Page 13 of 50
1 11 12 13 14 15 50

Education in Nigeria is in a mess from top to bottom. Five things can fix it

Africa/ Nigeria/ 23.04.2019/ Source: www.icirnigeria.org.

NIGERIA’S education system is based on the (1)-6-3-3-4 formula: one year pre-primary education, six years primary, three years junior secondary, three years senior secondary, and a minimum of four years tertiary education.

The model had been used successfully in China, Germany and Ghana before Nigeria adopted it in 1989.

But it’s never been fully implemented in Nigeria. Although successive governments have theoretically upheld its objectives, none has successfully implemented the policy.

Nigeria’s educational system is in assorted crises of infrastructural decay, neglect, waste of resources and sordid conditions of service. The country has over 10 million out-of-school children. That’s the highest in the world. Another 27 million children in school are performing very poorly. Millions of Nigerians are half-educated, and over 60 million – or 30 per cent  – are illiterate.

On top of this, many eligible young Nigerians can’t gain admission into public universities. At the same time prohibitive tuition fees, among other factors, are a barrier to the country’s private universities.

As the Buhari-Osinbajo government starts its second term it should focus on key areas that will dig Nigeria’s education system out of the deep hole it’s in. I have identified five priorities it should attend to first.

Appointment

The new government should appoint an expert Minister of Education, not a political party lackey. In the past, Nigeria’s educational system has fared better under expert education ministers who earned their stripes through the system.

Take Professor Jubril Aminu, who served in the portfolio from 1985 to 1990. The 6-3-3-4 system was inaugurated during his tenure. Aminu also introduced “nomadic education” in 1989 for nomadic Fulani and other migrant ethnic groups.

Aminu was followed by Professor Babs Fafunwa (1990 to 1992). He overhauled the national education policy. He also provided room for education in mother tongue, a universal practice which most African countries have not fully implemented. UNESCO recommends education in mother tongue because of its immense advantages.

Lastly, under Professor Sam Egwu (2008 to 2010), a controversial agreement was signed between the government and the union representing the country’s academic staff. The agreement – signed in 2009 after drawn-out negotiations – stipulated conditions of service and remuneration for lecturers, the autonomy of universities and how the government should fund tertiary education.

But successive governments have violated the terms of the pact, claiming that they didn’t have the money to meet some of its terms. Officials claimed that sections of the pact were difficult, and in some cases impossible, to implement. However, the union rejects these claims and has accused the government of using delay tactics and questionable criticisms to frustrate the deal.

Funding

Funding is the biggest problem confronting Nigeria’s education system. The percentage of the budget allocated to education annually is abysmally low. In 2018, only 7.04 per cent was allocated to education. This is far below UNESCO’s recommended 15-26 per cent.

Nigeria’s experience with the commercialisation and neglect of government secondary and primary school levels has led to poorer education outcomes. Nor is privatisation the answer: it’s only likely to widen the gap between the rich and the poor. It will deny many children an affordable quality education, increase the rate of illiteracy and reduce academic performance at the tertiary level.

If the government continues to privatise government-owned universities, as is already the case with the proliferation of private universities with high fees, tertiary education will become the exclusive preserve of the rich upper class. This, in a country where more than 90% of the population is currently living in abject poverty.

The government should also cut wasteful expenditure. For example, I would argue that the “school children feeding programme” is a massive drain on resources.

The government reported earlier this year that it allocated 220 billion naira for the programme and of that, about 50 billion naira was wasted. This money could have been spent on more pressing problems such as building more classrooms and equipping them, supplying teaching and learning materials and improving staff welfare and remuneration.

Money for research

Research suffers in three ways in Nigeria. First, researchers work without sponsorship, particularly in the core sciences. The Tertiary Education Trust Fund is virtually the only source of money. The Trust funds and sponsors research projects give grants for research and sponsor lecturers for academic conferences, among other things. But its resources are limited and its operations are slow, highly selective and sometimes politicised.

Secondly, study findings are often abandoned on library shelves because the government isn’t committed to research-oriented development. Researchers don’t have the means to promote their work and research findings.

Third, research output is mediocre and repetitive because there are no effective measures in place to track research output nationwide.

Stop incessant strikes

In 1978, the Academic Staff Union of Universities was established to represent academic staff in Nigeria’s universities. Since then, there have been strikes almost every year, disrupting the academic calendar.

To stop these annual disruptions, the government must increase budgetary allocations to the sector and honour agreements that have been signed with the unions.

The only way that strikes will be stopped is if the welfare of all staff, from teachers to lecturers, is prioritised.

In conclusion

If these priorities are successfully implemented, Nigeria’s education system would be well on its way to realising the government’s commitment to its own policies and the United Nations’ Sustainable Development Goals.

Source of the notice: https://www.icirnigeria.org/education-in-nigeria-is-in-a-mess-from-top-to-bottom-five-things-can-fix-it/

Comparte este contenido:

Universidad nigeriana lanza la primera planta de energía de residuos orgánicos

Redacción: Allafrica/17-04-2019

Los apagones son frecuentes y aleatorios en Nigeria. Para resolver este problema, una universidad en Nigeria ha construido una planta de generación de energía de residuos orgánicos para proveer de electricidad a toda la universidad, escribe Patrick Egwu para esto es África .

Los apagones son frecuentes y aleatorios en Nigeria. Para resolver este problema, una universidad en Nigeria ha construido una planta generadora de energía de desechos orgánicos para proporcionar electricidad a toda la universidad. Esta es la primera innovación de este tipo realizada por una universidad nigeriana para ayudar a abordar la escasez de energía en ese país.

Recientemente, la Universidad de Nigeria, Nsukka, la primera universidad indígena en el país, ubicada en el sureste de Nigeria, logró un hito al ser la primera universidad en el país en lanzar una planta de energía de residuos orgánicos que generará electricidad constante para el Universidad.

La planta es una planta de gasificación de combustible derivado de desechos (RDF) de 100 kilo-amperios (kVA) diseñada para alimentar todo el campus y las comunidades cercanas.

El proyecto, que fue iniciado por el ex vicecanciller de la institución, el profesor Chinedu Nebo, cuando fue ministro de poder hace cuatro años, fue completado e inaugurado por el profesor Benjamin Ozumba, el actual vicecanciller.

«Estoy feliz de que bajo mi supervisión, la universidad ha sido testigo de la innovación y la transformación», dijo Ozumba. «Hoy, otra pluma se ha agregado al límite de mi administración. Esta es la primera de su tipo en el condado: el uso de residuos para generar electricidad».

«Para cuando se establezcan más de estas plantas, que cubran cada parte de la universidad, se guardarán millones de nairas cada mes, ya que ya no pagaremos las facturas mensuales de electricidad a la compañía eléctrica».

La innovación y la planta fueron completadas por un grupo de investigadores de la institución, liderado por el profesor Emenike Ejiogu. Ejiogu, un ingeniero que recibió capacitación en Japón, tiene experiencia en dispositivos y sistemas de energía eléctrica, así como en nuevos sistemas de energía: energía eólica, solar y de celda de combustible.

Los subproductos agrícolas, como las cáscaras de maíz, son fuentes de desechos orgánicos que podrían utilizarse como materiales de desecho para alimentar la planta.

«El objetivo es permitir que la institución genere su propia electricidad con residuos orgánicos que sirvan como combustible», dice Ejiogu. La planta se completó con una subvención especial de la universidad en un paso que ayudará a resolver el creciente costo de la electricidad inestable en el país.

Según Ejiogu, su equipo de investigación estaba preparado para producir plantas de 250 kVA, que cubrirán las necesidades energéticas de toda la universidad y las comunidades cercanas.

«La demanda de energía de nuestra universidad ahora es de 3 megavatios, por lo que con 12 250 kVA de plantas RDF, cumpliremos con las necesidades de suministro eléctrico de la universidad», dice.

Esta innovación ha generado comentarios positivos de expertos que dicen que ayudará a combatir la contaminación ambiental y acústica.

«Esta es la primera planta de este tipo en el país», dijo Simon Oke, quien tiene más de una década de experiencia en el sector eléctrico. «Ayudará a combatir la contaminación, especialmente el ruido en el campus».

Ejiogu y su equipo han comenzado a recibir solicitudes de instalaciones de individuos y empresas privadas.

«Es más barato y puede transportar más corrientes que la instalación de energía solar», dice. «Con una planta RDF en su casa u oficina, alimentará sus acondicionadores de aire, congeladores, planchadoras y otros electrodomésticos».

Los subproductos agrícolas, como las hojas de maíz y las astillas de madera, entre otras, son fuentes de desechos orgánicos que podrían utilizarse como materiales de desecho para alimentar la planta.

Otro beneficio de esta innovación es la provisión potencial de empleos para los jóvenes desempleados. La tasa de desempleo en Nigeria ha aumentado desde que el país entró en recesión en 2016.

La tasa de desempleo de Nigeria aumentó del 18,8 por ciento en el tercer trimestre de 2017 al 23,1 por ciento en el tercer trimestre de 2018, según un informe de la Oficina Nacional de Estadísticas. Esto significa que alrededor de 21 millones de nigerianos están desempleados.

«El número de personas en la fuerza laboral aumentó de 75,94 millones en 2015 a 80,66 millones en 2016 a 85,1 millones en 2017 a 90,5 millones en 2018», señala el informe.

Ejiogu es optimista de que la nueva fuente de energía generará empleo para los jóvenes en el país porque habrá una demanda para que las personas suministren estos productos de desecho a la universidad oa otras personas que lo necesiten.

Fuente: https://allafrica.com/stories/201904100153.html

Comparte este contenido:

Improving primary education in Nigeria

Africa/ Nigeria/ 08.04.2019/ Source: www.blueprint.ng.

Examines the loopholes in education sector and reports that government should focus increased attention on basic school, which is the foundation of tertiary education.

Education is the bedrock of development of any nation. Developed countries of the world became so today because of the early recognition they accorded education.  But unfortunately, education in Nigeria is besieged with a lot of problems.  The worst hit is the primary education, which is the foundation for the attainment of a country’s growth and development aspiration.

Some of the problems include poor funding and the consequent poor educational infrastructures; inadequate classrooms and teaching aids like projectors, computers, laboratories and libraries. Shortage of quality teachers and poor or enervating teaching/learning environment are part of the problems.

In addition to these inadequacies, our school system is plagued with numerous social vices such as examination malpractice, cultism, hooliganism and other forms of corruption.

An educationist, Mrs Olufunmilayo Da_Silva said for meaningful development to take place in the education sector, government needs to re-address the issue of funding. Private education investors, teachers, parents/guardians and children need to be  re-orientated towards achieving the goals of education. Also, education must be made affordable for all but not free, except under the scholarship schemes for disadvantaged children who are also brilliant.

The current casual approach to knowledge acquisition, she said, must be changed, if this nation must move out of this present technological and scientific dependence. She added that government and the organised private sector must as well fund research programmes, invention and mass production of inventions.

We would want the government to take a decisive approach rather than paying lip-service to the outcome of this presidential retreat, when the communiqué is submitted and becomes a blueprint for the education sector, she stated.

“A quick fix of one week presidential summit or retreat would not solve our beleaguering  education system, rather a three-year plan would be ideal for a group of education practitioners, researchers, parents and NGOs from across the country to come together to examine the state of primary education in Nigeria,” she said.

Similar news  Philanthropist donates e-library to LAUTECH

The three years would allow thorough collection of evidence from research, interviews, focus groups, submissions and official data, interim reports to be followed by a final report with key findings and recommendations. This will call for quick political fixes and snap reforms to be replaced by a long-term, sustainable vision for primary schools grounded in secure evidence. The review then will move into dissemination mode, building a national network with regional centres and generating interest in all the states.

Child poverty

Child poverty currently affects between 17  and 36 per cent of Nigerian children, depending on whether you use the relative or absolute poverty measure, and poverty and social disadvantage impact directly on children’s educational progress and attainment.

Despite a long succession of government initiatives aimed at tackling the problem, most recently through the Universal Basic Education (UBE), the challenges remain severe. There’s a great deal that expert and inspirational teachers and school leaders working against the odds can do, and have done and they must learn from them. But for their work to achieve its full impact, it must be supported by the country’s wider economic, social and educational policies. All too often, such policies pull in different directions.

Ways to improve primary education

To improve education, educators must give children real say in their learning. We must celebrate children’s voice and rights in school and the classroom. As the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child points out, children should “have a right to be involved in decisions about their own learning”. This influence should extend to pedagogy as well as school management boards, for the classroom is where citizenship starts, and we know that discussion, dialogue and argument are very powerful tools for learning.

Primary education should not just be about preparing children for secondary school; we need to sort out what primary education is for, and ensure that aims driving the curriculum are not merely cosmetic. To say, as the government does, that the main aim of primary education is to make children ‘secondary ready’ is to undervalue children’s huge potential for development and learning during the primary years.

Similar news  Proprietress calls for adequate funding of girl-child education

Education is about the here and now as well as the future, but schools should also address the wider condition and needs of children and society in today’s complex world. Children leaving primary school, should of course, be ready for what follows, but what follows year six is life, not just year seven; make ‘breadth and balance’ more than a slogan. Take seriously the curriculum beyond the 3Rs; while primary schools must and do insist on the importance of literacy and numeracy, they should also lay foundations in other areas – in spoken language, science, the arts, the humanities, in physical, emotional and moral developments and lived experience. These are in their different ways no less important for children’s future learning, choices and lives; they might actually make children more “secondary ready” than the 3Rs alone. The three Rs refer to the foundations of a basic skills-oriented education programme in schools: reading, writing and arithmetic.

Educators argue against the old two-tier curriculum – where the basic subjects are covered in detail, while the rest of the curriculum in some schools, are treated seriously but in others, it is left to chance,  and where the idea of ‘standards’ is confined to the 3Rs. This approach undermines the cultural and economic worth of the non-core subjects and flies in the face of research that shows how learning in one area enhances learning in others. Without deflecting attention from the importance of literacy, education experts argue for a primary curriculum whose core includes essential knowledge, skills and experience drawn from all subjects, not just three of them; increase the focus on evidence-based pedagogy. It is only through teaching that the curriculum comes alive for children. And it is only through understanding the art, science and craft of teaching – from research, inspection and shared experience – that teachers can inform and refine their practice. Relying on habit or official pronouncements isn’t enough. A greater focus on what evidence tells us about effective teaching and learning will enable teachers to help every child achieve the highest possible standard in all aspects of their education.

Similar news  Let Operation Delta Safe be

Assessment

Assessment should be about more than just test results. Where assessment and standards are concerned we need a wider practical repertoire and a more sophisticated vocabulary. We must devise approaches that enhance learning as well as test that supports the curriculum rather than distort it, and that pursues high standards in all areas of learning, not just the core subjects.

It is no longer acceptable that tests at a moment in time and in a narrow spectrum of learning are treated as measures of a child’s entire educational attainment or of everything that schools aim to provide. Tests have their place, but both assessment and accountability should be about much more than test results.

Schools should connect with the community.

Nigeria has immense demographic, economic, cultural and linguistic diversity, which creates a vast array of educational circumstances and needs. The best of our schools don’t just work closely with their local communities but make the curriculum responsive to local needs and opportunities and live the very idea of community in their everyday work and relationships.

Equipping schools, teachers and pupils with 21st century competencies is important. Today, much success lies in being able to communicate, share, and use information to solve complex problems, in being able to adapt and innovate in response to new demands and changing circumstances, in being able to command and expand the power of technology to create new knowledge. Hence, new standards for what students should be able to do are replacing the basic skill competencies and knowledge expectations of the past. To meet this challenge schools must be transformed in ways that will enable students to acquire the creative thinking, flexible problem solving, collaboration and innovative skills they will need to be successful in work and life.

The discourse of educational policy must change radically. As recent events have shown, policymakers tend to be interested only in evidence that fits their ideology or prejudice, and they may ignore or even abuse those who provide evidence that doesn’t fit the political bill. Deep and lasting improvements in our education system will be achieved only when policymakers are even-handed rather than selective in their use of evidence and when they speak about education in a way that exemplifies the educated mind rather than demeans it. The government has to give urgent attention to the Nigeria educational system because if we don’t educate our citizens they will contribute to the social menace that has befallen our dear country because of the high level of illiteracy, Da Silva said.

 

Source of the notice: https://www.blueprint.ng/improving-primary-education-in-nigeria/

Comparte este contenido:

Nigeria procesará a los padres que mantienen a los niños fuera de la escuela

Redacción Allafrica

El ministro de Educación, Adamu Adamu, advirtió que los padres que no envíen a sus hijos a la escuela serán procesados. La agencia de la infancia de las Naciones Unidas, Unicef, dice que Nigeria es uno de los peores países del mundo para niños que no asisten a la escuela.

El Ministro de Educación, Adamu Adamu, dice que Nigeria pronto aplicará una política para procesar a los padres que se negaron a inscribir a sus hijos en edad escolar en escuelas de todo el país.

Adamu dio a conocer esto en Abuja el lunes al dirigirse a periodistas durante la novena edición de la reunión ministerial de fin de semana.

Dijo que los padres que sabotean los esfuerzos del gobierno para reducir el número de niños que no asisten a la escuela pronto serán penalizados y se les obligará a enfrentar la ira de la ley.

«A menos que el problema de los padres que rechazaron que sus hijos vayan a la escuela se convierta en delito, y comencemos a encarcelar a los padres, la amenaza de los niños que no asisten a la escuela no se resolverá».

«Hay muchos que todavía están trabajando detrás de la cultura, la religión.

«Entonces, el ministerio debe llevar a cabo esta política para que cualquier padre cuyo hijo en edad escolar se niegue a llevarlos a la escuela sea encarcelado», dijo.

Hablando de subvenciones de contrapartida y otros fondos de intervención para la educación básica en Nigeria, el ministro dijo que se había gastado un total de N350 mil millones en el subsector frente a los N360 mil millones gastados por la administración anterior.

«En los seis años anteriores a la administración de Buhari, entre 2009 y 2014, el gobierno federal gastó aproximadamente N360 mil millones de dólares en intervención en educación básica que abarca libros de texto, desarrollo profesional docente, construcción de aulas y recursos bibliotecarios, entre otros».

El Sr. Adamu agregó que en 2015, los desembolsos de donaciones equivalentes y no condicionales a 15 estados de la federación y el Territorio de la Capital Federal ascendieron a N68,4 mil millones.

También dijo que en 2016, los desembolsos a 29 estados y la FCT ascendieron a N77 mil millones.

Según él, en 2017 el gobierno federal proporcionó un total de N95 mil millones a 24 estados y la FCT, y otro N109 mil millones a 20 estados y la FCT.

«Durante los cuatro años bajo revisión, el gobierno del presidente Muhammadu Buhari proporcionó una subvención total para incluir, subvenciones de contrapartida, fondo de desequilibrio educativo, fondo de educación especial y fondo de buen desempeño.

«Otros son fondos de Materiales de Instrucción, Fondo de Desarrollo Profesional para Maestros, así como fondos de Implementación y Monitoreo de la Comisión de Educación Básica Universal (UBEC, por sus siglas en inglés) en las zonas geopolíticas que se adjuntan».

El Sr. Adamu enfatizó que la corrupción y la falta de voluntad política de los gobiernos estatales fueron, entre otras razones, responsables del colapso de la educación básica en todos los estados.

«Habiendo llegado a esta dolorosa conclusión, el Gobierno Federal decidió deducir de la fuente, parte del último tramo del reembolso del Club de París de todos los estados que no han podido acceder a su dinero (UBEC).

«Si esta actitud de rechazo deliberado por parte de los estados para proporcionar fondos de contrapartida para la educación básica continúa, entonces el Gobierno Federal no tendrá más remedio que sostener su estrategia de deducir el porcentaje de fondos de contraparte de los estados de la fuente».

El Sr. Adamu agregó que las partes interesadas estaban a la espera de la decisión del Consejo Ejecutivo Federal (FEC) sobre la reducción de las subvenciones correspondientes para los gobiernos estatales.

«Ya hemos presentado una propuesta sobre la reducción de las subvenciones de contrapartida y creemos que entre el 10 y el 20 por ciento de la subvención de contrapartida se reducirá en comparación con el 50 por ciento que los estados han reclamado que es difícil de proporcionar», dijo.

Fuente: https://allafrica.com/stories/201903190027.html

Comparte este contenido:

Helpdesk Report: K4D – Stunting, Wasting, and Education in Nigeria

Africa/ Nigeria/ 19.03.2019/ Source: reliefweb.int.

Summary

Globally, the number of primary school children with nutritional deficiencies is high. This rapid review focuses on children with such deficiencies (namely stunting and wasting), and how it affects them throughout their primary education. Although the focus is on Nigeria, other country examples and their approaches to address this issue are also included, where available.
Key points are:

  • As hungry children find it difficult to concentrate (Muiru et al., 2014; Foodbank, 2015;
    Businge, 2016), their learning needs and outcomes are different to well-nourished children.
  • Countries respond to these children in different ways: the most popular being school feeding programmes, e.g. in India, which has a high prevalence of stunting and wasting, there is the free Midday Meal Scheme, which is the largest such scheme in the world (Singh et al., 2012).
  • However, such approaches have varying impacts: positive effects on measured learning were found in Burkina Faso and Peru (World Bank Group, 2018). However, in Kenya, providing school meals took significant time away from the classroom, and so they had an ambiguous net effect (World Bank Group, 2018). Therefore, it is worth noting that although school feeding gets children to school, it does not always improve learning (FAO et al., 2018).
  • Differences were found between urban and rural areas: in Nigeria, children from rural areas are almost twice as likely to be stunted as children from urban areas.
  • In Nigeria, as part of a public private partnership, Bridge school teachers use an innovative programme designed to scale up effective new approaches to education.
    However, no evidence is available on successful approaches to teaching malnourished children, e.g. how the timetable is organised, what practices are used in the classroom, what resources are used, etc.
  • Read-Aloud (RA) story lessons in reading and maths learning outcomes in northern Nigeria were evaluated by Moussa et al. (2018). The Reading and Numeracy Activity (RANA) Programme provides training, monitoring, and support to help teachers properly use these materials in class. Maths RA lessons were relatively more effective than the language RAs in improving listening comprehension, missing number identification, and maths word problem scores- however these results are for low socio-economic status pupils, not necessarily malnourished ones.
  • Preliminary findings of the school-based component of Young Lives research found a relationship between teacher qualifications and experience, and pupil’s maths scores (Woldehanna et al., 2017).
  • In the classroom, large numbers of over-age malnourished pupils present a challenge for teachers, who must teach a more diverse group with lower levels of maturity and school preparedness.
  • Teaching malnourished children does not seem to feature in the curricula of teacher training programmes (Drury, 2102; Rampal & Mander, 2013). In 2018, the Nigerian Federal Government revealed plans to revamp the country’s basic education sector – however there is no detail regarding specific approaches to teaching malnourished children
  • The available evidence suggests the need for teacher training to be relevant to classroom reality, to maximise the chance of teachers adopting new techniques in the classroom, and to be linked to better management of teachers at the school level to maximise time on task (Vogel and Stephenson, 2012).
  • Chinyoka (2014) recommends that teachers adapt their behaviour to motivate the learners to work and co-operate with peers. This teaching methodology is supported by Snowman and Biehler (2011).
  • In South Africa, the First National Bank Fund Primary Education Programme (PEP) aims to train teachers to identify pupils affected by malnutrition, as well as assisting them in what they can do to help these learners. The end-term evaluation recommends that the programme clearly had a positive impact in most objective areas (Khulisa Management Services & Bisgard, 2017).

The main sources of evidence used for the rapid review were taken from peer reviewed journals, as well as grey literature and investigative projects. In general, nutrition status of primary schoolchildren in Africa has received relatively little attention in comparison to that of younger children (Saltzman et al., 2016). Most of the data available focuses on the causes of malnutrition, and the effect of adapting diet to improve education. There is little empirical evidence on the effect of childhood malnutrition on children’s cognitive achievements in low-income countries (Woldehanna et al., 2017). There are limited teaching approaches specifically used in Nigeria.

The evidence found was ‘gender-blind,’ as there is very little information available exploring the experiences of girls and boys who are affected by nutritional deficiencies in the early education system. Children with physical disabilities were not a focus of this rapid review.

Link of the document: https://reliefweb.int/sites/reliefweb.int/files/resources/540_Stunting_Wasting_and_Education_in_Nigeria.pdf

Source of the notice: https://reliefweb.int/report/nigeria/helpdesk-report-k4d-stunting-wasting-and-education-nigeria

Comparte este contenido:

Karmele Marchante: «Viajé a Nigeria para ver a las niñas, vendidas a los 10 años»

Redacción: Última Hora

La periodista y feminista Karmele Marchante (Tortosa, 1946), muy conocida por su presencia en programas de prensa rosa, presentará este viernes a las 20.00 horas en La Biblioteca de Babel Puta no se nace, un libro en que denuncia la explotación sexual de mujeres y niñas en España.

En Puta no se nace sigue el rastro de las prostitutas de origen africano que ejercen en Europa.
— Al hacer este libro me planteé hacer la ruta de la trata. Prostitución y trata están ligadas porque existen putómanos, que no puteros, y que compran los cuerpos de las mujeres. La trata europea viene fundamentalmente de Nigeria. Y viajé a Nigeria para ver a estas chicas que a los 10 años son vendidas por sus familias, con la intermediación de la iglesia pentacostal, para acabar en manos las mafias, en la industria del sexo.

Estas chicas saldrán de entornos de pobreza…
— Siempre salen de entornos de pobreza, de países pobres o campos de refugiados, que también visité. Pero Nigeria, que es el núcleo de la trata, tiene una explosión demográfica impresionante, con un 75 por ciento de analfabetismo y con familias polígamas que pueden tener 30 o 40 criaturas. No les pueden alimentar y luego venden a las chicas.

¿Cómo llegan a Europa?
— Por dos rutas, una que va por Argelia y otra por Marruecos. Desembarcan en lo que yo llamo el sarcófago mediterráneo y son dirigidas a España o a Italia, desde donde se las distribuye por Europa. En la travesía por la África subsahariana sufren violaciones, palizas… Recuerdo el caso de una niña a la que la mafia había apartado porque se rebelaba constantemente y que a los 11 años consiguió escapar. Cuando la cogieron le pusieron una cuchara ardiente en el ano y la vagina. Me enseñó las cicatrices. Jamás lo podré olvidar.

De vez en cuando vemos que la policía desmantela esas organizaciones.
— Muy de vez en cuando. Aquí la prostitución es alegal y la trata delictiva. Entonces, si la policía no tiene una constancia fehaciente no puede entrar. Y España, quiero decirlo, es el primer paraíso sexual del mundo, por delante de Tailandia y Puerto Rico.

En las zonas turísticas de Mallorca es corriente ver a prostitutas de origen africano ejerciendo.
— Ejerciendo no, obligadas a trabajar por la mafia de la industria del sexo. Les hacen el vudú, una ceremonia que les subyuga mentalmente, y si no cumplen amenazan a sus familias y les reclaman la deuda. Son vendidas por 50.000 o 60.000 euros.

Antes ha distinguido entre ‘putero’ y ‘putómano’.
— No, no he distinguido. A los puteros les llamo putómanos.

¿Cuál es el perfil del ‘putómano’?
— Cualquiera. Puedes ser tu, el señor que está allí… De cada diez varones españoles cuatro son putómanos.

Pablo Casado ha dicho que es partidario de retrasar la expulsión de mujeres inmigrantes si dan a su hijo en adopción. Después lo ha matizado.
— Para empezar, todo lo que dice Casado es una locura. Segundo, es un fascista nazi porque esto se hacía con las mujeres judías en los campos de concentración. Les cogían sus bebés y los daban en adopción. También se hacía con las presas políticas argentinas durante la dictadura, para darlos a familias fachas. Es traficar con las criaturas. Alguien que dice esto debería estar en la cárcel por nazi.

Vox crece con un discurso…
— Vox es lo mismo que el PP, no hago diferencias. Lo que acabo de decir del PP es para Vox. Si dicen esto, deberían estar en la cárcel.

Usted se mostró partidaria del referéndum catalán. ¿Qué le parece que ahora los presos digan que no declararon la independencia y la justicia española defienda que sí?
— Hemos llegado aquí porque no ha habido diálogo. Se declaró la independencia por un minuto, y luego Puigdemont no convocó elecciones, cosa que fue un error. Son personas presas políticas, nada más. Lo que dicen ahora creo que es una estrategia de juicio. De todas maneras, La Haya declarará nulo el juicio dentro de unos años.

¿La volveremos a ver colaborando en algún programa del corazón?
— No, jamás, he tenido una época para esto pero también una trayectoria muy ilustrativa en la que he hecho de todo. He vuelto a lo que es lo mío, prensa escrita y periodista.

Fuente: https://www.ultimahora.es/noticias/local/2019/03/15/1065065/karmele-marchante-viaje-nigeria-para-ver-ninas-vendidas-anos.html

 

Comparte este contenido:

Impact of education financing on Nigeria’s economic growth

By: Racheal Ishaya.

There are currently increasing complaints about poor standard of education at a period when globalisation demands much from the educational system in terms of preparation of skillful labour force.

The major challenge of public education still remains the commitment by the government to focus on funding public education to enhance qualitative learning.

Education funding comes from different sources. The major one for all levels of government is public revenue from taxation and proceeds from crude oil.

These funds are reported to be distributed among primary, secondary and tertiary educational levels in the proportion of 30 per cent, 30 per cent and 40 per cent respectively.

To create more awareness on the issue of education financing, with the hope of getting policy change, Action  Aid and its partners in December, 2018, held a two day  meeting tagged “Breaking Barriers to Education’’ in Sokoto and Lagos.

In both cities, the meetings had in attendance representatives of the state Ministries of Finance, Budget and National Planning, Education, Federal Inland Revenue Service, Civil Society Organisations and the Association of Persons with Disabilities.

The Education Programme Cordinator, Action Aid Nigeria, Mr Laban Onisimus said in spite of  the general consensus on the importance of education, many governments were spending less on education.

“People pay taxes for basic services and in most countries around the world one of the first expectations of tax payers is that their government will invest in providing basic education.

“Indeed it is part of the fundamental unwritten contract between citizens and the state that tax money will be spent on providing public schools accessible to all children,’’ he said.

Onisimus said that most of the working population in the country were reluctant to pay their taxes because of the poor quality of public schools and other services in the country.

Onisimus revealed that the Action Aid through the Breaking Barriers Project was working with stakeholders in Lagos and Sokoto to advocate for increase in budgetary allocation to the education sector.

Similarly, Mr Chinedu Bassey from CISLAC said that poor funding of the education sector has led to under performance in the Nigerian economy.

He noted that sufficient budgetary allocation to the education sector was a problem in the country, especially during election years.

#10YrsChallenge Federal Government’s Budgetary Allocation to Education from 2009-2019

Year Budget Education Allocation
2009 N3.049 trillion N221.19 billion
2010 N4.608 trillion N249.09 billion
2011 N4.972 trillion N306.3 billion
2012 N4.877 trillion N400.15 billion
2013 N4.987 trillion N426.53 billion
2014 N4.962 trillion N493 billion
2015 N4.493 trillion N392.2 billion
2016 N6.06 trillion N369.6 billion
2017 N7.444 trillion N550 billion
2018 N8.612 trillion N605.8 billion
2019 (proposed) N8.83 trillion N462.24 billion

 

Bassey said that the government would be in a position to increase funding to education and provide better public services when it improves its revenue generation.

He said that the guaranteed way to improve revenue was for government to block illicit financial flows and other avenues for revenue leakages, eliminate multiple taxation and improve accountability for tax revenue.

Observers believe that educational expenditure has a significant effect on the Nigerian economic growth.

They say that the gains include increase in productivity, worker’s income, poverty reduction, acts as a vehicle for promoting equity, fairness and social justice.

They agreed that enhanced investment on education in the country would help supply the essential human capital which is a necessary condition for sustained economic growth.

Source of the article: https://www.nan.ng/news/impact-of-education-financing-on-nigerias-economic-growth/

Comparte este contenido:
Page 13 of 50
1 11 12 13 14 15 50