceland, and Paris-Sorbonne University – Paris 4. No other 2015-16 Rankings positions have been affected.

World University Rankings 2015-2016

Comparte este contenido:

Campaña Latinoamericana por el derecho a la Educación (CLADE): Adolescentes y jóvenes fuera de la escuela

Fuente: IIPE Buenos Aires / 6 de Junio de 2016

El presente documento tiene como objetivo mostrar los hallazgos respecto a los factores de exclusión educativa en la secundaria y presentar 28 recomendaciones a las autoridades públicas para la formulación e implementación de políticas públicas que eliminen los obstáculos de acceso a este nivel de enseñanza y promuevan la reinserción de las y los adolescentes y jóvenes en el sistema educativo. Se plantea que los Estados adopten marcos legales y políticos que aseguren la realización de todas las dimensiones del derecho humano a la educación – su disponibilidad, accesibilidad, aceptabilidad y adaptabilidad –, así como el establecimiento de una secundaria incluyente, relevante y garante de derechos a todos y todas adolescentes y jóvenes de la región.

Subtítulo: Las demandas para una enseñanza secundaria garante de derechos en América Latina y el Caribe
Año de publicación: 2016
Ciudad/País: São Paulo
Autores/personas: Vezzali, Fabiana
Idioma principal: esp
Formato del documento: E
Tipo de documento: Documento
El libro mlo puede descargar aqui: Adolescentes y jóvenes fuera de la escuela
Comparte este contenido:
Page 181 of 231
1 179 180 181 182 183 231