Page 105 of 144
1 103 104 105 106 107 144

Laotian education planners join the Advanced Training Programme in Paris

Laos / Laos / April 15, 2018 / Author: Editorial Staff / Source: UNESCO

Five educational planners from Lao PDR have arrived at the International Institute for Education Planning (IIEP-UNESCO) in Paris, France to complete the Advanced Training Programme (ATP), a Master’s level training course in educational planning and management. This new group, as well as a trainee from Mali, joins the other ATP trainees who started at IIEP in January 2018.

This final phase of the training follows a two-year long tailored training programme, which specifically responded to the needs of the Laotian education system while remaining equivalent to the Paris-based training. The Laotian participants will complete their training after three months in Paris.

A flexible approach to training

IIEP’s ATP programme traditionally consists of two distance education modules plus a six-month residency at IIEP in Paris. The Institute’s increasingly flexible approach to course design and delivery means that professional planners can also pursue a customized approach tailored to national needs.

As part of this programme, the trainees began with IIEP delivered courses in Lao PDR. They now join the entire ATP cohort (2017-2018) for the remainder of the programme. In the coming months, they will study three specialized courses in educational planning and management and will complete a project in both Paris and Lao PDR, focusing on a specific national education challenge.

Phanthanome Didaravong, a statistical officer in the Department of Planning within the Ministry, said she looked forward to taking the upcoming specialized courses at IIEP, which responds fully to her professional commitments.

Prior to arriving in Paris, the trainees completed a short face-to-face Foundation Course from 14-16 March in Vientiane, Lao PDR. This session followed a month-long e-learning phase and focused on integrating the targets of Sustainable Development Goal 4 (SDG4) into the country’s Education and Sports Sector Development Plan (2016-2020).

The trainees during a luncheon hosted by the EU Ambassador to the Lao PDR, Mr. Leo Faber (3rd from the right) with the honourable Minister of Education and Sports, Madam Sengdeuane Lachanthaboun (4th from the right).

 

Sharing knowledge for lasting impact

Part of the objective, Didaravong said, is also to share the new skills and practices acquired through IIEP training with colleagues across the districts and provinces in Lao.

“We will be like core trainers on educational planning and that way it will last more than one year and a half,” she said. “We will conduct trainings for all districts and provincial staff – over 100 people – province by province over the next two years.”

IIEP appreciates the financial support provided by the European Union, which is allowing Didaravong and her colleagues Vanthala Souvanxay, Chaleunsouk Sisouvong, Bouavanh Chanthanongdeth, Vannasouk Bouasangthong to train at IIEP and develop their planning skills.

Source of the News:

http://www.iiep.unesco.org/en/laotian-education-planners-join-advanced-training-programme-paris-4472

Comparte este contenido:

United States: Where will the struggle lead Kentucky teachers?

United States / April 14, 2018/Socialistworker

Resumen: Las protestas representan la continua urgencia del recrudecimiento que ha convertido a Kentucky en otro sitio de las rebeliones de los maestros que barrieron al oeste de Virginia Occidental a través de estados que anteriormente se consideraban conservadores como «el país Trump»

Pranav Jani talked to Kentucky teachers on a visit to the state about how their struggle has developed–and what this weekend’s plans for more protests will bring.

KENTUCKY TEACHERS, education workers and their supporters will gather once again on April 13 and 14 for rallies at the state Capitol in Frankfort.

The protests represent the continuing urgency of the upsurge that has made Kentucky another site of the teachers’ rebellions that swept west from West Virginia through states formerly considered to be conservative «Trump country.»

At the same time, the demonstrations today and tomorrow highlight some of the dynamics and debates that teachers need to consider for the movement to succeed.

At the start of April, an estimated 12,000 teachers and supporters descended on Frankfort, sparked into rebellion specifically by a disastrous attack on public employees’ pensions passed late on March 29 under the camouflage of legislation about sewer construction.

The next morning after this late-night legislative sleight of hand, teachers–led by the grassroots group #KY 120 United–shut down schools in 20 counties through coordinated sick-outs, and many traveled to the capital to send a message to lawmakers.

The tactic of the sick-out was used effectively again on April 2 as politicians considered anti-worker budget and tax legislation. Schools that weren’t closed because of spring break in most of Kentucky’s 120 counties were shut down again, and the turnout in Frankfort was the biggest yet.

Though some educators continued sick-outs or other protests in that first week of April, many looked ahead to April 13–when the legislators’ recess ended and lawmakers would convene again–as the next date for a mobilization.

Developments between April 2 and April 13 highlight the questions that need to be addressed if the movement that shook Kentucky at the start of the month is going to be able to break the stranglehold on public education that is choking teachers, education workers, students and parents.

Above all, the need for a united mobilization of teachers–which was the basis for putting pressure on the legislature last week–is clear.

IN MY trip to Kentucky on April 9 and in conversations over the last two weeks, I’ve had the opportunity to speak with teachers who are in the thick of the struggle, parents and activists who are building solidarity, and supporters who understand its historical impact.

These individuals’ dedication to local organizing and the long-term struggle bodes well for the movement. At the same time, people spoke of the challenges they face–from the actions of politicians and school officials, but also debates within the movement–as they try to continue a struggle that has been months and months in the making.

All this has made for a complicated picture in the period between April 2 and April 13–when work stoppages have been attempted, but not continued; when the politicians have been forced to shift, but have slithered into new positions; and when grassroots groups have been built, but have had to fight hard to stay unified.

As we know from history, no movement or struggle ever develops evenly, going from advance to advance.

The situation in Kentucky is complicated by dynamics that will be familiar from past struggles: debates over what to do next when pressure on lawmakers isn’t enough; discussions about whether or not to strike; the complications of people in different communities with different considerations needing to figure out how they can speak with one voice.

As in all struggles, there’s an ongoing debate about the politics and aims of the movement.

As James Miller, a teacher at duPont Manual High School in Louisville said, some people are fighting only to stop the attack on teachers’ pensions or head off measures to undermine public education–whereas others, including himself, want:

to seize this opportunity to demand significant improvements to public education instead of merely defending the status quo. We want to protect our students by demanding the elimination of legislation that would further criminalize Black and Brown youth and an end to zero-tolerance policies. We want to protect our students’ families by opposing regressive sales taxes and flat taxes.

More than 3,000 people have signed a petition created by Miller that ties the fight for schools to the larger struggle for social justice.

Teachers of all views are still in motion to put forward their grievances–and they know they have the support of many people around them.

Krystal Spencer, with Save Our Schools Kentucky and one of the organizers of the rallies on April 13 and 14, says she’s confident that the rallies will be big, «hopefully bigger than [April 2].»

Citing the many groups that are coming together–including Indivisible, Planned Parenthood, Kentuckians for the Commonwealth, and university groups–Spencer noted how many of these organizations don’t represent teachers, but are participating.

Meanwhile, I heard reports of radicalized teachers who are calling off work this Friday and sending delegations to Frankfort–while working patiently with local groups in their schools who aren’t ready for a strike and have never heard the word «wildcat,» but remain very curious about the strategy.

THE LEGISLATIVE details in Kentucky are complicated, but they are important for understanding the strategic obstacles that teachers have to face.

Even as protesters were leaving the statehouse after their biggest demonstration on April 2, the Republican-led legislature passed a budget bill and a tax «reform» bill that are anti-worker and anti-poor. Yet the GOP claims the balance between the two would benefit education.

The legislature put these bills on the desk of Gov. Matt Bevin, a Tea Party favorite, and then left for a short recess until April 13.

Several teachers’ groups aimed to continue the momentum generated by April 2, with calling sick-outs, grassroots food drives and marching through their towns. But the Kentucky Education Association (KEA) send out a memo to members saying that the union didn’t support work stoppages at this time, and everyone should look to April 13.

On April 6, for example, the union issued a statement that, unfortunately, echoes some of the rhetoric that education bosses use against all teachers’ strikes: «Our students need us to show up for them in classrooms and schools. We urge educators statewide not to allow our united efforts to be compromised by continued calls for action that deprive students, parents and communities of the educational services we provide.»

Meanwhile, between April 2 and April 13, crafty Republican politicians and their ruling-class masters were busy creating a lose-lose situation for those seeking a legislative solution to the attack on education and the social crises in Kentucky–while adding lots of confusion to the process.

On April 9, Bevin vetoed the budget and tax bills put forward by his own party, stating that he wants more «comprehensive tax reform» and a «balanced budget»–code words for deeper tax cuts for the wealthy and austerity for the 99 Percent. This set up a challenge to the legislature to try to override the vetoes on April 13 and 14. Bevin signed the pension bill that sparked the teachers’ uprising.

The Democratic minority in the legislature, which has religiously opposed Bevin, supportshis vetoes and will vote against overriding them, on the basis that they are opposed to the budget and tax bills that passed.

On the other hand, the KEA and its affiliates have called for Bevin’s vetoes to be overridden–a de facto defense of the Republican legislature’s bills.

The logic of the position was explained in a statement from the Jefferson County Teachers Association (JCTA), which contended that, while the union «does not agree with some of the regressive ways the revenue bill generates new revenue, but without a revenue bill, Kentucky will lose hundreds of millions of dollars in funding for public education.»

The unions are right that Bevin vetoed these bills from the right, not the left. But it seems problematic to accept the original legislation, which are clearly regressive and harmful in various ways, as a kind of lesser evil.

Indeed, as so many teachers and supporters expressed in face-to-face discussions, what galvanized them to take action is the general and ongoing attack on education in the midst of a deep social crisis in Kentucky–not a dispute between two versions of budget cuts, two versions of tax cuts for the rich, and two versions of tax hikes that hit poor and working people.

EVEN ACTIVISTS who have organized outside the KEA have debated what path to follow in this confusing situation.

Internal discussions within the #KY 120 United this week revealed disagreement about whether or not to call for work stoppages, and whether or not to settle for the legislature’s original budget and tax bills.

Most of the teachers and others I met remained sympathetic to both the KEA and KY 120 United, even if they disagreed with the positions they have taken regarding the legislation.

After Bevin’s open and disparaging attacks on KEA as «a problem,» there was no question about this–even when one teacher defending the KEA against Bevin said she wished they would be «more of a problem.»

Thus, people who are part of KEA, KY 120 United and school-specific groups, many at the same time, are seeking for teachers to figure things out together as part of a longer struggle against a tough set of opponents. Perhaps some of the momentum of April 2 has fallen off, and no one wants to be pushed into choosing between Republican Plan A and Republican Plan B.

Plus, if we look at what teachers and supporters did accomplish in the «in-between» period, it’s clear how powerful the movement is at the grassroots level. With many teachers not being sure about an ongoing strike, a preparation period may have been exactly what was needed.

In Jefferson County–the state’s most populous county that includes Louisville and the surrounding area, there was an attempt to close schools through sick-outs on April 9, though participation wasn’t strong enough to shut down the schools.

In Pike County in eastern Kentucky, along the border with West Virginia, teachers laid out a week of actions leading up to April 13, including pressuring the Chamber of Commerce for supporting the pension bill.

FOR TEACHERS and activists I met from Northern Kentucky and Lexington, the «in between» meant local meetings with activists, talking to parents about the importance of taking action, and working with others to discuss building solidarity.

«Teachers in my building are hungry for info and action in a way they haven’t been before,» said Molly Seifert, a teacher at Beechwood High School in Northern Kentucky. Seifert noted that the organizing meetings she was part of now drew about 10 times more people than KEA meetings months before.

«I’m advocating for ‘the Pike County plan’ for the rest of the week: local action and then Frankfort on Friday,» Seifert said. «I’m also advocating for a long-term group like this that meets regularly and builds on this momentum.»

Laura McMullen, a teacher at Holmes Middle School in Covington, said: «We were ready last week, and we’re still ready.»

McMullen described the impact of the social crisis, especially in poor schools like hers:

Our class sizes are already at cap. So with all of these resources being pulled, and teaching a group of 31-32 kids, how can I ensure that all their needs are getting met, that their IEPs (Independent Education Plans) are being followed…Our school has a very high rate of special needs kids, and our transience rate is very high, with so many kids homeless at any given time.

So when they cut funding for those kids, for after-school programs, for extracurriculars, what are they going to do? We feed kids breakfast, lunch and dinner–where are those kids going to get that? Busing is very expensive–we have no way to bus these students. If the goal isn’t to bankrupt public schools, then I’m not really sure I know what it is.

Rose Curtin, a parent in the Newport Independent Schools system and member of a local School-Based Decision-Making Council and a Family Resource Center board, explained how poorer, non-white schools would be particularly devastated by the legislation being considered:

I’ve served on hiring boards, and I already know how hard it is to hire teachers to come into a high-poverty, urban school where there are a lot of challenges, and I strongly believe that this is meant to target those places first.

Because Fort Thomas schools are not going to have a hard time, with a wealthy tax base and a lot of extra support. They’re not going to struggle to get new teachers the way that I suspect we in Covington and Newport are going to in order to get people to come in, especially if there’s no pensions and they have significant student debt burdens.

THE EFFORTS of Kentucky activists to build solidarity is inspirational–and exactly what will be required to combat a social crisis with no real legislative solution in sight.

In Seifert’s region, KY 120 United made «plans of reaching out to parents in meetings at local libraries,» she said. «For the first time in my 17 years of teaching, activists from Boone County, Kenton County, Dayton Independent, Beechwood and Covington Independent are working together on a project like this.»

Curtin, who is also a member of the Democratic Socialists of America’s Metro Cincinnati and Northern Kentucky branch, heads up the Kentucky Teachers Strike Fund, to organize concrete solidarity should educators decide to walk out.

From the experience of a family member who lost her job after participating in a strike, Rose is aware of «just the amount of work that a work stoppage is [and] the financial and emotional effects that it has.» The fund, organized jointly by four DSA chapters across Kentucky, was formed after consulting with DSA members in West Virginia who had set up a similar fund for a coalition of groups.

Drew Van’t Land, an organizer for the Kentucky Workers League in Lexington, talked about organizing solidarity through helping working-class parents who might have trouble with childcare, and helping to «combat the narrative that their interests are somehow not aligned with those of the teachers.»

Everyone I talked to, even if skeptical about the future given the difficulty of the task before Kentucky teachers, underlined the gains that the struggle had already made.

Geoff Sebesta of the Lexington DSA said that teachers’ self-organization and solidarity had contributed to «the legislature being clearly scared as hell.»

«The floodgates have been opened by what’s happened in West Virginia,» said Drew Gerbel, the sibling of a teacher and an activist in his own right. «The example has been set. Look what power exists in the working class. But I don’t think people realize it 100 percent yet.»

It does take time for people across a whole state and with so many different circumstances and ideas to realize that strength–and there are no guarantees that the teachers will be able to win what they are fighting for.

But with all that remains to be done, something fundamental has already been gained. As Miller said to me:

There are too many unknowns to predict the future….But one thing will not change: Kentucky teachers are angry, and they will not be easily placated.

Already dozens of Kentucky educators have registered to run for state and local offices in campaigns specifically targeting incumbents who voted in favor of the governor’s anti-public education agenda. Already hundreds of Kentucky teachers have repeatedly swarmed the state Capitol in rowdy protests. Already thousands of Kentucky teachers have participated in a wildcat sick-out strike.

The future is unpredictable, but it will belong to us.

Fuente: https://socialistworker.org/2018/04/13/where-will-the-struggle-lead-kentucky-teachers

Comparte este contenido:

EEUU:I Disapprove of School Vouchers. Can I Still Apply for Them?

Por: nytimes.com/Kwame Anthony Appiah/ 11-04-2018

My son attends preschool part time at a private Montessori school, which goes up to middle school. I like the school, and he is very happy there, but I can’t afford to keep him there when he starts kindergarten full time.

I believe that free public education is an important aspect of our society. Our local public elementary school is generally considered a decent option, but I worry about how standardized testing has changed the public-school landscape in recent decades. My son is thriving in his current environment, and the approach of traditional public schools is significantly different from Montessori’s. If money were no object, I would strongly consider keeping him at his current school.

Our state has a school-voucher program, which uses public money to help low-income families pay for private-school tuition. My family would probably qualify. But I believe that taxpayer dollars would be better spent to fortify public-school systems and should not be funneled to private schools. Given my beliefs, may I apply for a school voucher? Name Withheld

Looking after your son’s interests is a special obligation you have as a parent. “Special obligation” is a philosopher’s term, but it simply means that you have duties to him, arising out of your relationship, that you don’t have to other children. You’re not merely entitled to put his education first; you’re obliged to do so. You should feel free to use whatever legal means there are to get him a great education, including vouchers — unless you think they are so wicked that your participation in them would amount to condoning evil. If you just think the voucher program is bad policy, then join the campaign against it. That’s the right way to voice your judgments about the merits of educational policy. You don’t want to sacrifice your son’s education to abstract principle, especially given that you’re not going to end the voucher program by failing to make use of it. Our roles as parents, friends, employees and citizens can make conflicting calls on us.

But be sure you’re right about what’s in your child’s best interests. You should take a closer look at your local public elementary school, and not content yourself with the general skepticism you express about the “public-school landscape” and the effects of “standardized testing.” If it turns out that the private option isn’t obviously better, you can bring your beliefs as a citizen into a more natural alignment with your duties as a parent.

My children are currently in private school, although both were in public school for many years, and my younger one may switch back to public school for high school. I’m a big supporter of public education, so I was already feeling guilty about my choice — and then the federal tax bill passed in December. New tax rules allow pretax 529 savings accounts to be used not just for higher education but also for private precollege education. What should I do, if I want to do all I can to be a public-school ally? It seems there are three options: 1) Not take the tax deduction; 2) Take the deduction and give the money I save to the P.T.A. of a local underresourced public school or an organization working to improve public education; or 3) Take the deduction, figuring that as an N.Y.C. resident it will help offset the huge increase I expect to see in my taxes.Name Withheld

 Under the new federal tax act, you can withdraw up to $10,000 a year from a 529 savings account to pay for a student’s private precollege education. Vouchers lite! Previously, these accounts could be used only for higher education. But the way that the relevant “deduction” works hasn’t changed. When you pay into these accounts in New York State, your state income-tax liability is reduced up to a limit of $5,000 for a single person or $10,000 for a couple. Once in the fund, your money grows federal- and state-tax-deferred; but you don’t have to pay taxes when you take the money out, if it’s for a qualified educational expense. (The details here, as with much tax law, get complicated, but this is the basic picture.) You may well be paying into one of these funds already for your child’s college education and getting the maximum state-tax deduction. If so, this particular change in the tax law should not affect your income taxes very much.

Of course, any money you take out in the next few years won’t be available later for college expenses and won’t have compounded for long. Still, the new federal law does encourage you to save for private school as well as college in one of these funds. If things remain as they are, the federal provision that increases the use of these funds threatens to reduce state income-tax revenue. Then again, a “preliminary report” from New York’s tax department suggests that K-12 payments may not be considered qualified educational expenses and that the state could recapture any associated tax benefits. And, as you’re aware, this new use for 529 funds may do little to offset the loss to you that comes from no longer being able to deduct more than $10,000 in state property and income taxes from your federally taxable income.

None of that is ethics, though. My ethical view is you should take all the tax deductions you’re legally entitled to. Many features of our tax system are ridiculous; many are the product of lobbying without much regard for the public good. But you don’t have a duty to pay more than you are required to by law just because you and people like you are benefiting from bad policies, any more than you have the right to pay less than you’re required to when you take a hit from bad policies. The right thing to aim for is tax reform that makes the system fairer. (We will all have our own views about whether the recent tax reforms did that. Count me a skeptic.)

You’re already helping to pay for New York’s public schools through your taxes. Your choice to give your children a private education doesn’t lessen your financial support for public schools. If you want to lend additional assistance to public schools without sending your kids to them, you can, as you say, support the local P.T.A. You can also pay attention when voting for candidates for public office and vote for those who will do their best for those schools. And you could lobby your state to make sure that it excludes deductions related to 529 funds used for K-12 expenses — deductions that encourage people with your sort of income to leave the public schools. With more people like you as parents, those schools might provide better education for all our children.

*Fuente: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/04/10/magazine/i-disapprove-of-school-vouchers-can-i-still-apply-for-them.html

Comparte este contenido:

India: Making educational innovations scalable

Por: thehindubusinessline.com/Rohan Sandhu /11-04-2018

Demonstrated impact, cost-effectiveness, and the ability to work with the existing system are crucial

India is reported to have about 15 million NGOs in the education sector. Combined with the proliferation of social enterprises in recent years, the space for non-government education innovations is rapidly becoming a network of cottage industries, with interventions often reinventing the wheel and successful practices not being appropriately leveraged to address India’s learning crisis at scale.

Former US President Bill Clinton’s observation while reviewing school reform initiatives in the US may hold true for India as well: “Nearly every problem has been solved by someone, somewhere. The frustration is that we can’t seem to replicate (those solutions) anywhere else.”

Over the past year, however, India’s Ministry of Human Resource Development (HRD) has made significant efforts to identify NGO-led innovations around the country and create platforms for them to present to and engage with state education departments.

HRD Secretary, Anil Swarup, calling himself a “principal facilitator,” travelled across States to identify innovative models and organised five workshops to showcase such education innovations. “A government champion,” the Brookings Institution’s Millions Learning report finds, is often the “linchpin behind experimentation and greater participation in policy-making.”

Complex undertaking

But, while a government leader’s backing is crucial, scaling is a complex undertaking that comes with some fundamental questions, and the need to recognise that not all innovations are necessarily scalable. Experiences of a number of educational innovations point to factors that are critical for an innovation to be one that is scalable — demonstrated impact, cost-effectiveness, and the ability to work with the existing system.

At the outset though, the definition of “scaling” itself must be clarified. Key here is the question of what should be scaled — an intervention as a whole or some critical components. The Millions Learning report, studying a multitude of case studies, concludes that the process of scale requires that a balance be struck between the non-negotiable elements that are imperative to the success of a programme and must be replicated, and other elements that can be adapted as per specific requirements of individual contexts.

This portends the need for rigorous impact metrics or proof of concept, and the ability to disaggregate the outcomes generated by an intervention’s myriad elements. But, as Mary Burns writes, “educational projects do not undergo the kind of meaningful or rigorous impact evaluations that determine whether they are indeed worthy of being scaled.”

A survey of about 40 technology-based education innovations in India corroborates this. While most innovations report their reach, information on their outcomes is seldom available. This, though, is linked to a larger systemic challenge — the absence of a universal assessments or monitoring framework, because of which there is no common benchmark against which outcomes across different models may be evaluated and compared. It is critical that this gap is addressed before innovations are scaled based on personal relations and adhoc decisions instead of well-defined impact metrics.

Apart from delivering impact, for a country like India, models that seek to scale must also do so in a cost-effective manner. As Venkatesh Malur, who led Sampark Foundation’s Pedagogy Framework — reaching over 2.8 million children studying in 46,000 primary schools in India — summarised inAccelerating Access to Quality Education that Subir Gokarn and I co-edited a few years ago, “There is a need to prioritise frugal innovations in classroom transactions and work in sync with the existing system that will leverage the existing teachers, systems, and infrastructure.”

In line with Malur’s point on frugality, Sampark’s Smart Class Kit costs one dollar per child per year. Other innovations which have attempted to scale reinforce this. Gyan Shala, which scaled its operations in Ahmedabad, Gujarat, to cover schools in West Bengal, Bihar, and Uttar Pradesh, operates with a total cost of education per student amounting to 3,000 per year. The Bharti Foundation’s schools similarly seek to deliver education at a rate that is lower than the government school system, so that they may be easily replicated by the latter.

In a similar vein, models that are able to scale must be able to operate within the constraints of the existing system, with the current set of teachers, school leadership, and government machinery. Often, social enterprises and NGOs, in an attempt to see some quick successes, actively avoid engaging with governments and teachers.

But if they wish to scale, such an attitude can prove deleterious. In several cases, pilots succeed in specific contexts with favourable conditions, but fail without these. In Kenya, for instance, limited understanding of public sector and political economy constraints prevented a contract teacher programme that was able to raise students’ test scores when implemented by an NGO, to show the same positive outcomes when implemented at scale by the government.

Studies attribute this difference to the “lack of attention to the interaction between the intervention being tested and the broader institutional context.” Ark, which designed a School Quality Assessment framework for 120,000 schools in Madhya Pradesh, sought to create a product that had government ownership from the very beginning and was “delivered with existing public sector capacity, rather than being dependent on a major skills upgrade” (Accelerating Access to Quality Education).As an innovation scales, partnering with the government system to build its capacity becomes even more critical since scaling is not just a straightforward process of replication, but a more complicated one of adaptation. Binswanger and Aiyar (2003) recommend real-time process-monitoring that provides “continuous feedback that enables the scaling-up process to constantly be improved.”

Given the state’s institutional capacity constraints, Malur writes how Sampark works “hand-in-hand with the state machinery,” providing support and strengthening it. Teachers, too, are provided constant support through continuous trainings, frequent visits from Sampark’s coordinators, and a helpline that is available at all times. On a related note, innovators must be flexible and open to deviating from their initial model. Ark’s SQA design underwent at least four changes over just one year based on constant testing. “The team rapidly discovered that their original ‘premium’ design was too complex for operating in the contexts, and with the resources, available.”

Ultimately, the success of scaling hinges upon a productive partnership between the innovation and the government and teacher system. This is a partnership that must be established at the very outset — embedded in the core design of the model — and one that needs to be deepened as the innovation is scaled up.

Remedial measures

Finally, the quest to scale should not cause us to ignore some fundamental issues. Several innovations — like remedial programmes — have actually cropped up in response to the challenges imposed by flawed policies. Scaling educational innovations is a worthy endeavour, but it is crucial that we don’t replicate band-aid solutions, while ignoring deeper malaises.

Additionally, it isn’t enough to think of innovation as being the domain of just NGOs and social enterprises. The narrative about the top-down centralised nature of the Indian education system that gives little agency to teachers, school leaders, and frontline administrators, is well-established. While there is undoubtedly a rich supply of innovations outside this system, the demand to adapt and scale these will only be amplified and made more organic if last-mile functionaries and implementers are given the time and space to deviate from the rigidities of the current governance framework.

The writer is an Associate Director at the International Innovation Corps, University of Chicago. This article is by special arrangement with the Center for the Advanced Study of India, University of Pennsylvania

*Fuente: https://www.thehindubusinessline.com/opinion/columns/making-educational-innovations-scalable/article23495239.ece

Comparte este contenido:

Pakistan: Public Private Partnership produced good results in education sector: CM

Pakistan/April 10, 2018/BY AFTAB CHANNA/Source: https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk

Sindh Chief Minister Syed Murad Ali Shah has said that the Public Private Partnership (PPP) in education sector has produced best results and its one of the success story is the toddlers who speak fluent English at DCTO English medium schools in Lyari.

This he said while addressing administration, teaching staff and students at DCTO English Medium High School, Lyari operating on PPP mode by Kiran Foundation, which he visited on Saturday. When the chief minister reached at school he was received by Education Secretary Iqbal Durani, Sindh Education Foundation (SEF) MD Nahid Durrani, administrator of school Nazir Tunio and others.

He said that Lyari was once a beautiful, peaceful and a vibrant area in the city. It used to remain opened the whole night. “I had also the honour to enjoy milk tea at restaurants at night but later something painful happened and Lyari turned into a most disturbed area in terms of peace and tranquility.

Murad Ali Shah added that drug dealers, paddlers and other out laws established their sway in the Lyari. The government worked day and night and fought bravely with mafias and restored peace there and then started developing the area to restore its past glories.

This DCTO school is one of the oldest schools from pre-partition. Originally it was established in 1930s by Deepchand T Ojha. This school was a preferred choice for schooling till 1970s. Later, this institution saw a great decline resulting in poor standard of education and dilapidated school building. He added that by 2002, the DCTO school had three double storey buildings where 13 schools were running within the same premises but there were barely any children getting education.

The government decided to hand over the school to Kiran Foundation in 2016, the chief minister said and added the Kiran Foundation runs this school from pre-nursery to high school. “The most encouraging move I have witnessed here at DCTO school is that the parents, particularly the mothers of students are given proper training to handle their kids at home DCTO,” he said and added this shows that mother and child education and training are taking place simultaneously at DCTO.

This novel but practical approach would definitely create [a child] father of nation. “These children who live in Lyari and have recently liberated themselves from the shekels of gang wars are speaking fluent English and know how to receive elders and how to talk and even they have good knowledge of history and geography.  “I assure you they are our best future and they would lead Layri to a prosperous, educated and culture Lyari,” he hoped.

The chief minister sharing his personal experience with the audience said that a little girl in a nursery class brilliantly briefed him about the geographical location of different province on the map of Pakistan. “They [students] are good at mathematics, science and history- this is what I have learnt by interacting with them in their class rooms.

Murad Ali Shah said that just after taking over as a chief minister he had visited this school and had made some promises with them to construct additional storey in school building to accommodate more students. “Today, I have visited that portion and heaved a sigh of relief to see wide and airy class rooms, labs and airy veranda,” he said and added the school administration has told him that 800 students are enrolled there and for academic session more three candidates/students had applied for admission but due shortage of space they could hardly accommodate 100 students.

The chief minister directed secretary education Iqbal Durani to locate a suitable school building in the area and hand over them to expand this DCTO school. “If you are giving good education, shaping up the future of students and training their mothers, I am with you- there is no service above it,” he said and vowed to support them in all intents and purposes.

Source:

https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2018/04/07/public-private-partnership-produced-good-results-in-education-sector-cm/

 

Comparte este contenido:

Children stuff food into their pockets and turn up to school in dirty uniforms as poverty worsens, headteachers warn in United Kingdom

United Kingdom/ 09.04.2018/ From: www.independent.co.uk.

Los niños que viven en la pobreza llegan a las puertas de la escuela con «piel gris, dientes pobres, cabello y uñas». Los niños desnutridos están llenando sus bolsillos con comida y yendo a la escuela con uniformes sucios a medida que crece el número de personas que viven en la pobreza , han advertido los directores.

Malnourished children are stuffing their pockets with food and turning up to school in dirty uniforms as the numbers living in poverty grows, headteachers have warned.

Pupils are arriving to school on Monday wearing uniforms they have been in all weekend, while others do not turn up to school because they have no shoes, staff have said.

And schools are going out of their way to give parents debt advice – and one primary school headteacher recently opened his school during the severe snow to ensure his pupils got a hot meal that day.

Speaking at the National Education Union (NEU) conference, NUT section, conference in Brighton, school leaders described how pupils arrived at the school gates with grey skin, poor teeth, hair and nails.

A survey, by the NEU and the Child Poverty Action Group, found that three in five (60 per cent) school staff believe child poverty has worsened since 2015.

And the vast majority (87 per cent) say it is having a significant impact on the learning of their pupils.

A head from a school in Cumbria, who would only give her name as “Lynn”, said her pupils put “food in their pockets to take home because they’re not sure if they’re going to get another meal that day”.

“In some establishments I would imagine that would be called stealing, but in ours it’s called survival,” she said.

Lynn added that her members of staff have washed dirty uniform for pupils and they have used their own money to buy families beds.

She added: “You can go into the town where we are and the children are wearing uniform, often something that we’ve given them, and they are wearing that at weekends.”

And Lynn described seeing children from a nearby affluent secondary school and comparing them to youngsters who had been to her school.

“My children who have gone from me up to the local secondary school have grey skin, poor teeth, poor hair, poor nails, they are smaller, they are thinner,” she said.

“You think ‘our kids are really small’, you don’t notice it because you’re with them all the time. When you then see them with children of the same age that are in an affluent area, they just look tiny.”

Ms Regan added that her school gives out food and clothing, such as winter coats and shoes, to those families in need.

She said: “We’ve had children who haven’t come to school because they didn’t have shoes, we’ve gone and bought shoes, taken them to the house and brought the child into school,” she said.

In 2015/16, there were four million children in the UK living in poverty, according to the Child Poverty Action Group (CPAG) – equivalent to nine in every classroom of 30 pupils.

A Department for Education spokesman said they have launched a social mobility action plan – which sets out measures to close the attainment gap between disadvantaged students and their classmates.

He added: “Alongside this we continue to support the country’s most disadvantaged children through free school meals, the £2.5bn funding given to schools through the Pupil Premium to support their education and the recently announced a £26m investment to kickstart or improve breakfast clubs in at least 1,700 schools.”

 Many of the union members described the situation facing their poorest pupils and families as “heartbreaking”, the study said.

One headteacher told the press at the NEU conference in Brighton said that league table positions were becoming secondary to dealing with the impact of financial hardship among pupils.

Jane Jenkins, from a Cardiff primary school, said that children have turned up with just a slice of bread and margarine in their lunchbox. “It is really tough,” she said.

“When people are asking you about standards and you know, “why is your school not higher in the league tables”, often that is very much a secondary consideration for us these days,” Ms Jenkins added.

From: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/education/education-news/child-poverty-headteachers-schools-teachers-national-education-union-neu-austerity-a8283956.htm

Comparte este contenido:

Teaching boys in Kenya how to intervene to stop sexual violence

Kenya/09.04.2018 / From: www.bbc.com.

Isaac, a 15-year-old boy, watched as a group of men grabbed a young girl. It was a bustling new year’s eve in Kibera, Kenya’s largest slum, and he knew she was in trouble.

He also knew he didn’t have the strength to fight off those older, larger men. Having been taught to intervene if he sees predatory behaviour, Isaac called over another man to help confront the group.

«Everyone started arguing,» explains Isaac. «The group said the girl was their ‘catch’ and they had to rape her.»

After 20 minutes, they decided to let her go.

«The stories you hear are shocking,» says Anthony Njangiru, a field co-ordinator for the Kenyan non-profit Ujamaa, which trains boys like Isaac to help stop violence against women and girls in the slums of the capital, Nairobi.

«Not everyone is so lucky,» he says.

Changing attitudes

Mr Njangiru teaches a programme called Your Moment of Truth to boys, aged 14 to 18, in secondary school.

He is one of many instructors, and the classes cover everything from sex education, to challenging rape myths, consent, and how to intervene if the boys witness an assault taking place.

Training for girls in how to resist a sexual assaultImage copyrightALEX MCBRIDE
Image captionTraining for girls in how to resist a sexual assault

For younger boys, aged 10 to 13, a programme called Sources of Strength focuses primarily on body changes.

The course takes place over weekly two-hour lessons, for six weeks, and each class is divided into two, with girls taught their own set of skills.

Since the organisation first began, Ujamaa has taught 250,000 children in over 300 schools across Nairobi.

When it comes to the boys, it’s ultimately about changing their perceptions and attitudes towards girls.

«If we, as boys and men, are part of the problem, then we can be part of the solution,» says Mr Njangiru. «We can be the first people to change.»

Confident ‘no’

The programme has been working to stop boys thinking that if a girl said «no» to sex what she actually meant was «yes». Or that it was justifiable to rape a girl if she wore a short skirt.

«They tend to use the girl’s weakness to their own advantage,» says Mr Njangiru. «If she says no, but she doesn’t confidently say no, for them it’s a ‘go zone’ – they just do whatever they want.»

The results are impressive, according to research from Stanford University in the US.

Following the Your Moment of Truth classes, the percentage of boys who intervened when they witnessed a physical and sexual assault rose from 26% to 74%.

Boys were also found to be less likely to endorse myths about sexual assault and the incidence of rape by boyfriends and friends had fallen.

Among female participants in the project, there was a remarkable 51% decrease in the reported incidence of rape.

Violence against women

Sexual harassment has become a worldwide issue and these programmes in Kenya, teaching young people how to recognise and prevent sexual violence, seem to be working.

Violence against women is a huge problem in Kenya.

This worsens once you enter Nairobi’s slums, where research has suggested that almost a quarter of girls will have been victims of sexual assault in the previous year.

From: http://www.bbc.com/news/education-43466365

Image copyrightALEX MCBRIDE. Image captionThe boys are taught about respect, consent and «the journey to manhood».

Comparte este contenido:
Page 105 of 144
1 103 104 105 106 107 144