Page 27 of 84
1 25 26 27 28 29 84

Universities raise alarm over no-deal Brexit and EU student enrolment

By: Sally Weale. 

University leaders have said that a no-deal Brexit would constitute “one of the biggest threats” ever faced by the sector, as figures revealed a further decline in EU student enrolment, particularly in postgraduate research.

According to the Russell Group of universities, there was a 9% decrease in the number of EU postgraduate research students enrolling at its institutions this academic year. The fall follows a 9% decline the previous year, and has potential consequences for Britain’s research capacity.

Dr Hollie Chandler, a senior policy analyst at the 24-strong group of leading universities, described the decline as “troubling” and said that were the UK to leave the EU without a deal, it would only increase uncertainty among prospective students from the rest of Europe.

Overall, the number of EU students who enrolled for the 2018-19 academic year at Russell Group universities fell by 3%. Last year, there was a 1% increase in overall EU student numbers, after years of healthy growth in recruitment.

Although enrolment of EU27 citizens at undergraduate level grew by 1% this year, at taught postgraduate level it fell by 5%.

The figures come as an open letter from leaders of 150 universities to MPs said the impact of a no-deal Brexit could lead to “an academic, cultural and scientific setback from which it would take decades to recover”.

“University leaders are united in the view that the UK leaving the EU without a deal is one of the biggest threats our universities have ever faced,” the letter says. “As a sector which contributes over £21bn to UK GDP every year and supports 944,000 jobs, it is critical to the national interest, to the economy, communities and wider society, that the UK’s universities thrive post-Brexit.

“To do so, our government must demonstrate the required ambition, put the right measures and guarantees in place, and, crucially, avoid the UK crashing out of the EU without a deal on 29 March.”

University leaders are particularly anxious to secure a guarantee from ministers that research funding for which the UK may become ineligible after Brexit will be replaced. Funding from the European Research Council (ERC) and Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions programme (MSCA) will be worth an estimated €1.3bn (£1.2bn) to the UK over the next two years, investing in projects to fight cancer and combat climate change.

Dame Janet Beer, the president of Universities UK, which represents vice-chancellors, said time was running out.

“While we welcome the assurances that the government has already provided about the continuation of Horizon 2020 funding in a no deal scenario, it is critical that similar guarantees are extended, without delay, to cover ERC and MSCA funding,” said Beer, who is vice-chancellor of the University of Liverpool.

“Without cast-iron assurances, world-leading academics and researchers may leave for countries where access to ERC funding is not at risk, and those currently considering relocating to the UK may think again.”

Dame Nancy Rothwell, the vice-chancellor of the University of Manchester, said vital research projects at her university risked being disrupted, including work on proton-beam therapy for cancer patients and Nobel-prize winning work on graphene.

“Researchers who have already spent months or even years preparing funding bids would be left high and dry, including those whose application would be stuck in the middle of the evaluation process,” she said.

Commenting on the EU student enrolment figures, Chandler said that although the Russell Group universities remained popular study destinations with strong global appeal, the figures cannot be ignored.

“It’s fair to assume that uncertainty over Brexit and the UK’s future relationship with Europe could be a significant factor. The drop in postgraduate research courses is especially troubling – these students contribute directly to the UK’s research capacity,” she said.

“If we leave the EU without a deal, the uncertainty felt by prospective European students will only get worse.”

A UK Government spokesperson said: “Science recognises no borders and the UK has a proud record of welcoming the world’s leading scientists and researchers to work and study here. This will not change when we leave the EU.

“Through our modern Industrial Strategy we are investing the highest ever level in research and development in UK history and we are committed to seeking an ambitious future relationship on science and innovation with our EU partners. We are also guaranteeing, in the event of a no deal, money for EU programme-funded research and innovation projects agreed before the end of 2020.”

Shadow Higher and Further Education Minister Gordon Marsden added: “Despite consistent warnings from Labour and the University sector, the Government has continued to ignore the impending damage, especially the drift to no deal, Brexit could cause to our world class Universities and FE Colleges.

“Today’s letter from the sector reiterated everything we have been saying over the past two years about the threats facing students, staff and research but DfE and the Education Secretary has been abysmally negligent in ensuring those concerns and a deal on them should be put at the top of the negotiations table.”

Source of the article: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2019/jan/04/universities-raise-alarm-over-no-deal-brexit-and-eu-student-enrolment

Comparte este contenido:

Queering sex education in schools would benefit all pupils

By: Kennedy Walker. 

All power to the pupil activists drawing attention to the lack of information about LGBT issues in sex education in England

All I remember from my relationship and sex education in school is phallic objects, condoms and everyone being terrified of pregnancy. Looking back it’s clear how disjointed and inadequate this was at a time when I was struggling with the complexity of being a black, queer, working-class boy navigating life inside and outside school.

If I had been given information about the kind of relationships I would later come to be in and given the space to think critically about my gender it would have made my road to self-acceptance a less bumpy one. It was also a missed opportunity to address toxic elements of masculinity such as suppressing emotion or objectifying women. Modernising the sex and education curriculum wouldn’t just make LGBT+ people safer, but would benefit the wellbeing of all students.

So when I found out that young south Londoners had put this particular new year’s resolution to the Department for Education, I was elated. Students put banners on every secondary school in Lambeth, demanding that relationship and sex education (RSE) in schools be inclusive of LGBT+ relationships and for it to examine gender and stereotypes. When you consider that inclusive RSE isn’t mandatory in schools in England, hasn’t been updated for well over a decade and almost half of young people no longer identify as exclusively heterosexual, it’s clear it’s time for a much-needed overhaul.

The demand is there. According to a report published by the Terrence Higgins Trust looking at responses from 900 young people aged between 16 and 25, 97% of them thought RSE should be LGBT+ inclusive, but the vast majority (95%) had not been taught about LGBT+ sex and relationships.

This isn’t the only front the current RSE is failing on: 75% of young people were not taught about consent and 50% of them rated their RSE as “poor” or “terrible” with only 10% rating it as “good”. In this context, the shocking 22% rise in cases of gonorrhea between 2016 and 2017 is sadly unsurprising.

I spoke to one of the students responsible for this action; they are 17 years old and asked to remain anonymous. When asked why they felt this action was necessary they said: “Being LGBT+ in school can be an isolating experience … I have experienced ignorant remarks from students and teachers alike. We wanted to do this visual action to draw attention to what feels like a hidden issue, but the impact of which I and many like myself feel on a day to day basis.”

Only 13% of LGBT+ young people have learned about healthy same-sex relationships. Those who do receive inclusive education are less likely to experience bullying and more likely to report feeling safe, welcome and happy according to Ruth Hunt, chief executive of the LGBT+ equality charity Stonewall.

The feeling that this is a “hidden issue” comes as no surprise given the long history of active exclusion of LGBT+ people and their experiences from public life. In 1988, the Thatcher government introduced section 28 which stopped local authorities from “promoting” homosexuality in schools. It took 15 years for this piece of legislation to be overturned, but many teachers still don’t know if they are legally able to openly discuss LGBT+ topics, and many feel that they lack the expertise to do so.

The reason inclusive RSE isn’t mandatory is because sex education as we know it today was introduced by a Labour government in 2000, but section 28 (the law that banned “promoting” homosexuality) wasn’t overturned until 2003. It is humiliatingly out of date. An inclusive RSE curriculum could mean LGBT+ identities could be celebrated in a place they were once erased and demonised.

Thanks to campaigning organisations such as the Terrance Higgins Trust, the government has committed to making RSE lessons compulsory in all secondary schools in England and relationship education compulsory in primary schools. This was meant to be rolled out in 2019, but has now been pushed back to 2020. Whether this will cover LGBT+ relationships and gender adequately remains to be seen, as the finalised guidance that will be used by schools to deliver the RSE has yet to be published.

The rollout can’t come soon enough. LGBT+ people are more likely to experience poor mental health in the form of depression, suicidal thoughts, self-harm and substance misuse due to the pervasive discrimination, isolation and homophobia they experience. This shake-up of RSE could be an important step towards changing this.

Source of the article: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/dec/24/queering-sex-education-lgbt-pupil-england

Comparte este contenido:

Reino Unido: Tratando de mejorar la diversidad racial en los medios de comunicación.

Europa/ReinoUnido/TheGuardian

Daniel Taylor tiene razón al preguntarse por qué hay una falta de diversidad étnica en el periodismo deportivo en Gran Bretaña ( ¿por qué debería alguien como Raheem Sterling ser visto como un «juego justo»?, 11 de diciembre). Muchos jóvenes de BAME, especialmente los negros, no creen que puedan entrar en ningún tipo de periodismo. Cuando todavía están en la escuela, y los asesores hablan sobre qué tipo de trabajos podrían intentar, estos jóvenes tienden a ser categorizados como deficientes en inglés hablado y escrito que no son aptos para el trabajo de los medios y no tienen ninguna posibilidad de adquirir las habilidades suficientes para competir en esa zona con niños blancos.

Por lo tanto, desanimado, se encoge de hombros, la sombría creencia de que el periodismo es solo otra línea de trabajo que es «blanco de pared a pared». Escuché esa frase varias veces cuando, alrededor de 1990, estaba enseñando en un curso de un año (Introducción al periodismo para estudiantes negros y asiáticos) en una universidad en el sur de Londres. El curso, cuyos alumnos tenían una edad mínima de 19 años, fue para dar a las personas que se habían perdido algunas calificaciones formales en la escuela la oportunidad de comenzar en el periodismo.

Estaba muy claro que a muchos de los estudiantes les faltaban las habilidades de alfabetización necesarias en cualquier sala de redacción. Parte del curso universitario abordaba eso, pero era a tiempo parcial para que los estudiantes aún pudieran obtener la prestación por desempleo. Por lo tanto, el curso estaba lejos de ser intensivo y los estudiantes estaban luchando para llegar a fin de mes. Esto no ayudó a su capacidad de aprender. Había aproximadamente 20 estudiantes en el curso al comienzo de cualquier año; alrededor de la mitad se retiraría.

Menos del 10% de los estudiantes que completaron ese curso introductorio, en mi tiempo allí, pasaron a una capacitación de tiempo completo en periodismo, que no involucró más pagos por desempleo, aunque hubo subsidios para algunos. a la sesión informativa: noticias para los creadores de noticias.

Los jóvenes de BAME tendrían muchas más posibilidades de ingresar al periodismo si, mientras estaban en la escuela y tan pronto como fuera posible, se les brindó una capacitación bien orientada sobre cómo escribir y editar una noticia sencilla lo suficientemente rápido como para cumplir un plazo.

Me dijeron, cuando empecé en el negocio, que el periodismo requiere tres cualidades: un buen dominio del inglés, una manera plausible y una astucia de rata. La vida de la ciudad británica puede darte el último e incluso el segundo. Deje que las escuelas proporcionen lo primero, antes de que se encogan de incredulidad y que cualquier astucia vaya a otra parte. 

• Las universidades pueden desempeñar un papel para ayudar a los estudiantes de BAME a encontrar trabajo en el periodismo, por lo que una representación justa de la comunidad de BAME sería más común en los medios de comunicación.

En la London Metropolitan University , tenemos un porcentaje más alto de estudiantes de BAME que todas las universidades del Grupo Russell combinadas, pero encontrar las pasantías de estudiantes de periodismo a veces puede resultar complicado. No siempre tienen los contactos que pueden tener los estudiantes en otros lugares, y algunos no tienen la experiencia laboral previa, u otras calificaciones previas, para competir en este campo feroz. Según Sutton Trust, el 51% de los principales periodistas del país acudía a escuelas privadas, más de siete veces el promedio nacional.

El año pasado puse en marcha la Red de Diversidad de Periodismo de Met. Según las estadísticas de 2016 , el 94% de los periodistas en el Reino Unido son blancos, y solo el 0,2% de los periodistas del Reino Unido son negros. Muchas redacciones son, de hecho, exclusivamente blancas.

Para el año inaugural de la Red de Diversidad de Periodismo, enviamos a cinco estudiantes a la BBC. Una de las productoras de Newsnight quedó tan impresionada con uno de nuestros estudiantes, que anteriormente había solicitado sin éxito las pasantías de la BBC cinco veces, que se le pidió que solicitara una pasantía de verano pagada de ocho semanas. Ella superó a 1,000 solicitantes y ahora está en su tercer año en London Met, mientras que también trabaja a tiempo parcial como productora asociada pagada en la BBC.

La diversidad en la sala de redacción es vital ya que «realmente necesitamos reflejar la sociedad y las personas que queremos cubrir», dijo la oradora invitada Melissa Pozsgay de Bloomberg a nuestros estudiantes de periodismo recientemente. Este año esperamos ampliar la pasantía con colocaciones en Bloomberg, el Islington Tribune y varios otros. 

 Como alguien que está enfermo por el racismo constante que se muestra a los jugadores en las instalaciones deportivas, ¿puedo sugerir que siempre que esta característica repugnante se ventile, todos los deportistas involucrados en esa instalación se jueguen, sin importar qué deporte, simplemente salgan del campo? Puede garantizar que no pasará mucho tiempo antes de que el público en general se vuelva contra estos racistas para siempre. 

Fuente: https://www.theguardian.com/media/2018/dec/12/trying-to-improve-racial-diversity-in-the-media

Comparte este contenido:

Reino Unido: Estudio encuentra altos niveles de depresión entre adolescentes LGB

Europa/Reino Unido/TheGuardian

La investigación ha encontrado que las personas jóvenes lesbianas, gays y bisexuales comienzan a deprimirse y autolesionarse a partir de los 10 años porque se sienten diferentes a sus compañeros heterosexuales.

Según un estudio basado en entrevistas con 4.800 jóvenes de Bristol y sus alrededores, las personas LGB de 16 a 21 años tienen cuatro veces más probabilidades de sentirse deprimidas, de hacerse daño y de pensar en suicidarse .

Los expertos dijeron que los números estaban relacionados con la intimidación, el estigma y el abuso que algunas personas jóvenes experimentan como resultado de su sexualidad.

Los hallazgos son de la primera investigación británica sobre la prevalencia de síntomas depresivos y autolesiones en los jóvenes.

Los problemas de salud mental se vuelven mucho más comunes entre los jóvenes LGB que en los heterosexuales a la misma edad que la adolescencia.

«Es profundamente preocupante que una proporción tan alta de jóvenes LGBQ + estén luchando con su salud mental», dijo Tom Madders de la organización benéfica YoungMinds.

«Si bien los factores detrás de los problemas de salud mental son a menudo complejos y múltiples, las cifras altas pueden relacionarse con la intimidación, la discriminación, sentirse como un extraño o preocuparse por las reacciones de familiares o amigos».

De los 4,828 participantes, 625 no dijeron que eran heterosexuales, sino que se describían a sí mismos como homosexuales, bisexuales, principalmente homosexuales, principalmente heterosexuales, inseguros o no atraídos por ninguno de los dos sexos. Todos ellos fueron calificados como pertenecientes a una «minoría sexual» por los académicos de University College London y King’s College London que llevaron a cabo la investigación.

«Hace tiempo que sabemos que los jóvenes de minorías sexuales tienen peores resultados de salud mental, y es bastante preocupante que hayamos descubierto que esta tendencia comienza a los 10 años y empeora durante la adolescencia», dijo la Dra. Gemma Lewis. El autor principal del estudio.

Los autores dijeron que sus resultados, publicados el miércoles en la revista Lancet Child & Adolescent Health , deberían hacer que los médicos y otros profesionales de la salud consideren la sexualidad de los jóvenes a los que tratan de ayudar con la depresión o la autolesión.

Los encuestados eran jóvenes que participaron en el Estudio Longitudinal de Padres e Hijos de Avon y reportaron su sexualidad a los 16 años.

Los síntomas depresivos ya eran más comunes entre los jóvenes LGB a la edad de 10 años que entre sus pares heterosexuales. Esa brecha se amplió hasta el 21, después de lo cual comenzó a cerrarse.

«A medida que avanzan en la adolescencia, pueden estar involucrados una variedad de factores estresantes, como la discriminación, la estigmatización, los sentimientos de soledad, el aislamiento social, la vergüenza o el miedo o el rechazo, incluso en el hogar o en la escuela», dijo Madeleine Irish, otra autora del estudio. .

Irish pidió a los ministros que se aseguren de que la nueva relación y el plan de estudios de educación sexual deberían alentar a los jóvenes a hablar sobre su sexualidad y género y abordar los prejuicios contra esos temas.

Las escuelas podrían empeorar el problema inadvertidamente al hacer que los estudiantes de «minorías sexuales» se sientan aislados al centrarse demasiado en relaciones directas, sugiere el estudio.

El Departamento de Salud y Asistencia Social lanzó un plan de acción LGBT de 4,5 millones de libras para mejorar el bienestar mental en el verano. Un portavoz dijo: «Nuestros planes ayudarán a que 70,000 niños más al año tengan acceso a atención especializada de salud mental para el 2020-21».

Fuente: https://www.theguardian.com/world/2018/dec/12/study-finds-high-levels-of-depression-among-lgbt-teenagers

Comparte este contenido:

Special educational needs ‘It’s hard to watch your child struggle. All you can do is chase people’

By: Michael Savage.

As council budgets are slashed, desperate parents speak about their exhausting battle in the courts to protect the forgotten victims – their children

As a former bouncer working in north London nightclubs, John Roden thought he knew a thing or two about stressful situations. But taking on the care of his five-year-old granddaughter Hope brought his greatest confrontation. Hope is disabled, and her rare condition means she cannot walk unaided and communicates using a form of sign language.

“Caring for Hope is stressful at the best of times,” says Roden, one of a group of carers to launch a legal challenge heard in court last month against proposed cuts to special educational needs funding in Hackney, east London. “Hope came to me when I was 57. I’m 62 this year. All this is heaping a lot more pressure on us. It grinds you down. There’s so much going through my head that I’ve been forgetting simple things. You spread yourself thin and something has to give. But we can do it.”

When the council announced proposals that could cut spending by more than £300,000 over the next academic year, Roden was among those who agreed to take on the fight. Like many parents looking after a child with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND), Roden describes an exhausting fight to secure the best support.

Fellow Hackney campaigner Dana Thompson’s daughter, Sade, 16, has narcolepsy and cataplexy, conditions that can cause her to fall asleep suddenly, or collapse. Thompson’s application for support was rejected four times before she received help – a battle that lasted 10 years.

“I couldn’t live with myself knowing I didn’t try one last time,” she says. “Unfortunately, many children have fallen through the net. That affects mental and physical health. With Sade, it has affected her.”

As councils nationwide face budget pressures that threaten them with bankruptcy, some are having to consider cuts to SEND funding that they would never have contemplated just a few years ago. Yet their desperation to balance the books has run up against the desperation of parents determined to secure support for their children. The clash is now being played out in court actions across England.

Alicia McColl is among the parents taking action against Surrey county council’s proposal for a £21m cut in its SEND budget. She has been battling for the right support for her 14-year-old son Kian, who has autism, hypermobility, dyspraxia and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. After years of campaigning, she is aware of the toll on her family. “All my money and inheritance went on my son’s education – on the battle,” she says. “The people who have missed out the most are my other two children. I try to make up for it now, but my eldest son is an adult and he missed out on a lot of my time. The impact is massive.”

Hopes have been raised by the success of a case in Bristol in the summer, in which a judge ruled that the council had unlawfully cut its SEND budget by £5m. Other campaigns are being drawn up in areas including Portsmouth, Gloucestershire and Sussex.

Hackney councillor Chris Kennedy insists everyone is “on the same side”, but adds that the court case “doesn’t address the fundamental issues that have led to councils up and down the country facing bankruptcy in their efforts to fund one of the most important services they provide”. Surrey county council said it was facing “huge financial pressure” and that it was wrong to describe the £21m saving as a cut “because we haven’t made or even proposed cuts to services”.

So what is causing the system to creak? The trouble, according to experts and council insiders, is that funding cuts have combined with recent education reforms to create a system loaded against councils – forcing them into cuts and legal battles with parents.

They point to 2014 changes designed to give “greater control and choice” to parents, which raised expectations about the support available and increased the legal responsibilities of councils. However, the new system was not matched with the necessary funding. With schools also under pressure to keep costs down and improve results, some are finding ways of removing SEND pupils from their rolls, or not accepting them in the first place.

That often leads to even higher costs for councils. Parents realised that some kind of national action was needed. A legal case has been launched against the government, with campaigners arguing that it is simply not providing sufficient funding. Among the parents in the group is Lorraine Heugh, who has faced cuts in funding for the care given to her son Nico, 15, who has autism and anxiety. “We had to go down the legal road and in the end they did supply the funding,” she says. “It didn’t stop there. The following September we had the same problem again. Now we’re in a situation where they have given a little bit of funding, but cut by half.

“The people who get forgotten are the children. For children like my son, when their needs are not met at school, it has a knock-on impact on them. It leads to children having breakdowns – why would you allow a child to go through that?”

Kirsty McFinnigan, from North Yorkshire, got involved through social media. After fighting for resources for her son Benedict, 14, she joined the legal battle out of “sheer and utter desperation”. “There’s too many people in this position,” she says. “My son is 14. I’m going to ultimately have to answer to him about why he didn’t get an education, so at least I can say I did everything I could.”

For Mary Riddell, who has fought her council in Birmingham over the support given to her nine-year-old daughter Dakota, it is simply about trying to be heard.

“We’ve had to fight every step of the way,” she says. “It is hard to watch your child struggle and all you can do is chase the people who are meant to be helping you – and knowing their hands are tied.

“I’m not holding out any hopes that they will instantly say, ‘here’s lots and lots of money’. But I would like them to take notice and understand what kind of effect these cuts are having.”

Source of the article: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2018/nov/10/its-hard-to-watch-your-child-struggle-all-you-can-do-is-chase-people

Comparte este contenido:

Why do dyslexic students do worse at university?

By: Christopher Byrne.

The proportion of UK university students who are dyslexic has increased markedly in recent years, rising to around 5%. Yet there remains a significant dyslexia attainment gap: around 40% of dyslexic students achieve a 2.1 or above, compared to 52% of non-dyslexic students. Dyslexia is unrelated to intelligence, so why does this gap persist?

Unfortunately, outdated attitudes towards dyslexia among university staff prevail. Too many view it as something made up by middle-class “helicopter parents” to gain unfair advantages for their children entering university, and not the valid medical diagnosis that it actually is. Even where it is accepted as a condition rooted in an inability to match spoken sounds with their written forms, the accommodations made to level the playing field for dyslexic students are often inadequate.

Most universities do little else than allow dyslexic students extra time (usually around 25%) to complete their assessments and ensure that their work is “marked for content”. This means that markers are instructed to not penalise dyslexic students for poor presentation of their written work, such as spelling mistakes and grammatical errors. While such accommodations are helpful, they fail to take into account that dyslexic students can struggle with a wide range of commonplace tasks, such as reading, spelling, note-taking, organising essays, timekeeping, expressing ideas verbally, concentrating and using short-term memory.

So how do we close the dyslexia attainment gap? We need a determined effort on the part of UK universities to make their institutions more dyslexia-friendly across the board. Lecturers can help by thinking more carefully about the effectiveness of their teaching and assessment methods for all of their students. For example, how many university teachers are familiar with research showing that the reading accuracy of dyslexic students can be significantly improved by using fonts such as Helvetica, Courier and Arial?

Equally, dyslexic students indicated in a survey I recently carried out at the University of Exeter that they highly value being given teaching materials in advance of sessions, and not being overloaded with information. They also wanted variety in both teaching and assessment methods, access to marking criteria written in plain English and, most importantly of all, easy access to recordings of teaching sessions, so that they can digest teaching materials at a suitable pace.

Every year, students with undiagnosed dyslexia arrive at UK universities. The number of these missed diagnoses could be greatly reduced if institutions received support to cover the costs of professional dyslexia assessment. Clear procedures would enable lecturers to refer students they suspect have undiagnosed dyslexia for a timely dyslexia screening. Universities can also establish guidelines for teaching staff, so that there is greater awareness of their specific needs. They should be monitoring the implementation of action plans for dyslexic students to ensure that they receive necessary adjustments in all of their modules.

Given that dyslexia is a highly variable condition, and one better thought of as a continuum than a categorical diagnosis, it is not possible to specify in advance which accommodations individuals might need. What we do know is that promoting a wider range of accommodations will help level the uneven playing field for dyslexic students.

Source of the article: https://www.theguardian.com/education/2018/dec/06/why-do-dyslexic-students-do-worse-at-university

Comparte este contenido:

El fascismo de la amapola y el sistema educativo inglés

Por: Kerron Ó Luain

‘Y aún te enseñan en la escuela acerca de aquellos gloriosos días de dominio’.

Lo que Jon Snow, periodista del Channel 4 (de la television inglesa), identificó sabiamente como ‘fascismo de amapola’ [la amapola es en Gran Bretaña el símbolo de los caídos, originalmente de la I Guerra Mundial, y se lleva en la solapa todos los meses de noviembre a modo de homenaje] llegó a su crescendo este fin de semana, como sucede con más vitalidad con cada año que pasa. Sin embargo, este año de 2018, dado que  era el centenario del  Armisticio de la I Guerra Mundial, el tono del crescendo se ha sentido más agudamente de lo habitual.

Cuando a mediados de semana veía Sky News Live en YouTube desde mi apartamento de Filadelfia, irrumpió en la pantalla un niño que sin darse aparentemente cuenta proclamaba la importancia de transmitir el ‘conocimiento’ de la I Guerra Mundial tomándolo de quienes habían vivido antes que él. Este segmento se retransmitió junto a una información sobre un  ‘artista’ [léase, ‘lunático’], de nombre Rob Heard, que a lo largo de cinco años había tallado miles de figuritas de madera de soldados británicos muertos en el conflicto y los había esparcido por el suelo de alguna parte de Inglaterra para conmemorar este centenario de una matanza fútil. Nada de contexto, nunca.

Para que no nos superemos y asumamos que termina aquí el fanatismo, se nos recuerda de modo intermitente a lo largo de la semana desde diversas fuentes de noticias inglesas que se encienden 10.000 antorchas cada noche (¿se acuerdan de esas antorchas que portaban los fascistas de Trump en Charlottesville el año pasado?) en la Torre de Londres para  recordar a los ‘caídos’.

Pero la breve entrevista del canal Sky al joven desencadenó en mí el recuerdo de uno o dos versos del principal trovador político irlandés de estos tiempos, DamienDempsey:

Y aun te enseñan en la escuela
Acerca de aquellos gloriosos días de dominio
Y cómo es tu destino
Ser superior a mí

¿Cuál debe ser el programa escolar de Historia de estos niños en el país sobre cuyo imperio no se ponía jamás el sol? Una somera pizquita («smidgeon» en ingles, una palabra prestada del irlandés, o sea, del «gaeilge») de investigación revela que, aunque el programa principal de las escuelas en Inglaterra, y forzosamente por extensión de  Gales y Escocia, mencionaba la historia de la colonización de otros países, esos aspectos no eran ‘obligatorios’. En lo esencial, existe una lista ideal de aspiraciones de lo que el niño y la población adolescente en general del Reino Unido deberían aprender en el colegio, pero lo que sabemos en realidad se reduce en la mayoría de los casos al banal estudio del linaje real, o, en muchos casos, al homenaje imperial/capitalista.

¿Cómo puede el Estado irlandés, o quienes residen en él, sostener una queja justificable sin parecer hipócritas? ¿No permitimos la eliminación de la historia del ciclo del Junior Cert [enseñanza medial] como materia principal? Sin protestas, sin un murmullo, de verdad.

Los protagonistas del discurso decolonial en tiempos modernos parecen provenir, no de Irlanda sino de otros lugares, de otras cimas anteriormente coloniales. ShashiTharoor, parlamentario y especialista académico indio, se ha manifestado ruidosamente en años recientes sobre el violento colonialismo de Gran Bretaña y el Raj [el dominio británico de la India] en su país de origen. Sin embargo, todos los crímenes de Gran Bretaña parecen haber caído en el silencio en Irlanda – primera colonia de Inglaterra  ‘para que no olvidemos’ – como se restriega cada mes de noviembre.

Ciertamente, no sólo considera el llamado Estado irlandés que queda bien erigir una escultura estridentemente grande de un ‘soldado inolvidable’ de la I Guerra Mundial en uno de los lugares donde se fraguó la resistencia revolucionaria republicana en 1916 (St. Stephen’s Green), siendo sus promotores gente como Leo Varadkar (Taoiseach/Primer ministro) y Frank Feighan (diputado [TeachtaDála] /Ministro/lamebotas general de Occidente y los británicos) que insisten en que llevemos un trébol adornado con una amapola teñida de sangre. Vaya impostura, desde luego.

Los oponentes sacarán a relucir la habitual defensa: que deberíamos recordar a ‘todos los que murieron’ en el pasado, por razones humanitarias. Con ello, sin embargo, se pasa por encima del elemento recordatorio real de la amapola, que resulta supuestamente tan central para su simbolismo. Los actuales soldados británicos – que han servido en Afganistán e Irak – conceden regularmente entrevistas a los medios británicos que vinculan claramente la carnicería sin sentido de antaño con las proezas imperiales contemporáneas.

¿Por qué no se sugiere lucir la amapola blanca alternativa (que carece de los antecedentes de la Legión Británica), que simboliza la paz y el final de todas las guerras? La respuesta sencilla y más cierta es porque la amapola roja – por oposición a la blanca – se utiliza para promover un orden del día militarista en Gran Bretaña, que de modo espeluznante recuerda al militarismo de principios del siglo XX en los preliminares de la I Guerra Mundial.

La ironía de todo esto, por supuesto, estriba en que deportistas como James McClean, jugador internacional de fútbol de la ‘República’ de Irlanda, que se atreven a rechazar este rancio militarismo/fascismo de la amapola, afrontan la ira de una franja enorme de la opinión pública británica cuyos ancestros lucharon supuestamente para sofocar el avance del autoritarismo y la intolerancia entre 1939-1945. Para que no olvidemos, desde luego.

Fuente: https://www.counterpunch.org/2018/11/12/poppy-fascism-and-the-english-education-system/

Traducción: Lucas Antón

Fuente: http://www.bitacora.com.uy/auc.aspx?10170,7

 

 

Comparte este contenido:
Page 27 of 84
1 25 26 27 28 29 84