Page 28 of 33
1 26 27 28 29 30 33

Operativo Aprender: concepción bancaria, mercantilista y meritocrática de la educación

Por: Ana Belinco

El 18 y 19 de octubre el macrismo busca implementar, en todo el país, una nueva evaluación externa ¿Para qué una nueva evaluación? ¿Cuáles son los objetivos reales del Operativo aprender?

Las evaluaciones externas y los discursos gubernamentales tendientes a desvalorizar la educación pública y a los trabajadores de la educación no son una novedad.

La ley Nacional de Educación, sancionada durante el kirchnerismo, no sólo no modificó el sistema descentralizado instaurado por la Ley Federal de Educación implementada por el menemismo, dejando a los gobiernos provinciales desangrados a cargo del sistema educativo, sino que presenta el marco legal que habilita este tipo de mecanismos evaluadores con el supuesto objetivo de garantizar y tender hacia una mayor ¨calidad educativa¨. Este argumento esconde el discurso del Banco Mundial que, tras una supuesta búsqueda de calidad, apunta a extender las políticas neoliberales al ámbito educativo impulsando una concepción bancaria, mercantilista y meritocrática de la educación.

Estigmatizando a la educación pública

Cristina Fernández de Kirchner, durante su presidencia, no se cansó de sostener que los problemas educativos son producto del ausentismo docente y de que la docencia, al adoptar medidas de fuerza, se queja de lleno dado que los maestros trabajan cuatro horas, tienen tres meses de vacaciones y cobran sueldos privilegiados. Siguiendo esta línea deformadora de la realidad que atraviesan los trabajadores de la educación, el Ministro de Educación Nacional Esteban Bullrich, sostiene que la docencia exagera, por motivaciones políticas oportunistas, cuando sale a denunciar las medidas de vaciamiento de la escuela pública en beneficio de las escuelas privadas y las condiciones de precarización del trabajo docente.

El gobierno macrista, siguiendo la línea de estigmatización de la docencia en clara búsqueda de trasladar las culpas del sistema económico y político hacia la institución educativa, busca implementar el Operativo Aprender en el próximo mes de octubre. Es una evaluación externa más de las tantas que ya han intentado aplicar dentro de las escuelas públicas porteñas. Estos mecanismos evaluadores son confeccionados por técnicos que no trabajan dentro del aula y representan líneas empresariales tecnocráticas que buscan atar los contenidos curriculares al mercado laboral.

Hasta la actualidad la docencia viene rechazando sistemáticamente estos mecanismos evaluadores porque son ajenos a la experiencia real de las escuelas, porque no tienen en cuenta los contextos educativos ni los tiempos propios de aprendizaje de cada estudiante; porque caen en una concepción reproductivista de contenidos vaciados y carentes de construcción creativa y fructífera; y porque no respetan lo establecido en el diseño curricular en torno al sentido de la evaluación como análisis de un proceso de construcción de aprendizaje sostenido en el tiempo. Para vencer esta resistencia el gobierno macrista busca convertir en aplicadores y veedores del Operativo Aprender a los propios trabajadores de la educación a cambio de $ 1.000 a pagar en tres meses. Dicen estar resolviendo, por medio de este mecanismo, una demanda histórica de la docencia en torno a las evaluaciones de este tipo dado que siempre se denunció el hecho de que fueron tomadas por aplicadores ajenos al ámbito educativo. La realidad, es que este ofrecimiento remunerativo esconde otros objetivos implícitos que deben ser analizados.

¿Qué esperan comprar con $ 1.000?

El interrogante abre varias aristas posibles de ser analizadas.

Un objetivo claro, como ya se planteó anteriormente, es quebrar la resistencia docente, comprar la voluntad a cambio de miseria en negro. Este punto es insultante dado que nos quieren pagar a los docentes por hacer un trabajo que nos saca de nuestra función educativa convirtiéndonos en aplicadores y veedores, mientras por otro lado nos diezmaron el sueldo a base de ajuste, tarifazos y negación de reapertura de paritarias. Parte de lo que ellos nos sacaron nos lo quieren devolver, para comprar nuestra voluntad convirtiéndonos en administradores del mecanismo que el día de mañana busca atar nuestro salario y nuestra estabilidad a resultados descontextualizados.

Así se abre una segunda arista en el análisis. Si aceptamos hoy ser aplicadores y veedores, ¿cómo vamos a salir a reclamar cuando busquen implementar el sueldo atado al mérito y a resultados? De esta forma no sólo compran la voluntad de la docencia para quebrar la resistencia sino que atan nuestra posibilidad de acción, reacción y movilización a futuro. Otra arista que no puede no ser considerada es que buscan poner a trabajadores contra trabajadores, buscan que nos convirtamos en evaluadores censales de nuestros propios compañeros en una espantosa casa de brujas interna dentro de la docencia misma. Lo macabro de pauperizar, flexibilizar y golpear el poder adquisitivo de los trabajadores y luego aprovecharse de la dificultad económica para llegar a fin de mes, pagar impuestos con tarifas desorbitadas o llevar el plato de comida a la mesa es indignante. Nos precarizan para animalizarnos azuzándonos a explotados contra explotados por monedas.

Usando términos altamente autoritarios como “Operativo”, “Aplicador”, “Veedor” nos quieren hacer creer que buscan mejorar la calidad educativa y que vienen a instaurar ¨la cultura de la evaluación¨ dado que la docencia se rehúsa a ser evaluada. A claras luces mienten. Olvidan que ya hay vigentes instancias de evaluación internas de la práctica docente dado que las conducciones nos evalúan a fin de año y a ellas las evalúan las supervisiones. Los docentes, al mismo tiempo, hacemos un seguimiento anual de nuestros estudiantes, evaluando un proceso de aprendizaje sostenido, contextualizado, adaptado y acorde a los tiempos de cada niño. Si quieren hacer estadísticas para mejorar la calidad educativa tienen que venir a las escuelas y hablar con los que día a día estamos en ellas. La información ya está. No necesitamos solventar negociados millonarios salvo que lo que en verdad se esté buscando es extender, sobre la educación pública, las concepciones neoliberales, elitistas y mercantilistas del Banco Mundial.

¿Por qué la docencia rechaza el Operativo Aprender?

Los trabajadores de la educación rechazamos abiertamente este mecanismo evaluador porque denunciamos que no redundará en una educación de calidad sino que viene a profundizar aún más los circuitos educativos diferenciados con escuelas para ricos y otras para pobres por medio del establecimiento de un ranking de escuelas que premiará a aquellas que logren obtener buenos resultados y castigará a aquellas que no los alcancen. No importa si la escuela evaluada tiene población de niños hambreados, con déficit habitacionales o explotados en el mercado laboral; o si tiene pibes con sus necesidades básicas cubiertas. Si rinden bien o mal las evaluaciones es responsabilidad exclusiva de los maestros que supieron o no supieron enseñarles a los pibes a sumar, restar, multiplicar o dividir con corrección. Los docentes de las escuelas donde los estudiantes no logren alcanzar resultados satisfactorios tenderán a querer trasladarse si se ata el salario y la estabilidad a los mismos. Por otra parte, la educación de conjunto se empobrece, dado que se buscará adiestrar a los niños, al mejor estilo de los perros de Pavlov, para que respondan correctamente las consignas. Por otra parte agudiza el premio al mérito, porque este tipo de evaluaciones, en otros países donde ya se están implementando, se usan como filtro para el acceso a la universidad generando una selección elitista del alumnado universitario con el objetivo de reducir la inversión en la educación universitaria dado que es considerado un costo o un derroche.

Al denunciar estos puntos no estamos haciendo futurismo ni especulaciones probables. Sólo basta analizar los modelos educativos de Chile, México o EE UU para demostrar que lo que plantea la docencia es real.

Por todo esto los maestros nos organizamos, desde las aulas y en las calles, para defender a la escuela pública, para decirle al macrismo que no pasará. No permitiremos que desarrollen sus negociados a costa de nuestros pibes y de los trabajadores. No aceptamos ser veedores ni aplicadores, como así tampoco que nos quieran convertir en nuestros propios verdugos poniéndonos compañero contra compañero. En pie de lucha y resistencia nos plantamos frente a los diferentes gobiernos burgueses y les gritamos: ¡la escuela pública no es tu empresa!

Comparte este contenido:

Nueva Zelanda: Teachers overwhelmingly oppose school funding changes

Oceanía/Nueva Zelanda/Septiembre de 2016/Autor: John Gerritsen/Fuente: RNZ

RESUMEN: Los maestros han votado abrumadoramente en contra de una propuesta de modificación del sistema de financiación de las escuelas, dicen los sindicatos. Los sindicatos tendrían ahora iniciar una campaña para hacer pivotar la opinión pública en contra de la propuesta, dijeron. Conocido como el «presupuesto global», la propuesta asignaría a las escuelas, una financiación basada en sus matrículas y luego dejar que las escuelas deciden qué parte de ella  asignara al personal docente. Las escuelas serán capaces de sacar provecho de la financiación del  maestro sin usar dinero para gastar en otros recursos. El gobierno está considerando uno de los siete cambios en los sistemas de financiación de la escuela y de la primera infancia. El Instituto para la Educación Nueva Zelanda (NZEI) y la Asociación de Docentes de Enseñanza Primaria Correos (PPTA) dijeron que después de dos semanas de reuniones con los miembros, los maestros se opusieron abrumadoramente a favor del cambio.

Teachers have overwhelmingly voted against a proposed change to the school funding system, unions say.

The unions would now start a campaign to swing public opinion against the suggestion, they said.

Known as the ‘global budget’, the proposal would allocate schools funding based on their enrolments and then let schools decide how much of it to allocate to teaching staff.

Schools will be able to cash in unused teacher funding for money to spend on other resources. It is one of seven funding changes to the school and early childhood funding systems the government is considering.

The New Zealand Educational Institute (NZEI) and the Post Primary Teachers’ Association (PPTA) said after two weeks of meetings with members, teachers were overwhelmingly opposed to the change.

The Education Ministry has said the proposal is similar to the current system, which recompenses schools at the start of each year for unused staffing from the previous year.

The main differences were that schools could deliberately choose how to use their staffing and would not have to wait to the following year to be paid for unused staffing, it said.

But the unions said the system was a form of bulk funding that would undermine the teacher ratios that help maintain education quality.

An advisory group of the main education organisations has also rejected the proposal.

Education Minister Hekia Parata recently acknowledged the advisory group’s advice, but Cabinet was yet to make a decision.

PPTA president Angela Roberts said the unions were not taking any chances on what Cabinet would decide.

«We don’t want to leave it up to one advisory group report to convince Cabinet that this idea isn’t worth pursuing,» she said.

«It’s great that the minister has acknowledged what the advisory group has said very, very clearly.

«I guess we’re just supporting her to continue to be really focused on taking that message and hopefully recommending to Cabinet that the global budget isn’t worth pursuing – we don’t want it, we don’t need it, it doesn’t provide any advantage to public schools.»

Ms Roberts and NZEI president Louise Green said their unions would hold a roadshow next month to support schools and encourage the public to reject bulk funding.

Teachers knew the impact of education policy on schools and early childhood centres and they needed to share that knowledge, Ms Green said.

«It’s important to us that parents and our communities actually understand all of the impacts of this,» she said.

Teachers’ feedback will be reported to Cabinet – Tolley

Acting Minister of Education Anne Tolley said the unions’ presidents were part of the funding advisory group that reported back to Minister of Education Hekia Parata earlier this year.

«Their feedback, alongside the views of teachers and principals that were gathered by the Ministry of Education, will be taken into account when Minister Parata reports to Cabinet later this year.

«The Cabinet will then decide how to progress,» she said.

Ms Tolley said discussions on the funding review were at a very early stage, and any changes would not be implemented until 2019 at the earliest.

Fuente: http://www.radionz.co.nz/news/national/313755/teachers-‘overwhelmingly’-oppose-school-funding-changes

Comparte este contenido:

Sudáfrica: Calls for uni shutdown over tuition hike

África/Sudáfrica/Septiembre de 2016/Fuente: AA.com

RESUMEN: Los estudiantes de la Universidad de Witwatersrand en Johannesburgo  cerraron el lunes las entradas al campus en una medida destinada a cerrar la universidad, después de un anuncio de aumento de la matrícula para el año académico 2017. El Secretario General del Consejo de Representantes de Estudiantes (SRC), Fasiha Hassan dijo que los estudiantes estaban enojados porque sus demandas no se habían cumplido y que se embarcarán en protestas en el campus. «No podríamos pagar las cuotas en 2015, y todavía no se pueden permitir en la actualidad. Por lo tanto estamos llamando de forma gratuita, la calidad y la igualdad en la educación «, dijo en un comunicado enviado a la Agencia Anadolu. En otros comentarios en Twitter, los estudiantes dijeron que rechazaron el aumento de las tasas y se unirían en protesta.

——————————————————–

Students at the Witwatersrand University in Johannesburg on Monday closed entrances to the campus in a move aimed at shutting down the university, after a tuition hike announcement for the 2017 academic year.

Secretary-General of the Students Representative Council (SRC), Fasiha Hassan said students were angry because their demands had not been met and they would embark on protests on campus.

“We could not afford the fees in 2015, and we still can’t afford them today. Thus we are calling for free, quality and equal education,” she said in a statement sent to Anadolu Agency.

In other comments posted on Twitter, students said they rejected the increase in fees and would unite in protest until the university shut down.

“No fee increment will be accepted until the realization of free education,” the SRC said on Twitter.

Higher Education Minister, Blade Nzimande announced Monday universities would individually decide to increase fees but they should not exceed 8 percent for the 2017 academic year.

Last year, thousands of students marched to the seat of government, and the Union buildings in the capital, Pretoria to protest against a proposed tuition hike for the 2016 academic year.

Protesting under the banner #FeesMustFall, students called for free tertiary education.

Lectures were suspended at several universities across the country, while university properties worth millions of rands were vandalized.

After days of protests, President Jacob Zuma announced there would not be any tuition fee hike for the 2016 academic year.

University officials warned at the time that this would cripple them financially affecting their educational programs.

At the time of writing this story, several police officers were seen gathering at the Witwatersrand University to avoid any violent protests.

Groups of students were also seen closing strategic entrances to the campus.

Students at other universities across the country have also been meeting to discuss the way forward after the announcement of fee increases.

Fuente: http://aa.com.tr/en/africa/s-africa-calls-for-uni-shutdown-over-tuition-hike/648704

Comparte este contenido:

Una «Universidad Facebook» porque las de siempre no enseñan lo que se necesita saber

Europa/Reino Unido/17 Septiembre 2016/Autor: Carlos Otto/Fuente: La Vanguardia

En el mundo laboral hay un mantra que se repite con cierta frecuencia: «las universidades no están enseñando lo que las empresas necesitan».

La frase puede ser más o menos cierta en función de lo que podamos esperar de la enseñanza universitaria, pero describe una situación meridianamente real: a menudo, sobre todo en cuestiones tecnológicas, las universidades imparten unos conocimientos que pueden servir como base, como punto de partida, pero a la hora de la verdad el mercado laboral precisa de unas aptitudes y conocimientos que rara vez se enseñan en la educación reglada.

El mantra se repite: las universidades no están enseñando lo que las empresas necesitan. ¿Deberían adaptar sus modelos educativos al mercado laboral o proporcionar conocimientos de punto de partida?”

Esto nos lleva a un debate sin fin: ¿deben adecuarse los estudios universitarios a “lo que las empresas necesitan”? Si el mercado laboral tecnológico va cambiando y evolucionando a una velocidad endiablada, ¿deben ir adaptando las universidades sus modelos educativos a igual velocidad? ¿O, por el contrario, deben proporcionar a los alumnos unos conocimientos neutrales y objetivos que sirvan como punto de partida para, más tarde, adaptarse ellos mismos a lo que el mercado laboral les acabará exigiendo en realidad?

825.000 empleos digitales… sin cubrir

Como muestra del problema basta un ejemplo: según la Grand Coalition for Digital Jobs, impulsada por la Unión Europea, en 2020 habrá cerca de 825.000 empleos digitales… que desgraciadamente no serán cubiertos.

Universidad de Boston
Universidad de Boston

Es decir, que, pese a las altas cifras de paro en todo el continente, Europa se encontrará dentro de cuatro años con que, aunque las empresas podrían demandar hasta 825.000 profesionales, en realidad no serán capaces de cubrir esas vacantes porque no encontrarán perfiles profesionales que tengan una cualificación adaptada al puesto de trabajo en cuestión.

La UE prevé que 825.000 empleos digitales no serán cubiertos… por falta de cualificación”

No es el único estudio en este sentido. De hecho, otros son aún más desilusionantes. Es el caso del último informe de empleo digital elaborado por Randstad, que eleva las cifras de manera muy peligrosa: según la consultora, en 2020, sólo España ya tendrá 1,9 millones de vacantes profesionales que quizá no puedan ser cubiertas por la falta de cualificación de quienes pretendan optar al puesto.

Todo ello pese a que, como muestra el gráfico de abajo, nuestro país cada vez cuenta con más especialistas TIC. Aunque, a la vista de las previsiones, las cifras de especialización seguirían siendo claramente insuficientes.

Google: “El expediente académico no sirve para nada”

La situación ha acabado desembocando en una realidad que parece describir un problema de facto: cada vez son más las grandes empresas tecnológicas que ‘pasan’ de las universidades y enseñanzas tradicionales.

Y es que, si los centros educativos al uso no ofrecen la formación que te será imprescindible para trabajar en empresas como Google, Facebook o Apple, no parece ilógico que, en determinadas situaciones, este tipo de compañías no contraten a sus empleados basándose (sólo) en el expediente académico, sino en la experiencia profesional propia o incluso en los conocimientos que el potencial empleado haya adquirido de manera autodidacta.

Lo dice nada menos que el jefe de Recursos Humanos de Google, Laszlo Bock, que hace poco se mostraba tajante: “El número de empleados de Google que no tiene título universitario cada vez es mayor, hay grupos en los que el 14% de la gente nunca ha pisado la universidad”.

Universidad de la Singularidad, en el Centro de Investigación Ames de la NASA, en Silicon Valley, patrocinada por Google; está destinada a complementar estudios universitarios para formar grupos limitados de dirigentes en la aplicación de las tecnologías a la resolución de los problemas de la humanidad
Universidad de la Singularidad, en el Centro de Investigación Ames de la NASA, en Silicon Valley, patrocinada por Google; está destinada a complementar estudios universitarios para formar grupos limitados de dirigentes en la aplicación de las tecnologías a la resolución de «los problemas de la humanidad»
En Google cada vez tenemos más empleados que nunca han pisado la universidad”
LASZLO BOCK

Director de Recursos humanos de Google

¿Conclusión? “El expediente académico no sirve para nada, no te ayuda a predecir nada”, asegura. “Muchas de las tareas que tienen que hacer en Google no tienen nada que ver con que el empleado haya tenido mejor o peor expediente académico”.

Evidentemente, Laszlo Bock no sólo se refiere a los conocimientos en sí, sino también a las aptitudes o destrezas necesarias en un empleado, perodibuja un escenario pesimista: a la hora de la verdad, las universidades no están introduciendo en sus alumnos ni los conocimientos ni las herramientas que el mercado laboral seguramente les acabe pidiendo.

La propuesta de Reino Unido: ¿una ‘universidad de Facebook’?

Mientras tanto, hay países que están intentando trabajar para poner solución a este problema cuanto antes. Uno de los más destacados es Reino Unido, que está empezando a proponer un profundo cambio en el sistema educativo para que las empresas tecnológicas puedan ‘insertarse’ en el enseñanza medianamente reglada.

La propuesta fue elaborada el pasado mes de mayo y está estructurada en Success as a Knowledge Economy , un documento en el que Reino Unido lanza la posibilidad de que empresas tecnológicas como Google, Facebook o Apple, que siempre se han quejado de esa falta de conexión entre el mundo educativo y el empresarial, puedan impulsar sus propios centros formativos, en los que impartirían los conocimientos que realmente acabarán necesitando.

De hecho, en Estados Unidos ya existen programas formativos impulsados por las propias tecnológicas, como la Escuela de negocios, la de Desarrollo y la de Analítica de la Universidad de Facebook .

Reino Unido lanza la propuesta de que las tecnológicas como Google, Apple o Facebook puedan impulsar sus propios centros creativos”

Esta propuesta no integraría a estas compañías directamente en los niveles de las enseñanzas universitarias, pero sí en un punto intermedio entre la formación de Bachillerato y la de los tradicionales grados superiores. En cualquier caso, supondría un punto de partida para que las mayores compañías tecnológicas del mundo tuvieran una puerta de entrada a la enseñanza oficial y reglada.

Desde la institución que impulsa la propuesta, integrada por diversos estamentos públicos, no aclaran si han recibido propuestas concretas de ciertas compañías para establecerse como centros formativos. Sin embargo, sí dejan claro que su interés es evidente y deslizan la posibilidad de que ya haya habido ciertos contactos con ellas y que estos estén avanzando de manera positiva en dicha dirección.

Las empresas ‘pasan’ de la universidad

En principio la propuesta de Reino Unido puede parecer llamativa o incluso arriesgada, pero lo cierto es que, como mínimo, pretende poner solución a un problema real: la desconexión cada vez mayor entre las universidades y las empresas privadas.

La Universidad de la Hamburguesa, una d ela sprimeras universidades creativas
La Universidad de la Hamburguesa, una de las primeras universidades creativas (McDonald’s)

Es aquí donde surge el concepto de las ‘universidades corporativas’, que no son otra cosa que los propios centros de formación que cientos de compañías de todo el mundo establecen para transmitir a sus empleados todos aquellos conocimientos y herramientas que necesitarán para su nuevo trabajo y que, por desgracia, no aprendieron en la universidad.

845 empresas cuentan ya con ‘universidades corporativas’; en España hay 55”

Según el informe que presentó la consultora Top Employers en 2014, 845 empresas de todo el mundo cuentan con sus propias ‘universidades corporativas’. En España, esta cifra alcanza a nada menos que 55 compañías. Ni que decir tiene que la mayoría de estas grandes empresas trabajan, eminentemente, en el ámbito tecnológico.

En realidad esta situación tiene muchos matices. Por mucho que las compañías llamen ‘universidad corporativa’ a sus propios estamentos, en muchas ocasiones estos centros no van más allá de meros cursos de iniciación en los que los empleados son instruidos en materias que no aprendieron en la universidad, es cierto, pero quizá porque eran medianamente marginales o, al menos, no eran lo suficientemente relevantes como para que la enseñanza pública tenga que decidir introducirlas en sus programas académicos reglados.

Del oscurantismo a la enseñanza reglada

Sin embargo, sería hipócrita asegurar que todas las situaciones se corresponden con el anterior dibujo. P uede que una empresa sólo esté usando su ‘universidad corporativa’ para impartir conocimientos que sólo valdrán en su empresa, pero lo cierto es que cada vez son más las empresas tecnológicas que, en realidad, están trasladando aptitudes y herramientas que serían válidas en prácticamente cualquier compañía de su sector.

Puede que algunas empresas impartan en sus universidades corporativas conocimientos solo válidos en su compañía, pero son más las empresas que están trasladando aptitudes y herramientas válidas en prácticamente cualquier empresa de su sector”

Por ello, la posibilidad de que dichos conocimientos pasen a la enseñanza reglada puede resultar más que interesante, ya que, hasta ahora, sólo son trasladados a los empleados que ya han sido contratados.

Imagen promocional de la Universidad de Facebook

La propuesta británica invertiría el orden tradicional de los factores para que los estudiantes pudieran realmente formarse en dichas competencias para, a continuación, poder optar a un número de posibles empleos que, sin duda, sería significativamente mayor.

Habrá que ver cómo evoluciona esta iniciativa y si otros países caminan también en esta dirección. Sea como fuere, lo cierto es que si la desconexión entre el mundo universitario y el empresarial es tan real como lo pintan, tenemos un problema. Y, quién sabe, quizá en el futuro el título de tus sueños no te lo entregue la universidad de toda la vida, sino la universidad de Google, Apple o Facebook.

Quizá en un futuro no lejano, el título de tus sueños no te lo entregue la universidad de toda la vida, sino la de Google, Apple o Facebook”
Fuente: http://www.lavanguardia.com/tecnologia/20160703/402899689142/universidad-facebook-no-ensenan-trabajo.html
Comparte este contenido:

Liberia: Some Operators Tipped to Transform Sector Have Limited Achievements in ‘Messy’ Arena

África/Liberia/16 de Septiembre de 2016/Autor: Rodney D. Sieh/Fuente: Front Page Africa

RESUMEN: Liberia esta en medio de lo que algunos desearían, en una importante transformación de la educación, entre el  éxito o el fracaso, entre nadar o hundirse en el dilema de las carreras  contra el tiempo para rescatar lo que muchos, incluyendo a la presidenta Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf, han concluido como un escenario un tanto desordenado, humedeciendo las esperanzas de decenas de niños pequeños que se encuentran en las esquinas de las calles al lado del tráfico durante el horario escolar. El gobierno a través del Ministerio de Educación recientemente tomó la controvertida decisión de externalizar el sector de los operadores privados en lo que el Ministro George Werner anuncio con bombo y platillo como una oportunidad para que los niños aprendan. «Todos los niños merecen una gran educación – una que le permita seguir sus sueños y lograr su potencial. Y sin embargo, en Liberia estamos fallandole demasiado a nuestros hijos. Nuestros profesores, nuestras escuelas y nuestro sistema todos se enfrentan a desafíos profundos en incorporarlos. Por desgracia, es en las comunidades más pobres, donde los retos son mayores.»

Liberia is in the midst of what some hope would be a major education transformation, a make or break, sink or swim dilemma racing against time to rescue what many including President Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf have concluded is a somewhat messy arena, dampening the hopes of scores of young children found on the street corners and traffic sideways during school hours.

The government through the ministry of Education recently took the controversial decision to outsource the sector to private operators in what Minister George Werner trumpeted as an opportunity for children to learn.

“Every child deserves a great education – one that allows her to follow her dreams and achieve her potential. And yet in Liberia we are failing too many of our children. Our teachers, our schools and our system all face deep and embedded challenges. Unfortunately, it is in the poorest communities where those challenges are greatest.”

Werner’s gamble hopes to improve on the disturbing statistics that out of 1.5 million children enrolled in primary school, some 42 percent of primary age children remain out of school.

While Werner and the government have labeled the dilemma “an injustice that needs to be addressed, many remain unsure that the outsourcing of the sector to private operators is the best approach to buck the trend holding back Liberia’s future generation from derail.

At a recent Cabinet meeting, the Ellen Johnson-Sirleaf led government was briefed on the status of the Partnership Schools for Liberia (PSL) undertaken by the Ministry of Education in concert with private operators targeting some 185 schools in 13 counties across the country.

Much of the attention was initially pointed at Bridge International Academies, the sole partner announced by the MoE when the outsourcing plan was initially announced. The school trumpets itself as the most polarizing chain of private schools in Africa.

The partnership includes 185 schools, 92 randomly chosen as PSL schools and 93 forming a comparison group. The partnership would enable the following eight private operators to run, manage and operate selected schools.

The MoE has broken down the distribution as follows: BRAC – 20; Bridge International Academies– 23; Liberian Youth Network, LIYONET – 14; More than Me – 6; Omega – 19; Rising – 5; Stella Maris – 4 schools; Street Child – 12 schools.

Over the past few weeks, FrontPageAfrica has been dissecting the partners and made some rather peculiar discovery, that a lot the operators have very limited exposure to Liberia terrain.

Bridge International Academies

SCHOOLS ALLOCATED: 23

THEIR PITCH: BIA trumpets itself as the world’s largest education innovation company serving the 700 million families who live on less than $2 USD per day. “We strive to provide the highest quality education product to the more than 100,000 students who attend Bridge’s more than 400 nursery and primary schools across emerging markets in Africa and (soon to open) in Asia.”

BIA pitches itself as a data-driven and technology-enabled using smartphones, tablets, and “closed loop” Learning Lab to monitor teacher and student performance in real time and says it constantly reviews and revises to ensure that it offers a world class education that will prepare students for the 21st century. Outside of the classroom, BIA works with governments and civil society organizations to create customized teacher training modules, English Language Learning curricula, and “pop up” schools for refugees and other vulnerable populations.

THE MISSING LINK: BIA took a hit recently when the Ugandan government announced that it would shut down all schools operated by Bridge. Janet Museveni, Uganda’s minister of education and sports, announced last month that the government will close the 63 for-profit nursery and primary schools run by Bridge International in the country after deciding they fell short of standards on education, hygiene and sanitation.

In a statement to parliament, Museveni said that in Uganda the material used by Bridge “could not promote teacher-pupil interaction” and that the poor hygiene standards “put the life and safety of school children in danger”.

Bridge International has been funded by the World Bank, the UK’s Department for International Development, Bill Gates and others.

Like Liberia and Kenya, Uganda had turned to private providers to fill the gaps in infrastructure, teaching and other resources which have opened up under its universal primary and secondary education programmes.

In May 2015, over 100 organizations signed a statement critical of the privatization of education in Kenya and Uganda, which slammed Bridge International specifically for delivering poor quality education for too high a fee.

In its defense, Bridge International said it was sincerely concerned over Museveni’s statement to the Ugandan parliament, which it said threatened to force 12,000 children out of their schools and 800 Ugandans out of work.

“We are waiting to receive the report [into Bridge schools in Uganda] to review the ministry’s concerns,” said Michael Kaddu, head of corporate and public affairs for Bridge International Academies in Uganda.

“We have been working closely with the ministry to put the needs of the children first and come to a speedy resolution of any issues made known to us.

EXPECTATIONS: Despite the controversy, Bridge says recent results point to gains by its pupils in standard deviation on core reading skills, standard deviation on Math compared to their peers in neighboring schools, based on USAID-designed exams administered by an independent monitoring and Evaluation Company – this translated into over 250 additional days of learning.

LIYONET

SCHOOLS ALLOCATED: 14

THEIR PITCH: The Liberian Youth Network (LIYONET), is a registered non-governmental, non-political and non-for-profit organization committed to promoting children and youth participation in sustainable development and good leadership leading to bringing up a generation of children and young people who are responsible citizens of Liberia, through provision of socio-economic empowerment, integration, access to basic services (education and information), self-reliance, gender mainstreaming and civil and constitutional rights of communities-residents and vulnerable persons.

THE MISSING LINK: Until the partnership announcement very little information was available regarding the network. FrontPageAfrica has been unable to trace any previous engagement in education. The network has no website or record or trail of its work to education or working with kids.

EXPECTATIONS: LIYONNET has been allocated schools in Bong and Sinoe counties respectively, notably in the Fuamah, Panta-Kpaai and Zota Districts in Bong and the Tarjuwon District in Sinoe. With very little experience in education, the jury is out on how much reach and impact the organization will have on transforming education for the rural and mostly-poor constituents.

BANGLADESH RURAL ADVANCEMENT COMMITTEE (BRAC LIBERIA)

SCHOOLS ALLOCATED: 20

THEIR PITCH: BRAC launched operations in Liberia in 2008 and has been working for a better future for Liberians with programmes in microfinance, agriculture, poultry and livestock, health, and Empowerment and Livelihoods of Adolescents; programmes that benefit more than half a million people.

THE MISSING LINK: While much of the attention was focused on Bridge, many were puzzled as to how the organization got its foot in the door of Liberia’s education outsource – particularly when it has not demonstrated experience in the area in Liberia.

Ironically, the organization which has been in Liberia since 2008 did not prioritize education as it had in next door Sierra Leone, Uganda, South Sudan, Philippines, Haiti and Afghanistan.

More importantly, an internal BRAC report on its schools in Bangladesh found that students found much of the course work difficult, in part because the BRAC methodology which equates learning with memorization. Moreover, according to the report, many of the children found the materials completely new. It is unclear how BRAC intends to adapt its model to suit Liberia’s pressing needs.

The report concluded that the strict discipline and rigid lines of authority found throughout BRAC and its programs — can be discomfiting to western sensibilities.

“This characteristic of BRAC’s program functions as a two-edged sword. On the positive side, BRAC has succeeded in setting basic standards for its schools, including the number, age, and sex of students; the size, shape, and decorations of classrooms; the teacher and students arriving and leaving at the right time; and the holding of regular meetings of the parent and school committees.”

EXPECTATIONS: The organization trumpets its primary schools’ operations in Bangladesh where it has been non-formal education to disadvantaged and out-of-school children, particularly girls. It will be interesting to see how it performs in Liberia where it has made no inroads in education.

Where BRAC could come in handy is if it can put some of the experiences trumpeted from its work in Bangladesh where it has prepared students to sit for the government Shomaponi Examination, the equivalent of the WAEC. BRAC primary schools are free, and include textbooks, notebooks, and other educational materials.

There are currently over 22,000 BRAC primary schools operating throughout the world. Liberia expects a lot and BRAC must prove it has earned its stripes. Under the partnership, BRAC has been allocated schools in Lofa and Nimba counties, in Foya, Kolahun, Zorzor, Voinjama, Saclapea and Gbehlay Geh.

OMEGA (Ghana)

SCHOOLS ALLOCATED: 19

THEIR PITCH: Founded by Ken & Lisa Donkoh, and James Tooley in 2008, and backed by Pearson’s Affordable Learning Fund, Omega Schools is a social enterprise on a mission to deliver quality education at the lowest cost on a grand scale.

The model has proven to be extremely attractive to parents, enabling its schools to be full within 10 days of opening. Currently the chain has 38 schools educating over 20,000 students and seeking to double that number in a year.

 In Ghana, Omega Schools has responded to need for low-income schools with an innovative Pay-As-You-Learn model – a chain of low cost private schools with specialized curriculum, assessment, technology and management modules that are benefiting the poor and empowering aspirations of low income families and their communities.

THE MISSING LINK: While Omega has been given high marks for its work in Ghana, it is entering unfamiliar territory in a rural Liberia setting lacking stable electricity and in some cases, very limited internet facilities.

But more importantly, a working Paper by author Curtis Riep suggests that the Omega Chain of Private Schools in Ghana which claims to bring education to the poorest is instead delivering a high-burden cost for access.

Riep finds that Omega Schools’ impact on access is «negligible,» quality of education suffers as expenditures are driven down, and the cost of these schools actually represents a high percentage of household income.

He concludes that this model of privatization represents a «for-profiteering» endeavor, exploiting the poorest members of Ghanaian society and their basic right to education.

EXPECTATIONS: Omega has been assigned schools in Bong, Margibi, Montserrado and Nimba counties respectively. Omega is expected to improve performances in Salala, Suacoco, Zota, Gibi, Marshall, Greater Monrovia, Buu-Yao, Gbehlay-Geh and Saclepea.

 If Omega can do a quarter of what it has on paper in Ghana, the areas benefiting from its program could see vast improvements. Located in Kasoa, on the outskirts of Accra has been hailed for its all-inclusive and no-hidden-fee model.

MORE THAN ME ACADEMY (US-Liberia)

SCHOOLS ALLOCATED: 6

THEIR PITCH: The academy uses education as a catalyst for transformative social change for every girl in Liberia.

MISSING LINK: Bolstered by heavy international media attention at the height of Ebola, the academy was asked by the MoE to replicate its model and add capacity to the ministry to meet their priorities. While the academy says it remains committed to maintaining a center of excellence by scaling its successes into pilot government schools across the country, results so far has not been convincing.

The Academy was in 2014 dogged by allegations of rape when its recruiter was accused of having sexual relations with ten students, ages 12 to 16.

In court documents, the students claimed that the recruiter took advantage of the school’s free education program to use them as sex slaves. The stain from that episode continues to raise questions over MTN’s ability to transcend the larger realities of Liberia’s education dilemma.

EXPECTATIONS: MTM has been allocated six schools in Bomi, Montserrado and Gbarpolu with emphasis in the Klay, West Bank, Senjeh, Bopolu and Dewoin districts. Many are unsure whether MTN with only one school to its credit in less than five years has enough pedigree to now be ranked amongst the top-carrying partners selected for the partnership.

RISING ACADEMY (Sierra Leone)

SCHOOLS ALLOCATED: 5

THEIR PITCH: The academy created by a group of Canadian and British entrepreneurs to address Sierra Leone’s education dilemma, uses simple pillars: teach strong values, select and train teachers carefully, make the student the protagonist of the classroom, develop well-crafted and engaging class plans and create a feedback culture.

In Sierra Leone, the school charges a flat fee, with no extra charges, of 25,000 Leones (US$3.5) per week, with a possibility of a scholarship for students that cannot afford this rate.

“The wage bill is kept low by paying teachers the average salary of state schools—but with the benefit of guaranteeing on-time payment which is already a huge competitive advantage,” according to Francisco Guarisse, who has spent some time working with Rising.

Rising has grown from 1 school and 80 students to 8 schools and more than 1000 students. The academy made its mark at the height of the deadly Ebola virus outbreak by continuing to provide education despite schools being closed during the epidemic as teachers provided daily Ebola prevention and literacy classes.

The academy says it remains committed to rigorous, transparent, independent evaluation. What sets Rising apart is its partnership with Oxford University which monitors its performance. The academy says its students develop excellent literacy, numeracy and spoken English, as the foundation for success in further study, work and day-to-day life.

MISSING LINK: According to a baseline report dubbed a longitudinal Study of learning, progression, and personal growth in Sierra Leone, the Students in the Rising Academy Network achieved in mathematics an average scale Score of 475 Compared to those in other private schools (matched. In age and circumstance) who achieve an average score of 458 And those in government funded schools who achieve an average score of 450.

The report noted that only 5% Of Rising Academy Network Students achieved the benchmark at the start of the study (before Teaching began). 62% performed very poorly.

The scale of the challenge to improve mathematics outcomes is clear and the study will monitor the migration of students out of low performance bands as a measure of equity in performance standards. Students in the Rising Academy Network Achieve an average scale score of 193 compared to those in other private schools (matched

EXPECTATIONS: Rising has been allocated schools in Bomi and Montserrado Counties and will be expected to mirror its successes in Sierra Leone to parts of Liberia where basic education remains a challenge in Suehn Mecca, West Bank, Dewoin.

Around 1,300 schools were destroyed during the Civil War that lasted from 1991 to 2002. The academy has thrived under similar conditions like Liberia, in Sierra Leone where two thirds of children were out of school due to the war, it has made inroads.

STREET CHILD

SCHOOLS ALLOCATED: 12

THEIR PITCH: The UK registered charity helps to create opportunities through education for some of the most vulnerable children in the world. It expanded its reach to Liberia in 2008 looking to help out-of-school children, many of whom are living full-time on the streets, and offer them the chance to improve their lives by going to school and reuniting them with their families.

The charity says it works with communities to construct basic schools and promote the importance of education and identify members of the community to undertake distance teacher training.

The project has grown over the past 3and a half years to support almost 400 teachers and has a presence in a total of 127 communities across Sierra Leone. As a result, Street Child has now created first ever access to education for over 17,000 children in rural communities.

MISSING LINK: While the charity is doing some good for needy kids in Liberia, it’s education model remains suspect in the absence of a track record of deliverables toward education in Liberia.  

EXPECTATIONS: The charity has been allocated schools in Grand Cape Mount, Margibi and Montserado Counties with particular emphasis in Todee, Tewor, Tallah Tomb, Gibi, Marshall and Garwula districts.

Beyond the charitable aspects of looking out for the poor and needy, SC will be required to show Liberians that it deserves the twelve schools under its watch and is capable of bringing out the best of the kids and improving scores.

STELLA MARIS

SCHOOLS ALLOCATED: 4

THEIR PITCH: Stella Maris Polytechnic (SMP) is one of the successful institutions under the highly-rated Catholic schools’ system. Founded in 1988, the school is owned and operated by the Roman Catholic Archdiocese of Monrovia with approximately 2,000 students.

The school is recognized by Liberia’s National Commission on Higher Education as an approved baccalaureate granting school of higher learning, and is a member of the Association of African Universities.

The school traces its history back to the Arthur Barclay Vocational Institute that had its roots in a donation of land to the church in 1972. Eventually the planned school was renamed as the Arthur Barclay Technical Institute and first held classes in February 1979.

Catholic leaders then considered starting a Catholic college beginning in 1985, which eventually led to the establishment of Don Bosco Polytechnic.  That school included Arthur Barclay Technical Institute which then became the Arthur Barclay Technical Institute.

Stella Maris Polytechnic elementary school supports those who are in need in the wider community in Liberia.

MISSING LINK: Catholic schools in Liberia have a strong track record of discipline and academic performance but impact has been slowed due to funding issues in recent years. Nevertheless, the schools under the catholic umbrella remain a vibrant contributor to Liberia’s post-war resurgence.

EXPECTATION: The catholic-backed institution has been allocated schools in Dorbor and Trehn districts in Grand Kru and Karleway 2 and Sodoken districts in Maryland. Many expect that the model that has worked in the past will continue here despite insurmountable odds.

THE VERDICT

Werner may have been right in his conclusion that “Change is not easy” as he heralded his argument that the public system alone cannot address Liberia’s pressing education challenges singlehandedly.

According to Werner: “We have some great public schools in Liberia but we have far too few of them. And we already have a diverse set of school operators from government and non-government sectors in our education system.

We must work together and draw on the best of both sectors if we are to achieve the results we want to see. While the government will always remain responsible for ensuring every child’s right to education, we need to work far more collaboratively with others to strengthen our public schooling sector. This must happen fast.  We cannot risk failing another generation of children.”

Despite Werner’s lament, the jury is still out on the effectiveness of low-cost private schools. Various reports and assessments have been mixed regarding the level of impact on disadvantaged and poverty-stricken environments.

The bottom line is many remain unsure that these low-cost private schools work for communities at the bottom of the economic barrel, particularly in some communities in Liberia lacking electricity, internet access and the high-tech model a lot of the schools are trumpeting as part of the successes in other countries.

In the coming months, evaluation and testimony from students and families experimenting Liberia’s venture into the model could prove to be a deciding factor as to how far this could go in helping Liberia fix its messy education system.

Expectations are high but accomplishing much in so little time could prove to be a daunting dilemma for the Liberian experiment

Some experts project two years as an ideal time to begin growing and seeing which operators can pull it off and work in the most difficult and remote districts.

It will be critical to see how the monitory and evaluation of this partnership would be enforced or regulated. If privatization is on the table, some observers say, it would have been key to look at successful school systems operating in Liberia to either participate in the PSL program or obtain license learned from their model to replicate in the flailing public school system.

Also, questions are being raised as to how the MoE came up with the criteria for allotting schools per organization with some of the partners accepted having no or limited track record of education work in Liberia being allotted larger number of schools compared to others who have.

What many agree on is that reforming Liberia’s education system is a work in progress and a process likely to take a long time as private operators — for-profit companies and charitable organizations — embark on a quest to take charge of 120 government primary schools, in a one-year pilot project that could make or break Liberia’s venture into a nationwide charter school system.

Fuente: http://www.frontpageafricaonline.com/index.php/politics/1983-dissecting-liberia-s-education-partners-some-operators-tipped-to-transform-education-sector-have-very-limited-record-of-achievements-accomplishments-in-messy-arena

Comparte este contenido:

China’s demand for pricey international schools insatiable

Asia/China/16 de Septiembre de 2016/Fuente: The Japan Times

RESUMEN: El año escolar en la escuela de Haileybury College, cerca de Pekín comenzó con tres soldados del Ejército Popular de Liberación marchando sobre una pista de atletismo con el himno nacional chino cantado por los altavoces. Setecientos estudiantes de pie en silencio en las líneas con sus manos cruzadas, y la cresta de la escuela estampado en muchos de sus abrigos y camisetas. Luego cantaron la canción de la escuela en Inglés antes de ir a clase en edificios de ladrillo de fachada según el modelo de una escuela de preparación británico. Para la mayoría de los estudiantes chinos, asistir a una escuela como esta sigue siendo impensable. Pero las escuelas internacionales desde el extranjero están en auge aquí gracias a la creciente demanda de los padres que buscan diferentes vías para que sus hijos asistan a la universidad en el extranjero.Mientras que el auge económico de China ha permitido a millones de familias proporcionar opciones como la escuela Haileybury College, escuelas internacionales siguen estando fuera del alcance de la inmensa mayoría de los chinos. Zeng Xiaodong, profesor de la Universidad Normal de Beijing, dijo que entendía que los padres que podían permitirse esas escuelas estaban buscando una vía para sus hijos «para entender el futuro y ser un miembro del mundo internacional.» Pero esas opciones permanecen cerradas a las familias rurales y no resuelven la inequidad del sistema global, dijo Wang, Profesor de la Universidad de Hong Kong, dicho sistema general de China puede llegar a beneficiarse de la introducción de nuevos métodos de enseñanza de las escuelas internacionales. Pero por ahora, sobre todo en las zonas rurales, los niños de clase media pobre e incluso muchos no tienen acceso a una mejor enseñanza, mientras que los niños de clase media alta están aprendiendo cada vez más en un sistema separado.

The school year at Haileybury College’s campus near Beijing began with three People’s Liberation Army soldiers marching on a running track as the Chinese national anthem played over loudspeakers. Seven hundred students stood silently in single-file lines with their hands crossed, the international prep school’s crest emblazoned on many of their coats and T-shirts.

Then they sang the school song in English before heading off to class in brick-facade buildings modeled on a British prep school.

For most Chinese students, attending a school like this remains unthinkable. But international schools from abroad are booming here thanks to growing demand from parents who are seeking different pathways for their children to attend college overseas and who can increasingly afford more options.

Top prep schools from around the world are opening campuses in the country, often charging higher fees than their flagships and catering to students who want to go to university in the West.

Attending Haileybury costs up to $28,000 a year. But Haileybury, which opened the Chinese version of its century-old Australian prep school three years ago, nearly doubled its enrollment this year and is considering opening a second campus in China.

Getting into China’s best public high schools can be monumentally difficult. Regardless of whether their child has the academic chops, many parents are opting to pay for what they see as a less stressful and more enriching experience at an international school.

“What they really care about is the happiness of their children,” said Wang Dan, an education professor at the University of Hong Kong. “Their future return on the student’s education is one concern, but equally important is the concern for the learning process.”

The International School Consultancy, which monitors school trends worldwide, says the demand among Chinese for English-language schools like Haileybury is “insatiable.” More than 150,000 Chinese students are currently enrolled in international schools, according to the consultancy, which says the number of Chinese who can afford to pay seemingly stratospheric fees for those schools — even if they are just a small percentage of the population — will continue to grow, absent a dramatic downturn in the economy.

China’s top public high schools are intensely competitive and often are criticized as excessively test-driven. Before their teenage years, children study long hours for entrance exams, often with high-priced private tutors. And at the end of high school, students take the notoriously difficult Chinese college entrance exam, the Gaokao, where a bad score can relegate a good student to a lesser university.

A massive government-ordered expansion of higher education over the last decade has produced many marginal colleges whose degrees count for little. That makes an overseas education even more attractive.

Western prep schools in China advertise a smoother pathway to university overseas, with teaching that emphasizes critical thinking over memorization and classes based on the International Baccalaureate program or others recognized abroad.

Once limited mainly to foreign children, international schools have been allowed during the last two decades to open campuses for Chinese students jointly with local companies. And while the Chinese government has sought to tighten its ideological control over textbooks and limit perceived Western influences, the international schools offer a valuable infusion of new teaching methods and options for China’s middle class.

That opening has brought in some of the world’s biggest brand names, joining long-established international schools in Beijing and Shanghai. Britain’s Dulwich College now runs schools for Chinese students in the eastern city of Suzhou and the southern city of Zhuhai; Britain’s Hurtwood House operates in association with a school in eastern Ningbo.

William Vanbergen, managing director of the Shanghai school consulting firm BE Education, predicts many more Western schools will enter China in the coming years. Some schools are already struggling to maintain their enrollment, but for most, China presents a “fantastic opportunity” to build a global profile, he said.

“Chinese parents are very smart,” Vanbergen said. “They demand the very best, and it’s going to become quite clear which operations are good and which are not.”

Haileybury established its first program in China in 2001. Nick Dwyer, the school CEO, said the school’s executives had long been seeking a local company with which to partner on its own campus.

“It’s a tough ask for any student to go as a foreign student to another country,” Dwyer said. “Here, we are offering the Australian product tailored in such a way that the Chinese students are at the center of the project, not off to one side.”

Eventually, the school reached a deal with a state-owned development company to build a tree-lined campus between Beijing and the port city of Tianjin, featuring a towering administration building with two turrets that is a replica of London’s Eton College prep school.

The campus anchors a development of high-rise residential towers and single-family homes. Haileybury leases the campus and charges higher tuition in China than in Australia.

Dwyer described the school as Australian in its traditions, presented “in Chinese dress.” Teachers give lessons in both English and Chinese, and events like its opening ceremony are adaptations of Australian assemblies. Hallways are marked as “English-speaking zones.” The school offers a modified version of the standard Chinese curriculum until high school level, and then classes based on Australia’s Victoria Certificate of Education.

Haileybury’s first class of about 25 students graduates this fall. Their success will be a huge test for the school, Dwyer said. For the school to be successful, he said, every graduate must be admitted into college or a prep school en route to college. “Most of them must get a pathway into university, and the rest of them must get a pathway that they will transition into university,” Dwyer said.

But already, Haileybury is successfully recruiting new families and moving toward profitability. Dwyer said he expects to break even this year.

Cheng Rui, a marketing consultant in Beijing, was touring Haileybury last month with his 9-year-old son. Cheng had enrolled his son previously in a bilingual program sponsored by a top Chinese university. But he saw his son feeling constant pressure and not being able to communicate with foreigners on a family vacation to the United States and Canada, despite having taken English classes in school.

“It will be more enriching and distinctive for him in terms of developing his interests, and he will be under less pressure than students at traditional Chinese schools,” Cheng said. “I wish to see him develop at his own pace.”

While China’s economic boom has allowed millions of families to afford options like Haileybury, international schools remain out of reach for the vast majority of Chinese.

Zeng Xiaodong, a professor at Beijing Normal University, said she understood that parents who could afford those schools were seeking a pathway for their children “to understand the future and be a member of the international world.” But those options remain closed to rural families and don’t solve the inequity of the overall system, she said.

Wang, the University of Hong Kong professor, said China’s overall system may eventually benefit from the introduction of new teaching methods by international schools. But for now, particularly in rural areas, poor and even many middle-class children don’t have access to better teaching, while upper-middle-class children are increasingly learning in a separate system.

“The inequality of China right now is really dividing the population, and each group is playing a different game,” she said.

Fuente: http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2016/09/14/asia-pacific/social-issues-asia-pacific/chinas-demand-pricey-international-schools-insatiable/#.V9nibhJGT_s

Comparte este contenido:

Sudáfrica: Deputy Minister Condemns Burning of University Property

África/Sudáfrica/11 de Septiembre de 2016/Fuente: All Africa

RESUMEN: El Viceministro de Educación Superior,  Mduduzi Manana ha condenado  la destrucción de la propiedad de la Universidad de KwaZulu-Natal durante las recientes protestas. El Viceministro pidió a los estudiantes ejercitar la paciencia y permitir que la comisión de investigación, que fue establecida por el presidente Jacob Zuma para estudiar modelos alternativos de financiación para la educación superior,  hacer su trabajo sin interrupciones. Dijo esto cuando la Asamblea Nacional llevó a cabo un debate en torno al tema: «cuotas de los estudiantes de crisis en África del Sur», el jueves. «Compañeros, seguimos siendo testigos con consternación del vandalismo recurrente de nuestras instituciones. Como gobierno, condenamos la destrucción de la propiedad educativa y hacemos un llamado a todas las comunidades a hacer lo mismo.

Higher Education Deputy Minister Mduduzi Manana has condemned the destruction of property during recent protests at the University of KwaZulu-Natal.

The Deputy Minister called on students to exercise patience and allow the Commission of Inquiry, which was established by President Jacob Zuma to look into alternative funding models for higher education, to do its work without disruptions.

He said this when the National Assembly held a debate under the theme: «Student fees crisis in South Africa» on Thursday.

«Fellow students, we continue to witness with dismay the recurring vandalism of our institutions. As government, we condemn the destruction of educational property and we call on all our communities to do the same.

«We have to isolate and expose vandals from genuine students who need to build their future in our universities,» he said.

The university’s senate building and six vehicles outside the Westville campus were set alight, allegedly by protesting students, with a university spokesperson confirming that several students were arrested following the incident.

During the debate on Thursday, the Deputy Minister condemned the torching of the buildings, which also left the university’s Law Library in ashes.

«Serious action must be taken against the perpetrators of sordid criminality. We equally condemn police brutality against students and all our law enforcement agencies but to instead arrest all those who are found to be responsible,» he said.

The Deputy Minister said all stakeholders participating in the Commission of Enquiry should exercise patience.

This comes after reports that some hearings held by the commission were disrupted by students when emotions ran high.

«In this connection, I wish to appeal to all our stakeholders, and particularly the students, to allow the commission of enquiry to do its work without disruptions so that the views of members of society on possible options can be well captured.

«As you may be aware, the commission is not only [seized by] investigating modalities for free undergraduate education, but it is also looking at the pertinent issue of funding for the entire post-school system,» he said

While short-term solutions will provide a much-needed cushion for students who cannot afford university fees, discussions should also explore lasting solutions to ensure accessibility of the higher education system.

«We are navigating through this precarious path with all our stakeholders, the communities and indeed the masses of our people who stand to benefit from improved access to higher quality education and training.

«We therefore ask our people to exercise maximum patience as we find lasting and workable solutions to the current challenges.»

Fuente: http://allafrica.com/stories/201609090404.html

Fuente de la imagen: http://www.timeslive.co.za/politics/2015/11/02/Deputy-Higher-Education-Minister-Manana-stood-up-students-at-parliament

Comparte este contenido:
Page 28 of 33
1 26 27 28 29 30 33