Page 5480 of 6083
1 5.478 5.479 5.480 5.481 5.482 6.083

Education in South Africa: A system in crisis

Africa/Sudáfrica/Junio 2016/Autor: Sipho Masondo / Fuente: city-press.news24.com

ResumenUniversidad publica un estudio concluyente que cita la influencia indebida de los sindicatos, falta de conocimiento de los contenidos por parte del profesor y muy poco tiempo para el aprendizaje.

South Africa’s education system will not work effectively until undue union influence and critical educational factors are resolved, according to Stellenbosch University researchers.

They describe these factors as binding constraints, which include weak institutional functionality, poor teacher content knowledge and insufficient learning time for pupils.

The findings are included in a summary of several education-related research papers produced by education experts affiliated to the University of Stellenbosch’s Research on Socio-Economic Policy unit.

“The binding constraints approach argues that some problems are so severe that, unless they are first resolved, no amount of money or time spent solving the less severe problems will help,” says the study, titled “Identifying Binding Constraints in SA Education”.

It maintains that there are some critical educational inputs or factors without which learning cannot effectively take place.

The report reflects concerns expressed by academics, practitioners and the public at large about the influence exerted by unions, especially the SA Democratic Teachers’ Union (Sadtu) – perceived as interfering with the ability of the education system “to act in the best interests of children”.

“This in turn undermines efforts to implement higher levels of accountability and compromises capabilities in the sector,” the researchers conclude.

The report is another independent study to support Department of Basic Education Minister Angie Motshekga’s report on jobs for cash.

That study, published two weeks ago by City Press, found that Sadtu officials had captured the education system and were in effect running education in six provinces: North West, KwaZulu-Natal, Gauteng, Limpopo, Mpumalanga and Eastern Cape.

These researchers found that beyond advocating for improved pay, benefits and conditions of work, “Sadtu remained strongly opposed to national policies implementing any forms of monitoring or control of teachers’ work, even where accountability systems were disconnected from punitive measures”.

The report called for unions to be held accountable for their conduct in schools.

Sadtu has consistently refused its cooperation. Methods the department is introducing to hold teachers accountable include testing teachers’ and principals’ competencies, periodic evaluation of teachers, performance contracts for principals, a biometric clocking system to monitor teachers’ comings and goings, pay that is linked to performance, making education an essential service and the introduction of inspectors to monitor the delivery of the curriculum.

Sadtu has consistently rejected all these initiatives.

A number of studies contained in the report jointly found that in many schools, fewer than half of the official curriculum was being covered by the end of the year and fewer than half of the officially scheduled lessons were being taught.

Researchers laid the blame at the door of: inadequate teaching time; teacher absenteeism; and insufficient opportunity for pupils to learn.

The report said the National School Effectiveness Study showed that most Grade 5 pupils wrote in their books only once a week, or less. It added that only 3% of Grade 5 pupils across the country wrote in their books every day.

“Of greatest concern is how little extended writing there is in the books… [pupils] write one paragraph every month. In one instance, a shocking 44% of the Grade 4 pupils had not written any paragraphs during the entire school year,” the report charged.

On inadequate teaching time, the report observed that out of the 130 maths lessons scheduled for Grade 6 pupils during the 2012 academic year in 58 schools in North West, teachers had only administered 50 lessons by November.

“The researchers note that frequently the problem was not teacher absenteeism but rather a lack of teaching activity, despite teacher presence,” it said.

While it has long been established that teacher content knowledge is significantly related to learning outcomes, the report has concluded that raising teacher knowledge on its own was also insufficient.

“Teachers need to know how to translate that knowledge for effective learning in the classroom. This implies that content knowledge and pedagogical skills both need to be good.”

For example, the 2007 South and Eastern Africa Consortium for Monitoring Educational Quality showed that only 32% of Grade 6 maths teachers in South Africa had desirable subject knowledge, said the report.

On weak institutional functionality, the report attributed the underperformance of many pupils in provinces such as the Eastern Cape and Limpopo to poor administration.

Research conducted in Gauteng schools, which previously fell under North West before the changing of provincial boundaries in 2005, revealed improvements after their incorporation into Gauteng because a better-performing province was associated with improved student performance.

Fuente de la noticia: http://city-press.news24.com/News/education-in-south-africa-a-system-in-crisis-20160531

Fuente de la imagen: http://cdn.24.co.za/files/Cms/General/d/4035/52aadfc2eb0b41a88f17eb3bae7c46f7.jpg

Comparte este contenido:

EEUU: We behave a lot more badly than we remember

América del Norte/EEUU/Junio 2016/Autor: Francesca Gino y Maryam Kouchaki  / Fuente: theconversation.com

ResumenEn una encuesta realizada en EEUU en el año 1997. realizada por News and World Report, a 1.000 estadounidenses se les hizo la siguiente pregunta: «¿Quién es la persona que es más probable que entre en el cielo?» Según los encuestados, el entonces presidente Bill Clinton tuvo la oportunidad de un 52 por ciento; estrella del baloncesto Michael Jordan tuvo la oportunidad de un 65 por ciento; y la Madre Teresa tuvo la oportunidad de un 79 por ciento.

In a 1997 U.S. News and World Report survey, 1,000 Americans were asked the following question: “Who do you think is most likely to get into heaven?” According to respondents, then-president Bill Clinton had a 52 percent chance; basketball star Michael Jordan had a 65 percent chance; and Mother Teresa had a 79 percent chance.

Guess who topped even Mother Teresa? The people who completed the survey, with a score of 87 percent. Apparently, most of the respondents thought they were better than Mother Teresa in regards to their likelihood of getting into heaven.

As the results of this survey suggest, most of us have a strong desire to view ourselves in a positive light, especially when it comes to honesty. We care very much about being moral.

In fact, psychological research on morality shows that we hold an overly optimistic view of our capacity to adhere to ethical standards. We believe that we are intrinsically more moral than others, that we will behave more ethically than others in the future and that transgressions committed by others are morally worse than our own.

So, how do these beliefs of our moral selves play out in our day-to-day actions? As researchers who frequently study how people who care about morality often behave dishonestly, we decided to find out.

Unethical amnesia

One key result of our research is that people engage in unethical behavior repeatedly over time because their memory of their dishonest actions gets obfuscated over time. In fact, our research shows, people are more likely to forget the details of their own unethical acts as compared to other incidents – including neutral, negative or positive events, as well as the unethical actions of others.

We call this tendency “unethical amnesia”: an impairment that occurs over time in our memory for the details of our past unethical behavior. That is, engaging in unethical behavior produces real changes in memory of an experience over time.

Our desire to behave ethically and see ourselves as moral gives us a strong motivation to forget our misdeeds. By experiencing unethical amnesia, we can cope with the psychological distress and discomfort we experience after behaving unethically. Such discomfort has been demonstrated in prior research, including our own.

How forgetting works

We found evidence of unethical amnesia in nine experimental studies we conducted on diverse samples with over 2,100 participants, from undergraduate students to working adults. We conducted these studies between January 2013 and March 2016.

We chose a wide range of populations for our studies to provide a more robust test of our hypotheses and show that unethical amnesia affects not only college students but also employed adults.

In our studies, we examined the vividness and level of detail of people’s memories when they recalled unethical acts as compared with other acts.

For instance, in one of our studies, conducted in 2013, we asked 400 people to recall and write about their past experiences: some people recalled and wrote about their past unethical actions, some about their past ethical actions, and others recalled and wrote about other types of actions not related to morality.

We found that, on average, participants remembered fewer details of their actions and had less vivid memories of unethical behaviors as compared to ethical behaviors or positive or negative (but not unethical) actions.

In follow-up studies conducted either in the laboratory at a university in the northeast United States or online in 2014 and 2015, we gave people the opportunity to cheat on a task. A few days later, we asked them to recall the details of the task.

For instance, in one study, we gave 70 participants the opportunity to cheat in a dice-throwing game by misreporting their performance. If they did, they would earn more money. So, they had an incentive to cheat.

When we assessed their memory a few days later, we found that participants who cheated had less clear, less vivid and less detailed memories of their actions than those who did not.

Why does it matter?

Is having a less vivid memory of our misdeeds such a big problem? As it turns out, it is.

When we experience unethical amnesia, our research further shows, we become more likely to cheat again. In two of the studies we conducted out of the nine included in our research, we gave over 600 participants an opportunity to cheat and misreport their performance for extra money.

A few days later, we gave them another chance to do so. The initial cheating resulted in unethical amnesia, which drove additional dishonest behavior on the task that participants completed a few days later.

Because we often feel guilty and remorseful about our unethical behavior, we might expect that these negative emotions would stop us from continuing to act unethically.

But we know that is not so. Our experiences and news headlines from across the globe suggest that dishonesty is a widespread and common phenomenon.

Our work points to a possible reason for persistent dishonesty: we tend to forget our unethical actions, remembering them less clearly than memories of other types of behaviors.

So, what if people actively pursued scheduled time to reflect on their daily acts? In our research we showed that unethical amnesia most likely happens because people limit the retrieval of unwanted memories about when they engaged in dishonesty. As a result, these memories are obfuscated.

Perhaps creating a habit of self-reflection could help people keep such memories alive and also learn from them.

Fuente de la noticia: http://theconversation.com/we-behave-a-lot-more-badly-than-we-remember-59727?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Latest%20from%20The%20Conversation%20for%20June%2010%202016%20-%205020&utm_content=Latest%20from%20The%20Conversation%20for%20June%2010%202016%20-%205020+CID_ebbef61515f7d9803c2b1149ba7502ef&utm_source=campaign_monitor_us&utm_term=We%20behave%20a%20lot%20more%20badly%20than%20we%20remember

Fuente de la imagen: https://62e528761d0685343e1c-f3d1b99a743ffa4142d9d7f1978d9686.ssl.cf2.rackcdn.com/files/125414/width926/image-20160606-13043-1nm51pa.jpg

Comparte este contenido:

UN Chief Admits He Removed Saudi Arabia From Child-Killer List Due to Extortion

ONU/Junio 2016/Autor: Alex Emmons and Zaid Jilani / Fuente: The Intercept

Resumen:  Secretario General U.N., Ban Ki-moon, reconoció públicamente el jueves que eliminó a la coalición liderada por Arabia Saudita de una lista negra de asesinos de niños, de actualmente bombardear Yemen -72 horas después de que se publicó- debido a una amenaza financiera para cortar los fondos para los programas de las Naciones Unidas.

U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-moon publicly acknowledged Thursday that he removed the Saudi-led coalition currently bombing Yemen from a blacklist of child killers — 72 hours after it was published — due to a financial threat to defund United Nations programs.

The secretary-general didn’t name the source of the threat, but news reports have indicated it came directly from the Saudi government.

The U.N.’s 2015 “Children and Armed Conflict” report originally listed the Saudi-led coalition in Yemen under “parties that kill or maim children” and “parties that engage in attacks on schools and/or hospitals.” The report, which was based on the work of U.N. researchers in Yemen, attributed 60 percent of the 785 children killed and 1,168 injured to the bombing coalition.

After loud public objections from the Saudi government, Ban said on Monday that he was revising the report to “review jointly the cases and numbers cited in the text,” in order to “reflect the highest standards of accuracy possible.”

But on Thursday, he described his real motivation. “The report describes horrors no child should have to face,” Ban said at a press conference. “At the same time, I also had to consider the very real prospect that millions of other children would suffer grievously if, as was suggested to me, countries would defund many U.N. programs. Children already at risk in Palestine, South Sudan, Syria, Yemen, and so many other places would fall further into despair.”

Saudi Arabia is one of the U.N.’s largest donors in the Middle East, giving hundreds of millions of dollars a year to U.N. food programs in Syria and Iraq. In 2014, Saudi Arabia gave $500 million — the largest single humanitarian donation to the U.N. — to help Iraqis displaced by ISIS. Over the past three years, Saudi Arabia has also been become the third-largest donor to the U.N.’s relief agency in Palestine, giving tens of millions of dollars to help rebuild Gaza and assist Palestinian refugees.

“It is unacceptable for member states to exert undue pressure,” the secretary-general said. “Scrutiny is a natural and necessary part of the work of the United Nations.”

Ban called the decision “one of the most painful and difficult decisions I have had to make.”

Saudi Ambassador to the U.N. Abdallah al-Mouallimi, who held his own press conference afterward, offered his own back-handed confirmation of what happened. “We didn’t use threats,” he said, “but such listing will obviously have an impact on our relations with the U.N.”

“It is not in our style, it is not in our genes, it is not in our culture to use threats and intimidation,” he concluded.

Ban has invited a team from the Saudi-led coalition to New York to conduct a “joint review” ahead of scheduled U.N. discussions on the report, scheduled for August.

On Monday, however, after the changes were announced, the Saudi ambassador to the U.N. declared that the changes were “final and unconditional” and that Saudi Arabia had been “vindicated.”

Fuente de la noticia: http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/318-66/37387-un-chief-admits-he-removed-saudi-arabia-from-child-killer-list-due-to-extortion

Fuente de la imagen: http://readersupportednews.org/images/stories/article_imgs21/021400-ban-ki-moon-061116.jpg

Comparte este contenido:

En Venezuela: Yenchi es reconocida con el Premio Nacional de Periodismo Anibal Nazoa en su convocatoria 2016.

 Activista XSL / 10 June, 2016

El pasado miércoles 8 de junio, el Jurado de la VII Edición del Premio Nacional de Periodismo Aníbal Nazoa, decidió otorgar la Mención especial en Investigación al artículo “El aprender-haciendo desde las Tecnologías de Información Libres: Yenchi, una herramienta para seguimiento de violencia de género”, escrito por Mariángela Petrizzo, integrante de nuestro colectivo, y del portal de Comunicación Educativa Otras Voces en Educación. El jurado consideró que se trataba de una propuesta innovadora donde se combina de forma original la investigación y el seguimiento de información a través de las tecnologías libres con perspectiva de género para el tema de la violencia y la seguridad digital.

Cuando desde ActivistasXSL pensamos en hacer un aporte a la gestión nacional de incidentes de género, no previmos la posibilidad de poder participar en una convocatoria de periodismo, sin embargo, es indudable que la labor de sensibilización que asumimos desde el feminismo militante en las tecnologías libres, nos llevaría tarde o temprano a incursionar nosotras mismas en tareas directas de divulgación.

Este premio nos llena de expectativas como colectivo. Es evidente que una de las primeras razones es la proyección del uso de Yenchi, tanto a nivel institucional, como de colectivos feministas que abordan la violencia de género puede dar este premio. Esto supone para nosotras como colectivo un reto en términos técnicos y también en términos humanos. Atender la violencia de género, con su multifactorialidad implícita, es una tarea que demanda el concurso de todas nosotras como activistas y desde todos nuestros campos de acción.

Pero quizás una de las mayores expectativas es lo que este reconocimiento supone: por primera vez en Venezuela se premia un proceso de investigación hecho sobre una iniciativa de software libre orientado a una solución nacional, y por primera vez, además, se trata de una iniciativa llevada por feministas activistas en tecnologías libres

Como colectivo, estamos muy agradecidas con el Jurado de la VII Edición del Premio Nacional de Periodismo Aníbal Nazoa, este reconocimiento es una oportunidad para seguir trabajando, con más ahínco cada día, en la feminización de las tecnologías libres.

Yenchi es una de nuestras hijas. Estamos orgullosas de que su postergada presentación colectiva haya sido de la mano de un reconocimiento de estas dimensiones y mucho más de la posibilidad que tal espacio le ofrece aActivistasXSL y al movimiento feminista para apalancar otros espacios de nuestro quehacer, como lo son la divulgación de presencia de mujeres en producción y divulgación de TIL y la incorporación activa, militante y visibilizada de mujeres con discapacidad a esa producción y uso de TIL.

Somos mujeres, activadas en estos compromisos y activistas de su logro.

Fuente: http://activistasxsl.org.ve/2016/06/yenchi-es-reconocida-con-el-premio-nacional-de-periodismo-anibal-nazoa-en-su-convocatoria-2016/

Comparte este contenido:

Reino Unido: Power to the students: how the nature of higher education is changing

Europa/Reino Unido/Junio 2016/Autor: Andrew Gunn/ Fuente: theconversation.com

Resumen:  Una gran mayoría de los estudiantes del Reino Unido están satisfechos con sus estudios universitarios, de acuerdo con los resultados de una encuesta anual de 15.000 estudiantes a tiempo completo. Pero la encuesta sobre la experiencia académica de estudiante -2016- encontró que la percepción de «buena relación calidad-precio» están en declive, lo que indica que los estudiantes son cada vez más exigentes.

A large majority of UK undergraduates are satisfied with their university course, according to the results of an annual survey of 15,000 full-time students. But the 2016 student academic experience survey found perceptions of “good value for money” are in decline, indicating that students are becoming more demanding.

This year, only 37% of students felt they get value for money at their university, compared to 53% in 2012. And 86% do not want to see higher student fees, even where an excellent experience can be demonstrated.

Measuring the student experience is a central theme in the Conservative government’s new higher education white paper, where students are regarded as consumers. The proposed reforms include the creation of a new industry regulator, the Office for Students (OfS), with a remit to act in the interests of students by ensuring competition and choice as well as assessing quality and standards across higher education.

But the reforms go much deeper than merely rebranding a sector agency – they involve several serious measures designed to give students, as consumers, much greater control.

Putting excellence into practice

This can be seen in the creation of a Teaching Excellence Framework (TEF), which will give more power to consumers by helping applicants make a more informed choice. The TEF results seek to provide comparable information on the quality of teaching at different universities, which has not been available in the past.

Asking universities to report on the quality of their teaching, the support they offer students and the employability of their graduates not only provides information for consumers, it also encourages universities to make performing well on these issues a much higher priority.

Following consultation on a green paper, the full TEF has been moved back one year to allow lessons to be learned from a pilot year. Allowing universities to make additional above-inflation increases in undergraduate fees based on TEF results has been moved even further into the future. This means large variations in fees between universities won’t emerge for several years.

New metrics are being developed for later years of the TEF, including a new dataset using tax records to show actual graduate earnings. Pilots within certain disciplines will be undertaken to help the TEF drill down to the level of individual subjects.

Fast tracking

The white paper is accompanied by two technical consultations. The first deals with the details of the TEF, explaining how it will eventually be extended to taught postgraduate courses, for example. The second explores the viability of two other schemes to increase student choice: accelerated courses and switching universities.

Accelerated or fast-track courses are typically two-year degrees, where a traditional three-year degree is completed in two years by attending over the summer. The government wants the higher education sector to offer more flexibility and appreciate that all students may not want the standard three-year undergraduate experience.

Since their introduction, the demand for two-year degrees has remained relatively small; although this may be because the current choice of courses available is quite limited. Accelerated learning has been criticised and questioned by those who argue it means fewer opportunities for reflection that fosters a better understanding of a subject. Two-year degrees have been condemned by campus trade unions who describe them as “sweatshops” for university teachers.

The government also wants to see how the process of switching universities could be made easier. The TEF results may be useful for applicants who are yet to make their choice, but they aren’t useful for students already studying whose personal circumstances or course may have changed if they cannot easily “vote with their feet” and go elsewhere.

Power to switch

The government wants a system where the money follows the student, enabling students to switch universities rather than being locked into one place. To make this work, they envision a “credit transfer market” where students can take credit from their existing university to another that better fits their current needs.

Even if the number of transferring students was small, a credit transfer market would increase the power of students as consumer by challenging the entrenched idea that university choice is a “one-off purchase”. Another reason the government wants to do this is because it foresees a situation in the new marketplace where some providers may close down. Ensuring the stranded students affected can complete their degrees elsewhere needs to be considered.

In the US, student transfers are the norm, and the numbers are on the rise. A recent report found that over one third of students who began their studies in 2008 transferred to a different institution at least once. Out of these students, almost half changed their institution more than once. But the US context is quite different to English higher education. For example, the Wisconsin system of community colleges and universities is one entity where credit has common currency and students move from associate to bachelor degrees.

Yet Australian higher education, which is more comparable, shows how it is possible to make transfers between universities easier by having a national framework and more visible and straightforward policies within each institution.

The reforms show the government’s resolute determination to achieve greater competition and choice in higher education. These are reforms that seek to shift the balance of power to ensure the higher education sector delivers what students wish to receive, rather than what universities wish to offer.

Fuente de la noticia: http://theconversation.com/power-to-the-students-how-the-nature-of-higher-education-is-changing-60031

Fuente de la imagen: http://theconversation.com/power-to-the-students-how-the-nature-of-higher-education-is-changing-60031

Comparte este contenido:

Uruguay hará «hincapié» en integrar la educación en el trabajo adolescente

La ministra de Desarrollo Social de Uruguay, Marina Arismendi, participa en un acto de conmemoración del Día Mundial contra el Trabajo Infantil hoy, viernes 10 de junio de 2016, en Montevideo (Uruguay). EFE

10 de junio de 2016/

Montevideo, 10 jun (EFE).- Uruguay hará «hincapié» este año en integrar la educación en el trabajo de los adolescentes, dijo hoy el ministro de Trabajo y Seguridad Social del país suramericano, Ernesto Murro, en el marco de las actividades de conmemoración del Día Mundial contra el Trabajo Infantil.

«En el Ministerio del Trabajo y Seguridad Social (MTSS) queremos hacer especial hincapié en la situación de los adolescentes, en particular en integrar la educación en el trabajo en este sector de la población», expresó el funcionario durante su intervención.

Además, agregó que esto se busca hacer a través de puntos como el diálogo, la negociación colectiva y participación, «desde una perspectiva de derechos» y «desde la base» de que los jóvenes uruguayos y adolescentes «tienen que ejercer sus derechos».

En ese sentido, Murro valoró las distintas iniciativas que se han desarrollado en el país dirigidas a este sector de la población, como «Yo trabajo y estudio», programa en el que según indicó, existen unos 600 jóvenes entre 15 y 18 años que trabajan bajo este plan.

Sin embargo, señaló que desde el Gobierno «existe una preocupación» por promover e impulsar la interconexión dialéctica entre educación y trabajo y la formalización del trabajo adolescente.

«Esto no solo buscamos hacerlo en nuestro país sino también integrados al Mercosur y a lo que es la iniciativa regional de América Latina y el Caribe. Se ha avanzado en las políticas sociales que hemos implementado en la historia del país y estos últimos 11 años tenemos que seguir profundizando en ese camino», aseguró.

Según la última encuesta de trabajo infantil, realizada en 2010, en Uruguay la cifra de jóvenes menores de 15 años en el trabajo informal se ubicó en unos 90.000, explicó a la prensa la subdirectora de la Inspección General del Trabajo, Cristina de Marco.

Además, informó que trabajan en el desarrollo de una nueva encuesta, en la que se analizarán temas diversos, como los trabajos peligrosos que se realizan sin previa capacitación para ello.

«Son trabajos peligrosos que ponen en riesgo la integridad física, y esa persona no está preparada para realizarlos, y entre estos están algunos trabajos rurales, la tala, una parte de la cosecha, algún tipo de construcción y trabajos de peso y capacidad que necesitan de un organismo adulto para poder superarlo», detalló.

Asimismo, hizo énfasis en que «se necesita la participación activa» de todas las escuelas e institutos del país para que los jóvenes «no dejen el estudio» y que «de alguna manera» el trabajo «no entorpezca el proseguir en su formación».

Por su parte, la presidenta del Instituto del Niño y Adolescente uruguayo, Marisa Lindner, explicó que existen permisos de este organismo para que jóvenes entre 15 y 18 años puedan trabajar, que se basan en instancias de fiscalización y autorización para que los adolescentes lo hagan en condiciones adecuadas.

«El otorgamiento de un permiso laboral se hace luego de evaluar condiciones que están vinculadas al tema del estudio, es decir, se registra que el adolescente pueda continuar sus procesos educativos», concluyó.

Fuente: http://mexico.servidornoticias.com/187_america/3868679_uruguay-hara-hincapie-en-integrar-la-educacion-en-el-trabajo-adolescente.html

Comparte este contenido:

En Colombia: Ministra Gina Parody y Alcalde de Sogamoso firman compromiso para invertir en infraestructura educativa y fortalecer la Jornada Única

Este acuerdo tiene como objetivo diseñar un plan de trabajo para contribuir al cumplimiento de las metas del Plan Nacional de Desarrollo 2014-2018 y aportar al mejoramiento de la calidad de la educación básica y media en el municipio

Bogotá. D.C., 9 de junio de 2016. Mineducación.

La Ministra de Educación, Gina Parody, y el Alcalde de Sogamoso, Sandro Nestor Condia, firmaron hoy el Acuerdo Por la Educación, el cual reafirma el compromiso de trabajar de la mano entre las autoridades nacionales y municipales en torno al mejoramiento de la calidad educativa y de ofrecer más y mejores espacios de aprendizaje para niños y jóvenes.

«El Alcalde de Sogamoso ha sido un gran aliado del Ministerio para la implementación y puesta en marcha de los programas y proyectos que venimos impulsando para que nuestros estudiantes cuenten con mejores oportunidades de aprendizaje y accedan a una educación de alta calidad. Por esto hoy establecemos un acuerdo que nos permitirá reafirma ese compromiso en temas como infraestructura educativa y jornada Única», señaló la Ministra Gina Parody.

En cuanto a infraestructura educativa, el Alcalde se comprometió frente a la Ministra a que el municipio aportará $14.555 millones adicionales a los $2.604 que ya se habían destinado para completar la cofinanciación solicitada por el Ministerio para intervenir 13 instituciones con 196 aulas y beneficiar a 7.840 niños, niñas y jóvenes de la ciudad.

De esta manera, se asegurarán los recursos para garantizar las obras de construcción y adecuación de las obras priorizadas en el Plan Nacional de Infraestructura Educativa, que ascienden a los $57.200 millones, de los cuales el 70% ($40.040 millones) serán aportados por el Gobierno Nacional, y el 30% restante ($17.160 millones) los asumirá la administración Municipal.

«Si queremos garantizar que nuestros estudiantes del sector oficial cuenten con las mismas oportunidades que tienen los que asisten a colegios privados, debemos invertir recursos que permitan generar igualdad. Estoy convencida que este compromiso nos va a permitir igualar la cancha», afirmó la jefe de la Cartera Educativa.

Adicionalmente, otro de los puntos de este Acuerdo consistió en iniciar de manera inmediata la coordinación de las acciones que permitan atender a cerca de 1.250 niños y jóvenes en Jornada Única: 556 pertenecientes a instituciones postuladas y viabilizadas en la cuarta convocatoria; y 690 estudiantes de colegios que tras la tercera convocatoria ya se encuentran en proceso de implementación.

«Con esto avanzamos en el cumplimento de las metas que nos establecimos para el 2018 para este municipio, y es tener al 30% de la matrícula oficial gozando de más tiempo en las aulas y menos tiempo en las calles», destacó la Ministra de Educación.

Comparte este contenido:
Page 5480 of 6083
1 5.478 5.479 5.480 5.481 5.482 6.083