Page 20 of 47
1 18 19 20 21 22 47

Australia: Research shows the importance of parents reading with children – even after children can read

Oceanía/Australia/Septiembre del 2017/Noticias/https://theconversation.com/

Many of us will be able to recall the enjoyment of shared reading: being read to and sharing reading with our parents. However, my research has found that of the 997 Year 4 and Year 6 respondents at 24 schools who took part in the 2016 Western Australian Study in Children’s Book Reading, nearly three-fifths reported that they were not being read to at home.

A sample of these children also participated in interviews, where I asked them how they felt about shared reading. While a few children did not mind no longer being read to, others were disappointed when it stopped. For example, when I asked Jason about his experience of being read to by his parents, he explained:

… they kind of stopped when I knew how to read. I knew how to read, but I just still liked my mum reading it to me.

His experience is common, with other recent research suggesting that more than one-third of Australian respondents aged six to 11 whose parents had stopped reading to them wanted it to continue.

But why is it so important for us to keep reading with our children for as long as possible?

Research has typically found that shared reading experiences are highly beneficial for young people. Benefits of shared reading include facilitating enriched language exposure, fostering the development of listening skillsspellingreading comprehension and vocabulary, and establishing essential foundational literacy skills. They are also valued as a shared social opportunity between parents and their children to foster positive attitudes toward reading.

When we read aloud to children it is also beneficial for their cognitive development, with parent-child reading activating brain areas related to narrative comprehension and mental imagery. While most of the research in this area focuses on young children, this does not mean that these benefits somehow disappear as children age.

As young people’s attitudes towards reading reflect their experiences of reading at home and at school in childhood and beyond, providing an enjoyable shared reading experience at home can help to turn our children into life-long readers.

However, not all shared reading experiences are enjoyable. Some children described having poor quality experiences of being read to, and children did not typically enjoy reading to distracted or overly critical parents. In some cases, parents attempted to outsource this responsibility to older siblings, with mixed results.

While many children really enjoyed the social aspects of reading and being read to as valuable time with their parents, they also felt that they learned from these experiences. For example, listening was felt to provide an opportunity to extend vocabulary, and improve pronunciation. Gina recalled the advantage she lost when her parents stopped reading to her, as:

… when they did read to me when I was younger, I learnt the words; I would like to learn more words in the bigger books and know what they are so I could talk more about them.

Similarly, Craig explained how being read to enabled his academic advantage in literacy, as “they were teaching me how to say more words”, and “that’s why I’m ahead of everyone in spelling and reading and English”. When this stopped “just because my mum thought I was smart enough to read on my own and started to read chapter books”, Craig was disappointed.

In addition, children were sometimes terrified of reading aloud in the classroom, and this fear could potentially be alleviated through greater opportunities to practice at home.

Hayden’s anxiety around reading aloud at school related to his lack of confidence, and his tendency to compare his skills with those of his peers. He described himself as “always standing up there shivering, my hands are shivering, I just don’t want to read, so I just start reading. And I sound pretty weird”. No-one read with him at home, so he had limited opportunity to build his confidence and skills.

This research suggests that we should not stop reading with our children just because they have learned to read independently.

We should continue reading with our children until they no longer wish to share reading with us, ensuring that these experiences are enjoyable, as they can influence children’s future attitudes toward reading, as well as building their confidence and competence as readers. It is worth the effort to find time to share this experience with our children in the early years and beyond.

Fuente: https://theconversation.com/research-shows-the-importance-of-parents-reading-with-children-even-after-children-can-read-82756

Imagen: https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/HJvBgzyBnur4OIJFzg7YAmbScb_R41EWLo4__PVbFfhzA5iFnR-UxUM3DW2fuvgVyhVgPQ=s85

Comparte este contenido:

Revealed: who supports marriage equality in Australia – and who doesn’t

Oceanía/Australia/Septiembre 2017/Noticias/https://theconversation.com/

 

Ahead of the postal plebiscite on marriage equality, much is being written about the relative chances of a “Yes” or “No” outcome, and the strategies both sides need to influence public opinion.

However, the bulk of the public debate seems to be based on intuitive or speculative perceptions of the traits of people who are likely to oppose or support marriage equality, or on anecdotal evidence.

We used data from the Household, Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia Survey (HILDA) to assess trends in the degree of support for marriage equality, and to ascertain the characteristics of those Australians who do, or don’t, support it.


Further reading: Finding balance on marriage equality debate a particular challenge for the media


The data

In 2005, 2008, 2011 and 2015, the HILDA Survey asked its national panel to rate their degree of agreement with the statement “Homosexual couples should have the same rights as heterosexual couples do” on a scale from one (strongly disagree) to seven (strongly agree).

The HILDA data have strengths and weaknesses compared to recent poll data. The drawbacks are that they are relatively old (July 2015-February 2016), and do not collect information about views on same-sex marriage specifically.

However, they are collected with much more statistical rigour (probability sampling, population representativeness), feature sample sizes that dwarf those of opinion polls (>15,000 respondents), and encompass rich demographic information.

Degree of support

We find a pronounced trend between 2005 and 2015 in the degree to which Australians agree with the notion of same-sex couples having the same rights as different-sex couples.

As seen below, the percentage of people who “strongly agree” (the highest point in the scale) rose from 19.2% in 2005 to 46.3% in 2015. In contrast, the percentage of people who “strongly disagree” (the lowest point) fell markedly from 26.7% in 2005 to 12.9% in 2015.

The percentage of people who chose any of the five intermediate responses either remained stable, or decreased slightly.

Defining agreement as response points five to seven on the “agree side” of the aforementioned question, the 2015 HILDA Survey reveals agreement rates of 66%, up from 39.8% in 2005.

When agreement is defined as response options four to seven, the 2015 agreement rate grows to 78%.

Who supports equal rights?

Examination of the 2015 HILDA Survey data revealed marked differences in the degree of support for equal rights for same-sex couples across population subgroups.

Such support was significantly greater among:

  • women;
  • non-heterosexual (gay/lesbian, bisexual) people;
  • younger people;
  • people with degree-level or year 12 as their highest educational qualifications (compared to lower than year 12, or a professional qualification);
  • non-religious people;
  • people born in Australia or an English-speaking country (compared to people born in a non-English-speaking country);
  • people with higher incomes; and
  • people living in major cities (compared to those living in regional/remote areas).

Once these factors were accounted for, there were few and small differences across Australia’s states and territories.

Who sits on the fence?

About 12.4% of the 2015 HILDA Survey respondents selected the mid-point of the seven-category response scale when reporting on their agreement with the rights of same-sex couples.

This is an important portion of the Australian population. They represent those who may be swayed in either direction.

Examining their traits reveals these respondents were more likely to be men, heterosexual, older than 40, religious, to have below-year-12 education or professional qualifications, from a non-English-speaking background, in the bottom quartile of the income distribution, and from regional/remote areas of Australia.

Social change

The longitudinal nature of the HILDA Survey data enabled us to compare trends over time in support for the rights of same-sex couples between population segments.

Between 2005 and 2015, support rates increased across all of the population subgroups under scrutiny. This was even the case among groups that expressed the lowest levels of support.

For the most part, the group differences in support rates reported before remain reasonably constant over time. Interesting exceptions included a reduced “support premium” associated with holding university-level qualifications, and increasing religious disparities.


Further reading: To Christians arguing ‘no’ on marriage equality: the Bible is not decisive


What does all this mean?

The figures reveal an overwhelming tide of support toward the rights of same-sex couples within Australian society.

However, certain population groups are clearly lagging behind in their support. This includes male, older, and religious Australians, and those from non-English-speaking backgrounds. These same traits are also predictive of being undecided on the issue. This implies campaigners for a Yes vote should redouble efforts in putting forward arguments that appeal to these groups.

Even with a favourable outcome, the moral scrutiny to which the LGBT community is being subjected will likely have long-term negative consequences. Social friction and debates about the rights of same-sex couples are unlikely to disappear after the plebiscite. Our results point toward population groups that will need further convincing.

Fuente: https://theconversation.com/revealed-who-supports-marriage-equality-in-australia-and-who-doesnt-82988

Imagen: https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/eTGYR2xSmdtdAvRcfQXPCRdXHVwRhFbUdVnj23zp8XYOy23UogfzUWQK0LcioJ9rVQbXnA=s170

 

Comparte este contenido:

The UK is rethinking university degrees and Australia should too

Oceanía/Australia/Septiembre 2017/Noticias/https://theconversation.com/

There are growing calls for a debate about the role of post-school in society, both in Australia and overseas.

After 30 years of constant expansion, some complain that universities have become too vocational in nature – too focused on jobs, not enough on the art of inquiry.

At the same time, the vocational education sector is reeling from 15 years of funding cuts and the aftershocks of failed free-market experiments. Numbers in trade apprenticeships and traineeships are plummeting. Less than 30% of vocational students in Australia work in the areas in which they studied.

The same is true of higher education. An annual survey of university graduates from 2014 shows that 54% of all bachelor’s degree holders said their qualification was a formal requirement for their job. But the proportion ranged from one in four humanities graduates to 96% of medical graduates. The more regulated the profession, the more degree and career path are likely to be correlated.

The British higher education system is rolling out an alternative education route. Degree apprenticeships were launched in the UK in 2015. These are designed to bridge the gap between technical skills, employment and higher education.

They’re part of a larger scheme intended to reinvigorate apprenticeships more broadly. A 0.5% levy on corporations with an income of more than £3 million (A$4.8 million) funds the system.

Supporters say the initiative is good for employers and good for students, especially for disadvantaged students. They not only struggle to get into higher education (despite an uncapped system) but are also much more likely to drop out of it.

Degree apprenticeships work a lot like traditional trade apprenticeships: students work in a related job with their education strapped on around their employment.

Traditional degrees are steeped in theory and deliver practical experience through internships, practicums or other work-based experiences. In contrast, degree apprenticeships deliver a skill and a qualification simultaneously. Students work four days a week and study for one.

Crucially, the apprenticeship levy covers tuition fees, so students don’t graduate with a debt. If adopted here, this could enable Australia to avoid the distress over rising debts seen in the UK, where it is expected 80% of students will never fully repay their loans.

In the last UK election, Labour leader Jeremy Corbyn rode a rising tide of anger among younger voters over student debt with his promise of a return to free higher education.

Even Andrew Adonis, Tony Blair’s former adviser and architect of the current loans scheme, has switched camps. He described the income-contingent loans scheme that resulted in a tripling of fees in 2012 as a Frankenstein’s monster and “a Ponzi scheme”.

While Australia doesn’t have the same immediate crisis, several factors suggest higher education could be heading slowly towards a tipping point. Government plans to increase university fees and introduce more rigorous parameters for the Higher Education Loans Program (formerly HECS) have sparked furious debate.

Meanwhile, graduates face a declining employment market. Just 69% of graduates in 2014 held a full-time job four months after graduation, compared to 81% a decade earlier.

Part-time work, casualisation and under-employment are widespread. Graduate salaries have been more or less static for years. Increasingly, students, particularly the most advantaged, turn to postgraduate education to boost their chances in an overcrowded jobs market, raising questions over credentialism.

Having larger numbers of people with a higher degree produces public benefits, including better health, better parenting, higher rates of volunteering and lower rates of incarceration. But all of this comes at a cost to the taxpayer and does little to correct an imbalance in skills entering the jobs market. Too many lawyers does not balance out a shortage in IT experts or agricultural scientists.

The question is whether new pathways need to be created to help young people straddle the gap between education and work.

Work is under way on this issue in Australia. The University of Tasmania, for example, is adding associate degrees, which are shorter, cheaper and more vocationally focused on local industries than full bachelor degrees.

Perhaps other institutions, particularly those in regional and outer-metropolitan areas, should consider the possibilities offered by the UK-style degree apprenticeship model. These are the universities, after all, that educate by far the greatest proportion of disadvantaged students.

Ironically, degree apprenticeships are a modern, more work-intensive version of the associate degrees that colleges of advanced education offered before the higher education system was unified under the Hawke government in 1989.

Perhaps part of the emerging discussion should include a return to a tripartite public education and training system, which includes TAFE, teaching-only polytechnics and research-intensive universities.

The post-secondary education sector may have a limited appetite for more structural reform. However, as a society, we do need to tackle the question of whether a higher education system devised 30 years ago, onto which uncapped student places have been glued, is still fit for purpose. Times have changed and education systems must surely move with them.

Fuente: https://theconversation.com/the-uk-is-rethinking-university-degrees-and-australia-should-too-82973

Imagen:

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/VzomlBB6rQ3lpoyEQr1Ps3qjMlmARiVn9yy9Hus170KYtSTSrHtMNR3D4DXssQUjZGri_v0=s85

Comparte este contenido:

Successful Australian Education Fair in Hyderabad

Australia/Agosto de 2017/Fuente: The Hans India

Resumen: IDP Education India, el proveedor líder de servicios de colocación de estudiantes organizó la feria de educación australiana en Hyderabad en Taj Krishna recientemente para estudiantes que aspiran a obtener una educación superior en Australia. La feria distribuida en 15 ciudades reunió a universidades prominentes e institutos educativos de Australia bajo un mismo techo. Más de 650 estudiantes visitaron la feria.

IDP Education India, the leading student placement service provider organised the Australian education fair in Hyderabad at Taj Krishna recently for students aspiring to pursue higher education in Australia. The fair spread across 15 cities brought together prominent universities and educational institutes from Australia under one roof. Over 650 students visited the fair.

Piyush Kumar, Country Director, India – IDP Education said, “IDP seeks to provide a platform to aspiring students to come and have a face-to-face interaction with the university representatives and get answers to all their queries related to studying in Australia. 34 Australian institutions have participated in the fair. It is a FREE platform for all students to gauge their prospects, apply directly to the institution of their choice and get first hand information on courses, scholarships etc.”

“Australian education has always attracted Indian students for its quality and the availability of post study work opportunities make it even more attractive. Also 20 out of 34 Australian universities feature in world’s Top 400 Times Higher Education Rankings” added Kumar.

In addition to meeting the institutions, the qualified students also got application fee waivers and scholarships. The scholarships can range from a fee bursary to a 50% scholarship of tuition fee for select students. Students were advised to bring along their educational certificates in original along with photocopies. One can also visit the IDP office to pre-register for priority processing and detailed counseling with trained & experienced Australia counselors.

Fuente: http://www.thehansindia.com/posts/index/Hans/2017-08-31/Successful-Australian-Education-Fair-in-Hyderabad/323186

Comparte este contenido:

Australia: Religion in Australian schools: an historical and contemporary debate

Oceanía/Australia/Agosto del 2017/Noticias/https://theconversation.com/

Australia maintains one of the highest concentrations of religious schools compared to other OECD countries. This proportion fits with the higher proportion of students who are enrolled in private schools in Australia.

Approximately 30% of all schools in Australia are affiliated with a religion, or 94% of private schools.

Research from the Centre For Independent Studies compared this proportion of religious schools in Australia to countries such as Sweden (2% of schools are religious), the US (10% of all schools), and the Netherlands (60% of all schools).

Religious schools in Australia predominantly consist of Anglican and Christian. But there are numerous religious affiliations represented in schools, and also diverse ways of practising religion.

Contextually, our population is shifting (and increasing). We have a rising population of minority religious groups; a sharp increase of people identifying with “no religion” on the census (29.6%); and a declining population of individuals identifying with Christianity. However, Christianity continues to be the dominant religion (57.7%).

But how an individual identifies on the Census does not readily translate to choosing a religious or non-religious school.

A brief history of religious schools in Australia

Historically speaking, religion in schools has always been contentious. This is a contentious issue in many parts of the world. The question of whether to include religion in schools is conflated with our views around the purpose of education.

In other words, what is the social purpose of education? What kind of views, ideologies and values do we want our children to learn in school? The topic of sex education and abstinence education is often paired with this debate.

As a democratic society, we will all have various responses to these questions.

The fact that religion is contentious, and not a unified consensus, was a motivation for the original foundation of our state or public schooling system.

In the state of Victoria, the Education Act founded our schools on the principle of “free, secular and compulsory”.

It was argued that secular education would remove religious discrimination and unite the community. Leading campaigners arguedthat religion should be taught in church and at home, rather than in schools.

Even though state schools were founded on secular principles, they were far from equitable or accessible for all.

The education acts were established in the context of the Stolen Generations, genocide and endemic racism towards Indigenous children. Indigenous people did not gain the right to vote until much later, in 1965.

Historians claim that our earlier schools were largely influenced by arguments around biological determinism and eugenics. Reportedly, leading commentators argued that you could measure a child’s head to determine their ability for academic work. Biological determinism disadvantaged poor children and Indigenous children.

Religious schools in contemporary times

Historically speaking, and also constitutionally, Australia is a secularcountry. Following this, each state and territory maintains slightly different policies around the inclusion or exclusion of religion in schools.

In Victoria, for example, the state department follows the Education and Training Reform Act. This act stipulates that public school education must be secular. Schools are not permitted to promote “any particular religious practice, denomination or sect, and must be open to adherents of any philosophy, religion or faith”.

Some groups, such as the Australian Secular Lobby, argue that the policy commitment to secularism in state schools is being eroded.

They have identified four key areas of concern:

  • the National School Chaplaincy Program, which provides funding for schools to employ a chaplain (government funding for this program has recently increased);
  • religious instruction classes conducted during school hours, predominantly by evangelical religious groups (this can be an “opt-out” or “opt-in” arrangement. In the state of Victoria, this is now held at lunchtime or out of school hours);
  • state funding for religious schools; and
  • the teaching of creationism in schools.

On the other hand, lobbyist groups such as the Australian Christian Lobby are highly active in campaigning for greater inclusion of religion in schools.

The Australian Christian Lobby has been very proactive in lobbying against the Safe Schools program. This is an example of how sex education, and sexuality, becomes conflated with religion.

A commitment to secularism?

Constitutionally, Australia is committed to secularism. However, the way in which this translates to schools, and the inclusion or exclusion of religion in schools, is slippery.

Religion and religious instruction is taken up differently across states and territories. This is influenced by the state political party, and fluctuates across voting periods. This often results in rapid changes to policy, and volatility.

It is fair to argue, then, that religion in schools is an ongoing contentious issue. This is strongly indicated by the ongoing debates and controversies surrounding government funding for religious schools.

While we may be secular on paper, government policy takes a largely empathetic approach to religion in schools, with a stronger preference for Christianity

Comparte este contenido:

Australia: Explicit school sex display rebuked by education minister

Oceania/Australia/frasercoastchronicle.com.au

Resumen: Una exhibición EXPLÍCITA de educación sexual, donde se demostró a los estudiantes de la escuela secundaria juguetes sexuales para adultos, ha sido penalizada por los jefes de la educación de Queensland.  El maestro  de la Escuela Secundaria Urangan del estado aprobó el miércoles la instalación improvisada de una exposición sobre educación sexual dirigida a los estudiantes de 9no año, donde se planificó que los vibradores fueran exhibidos junto con preservativos y folletos relevantes.  Esto causó que varios padres de familia utilizaran las redes sociales para quejarse, provocando un debate que atrajo cientos de comentarios emotivos y forzó al director de la escuela a controlar los daños. Una madre, Kasey Hudson, dijo que estaba sorprendida cuando su hijo de 12 años  que no participaba en el ejercicio, regresó a casa y le preguntó sobre los «consoladores» mostrados en la escuela. Inicialmente, un portavoz de Education Queensland explicó que un ejercicio de salud sexual pre-aprobado y supervisado de cerca había sido llevado a cabo por estudiantes del 11vo Año 11 quienes «encuestaron» a sus pares más jóvenes para medir su nivel de «comprensión». Ellos dijeron que la mesa de exhibición fue «establecida en un área no designada para los estudiantes del Año 7». Esta explicación también se publicó en la página de Urangan State High School en Facebook.  Sin embargo, unas horas más tarde, el Director General Adjunto de Escuelas del Estado de Queensland, Patrea Walton, el director, que la Crónica entiende que no sabía que la exhibición iba a tener lugar, tomó medidas inmediatas. «El director de la escuela se ha disculpado directamente a los padres que habían contactado a la escuela por el fracaso de la escuela para cumplir con la política y la práctica departamental,» Sra Walton dijo «El Maestro HPE que dieron su aprobación para el Año 11 estudiantes para establecer una salud sexual y Mesa de educación de seguridad ha sido aconsejado. » La ministra de Educación, Kate Jones, dijo que «esto nunca debería haber ocurrido.
«Los padres deben tener confianza en que los maestros van a cumplir con la política departamental», dijo Jones.


AN EXPLICIT sex education display, where junior high school students were reportedly shown adult toys, has been rebuked by Queensland’s education chiefs.

The makeshift set-up, where vibrators were said to have been displayed alongside condoms and relevant brochures, was approved by a health teacher at Urangan State High School on Wednesday.

The target audience was Year 9 students aged between 14 and 15.

This caused a number of parents to take to social media to complain, sparking a debate which attracted hundreds of emotive comments and forced the school’s principal into damage control.

One mother, Kasey Hudson, said she was shocked when her 12-year-old son came home and asked her about the «dildos» shown at school.

She said while her son did not take part in the exercise, older students who had quickly spread the word.

Initially, an Education Queensland spokesman explained a «closely monitored», pre-approved sexual health exercise had been carried out by Year 11 students who «surveyed» their younger peers to gauge their level of «understanding».

They said the display table was «set up in an area not designated to Year 7 students».

This explanation was also posted to the Urangan State High School Facebook page.

The department would not be drawn on whether sex toys or objects resembling sex toys were used in the display.

Just hours later however, Education Queensland’s Deputy Director-General of State Schools Patrea Walton the principal, who the Chronicle understands was unaware the display was going to take place, had taken immediate action.

«The school principal has apologised directly to parents who had contacted the school for the failure of the school to comply with departmental policy and practice,» Ms Walton said

«The HPE Teacher who gave approval for Year 11 students to set up a sexual health and safety education table has been counselled.»

Education Minister Kate Jones said «this should never have happened».

«Parents should have confidence that teachers are going to comply with departmental policy,» Ms Jones said.

«I have spoken directly with the principal and I am confident she has taken appropriate action.»

Ms Hudson she had spoken to her son about the «birds and the bees» and had started discussing safe sex, she did not expect to have to explain sex toys just yet.

She was grateful for the call from the principal but adamant parents needed to be informed if there was the potential for their kids to be exposed to school sex talk in future.

«We should be told about any lessons on this issue,» Ms Hudson said

«Particularly when there is this discussion about Safe Schools (Urangan State High School is not part of the program) I would like to know what is being taught so when he comes home and says ‘what’s this?’ I am ready and armed.»

According to the department, the students who visited the information table were given erasers with the slogan «Rub out STDs» and sexual health brochures.

«All items used at this information table were for demonstration only and monitored carefully, to ensure all were returned,» the spokesman said

«Relationships and Sexuality Education (RSE) covers a broad range of topics including sexual and reproductive health, relationships, growth and development, identity, inter and intra personal skills, gender equality, ethics, values, human rights and responsible decision-making.»

Fuente: https://www.frasercoastchronicle.com.au/news/ed-dept-says-school-sex-stall-was-pre-approved/3216012/

Comparte este contenido:

Religion in Australian schools: an historical and contemporary debate

Australia/Agosto de 2017/Fuente: The Conversation

Resumen: Australia mantiene una de las más altas concentraciones de escuelas religiosas en comparación con otros países de la OCDE. Esta proporción encaja con la mayor proporción de estudiantes que están matriculados en escuelas privadas en Australia. Aproximadamente el 30% de todas las escuelas en Australia están afiliadas a una religión, o el 94% de las escuelas privadas. La investigación del Centro de Estudios Independientes comparó esta proporción de escuelas religiosas en Australia con países como Suecia (el 2% de las escuelas son religiosas), los Estados Unidos (10% de todas las escuelas) y los Países Bajos (60% de todas las escuelas).

Australia maintains one of the highest concentrations of religious schools compared to other OECD countries. This proportion fits with the higher proportion of students who are enrolled in private schools in Australia.

Approximately 30% of all schools in Australia are affiliated with a religion, or 94% of private schools.

Research from the Centre For Independent Studies compared this proportion of religious schools in Australia to countries such as Sweden (2% of schools are religious), the US (10% of all schools), and the Netherlands (60% of all schools).

Religious schools in Australia predominantly consist of Anglican and Christian. But there are numerous religious affiliations represented in schools, and also diverse ways of practising religion.

Contextually, our population is shifting (and increasing). We have a rising population of minority religious groups; a sharp increase of people identifying with “no religion” on the census (29.6%); and a declining population of individuals identifying with Christianity. However, Christianity continues to be the dominant religion (57.7%).

But how an individual identifies on the Census does not readily translate to choosing a religious or non-religious school.

A brief history of religious schools in Australia

Historically speaking, religion in schools has always been contentious. This is a contentious issue in many parts of the world. The question of whether to include religion in schools is conflated with our views around the purpose of education.

In other words, what is the social purpose of education? What kind of views, ideologies and values do we want our children to learn in school? The topic of sex education and abstinence education is often paired with this debate.

As a democratic society, we will all have various responses to these questions.

The fact that religion is contentious, and not a unified consensus, was a motivation for the original foundation of our state or public schooling system.

In the state of Victoria, the Education Act founded our schools on the principle of “free, secular and compulsory”.

It was argued that secular education would remove religious discrimination and unite the community. Leading campaigners arguedthat religion should be taught in church and at home, rather than in schools.

Even though state schools were founded on secular principles, they were far from equitable or accessible for all.

The education acts were established in the context of the Stolen Generations, genocide and endemic racism towards Indigenous children. Indigenous people did not gain the right to vote until much later, in 1965.

Historians claim that our earlier schools were largely influenced by arguments around biological determinism and eugenics. Reportedly, leading commentators argued that you could measure a child’s head to determine their ability for academic work. Biological determinism disadvantaged poor children and Indigenous children.

Religious schools in contemporary times

Historically speaking, and also constitutionally, Australia is a secularcountry. Following this, each state and territory maintains slightly different policies around the inclusion or exclusion of religion in schools.

In Victoria, for example, the state department follows the Education and Training Reform Act. This act stipulates that public school education must be secular. Schools are not permitted to promote “any particular religious practice, denomination or sect, and must be open to adherents of any philosophy, religion or faith”.

Some groups, such as the Australian Secular Lobby, argue that the policy commitment to secularism in state schools is being eroded.

They have identified four key areas of concern:

  • the National School Chaplaincy Program, which provides funding for schools to employ a chaplain (government funding for this program has recently increased);
  • religious instruction classes conducted during school hours, predominantly by evangelical religious groups (this can be an “opt-out” or “opt-in” arrangement. In the state of Victoria, this is now held at lunchtime or out of school hours);
  • state funding for religious schools; and
  • the teaching of creationism in schools.

On the other hand, lobbyist groups such as the Australian Christian Lobby are highly active in campaigning for greater inclusion of religion in schools.

The Australian Christian Lobby has been very proactive in lobbying against the Safe Schools program. This is an example of how sex education, and sexuality, becomes conflated with religion.

A commitment to secularism?

Constitutionally, Australia is committed to secularism. However, the way in which this translates to schools, and the inclusion or exclusion of religion in schools, is slippery.

Religion and religious instruction is taken up differently across states and territories. This is influenced by the state political party, and fluctuates across voting periods. This often results in rapid changes to policy, and volatility.

It is fair to argue, then, that religion in schools is an ongoing contentious issue. This is strongly indicated by the ongoing debates and controversies surrounding government funding for religious schools.

While we may be secular on paper, government policy takes a largely empathetic approach to religion in schools, with a stronger preference for Christianity.

Fuente: http://theconversation.com/religion-in-australian-schools-an-historical-and-contemporary-debate-82439

Comparte este contenido:
Page 20 of 47
1 18 19 20 21 22 47