Reino Unido: With ‘Brexit’ Win, Universities Face ‘Significant Challenges’
Europa/Reino Unido/24 de junio de 2016/Inside Highe Red
Resumen: ciudadanos británicos votaron el jueves para el Reino Unido para salir de la Unión Europea, marcando el comienzo de un período de incertidumbre para las universidades. El margen fue de 52 a 48 por ciento. Muchos en la educación superior se opusieron a una salida británica , o Brexit, de la unión, con el argumento de que la pertenencia a la UE ayuda a permitir que las colaboraciones de investigación internacionales y que la libre circulación entre los estados miembros de la ayuda a las universidades del Reino Unido atraen a los mejores profesores y estudiantes. La asociación de vicerrectores universitarios, Universidades del Reino Unido, condujo un esfuerzo de lobby anti-Brexit, y alrededor de 100 vicerrectores firmó una carta abierta publicada el martes expresando su preocupación por el impacto de una salida del Reino Unido de la UE en materia de universidades y estudiantes.
British citizens voted on Thursday for the United Kingdom to leave the European Union, ushering in a period of uncertainty for universities. The margin was 52 to 48 percent,
Many in higher education opposed a British exit, or “Brexit,” from the union, arguing that membership in the E.U. helps enable international research collaborations and that free movement across member states helps U.K. universities attract top scholars and students. The association of university vice-chancellors, Universities UK, led an anti-Brexit lobbying effort, and about 100 vice-chancellors signed an open letter published on Tuesday expressing concern about the impact of a U.K. exit from the E.U. on universities and students.
«‘Leaving the EU will create significant challenges for universities,» Julia Goodfellow, president of Universities UK said in a statement. “Although this is not an outcome that we wished or campaigned for, we respect the decision of the U.K. electorate. We should remember that leaving the E.U. will not happen overnight – there will be a gradual exit process with significant opportunities to seek assurances and influence future policy.»
‘Our first priority will be to convince the U.K. Government to takes steps to ensure that staff and students from E.U. countries can continue to work and study at British universities and to promote the U.K. as a welcoming destination for the brightest and best minds. They make a powerful contribution to university research and teaching and have a positive impact on the British economy and society. We will also prioritize securing opportunities for our researchers and students to access vital pan-European programs and build new global networks.”
In the run-up to the referendum many in higher education raised concerns that British academics could potentially find themselves cut out of E.U. research programs, including the flagship Horizon 2020 program, which is funded at nearly €80 billion (about $88 billion) over seven years.
A number of non-E.U. states – including Iceland, Israel, Norway, Switzerland and Tunisia — have successfully negotiated participation in Horizon 2020, so there’s precedent to think that a U.K. outside the E.U. could too. But opponents of Brexit stressed that Britain’s future participation in the event of a “leave” vote would have to be negotiated and would not be guaranteed. Switzerland saw its participation in Horizon 2020 reduced after the passage of a 2014 referendum limiting immigration. Switzerland’s future level of participation in the program after the end of this year is contingent on it ratifying an agreement to extend free movement to the people of Croatia, the newest of the E.U. member states.
Beyond participation in E.U. research programs, U.K. universities face post-Brexit questions about student mobility. Will a U.K. outside the E.U. continue to participate in the union’s Erasmus+ student exchange program? And will full degree-seeking students from the E.U. be deterred from attending British universities if they’re required to pay higher international student tuition fees? Currently students from the E.U. pay the same tuition as British students and have access to the same student loan system.
“A lot of students are saying to us, can you tell us what it will be like if the U.K. leaves the E.U.,” Dominic Scott, the chief executive for the UK Council for International Student Affairs said in an interview before the vote. “We continue to say as yet we have no idea. There are so many things which could be negotiated or could be discussed following a Brexit.”
“We can’t assume that the current system would continue,” Scott said, “but what would be put in its place many of us have no idea.”
Under the terms of the Lisbon Treaty the U.K. has two years after it notifies the European Council of its intent to withdraw to negotiate a new agreement governing its future relations with the union. As the BBC reports, the referendum is not legally binding on Parliament, which must take action in order to initiate the U.K’s separation from the E.U.
The University of Cambridge’s vice chancellor, Leszek Borysiewicz, issued this statement Friday morning: «We note this result with disappointment. My position on this issue is well known, but 52 percent of voters in the referendum disagreed. We will work with our partners in business, research and academia, as well as our European partners and the government, to understand the implications of this outcome.»
International Higher EducationEditorial Tags: BritainInternational higher educationIs this breaking news?:
British citizens voted on Thursday for the United Kingdom to leave the European Union, ushering in a period of uncertainty for universities. The margin was 52 to 48 percent,
Many in higher education opposed a British exit, or “Brexit,” from the union, arguing that membership in the E.U. helps enable international research collaborations and that free movement across member states helps U.K. universities attract top scholars and students. The association of university vice-chancellors, Universities UK, led an anti-Brexit lobbying effort, and about 100 vice-chancellors signed an open letter published on Tuesday expressing concern about the impact of a U.K. exit from the E.U. on universities and students.
«‘Leaving the EU will create significant challenges for universities,» Julia Goodfellow, president of Universities UK said in a statement. “Although this is not an outcome that we wished or campaigned for, we respect the decision of the U.K. electorate. We should remember that leaving the E.U. will not happen overnight – there will be a gradual exit process with significant opportunities to seek assurances and influence future policy.»
‘Our first priority will be to convince the U.K. Government to takes steps to ensure that staff and students from E.U. countries can continue to work and study at British universities and to promote the U.K. as a welcoming destination for the brightest and best minds. They make a powerful contribution to university research and teaching and have a positive impact on the British economy and society. We will also prioritize securing opportunities for our researchers and students to access vital pan-European programs and build new global networks.”
In the run-up to the referendum many in higher education raised concerns that British academics could potentially find themselves cut out of E.U. research programs, including the flagship Horizon 2020 program, which is funded at nearly €80 billion (about $88 billion) over seven years.
A number of non-E.U. states – including Iceland, Israel, Norway, Switzerland and Tunisia — have successfully negotiated participation in Horizon 2020, so there’s precedent to think that a U.K. outside the E.U. could too. But opponents of Brexit stressed that Britain’s future participation in the event of a “leave” vote would have to be negotiated and would not be guaranteed. Switzerland saw its participation in Horizon 2020 reduced after the passage of a 2014 referendum limiting immigration. Switzerland’s future level of participation in the program after the end of this year is contingent on it ratifying an agreement to extend free movement to the people of Croatia, the newest of the E.U. member states.
Beyond participation in E.U. research programs, U.K. universities face post-Brexit questions about student mobility. Will a U.K. outside the E.U. continue to participate in the union’s Erasmus+ student exchange program? And will full degree-seeking students from the E.U. be deterred from attending British universities if they’re required to pay higher international student tuition fees? Currently students from the E.U. pay the same tuition as British students and have access to the same student loan system.
“A lot of students are saying to us, can you tell us what it will be like if the U.K. leaves the E.U.,” Dominic Scott, the chief executive for the UK Council for International Student Affairs said in an interview before the vote. “We continue to say as yet we have no idea. There are so many things which could be negotiated or could be discussed following a Brexit.”
“We can’t assume that the current system would continue,” Scott said, “but what would be put in its place many of us have no idea.”
Under the terms of the Lisbon Treaty the U.K. has two years after it notifies the European Council of its intent to withdraw to negotiate a new agreement governing its future relations with the union. As the BBC reports, the referendum is not legally binding on Parliament, which must take action in order to initiate the U.K’s separation from the E.U.
The University of Cambridge’s vice chancellor, Leszek Borysiewicz, issued this statement Friday morning: «We note this result with disappointment. My position on this issue is well known, but 52 percent of voters in the referendum disagreed. We will work with our partners in business, research and academia, as well as our European partners and the government, to understand the implications of this outcome.»
International Higher EducationEditorial Tags: BritainInternational higher educationIs this breaking news?:
Source: With ‘Brexit’ Win, Universities Face ‘Significant Challenges’
En el mismo sentido se pronuncian fuentes del Ministerio de Educación: «El procedimiento de salida del Reino Unido está recogido en el propio tratado de la UE y solo se pondrá en marcha cuando el Gobierno británico lo solicite oficialmente ante las instituciones europeas, algo que no ha sucedido todavía. A partir de ese momento, existe un plazo de dos años para que Reino Unido negocie con la UE los términos y acuerdos de su salida».
Users Today : 117
Total Users : 35508585
Views Today : 137
Total views : 3636030