Page 35 of 144
1 33 34 35 36 37 144

Teaching degrees miss the mark on reading instruction

By: Pallavi Singhal.

All primary school teaching degrees in Australia are missing fundamental components on teaching children to read, which is leading to as many as one in five students falling behind by year 4.

Only 4 per cent of university units have a specific focus on early reading instruction, while 70 per cent do not mention any of the five key elements of reading instruction that are recognised by the NSW Department of Education, a new analysis of 116 literacy units in 66 degrees at 38 universities across the country has found.

‘I suspect it’s a big factor in why we have a large number of children not meeting reading and writing benchmarks,’ said Jennifer Buckingham, the lead author of a new study.

Nearly one in five students and as many as one in four students in some states and territories didn’t meet the country’s proficient standard for reading by year 4, the results of the latest Progress in International Reading Literacy Study show.

«University education faculties just have not updated their courses to reflect enormous developments in cognitive science and reading research over the last 30 or 40 years,» said Jennifer Buckingham, the lead author of the study and a senior research fellow at literacy instruction provider MultiLit.

«I suspect that’s a big factor in why we have a large number of children not meeting reading and writing benchmarks.

«Principals are saying it takes a few years to catch teachers up who haven’t been given this knowledge base as part of their training.»

However, the head of one education faculty said that universities teach all three components of English that are outlined in the Australian curriculum, which covers reading instruction, and teaching graduates meet Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership standards.

«If I showed you all the slides from powerpoints and lectures, you’d find that all those elements of reading instruction are in there, they just don’t always get packaged up exactly like that,» associate head of the school of education at the University of South Australia Sue Nichols said.

«I can tell you that we teach those things categorically. What I’d like to see is more connectivity between schools and teacher education so they can come in and see exactly what we’re doing.»

The new report finds that in some university courses, literacy isn’t taught beyond the second year and that about 9 per cent of teachers graduating in 2018 did not pass the literacy component of a compulsory test introduced by the federal government.

Paul McDermott, principal at Blue Haven Public School on NSW’s Central Coast, said there is an «enormous gap» between university students’ knowledge of reading instruction and the teaching strategies used by top-performing schools.

«It’s not just new teachers, we spend a lot of time training and retraining staff,» he said.

«We’re quite authentic to the research around reading and our results reflect that. [Teachers] are up and running very quickly but it does take them time to catch up to what we do as a school.»

Blue Haven Public has gone from improving student results in NAPLAN reading tests at well below the improvement rate of similar schools between 2012 and 2014 to having significantly above-average gains between 2016 and 2018.

Mr McDermott attributed the improvement to their use of evidence-based reading instruction, including a focus on the five essential elements of phonemic awareness, phonics, fluency, vocabulary and comprehension, which should be taught explicitly according to literacy researchers and the NSW Department of Education’s Centre for Education Statistics and Evaluation.

«They’re taught very little of that at university and a lot of schools out there probably don’t have the systems in place to teach these things,» Mr McDermott said.

«If teachers came in highly trained in the evidence, that would certainly make a massive difference to kids.»

The report recommends that all initial teacher education programs be required to demonstrate that they include evidence-based reading instruction techniques in adequate depth to be accredited, that literacy units be included in every year of teaching courses to «prevent a long gap between study and practice» and that ability to teach reading be included in graduate standards.

Peak body Universities Australia did not respond to requests for comment.

Source of the article: https://www.smh.com.au/education/teaching-degrees-miss-the-mark-on-reading-instruction-20190710-p525ww.html

Comparte este contenido:

Educación Sexual Integral, un desafío para los educadores

 

La conferencia de MELE abordó esta temática desde los aspectos legales, psicológicos, socioeducativos y pedagógicos.

Organizada por Medios en la Educación de Los Andes, el pasado jueves 22 de agosto se desarrolló en el Auditorio “Dr. Adolfo Calle” la tercera conferencia del Ciclo 2019 sobre “Educación Sexual Integral, Logros y Desafíos de su implementación”, a cargo de Germán Gregorio Morassutti, Daniel Di Giuseppe, Claudio Pilot y Ana María Vega, profesionales que, desde diferentes perspectivas, acercaron sus aportes ante un atento público.

La sexualidad como construcción

El encuentro comenzó con la intervención del psicólogo y sexólogo Germán Gregorio Morassutti, quien partió diferenciando los conceptos entre sexualidad y sexo: “Según la Organización Mundial de la Salud, la sexualidad se define como un aspecto central del ser humano que está presente a lo largo de su vida, y abarca el sexo, las identidades, el género, el erotismo, el placer, la intimidad, la reproducción y la orientación sexual. Es una dimensión fundamental del hecho de ser humano y se practica y se expresa en todo lo que somos, sentimos, pensamos y hacemos. Esta sexualidad está relacionada con lo biológico, lo psicológico, lo social y lo espiritual” -puntualizó el disertante-.

Morassutti también abordó aspectos del desarrollo psicosexual, exponiendo conceptos como identidad y expresión de género, sexo biológico y orientación sexual, y especificó los ejes y las dimensiones de la Educación Sexual Integral (ESI) para trabajarlos con alumnos, los mitos y realidades de su implementación, junto con los materiales didácticos disponibles. “El docente puede tener su propia creencia sobre sexualidad, y es algo totalmente valido, pero cuando va a impartir conocimientos tiene que apoyarse en información científica, actualizada y apropiada a cada edad. Los materiales de ESI están pensados y estructurados para brindarle apoyo al educador, de modo que pueda trabajarlos pedagógicamente. Tenemos una doble tarea, la de educar en la escuela, y está bueno incorporar a la familia en estos aprendizajes” –precisó el especialista-

Marco legal y educativo de la ESI

El panel que presentó los abordajes legales y educativos de la ESI dio inicio con la propuesta del abogado Daniel Di Giuseppe, a cargo de la Delegación Mendoza del Instituto Nacional contra la Discriminación, la Xenofobia y el Racismo (Inadi), quien sostuvo que “la Ley Nacional 26150 sancionada en 2006 tiene 11 artículos y entre algunos de sus puntos importantes encontramos, en el artículo 1, que todos los educandos tienen el derecho a recibir ESI en los establecimientos educativos públicos, de gestión estatal y privada. Uno de los proyectos que plantea la modificación de esta ley elimina el término ‘educando’ y propone hablar de género, diversidad y de las y los estudiantes. El artículo 2 plantea la creación del Programa Nacional de ESI a partir del cumplimiento de distintos marcos normativos como la Convención de los Derechos del Niño y otras leyes generales. Hay legislaciones posteriores a la Ley 26150, entre las que se encuentran la Ley Nacional de Educación, de Protección Integral de la Mujer, de Matrimonio Igualitario, de Identidad de género y la resolución del Consejo Federal de Educación que da el marco para la creación del Programa Nacional. El artículo 5 plantea la obligatoriedad. ¿Por qué es importante la ESI? Entre otras realidades, para evitar embarazos adolescentes, suicidios, abusos o entender los derechos de una persona al momento de sufrir discriminación como el bullying, o de tipo institucional”.

La exposición del psicólogo y sexólogo Claudio Pilot abordó cómo garantizar el derecho a la ESI desde el rol docente: “Ante la ESI debemos preguntarnos dónde posicionarnos. Un modo de explicación es desde el pensamiento mágico y la mitología, que son conocimientos que se crean para dar alguna explicación a hechos, sucesos o acontecimientos pero lo llamativo es que no parten de un fundamento científico, sino que son imposiciones que se sostuvieron y se proyectaron en el tiempo. Actualmente hay muchos mitos vinculados a la sexualidad que, si los indagamos, no tienen ninguna lógica. Hay una diferencia entre, por ejemplo, las religiones intentando explicar qué es la sexualidad (vinculada, principalmente, a lo reproductivo) y la Organización Mundial de la Salud, que es un único organismo, y que explica muchos otros aspectos para entenderla. El otro modo de explicación de la sexualidad es basarnos en la ciencia, los derechos y las leyes. La información, los conocimientos válidos, para el educador, son lo básico, no solo a nivel escolar sino, también, para toda la comunidad en general”.

La comunicadora y formadora en ESI Ana María Vega cerró el panel sobre la experiencia de la formación, en las instituciones, sobre el tema: “Los ejes de la ESI (reconocer la perspectiva de género, el respeto a la diversidad, el valor de la afectividad, el ejercicio de nuestros derechos y el cuidado del cuerpo y la salud) abarcan todo lo que nos pasa a las personas adultas y a nuestros niños, niñas y adolescentes y no se pueden analizar de forma aislada, ya que somos personas con una sexualidad que se expresa de una manera distinta. ¿Quién se puede arrogar la capacidad absoluta de decir ‘yo soy normal y todos los demás son raros’? ¿No será que ‘lo normal’ es la diversidad? Las niñas y los niños no pueden aprender a poner en palabras lo que les pasa si nosotros, como adultos, no los habilitamos, acompañamos e interpretamos su emocionalidad. La ESI tiene que servir para acercar, también, a las familias, a la escuela, como garantes de derechos, y brindarles estos conocimientos con aval científico y legal, y acompañarlas en la crianza desde esta perspectiva”. Vega cerró su intervención compartiendo su experiencia en el Nivel Superior, en formación continua y profesional y en sindicatos: “Tiene que haber voluntad política con presupuesto para la formación docente, no solo a través de plataformas, sino de modo vivencial”.

Opiniones de los asistentes

El público evaluó este encuentro destacando la importancia de generar espacios para que se siga trabajando y aprendiendo sobre ESI: “Fue una jornada positiva, ya que se brindó información, como así también modos de acercarla a diferentes contextos, enfatizando el derecho que todos tenemos a su acceso, lo cual me parece una herramienta sumamente importante de conocer”, opinó una de las asistentes.

“Excelente conferencia, de gran interés educativo. Los temas fueron muy bien abordados y fue excelente el espacio para las preguntas y los profesionales que respondieron a las mismas. Lo mejor de todo es que haya sido gratuita”, fue otra evaluación de una docente participante. “Hubo explicaciones conceptuales muy claras y coherentes, con adecuado manejo del lenguaje y el tiempo. Las presentaciones de cada uno de los expositores fueron excelentes”, destacó otra docente.

Un trabajo permanente en la escuela

La Nº 26150 la Ley de Educación Sexual Integral fue promulgada en 2006 y su aplicación, aún, es parcial. La ESI, a través de un conjunto de actividades que se realizan en la escuela promueve que los chicos y las chicas, de acuerdo con sus edades, aprendan a conocer su propio cuerpo, asumir valores y actitudes responsables relacionadas con la sexualidad, conocer y respetar el derecho a la identidad, la no discriminación y el buen trato. El acceso a esta información es un derecho humano y el Estado y las instituciones educativas tienen la obligación de garantizarlo, para ayudar a pensar críticamente las costumbres que las escuelas conservan y naturalizan, y acompañar en el abordaje de los episodios que, no siempre, es sencillo trabajar desde esta perspectiva.

El próximo encuentro será el viernes 27 de setiembre sobre “Bienestar docente, trastornos del sueño y estrés”, a cargo de reconocidos profesionales en el tema.

Fuente de la noticia: https://www.losandes.com.ar/article/view?slug=educacion-sexual-integral-un-desafio-para-los-educadores

Comparte este contenido:

Zambia’s education curriculum is rigid- Education PS

Africa/ Zambia/ 26.08.2019/ Source: www.lusakatimes.com.

 

General Education Permanent Secretary Jobbicks Kalumba says the country’s current education curriculum is rigid and not favorable to the career needs of Zambians.

Dr. Kalumba said most subjects offered are not compatible with what the pupils want to do in future.He said there is urgent need to transform the curriculum to ensure it becomes relevant to career paths of children.

Dr. Kalumba said the educational reforms being implemented are meant to improve education standards and that the PF government has pro poor policies. He stated that reduction in school fees will ensure all Zambians have access to education.

Source of the notice: https://www.lusakatimes.com/2019/08/18/zambias-education-curriculum-is-rigid-education-ps/

Comparte este contenido:

Australia must fix school inequity to create a top education system

Oceania/Australia/ 20.08.2019/ Source: www.abc.net.au.

About a year ago my life turned upside down, literally.

My wife and I, with our two school-aged children, moved to Sydney from Helsinki.

We soon realised that Australians do not walk upside down. But there were some things that we were not prepared for.

Ever since we arrived in our new hometown, people were curious to know how we chose a school for our sons.

For us it was no-brainer — the neighbourhood public school.

But most parents in our shoes, we’ve been told, would explore the vast school market in Sydney to find the best available school, and the best value for money, for their children.

Education is a human right

Where to find the best school for your children sounded like a strange question to us.

Back in our old home, just like most other Nordic countries, the best school for our children and everyone else’s is the local public school.

This privilege is not a lucky coincidence but the result of deliberate public policies that view education as a human right rather than a commodity.

Interestingly, in some countries parents can be quite confident that any public school is a good school. At the same time, in some other places finding a school for your child can be a major headache.

It doesn’t have to be this way.

It all starts from an understanding that the importance of education to a society can be judged not just by how much is spent on education but by how public money is invested to serve everyone’s individual needs and desires in as fair way as possible.

Rich countries vary greatly regarding how much of their national wealth is invested in schools.

Nordic countries typically cover about 99 per cent of their total education expenditure from taxpayers compared with 81 per cent in Australia.

Furthermore, in OECD countries, on average, four out of five children attend public schools.

In Australia it is three out of five children.

The relationship between funding and excellence

Again, this is not by accident. It is a result of the public view about the importance of education as a common good.

During my work for and with a number of senior politicians, I have learnt that a government’s budget is not just a financial document, it is also a moral one.

What policy-makers need to understand better is this: How schools are funded is a fundamental question for those wishing to achieve educational excellence in schools. Here is why.

About a decade ago the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) discovered that the most successful school systems are those that combine excellence and equity in their education priorities.

Equity in education, as defined by David Gonski’s Review panel, is to «ensure that differences in educational outcomes are not the result of differences in wealth, income, power or possessions».

The OECD’s data from its PISA (Programme for International Student Assessment) studies since 2000 suggested that, indeed, those education systems that had established systematic mechanisms to finance schools based on schools’ socio-economic makeup and children’s educational needs tend to do better overall.

The OECD went even further in its policy advice to governments.

In its 2012 publication titled Quality and Equity in Education: Supporting disadvantaged students and schools, it stated:

«School choice advocates often argue that the introduction of market mechanisms in education allows equal access to high-quality schooling for all. Expanding school choice opportunities, it is said, would allow all students — including disadvantaged ones and the ones attending low performing schools — to opt for higher quality schools, as the introduction of choice in education can foster efficiency, spur innovation and raise quality overall. However, evidence does not support these perceptions, as choice and associated market mechanisms can enhance segregation.» (p64)

Instead of increasing school choice, the OECD suggests that governments should invest more systematically in equity in education.

For many OECD countries that has meant a faster, smarter, and fairer way to achieve educational excellence.

The OECD suggests that school choice should be managed to balance parental choice while limiting its negative impact on equity.

Competition between schools delivers bad outcomes

In this subject Australia has not been a very good pupil in the class of OECD countries.

And we should know better.

Parental choice is an idea that became commonly known as a consequence of Milton Friedman’s economic theories in the 1950s. Friedman stated that parents must be given the freedom to choose their children’s education and encourage competition among schools to better serve families’ diverse needs.

Friedman’s school choice theory has been tested in large- and small-scale settings around the world since then.

School voucher systems in Chile and Sweden, charter schools in the US, and academies in England, are examples of mechanisms to advance parental choice and private schools.

Results over the past half a century have not been what Friedman expected.

In 2013 the Grattan Institute in Australia concluded:

«By increasing competition, government policies have increased the effectiveness of many sectors of the economy. But school education is not one of them.» (p35)

Instead of asking schools to race against one another for better outcomes, state and federal strategies should introduce incentives that would encourage collaboration between schools and guarantee that all schools have sufficient resources to cope with inequalities that children bring with them to school every day.

So what do I think of Australian schools?

Now, after almost a year here, friends overseas ask my opinion about Australian schools.

I tell them that based on what I have seen here, we have one of the best education systems anywhere. World class.

Then, I pause and say: But only for some children.

I believe I am right.

Some of the most interesting and innovative schools I have ever visited are right here, throughout this magnificent land.

Teachers and principals are advanced professionals akin to their peers in Finland, Singapore, or any other country.

But, as I have noticed, and what was well reported in recent ABC reportage, this world-class educational excellence is very unevenly distributed around this country and its communities.

Frankly speaking, «Rich school, poor school: Australia’s great education divide» is a depressing read.

Having world-class schools is not the same as having a high-performing school system.

David Gonski’s Review Panel in its 2011 report got it to the point:

«Funding for schooling must not be seen simply as a financial matter. Rather, it is about investing to strengthen and secure Australia’s future. Investment and high expectations must go hand in hand. Every school must be appropriately resourced to support every child and every teacher must expect the most from every child.»

In other words, we need to fix current inequalities in and out of schools before educational excellence can truly be achieved.

It is that simple. The evidence is clear and so should be the road ahead.

Source of the notice: https://www.abc.net.au/news/2019-08-14/australia-must-fix-school-inequity-for-top-education-system/11412438

Comparte este contenido:

India orders schools to reopen, but Kashmiri parents keep kids at home: ‘Education is less important than our children’s lives’

Asia/ India/ 20.08.2019/ Source: www.independent.co.uk.

Authorities criticised for move as situation remains volatile in disputed region

Parents across Kashmir kept their children at home, despite an order from Indian authorities for schools to reopen, fearing the youngsters could get caught in clashes between civilian protesters and armed personnel.

Authorities closed schools and colleges on 5 August after India revoked the special status of Kashmir, which is divided between India and Pakistan and claimed in entirety by both.

Kashmiris have criticised the authorities for reopening the schools when the situation remains volatile and clashes continue.

The ongoing internet and communications blockade also contributed to the fears of parents who had no means of contacting the school authorities.

“If normality has returned to that extent that schools can be reopened, then why don’t authorities lift the ban on phone connectivity and public movement?” said Showkat Nabi, whose son is in nursery at Tyndale Biscoe School, a Christian missionary institution in Srinagar.

“The kids are too young to understand what has happened… If we send them to schools, they will go – but we fear for their safety,” he continued.

At Burn Hall School, one of the oldest Christian missionary educational institutions in Srinagar, gates have been locked for the past two weeks.

The security personnel guarding the school told The Independent no student attended today’s classes and few teachers had turned up.

“Who would risk sending a 5-year-old kid to school in the present situation in Kashmir?” said the guard, who asked to be identified as Sagar.

Mohammad Younis Malik, director of school education in Kashmir, said 166 of Srinagar’s 196 primary schools were open, but admitted that 72 of them had “thin” attendance.

Tariq Aziz, whose son studies at a private school in Srinagar, argued that not sending children to school was a form of protest by the parents.

“I want my son to know that India is trying to grab our land. Our future is at risk in Kashmir now. I want to make him conscious that he has to fight for it in future,” Mr Aziz said.

“Education is less important than the lives and safety of our children. We have seen the closure of schools for months in the past and if it continues our teachers will volunteer to open community schools,” he said.

Government employees were also ordered to attend their offices today, but it is unclear how many exactly followed the order.

Sehrish Asghar, an official spokesperson of the government, described the numbers of those heading back to work as “encouraging”.

“It is difficult to reach the office amid strict restrictions on public movement, but we have to take a risk to save our jobs,” engineer Aftab Ahmad told The Independent.

Across Kashmir, most shops and businesses remained closed, and the streets remained largely deserted.

But in a several locations, small-scale protests were seen as people clashed with the heavy contingents of armed forces deployed across towns and villages of the disputed region

Deputy Inspector General VK Birdi, who briefed media about the situation in Kashmir, said there was no major law-and-order incident reported in the region.

“Some minor incidents of stone pelting were reported at some localities and were dealt with as per norm. The culprits were dispersed,” Mr Birdi said.

He said authorities are closely monitoring the situation, which is “slowly returning to normality”.

Source of the notice: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/asia/kashmir-schools-open-india-pakistan-crisis-a9070431.html

 

Comparte este contenido:

170,536 hawkers, almajiri get free education in Oyo

Africa/ Nigeria/ 20.08.2019/ Source: guardian.ng.

 

Oho State Government has expressed its readiness to deploy the World Bank-assisted Better Education Service Delivery (BESDA) takeoff grant in educating about 170, 536 out-of-school children in 23 councils of the state and ensure their retention in schools.

Chairman of the State Universal Basic Education Board (SUBEB), Dr. Nureni Adeniran, said this yesterday after a two-day interactive session in Ibadan on the implementation of the project.

Adeniran reiterated the state government’s resolve to rid the streets of all out-of-school children and put them in public schools, saying the programme would cater for even hawkers and the almajiri in the state.

Source of the notice: https://guardian.ng/news/nigeria/170536-hawkers-almajiri-get-free-education-in-oyo/

Comparte este contenido:

Learning education from Japan

By: Naazir Mahmood.

One of the reasons for Japan’s rapid progress in the 20th century was its education system. Today we discuss some of the salient features of Japanese education and how it has facilitated the creation of one of the most civilized nations on the globe. Here being ‘civilized’ does not mean their achievements in science and technology alone, it also means a nation of people who are caring, considerate, honest, and responsible citizens. This can be seen while travelling across Japan, and even while walking on the streets in cities from Tokyo to Nagasaki.

On a recent visit to Japan, this writer availed himself of the opportunity to review the elementary and secondary education system in Japan and also visited a couple of universities. Ms Yumioka Haruna from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology (MECSST – normally written as MEXT) was kind enough to give a detailed briefing about the Japanese education system. With her impeccable English proficiency, she explained the intricacies of their system and the challenges they have faced and overcome. She started with the constitutional provisions for education in her country.

Article 26 of the Japanese constitution says, “All people shall have the right to receive an equal education corresponding to their ability, as provided by law. The people shall be obligated to have all boys and girls under their protection receive ordinary education as provided by law. Such compulsory education shall be free.” Before moving forward, I would like to make two comments here: first, please have a look at the name of the ministry once again. It is one ministry that takes care of culture, education, science, sports, and technology.

If you compare this with the countries in South Asia, most have separate ministries for all of the above. In Pakistan, even almost a decade after the 18th Constitutional Amendment was passed in 2010, we have overlapping ministries at the federal and provincial levels. In Japan, MEXT combines all related departments such as culture, education, and sports together; and also puts science and technology (S&T) under the same umbrella. If one of the purposes of education is to nurture citizens who are cultured and civilized, you cannot separate culture from education. Being cultured means being caring, considerate, honest, and responsible.

The second comment is regarding Article 26 of the Japanese constitution and its provisions. Its stress on ‘equal education’ deserves attention as in Japan the state provides almost equal opportunities to all its citizens. As opposed to South Asian countries where the states have miserably failed to offer ‘equal education’, Japan has been successful in doing so, mainly thanks to its appropriate allocations to education. If we look at the Basic Act of Education of Japan, its Article 5 reads:

“The objective of general education, given in the form of compulsory education, shall be to cultivate the foundation for an independent life within society while developing the abilities of each individual, and to foster the basic qualities necessary for those who form our state and society.”

Please note that there is no mention of any national, patriotic, or religious responsibilities; neither is there any rhetoric about defending or preserving any ‘Japanese culture’ or any ‘Buddhist or Shinto’ heritage. Yes, there is emphasis on cultivating “the foundation of an independent life” and “developing the abilities of each individual”. This is the spirit and the approach for an effective education system. If you compare this with our myriad education policies, we find them full of platitudes about our nationalistic and patriotic pride, and cultural heritage and religious identity, and Pakistani faith, unity, and discipline.

Now some more specifics. The costs of municipal elementary, junior, and high schools are borne by the government. The national government is merely responsible for establishing a framework and setting of national standards. It also secures funding sources for preparation of education conditions. That means the national government provides guidance, advice and assistance without interfering into the curriculum and syllabus matters, as long as certain national standards are followed. There are two tiers or boards of education (BoE): prefectural and municipal. Prefectural is like the provincial board that establishes and operates high schools and special-needs schools.

Prefectural BoEs also hire teachers and make payments to elementary and junior high school teachers’ salaries. Municipal BoEs get advice, assistance and guidance from prefectural BoEs, but they establish and operate their own municipal schools. Interestingly, BoEs are established in all prefectures and municipalities as administrative committees, but they are totally independent of the prefectural or municipal head of government. BoEs decide the basic policy and important matters regarding the administration of education. Each BoE has five members: one full-time superintendent with a three-year term; and four part-time lay members who can be reappointed after four years.

The relevant local assemblies approve the appointment of the head of prefectural or municipal BoE. The BoE ensures political neutrality – meaning the contents of education must be neutral, fair and free from personal value judgments. The BoE also ensures sustainability and stability of compulsory education throughout the learning period. That means absenteeism and dropouts are controlled and minimized. There is a strong provision for pre-primary education (PPE) which starts at the age of three and ends at the age of six when children start elementary schools. For PPE there are integrated centres for early childhood education and care (ECEC) established and run by the kindergarten department.

The elementary department establishes and runs elementary schools that provide primary education for six years till the age of 12. The last phase of compulsory education is managed by the lower secondary department which runs lower secondary schools offering three years of schooling till the age of 15. MEXT, which is a large ministry, has multiple departments for each level of education. Again, if you compare it with public education in South Asia, here perhaps the most neglected area is PPE or kindergartens. Lack of facilities and resources, and absence of committed and qualified ECEC professionals render early childhood education meaningless in countries such as Pakistan.

After the age of 15, Japanese boys and girls can do part-time courses, join upper secondary schools, or get into specialized training colleges to do upper secondary courses run by the upper secondary department. They may also get admitted to colleges of technology run by the higher education department. At age 18, when they complete 12 years of education, they may get into junior colleges or specialized training colleges where they can enroll into one-year or two-year courses. They have an exit option after every year and may also continue for four years doing multiple courses if they want.

This model is quite contrary to the HEC model in Pakistan which has enforced a four-year bachelor’s programme without introducing exit options after two years. The provincial HECs in Pakistan should introduce two-year associate degrees in all disciplines and in all degree colleges or universities so that students who face family problems or financial issues may exit after two years and join the workforce. Here we have a lot to learn from the Japanese model of higher education which offers six years of higher education till the age of 24 but also has multiple exit options on the way, without forcing students to quit midway without a degree or certificate.

But perhaps the best aspect of Japanese education system is its stress on the three components of education – intellectual, moral and physical. That’s how they take a holistic approach, and teachers in Japan are trained not only to teach but also to engage in extracurricular activities to develop competencies and provide guidance. Lastly, meal provision in schools makes a lot of difference, where children themselves serve food provided by the school and are encouraged to clean up after themselves.

Source of the article: https://www.thenews.com.pk/print/514098-learning-education-from-japan

Comparte este contenido:
Page 35 of 144
1 33 34 35 36 37 144